Have you looked for jumbo-frame (lack of) configuration everywhere?
That reminds me of failure modes I’ve seen in due to missing (or not
compatible) jumbo frame support. Is the new server on a new switch?
Does the new server support a larger jumbo frame size that might be
rejected between it and
FILE allows deduplication; DISK doesn't.
My impression after some experimenting is that FILE wasn't meant to replace
DISK; it was solely meant to replace tape device classes. We didn't need
to, so those experiments quietly ended.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Zoltan Forray zfor...@vcu.edu
This is the second flashback to one of my former jobs that Richard has
given me this week.
A Fortune 50 retailer built a special infrastructure to back up their
Teradata. As you say, it had to be a Windows server for the client. In this
case, I think it was six storage agents. The storage pool
I used to work with BACKUPS and CONTENTS a lot when auditing how well some
DBAs were policing their own backups. I don't have those scripts any
longer, but my recollection is that techniques I developed using those
tables in TSM 5.5 were unusable on TSM 6.1 and early TSM 6.2 servers. They
were
amateurish looking lables. I've only ever done them on a laser printers
though.
Getting them to stick (and stay) on is always the most challenging bit!
Steven
On 16 January 2015 at 12:01, Nick Laflamme n...@laflamme.us wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with trying to produce
Does anyone have any experience with trying to produce labels in-house to
relabel physically LTO tapes?
We’re going to start using different series of barcode labels as we start
working with outside customers; I want to know just by looking at a tape whose
data should be on that tape. My
I haven’t seen an answer to another Nick’s suggestion, which this Nick
endorses.
On Dec 23, 2014, at 8:47 AM, Nick Marouf mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jeannie,
Would trying search=bulk make a difference?
label libv XXX search=b checkin=scr labels=b overwrite=y waitt=0
On Tue,
You refer to both a library manager and a TSM server. I assume the TSM
server shares tape drives with the library manager. If the paths from the
TSM server to the drives are still on-line, that may explain part of what
you're seeing. I would have thought off the top of my head that taking the
When I had dedicated VTLs, I routinely ran with an arbitrarily large maxscratch
value and used the amount of tapes defined as the limiting factor detect
run-away situations. You don’t have to keep them synchronized in any particular
manner as long as MaxScratch is larger.
On Oct 9, 2014, at
When I worked in a TSM/DD shop with Data Domain VTLs, we did something a
little different: we defined for each TSM server both a normal VTL
instance and a LAN-free library for any storage agents. The TSM master
server needs access to the LAN-free library so it can mount tapes and
validate tape
I never said 32 drives. In fact, they routinely defined 48 drives per
library, although I don't think they ever had that many in use. Larger
numbers let more large clients (databases, mostly) use more streams
(drives) concurrently, but at some point, the SAN becomes a limiting
factor, if the
Call it in to IBM; those messages clearly are not, business as usual. Even if
I thought I recognized them, I still would worry that they don't mean the same
on your system as mine.
It reminds me of a problem I saw on a 6.2 system last fall. Lots of
undocumented commands were dictated by IBM
On Apr 24, 2014, at 6:17 PM, Prather, Wanda wanda.prat...@icfi.com wrote:
My thoughts too!
HOW can that happen in a VTL? Unless there is real physical damage?
I'd sure check the back end for any warning lights/alerts/logs.
It happens.
In a recent life, using two different technologies from
I'll bet today's lunch money that what's going on is that these aren't
scratch volumes; they're volumes that were assigned to the pool with a DEF
VOLUME command.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:05 AM, David Bronder david-bron...@uiowa.eduwrote:
If it were the REUSEDELAY setting, the volume would
?
How do I get backups to go to the disk first while still having different
expiration for each?
Thomas Taylor
System Administrator
Jos. A. Bank Clothiers
Cell (443)-974-5768
From:
Nick Laflamme n...@laflamme.us
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU,
Date:
03/21/2014 02:50 PM
Subject:
Re: [ADSM
It doesn't work that way.
If you want to keep a copy of inactive files on tape forever, you need to
have a primary storage pool on tape (call it ONSITE for the purpose of
this note). So, BACKUPS will migrate data to ONSITE. You'll also use
BACKUP STG to populate OFFSITETAPE, mostly from BACKUPS,
set up as a primary pool... If I do
not have more disk space to make a new active pool would I need to wipe
out the current disk primary pool in order to make this new active data
pool?
Thomas Taylor
System Administrator
Jos. A. Bank Clothiers
Cell (443)-974-5768
From:
Nick
Check the path to your library device; it sounds like that's the wrong
device, or it's not working correctly.
When you look at the new library directly, are the tapes there and in
storage slots, not input slots?
HTH,
Nick
On Thursday, March 20, 2014, D'Antonio III, Vincent E (N-Aerotek)
I agree, these kinds of function are common. My concern was how to trigger them
when running in a virtual machine running Linux with no vendor support for that
configuration.
I was told over the weekend that Linux has a SigQuiesce signal that fires in
this situation. That at least points me
I apologize for introducing a tangent, but I need some help defining a
problem.
Those of us who have studied (or used!) TSM for VE know that the TDP for
SQL Server can receive a signal from Windows Server that something is about
to take a backup. The same signal should trigger any pending writes
:
**/usr/sbin/pre-freeze-script
/usr/sbin/post-thaw-script
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Michael Prix
On 02/28/2014 03:14 PM, Nick Laflamme wrote:
I apologize for introducing a tangent, but I need some help defining a
problem.
Those of us who have studied (or used!) TSM
I no longer have any Rman clients, but I'd do a Q CONTENT to see if there's
a naming convention you can exploit for an INCLUDE rule to specify the
management class. As I recall, it was trivially easy to identify full
backups in a prior environment, and Rman/TDPO honored the management class
I’ve never been at a site that used more than one policy set.
But if I had been at either of two sites that had to implement infinite “legal
holds” when that order actually came, I’d have used a new policy set to do
exactly that. That’s the only situation in which I’d use that option.
Nick
I’d go straight to opening a PMR. I haven’t seen a problem like yours on a TSM
5.5 system, but I saw something similar on a TSM 6.2 system. TSM Support had a
very specific set of steps to validate the cause and to resolve the issue. It
might not be the same as your current issue, but it’s
I think that on SERVER1 you should be trying to define SERVER2 if you want PING
to work, and vice versa. Or have you already done that?
I’m confused why your ANR0561E message refers to TSMSERVER2, not SERVER2.
Nick
On Dec 10, 2013, at 9:53 AM, mik tsm-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote:
Hi
Did you issue SET SERVERPASSWORD on each server before doing the DEFINE SERVER
commands?
That’s probably a silly question, but if you didn’t, that would explain things.
When you look at the activity logs on each server, can you see the other server
trying to connect? Does it ever work?
Rick has already brought up MIGRATE STG, which probably is the normal way to do
this.
Remember that MOVE NODEDATA can also move data among primary storage pools
(including back to a random access storage pool, good for when you anticipate
an important recovery operation). You can even set up
The fix seems to be to install TSM Server 6.3.4-- which has been out for so
long, I installed it a month ago for unrelated reasons.
Oddly, the list of APARs fixed in 6.3.4 doesn't include IC82487. Presumably
IBM wasn't discussing this APAR until something happened.
At least I can tell my current
A colleague insists that TSM service once told him that DSMCAD would be
deprecated and that we need to convert to using the TSM Scheduler
routinely.
The TSM 6.3 client manuals, however, refer to both techniques as valid
choices.
Has anyone ever been told by IBM that DSMCAD had been or will be
.
Jim Schneider
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU javascript:;]
On Behalf Of Nick Laflamme
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 9:28 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU javascript:;
Subject: [ADSM-L] DSMCAD deprecated?!?
A colleague insists that TSM
BACKUP STG will issue the ANR1229W message if a volume in the source
storage pool is UNAVAILABLE, even if there's nothing on that volume that
needs to be backed up.
There was an APAR against 5.5 and 6.1 to change this behavior, but it's
back in 6.3.4, with nothing in PM06004 (from memory) saying
Isn't it also a demonstration?
On Tuesday, November 12, 2013, Jeanne Bruno wrote:
Hello. this is only a test.
Jeannie Bruno
Senior Systems Analyst
jbr...@cenhud.com javascript:;mailto:jbr...@cenhud.com javascript:;
Central Hudson Gas Electric
(845) 486-5780
the address you want is lists...@vm.marist.edu, not adsm-l@vm.marist.edu.
I used to be a Listserv postmaster, a couple of decades ago. It’s always been
an FAQ.
Nick
On Nov 9, 2013, at 10:32 AM, btim...@yahoo.com btim...@yahoo.com wrote:
REVIEW ADSM-L
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G
Does anyone have much experience with active storage pools?
My current customer isn’t allowed to reclaim tapes, so their inventory of
primary storage volumes is much larger than their ATL. This makes client
restores prone to failure because of the number of primary volumes that need
manual
Also, look for errors about failed scheduled backups. It may be trying to
prompt a client to back up -- and TSM doesn't expose those particular
settings.
Nick
On Friday, November 8, 2013, Huebner, Andy wrote:
Look for a node with the TCP/IP name of xxx.
select node_name, tcp_name from nodes
Forgive me for asking, but is this based on experience? I ask because some
administrative processes aren't that graceful about unavailable tapes.
(RECLAIM STG comes to mind.)
On Friday, November 8, 2013, Shawn DREW wrote:
I would just mark all the tapes that are not in the library as
After a few uneventful upgrades from 6.2 to 6.3 TSM servers in my most
recent TSM shop, my first such upgrade for my current client hit IC90735:
some clients using encryption don't correctly change to AES-128 and thus
are rejected for invalid passwords.
The APAR led to client changes, not server
It's surprisingly hard to find a What's New in TSM 7.1 page or list on
IBM's web site. It's not in the TSM Wiki, and it's not on the product pages
that I can find, although the data sheets refer to 7.1.
I'll muddle through, but this shouldn't be hard, should it?
(Y'all heard that they announced
. (I don't understand why doing it the server-to-server way DOES
trigger mounts with PREVIEW=YES).
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU javascript:;]
On Behalf Of Nick Laflamme
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 2:59 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
COPY ACTIVE has a preview option to tell me which volumes I'd need, but is
there a simple way to compute how active data I have? QUERY OCCUPANCY
doesn't have a useful parameter for that. For some reason, EXPORT NODE
tries to mount each volume, even with PREVIEW=YES, which doesn't help me --
I'm
If it's auto-excluded, does that imply it's in the system state?
(No, I'm don't know how to exploit that.)
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013, Steven Langdale wrote:
Hello all
I have a requirement to backup scheduled tasks on a couple of windows
servers. I though I may be able to get away with
Remember that the 6.4 TDP for SQL Server is VE aware, or so I've read.
Just a thought,
Nick
On Friday, September 27, 2013, Prather, Wanda wrote:
In my case it appears to be DB related, lots of small (over 100) SQL DB's.
With the combination of the DB's, plus the DBA's (reasonably) creating
, Wanda wanda.prat...@icfi.com wrote:
AFAIK, all that does is let the VE backup VSS snap also truncate the logs.
But won't help with the change rate.
Thanks!
W
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Nick
Laflamme
Sent: Friday
That's the page I remember. I guess I need to bookmark it, because finding
it again is always a challenge.
Thanks,
Nick
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Shawn DREW
shawn.d...@us.bnpparibas.comwrote:
I always use this link for client code and server updates. I find it
convenient because they
IBM has changed their support portal again; they now are trying to restrict
customers only to software downloads to which they're entitled.
I can't figure out how to get them to offer me client code, and I can't
figure out how to get them to offer me 6.2 code.
Does anyone have any suggestions
Your users install .0.0 code?!?
On Monday, September 16, 2013, Zoltan Forray wrote:
I guess it must be at 6.4.0.1+ since 6.4.0.0 is what is installed!
: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Nick
Laflamme
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 11:08 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] 3584 ALMS and uncleaned drives
After three years in a data center in which actual physical tapes were
forbidden, I'm now doing
After three years in a data center in which actual physical tapes were
forbidden, I'm now doing penance in a smaller data center using a
honest-to-god 3584 with ALMS.
To my surprise, I'm seeing entries in an AIX 6.1 error report that some of
my tape drives need cleaning, and I'm finding
is that when the 3584 was set up autoclean the drives, it
caused one or two entries in the errpt when it did a drive clean.
David
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Nick Laflamme
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 11:08 AM
What happens if you specify a specific node name that hasn't been exported
yet?
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Dury, John C. jd...@duqlight.com wrote:
I have tried several combinations of the following and they all fail with
the output listed below.
export node toserver=LINUXSERVER
QUERY SESSION # F=D should show you when the first data was sent for that
session. If you look in the activity log around the time of that first data
being sent, I expect you'll find a BACKUP DB command starting that never
finishes. The userid you're seeing is what your intra-TSM DB2 instance uses
Without any specific knowledge about MS SQL Server 2012 or the TDP for
Databases, I would assume two things:
1) There is a manual in the info center, probably with the latest and greatest
TSM release.
2) The manual will say nearly the same thing as the Information Center, because
the
The most alarming thing I see about Tim's question is the discrepancy
between Q NODEDATA and Q CONTENT. Q NODEDATA says that there's data for
that user in that volume; Q CONTENT contradicts that. He doesn't show the
full output of the Q CONTENT command, but if what he says is true, I'd
suggest he
How long have you been at 6.3.4.0? I've seen this on slightly older servers
when Windows 2008 Server clients (and similar era Windows desktop, from what I
hear) back up their system states. You get huge numbers of small objects, and
expiration takes a long, long time to process those with no
Off the top of my head:
1) dsmserv will auto sense drives and paths for devtype=VTL
2) Some waits for operation completion are shortened when you tell TSM it's
all virtual, not real.
The latter is the larger benefit, of course.
I haven't seen any drawbacks to VTL.
Nick
On Friday, August 2,
On Jul 26, 2013, at 5:21 AM, Steven Langdale steven.langd...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Stefan
Have you got cases of this? I ask because I have been specifically told by
our rep that any dedupe saving for capacity licensing is TSM dedupe only,
regarless of the backend storage.
During our last
I'm surprised by Allen's comments, given the context of the list.
TSM doesn't support BOOST. It doesn't support at the server level, and it
doesn't support for a client writing directly to a DataDomain DDR. This may
be obvious to everyone, but I fear for the people who are TSM-centric and
haven't
On Jul 16, 2013, at 5:21 AM, Grigori Solonovitch
grigori.solonovi...@ahliunited.com wrote:
I have found the way to re-label existing scratch volumes in VTL:
checkout libvolume library volume remove=no - for all scratch volumes
label libvolume library search=yes labelsource=barcode
If you absolutely need for nodes to be isolated on their own media, why aren't
they in their own individual domains which point to their own storage pools,
all of which might share a library?
Frankly, I like that TSM will override collocation preferences when its at
MAXSCR for volumes in a
UPDATE STG pool1 ACC=UNAVAIL would tell TSM not to try to use that
particular storage pool. That might be heavy-handed in normal operations, but
it works well in DR situations.
What problem are you really trying to solve? :-) You're going to have the same
rehydrate performance penalty
Architect Ahli United Bank Kuwait www.ahliunited.com.kw
Please consider the environment before printing this E-mail
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Nick
Laflamme
Sent: 14 04 2013 12:33 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject
I'm not sure if I'm late to the show or a relatively early adapter, but I have
to ask:
Does anyone have a starter kit for extending Tivoli Monitoring for TSM beyond
the initial configuration?
We're doing a proof-of-concept with it now, trying to see what it gives us
compared to what we have
I got an off-line response that there's also a System Management Central Wiki
developers page on IBM's site that is supposed to have helpful articles on
Tivoli Monitoring for TSM. I haven't dove into that yet, nor have I gone off to
the Cognos Info Center to figure out how I'm going to write my
I don't work with the TDP for SQL, but one thing caught my eye:
Do you really need to repeat the /RELOCATE term twice? If your command is being
truncated because it's too long, what happens if you leave out the second
/RELOCATE term?
On Feb 3, 2013, at 2:08 PM, felymich
On Jan 26, 2013, at 7:43 AM, Zoltan Forray zfor...@vcu.edu wrote:
With 7-TSM servers (with more TSM servers in my future to address the need
to backup many thousands of faculty/staff/student desktops) transferring
data from disk-to-tape, all day long, I need spindles not necessarily
storage
On Dec 24, 2012, at 12:31 PM, nkir tsm-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote:
Thank you! I know about these options. But how exactly I can apply them?
How to check that DB backup was successful and I can proceed next task?
+--
This is probably a silly question, but are you sure expiration is running for
the node in question? With Version 6, expiration can now be granular, and its
results are reported in a granular manner. You can run expiration on just this
node, if only to see if anything weird happens as a
Every day, our EMC Data Protection Advisor server processes the data it
collects overnight from our dozens of TSM servers and blasts out to the client
administration teams a listing of the servers who haven't had a good scheduled
backup in at the past 24 hours. As long as the client
Off the top of my head:
select volume_name from volumes where pct_utilized10
You may also want to test for status='filling' compared to status='full' while
you're at it.
On Oct 25, 2012, at 9:20 PM, Geoff Gill avalnch...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello,
Anyone have a select that will show all
Were you hoping for change in 6.3 because you've submitted an enhancement
request and were led to believe it would happen soon? Or were you just
figuring that someone else has probably requested this enhancement already?
Nick
On Jul 23, 2012, at 5:03 PM, Kevin Kettner wrote:
Does anyone
When we first started renegotiating our last deal, about a year ago, the
discount for ProtecTier was talked about a lot, but I don't know if it was part
of the final package.
We went with capacity-based licensing for two reasons:
1) no one liked dealing with PVUs, and the TSM server team
I've seen Oracle propose backups from RMAN to NFS-mounted file spaces as the
best solution in a proposed configuration. This was an Exadata configuration,
but, RMAN is RMAN.
Sigh,
Nick
On Jul 9, 2012, at 3:25 PM, Grigori Solonovitch wrote:
Maybe I am wrong, but RMAN is not able to backup
This is more about VTLs than TSM, but I have a couple of questions, influenced
by my shop's experience with VTLs.
1) When you say 40 VTLs, I presume that's on far fewer frames, that you're
using several virtual libraries on each ProtecTier or whatever you're using?
2) I see that as 128 tape
On Jul 3, 2012, at 2:02 AM, Chavdar Cholev wrote:
I would say
Data Domain de-dupe ratio == 24:1
or
protecTier 7650G de-dupe ratio = 34:1
What application are you using to get a dedupe ratio of 24:1 on a DataDomain?
We've got about 25 DataDomains or DataDomain replication pairs set up;
On Jul 2, 2012, at 9:35 AM, Kevin Boatright wrote:
We are currently looking at adding a Disk to Disk backup solution. Our
current solution has a 3584 tape library with LTO-5 drives using TKLM.
We have looked at Exagrid and Data Domain. Also, I believe HP has a solution.
We will need to
Considering that I've gone the other direction, from the contents of a tape to
the backup date of every object on the tape, it should be possible, but it
might not be practical; the TSM V6 DB tables aren't indexed very well for this
kind of work.
Complications might include inactive copies of
On Jun 22, 2012, at 6:23 PM, Robert J Molerio wrote:
Do yourself a favor and don't use the admin center.
Is this based on recent experience, or is this just a knee-jerk reaction based
on old experiences and old wives' tales?
I'm not a fan of IBM's recent attempts to making TSM easy to use
On Jun 6, 2012, at 7:37 AM, Leonard, Matthew wrote:
Nick, Tell them one word...GOOGLE!
The main thing here is the person must contain the skillset to be able to
troubleshoot an issue. Some people in IT do not contain this Skill which
is difficult to have them move past. But if there
There's a TDP for Oracle; some of my Oracle clients are on Linux on Intel.
I'm not sure if any of our Oracle clients are black box back ends, but it
just plugs into rman, so even for the black boxes, it should be simple enough.
Nick
On Apr 11, 2012, at 2:39 PM, Lee, Gary wrote:
Well, I have
Experienced TSM administrators currently out of work, under-employed, or just
ready for a change may be interested to know that The Home Depot has posted a
position for a TSM administrator in Austin, TX. The position is on a team of
four responsible for ~40 TSM servers in two data centers and
Is anyone working with the TSM for z/OS Media Server component of TSM 6.3 yet?
It seems tailor made for us; we have about 12 TSM images on z/OS that we'd like
to replace with TSM on UNIX(-like?) platforms. On the other hand, our only z/OS
staff member with much TSM knowledge just resigned, so
I have no reason to suspect a DB2 interaction, but at the same time, with our
V6 systems, our second instinct is to look in db2diag.log, just in case.
You might check your db2reorg settings, just because.
On Nov 26, 2011, at 1:23 PM, Prather, Wanda wrote:
OK, here's another oddity.
I'm sure Wanda has thought of this, but since she didn't explain why she ruled
it out, I'll throw it out just in case:
BACKUP NODE allows for a management class. I presume the customer is doing a
mix of full differentials and fulls. Why not do an extra differential with a
different management
We've been told by consultants (these particular consultants shouldn't throw
stones) that DataDomain customers running TSM are far happier running NFS than
VTL, because DDRs are built primarily as file servers and the VTL function is
an add-on.
I can see the financial motive for staying with
in front to handle
the hundreds of incoming streams and to handle incoming data when the DD is
down for maintenance.
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Nick
Laflamme
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 6:45 AM
Your DataDomain VTL has more than 4400 slots in it. If you can, reduce it to
4400 slots, and it will resume normal behavior. You'll need to delete and
recreate the library for this to take effect, but it will work.
I've got a PMR open with IBM and a Case open with DataDomain on this issue. I
I've run that way at least once in past shops. This was back in 5.3 days, but I
can't imagine why it'd have changed.
Nick
On Oct 25, 2011, at 6:45 AM, Stefan Folkerts wrote:
I have never build this setup before and I was just wondering if there is
any reason a cross library master/client
I don't work much with Windows client support, but I'm surprised at how broad
that statement is. Are there limitations about the TSM client level (at the
time of the backup or the time of the recovery) or the Windows version?
Nick
On Oct 17, 2011, at 4:17 AM, Francisco Molero wrote:
If the
On Sep 29, 2011, at 12:30 AM, Daniel Sparrman wrote:
I'm not fully aware of how the DD replicates data, but if you have
15-20TB/day being written to your main DD, and that data is then replicated
to the off-site DD, how much data is actually replicated?
With a 1Gbs connection, you could
for multiple simultaneous reads.
Can anyone confirm that TSM will use an available copy pool volume rather than
make the session wait for a primary tape volume?
Thanks,
Nick
---
Nick Laflamme
(512) 977-2344
The information in this Internet Email is confidential
The problem with Delete/Define is that if your script is subscribed to a
profile for distribution to other TSM servers you manage, you've just deleted
from the profile implicitly and not re-associated it with the profile.
Oddly enough, I hit a very similar problem today with UPDATE SCRIPT; the
Just to be very safe, I'd also try an AUDIT LIBRARY, just to make sure there
isn't something funky going on with which volume is where.
Nick
On Aug 14, 2011, at 5:47 AM, Daniel Sparrman wrote:
Hi
What result does audit vol give you?
No label on the tape/blank tapes usually points
On Jul 17, 2011, at 9:07 PM, Paul_Dudley wrote:
Is it possible to interrogate the TSM database with an SQL query to display
the list of backed up files whose size is larger than - for example - 160 Mbs?
I understand that this will be a query that will take a while to run so I am
prepared
On Jul 7, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Prather, Wanda wrote:
I've avoided getting into BIRT, because I was told by a Tivoli person that
6.3 will switch the reporting from BIRT to COGNOS. But I haven't heard
anything else, so that is just a rumor. Anybody know if the rumor is true?
W
While I
On Jul 3, 2011, at 7:32 AM, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote:
Are there any issues performing this maintenance update? Anything to be
concerned with?
I am hitting numerous issues that are supposedly addressed in the 6.1.5.0
maintenance release.
We hit major problems with our test install of
On Jun 16, 2011, at 8:34 PM, Paul Zarnowski wrote:
At 05:59 PM 6/16/2011, Nick Laflamme wrote:
We need to do a bake-off -- or study someone else's -- between using
deduplication in a DataDomain box and using both client-side deduplication
and server-side deduplication in TSM V6
On Jun 16, 2011, at 2:49 PM, Tim Brown wrote:
Any one use emc's data domain devices for storage pools and replication
Would like to here positive and negative issues.
My current employer has dozens of DataDomain DD690s and DD880s, all arranged in
pairs in which one is primary and one is a
On Jun 15, 2011, at 4:49 AM, Mehdi Salehi wrote:
Hi,
Is the concept of bare machine recovery applicable for z/OS and other
mainframe operating systems like zLinux?
z/VM and, as far as I know, z/OS come with utilities designed to be booted when
the system is down; think of a boot floppy or
On Jun 11, 2011, at 8:44 AM, Mehdi Salehi wrote:
Hi,
Has IBM any plan to release TSM 6 for MVS?
Considering that TSM V6 installs an instance of DB2 and expects it to be the
only DB2 on the system, and considering that z/OS isn't anything like Windows
or an UNIX server in how DB2 would be
On May 22, 2011, at 3:55 AM, Mehdi Salehi wrote:
Hi,
When we backup files to TSM, number of versions makes sense in paramteres
like VEREXISTS, VERDELETE and so forth. How does the versioning concept
apply for filesystem backups and backups coming from TDP?
Databases have their own full and
1 - 100 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
