the database backup.
They're that important.
BTW I have tried doing database backups via server-to-server, but I
found that it was slower and less flexible, so I do not recommend that.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed
.1.8/8.1.3 as though it was just a
patch. It's a major upgrade, requiring major research and planning, with
the threat of an exploit constantly hanging over our heads. I really
wish this had been handled differently.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I h
ches quickly for all published security issues. (Like Equifax didn't
do for Apache.) I'm trying to figure this out fast, because we're doing
it this coming weekend. I'm sure there are parts of this I don't
understand. I'm trying to figure out how ugly it's going to be.
Roger Deschner University of
tion about this. Either I'm missing something
obvious, or there really is not much happening here.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
. The answer
there is ISP image backups.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
On Mon, 20 Mar 2017, Harris, Steven wrote:
>Bo
>
>The problem with small files is that the TSM datab
al tapes. DELETE VOL
DISCARDDATA=YES and it has always gone into Pending status.
Sounds like a defect. Preserve the ACTLOG and call IBM support.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
On Tue, 21 Mar
. Go to www.indexengines.com and click on "Partners and
Resources" for companies that can do this as a service.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
On Fri, 10 Mar 2017,
, and then using Unix cp to copy it to CIFS. That would be
a double copy of 4 TB / 900,000 files. It's already going to take a
while to restore this, and I don't want to double my time to do this.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind
Wouldn't ordinary migration work for this?
UPDATE STGPOOL stg1 HI=1 LO=0 NEXTSTGPOOL=stg2
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
On Sun, 5 Feb 2017, rou...@univ.haifa.ac.il wrote
Management here is contemplating having us move our production TSM
servers to the CentOS Linux operating system, which is a free branch of
Red Hat.
Has anybody done this? What are the support issues with IBM?
(TSM Client is already supported on CentOS via "Best effort".)
Roge
c:\Program Files\Tivoli\TSM. Whew! That will make ISP v8.1 deployment
MUCH easier! Thank you to whoever in IBM insisted that it not change.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
On Tue, 27
not sure is possible.
It gets trickier when you have multiple TSM servers on a single OS
image, one of which is a Library Manager. This is my configuration. (It
seemed like a good idea at the time...)
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my
after the upgrade, so that they are guaranteed to be
running on the new version, and you shouldn't have to reboot. This
actually makes sense.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
On Thu
of InstallShield with TSM.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016, Erwann SIMON wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I'm trying to deploy 7.1.6 client updates on Linux and Wind
process that triggers the script the one you intended? It
could be an issue with the ID you use to run the maintenance script, an
issue that is circumvented when you log into dsmadmc and manually type a
BACKUP DB command. Just some random ideas.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago
ollection of
content to the winds in the form of thousands of online web pages.
Again, thnaks Andy!
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
On Mon, 6 Jun 2016, Andrew Raibeck wrote:
>I
IBM introduced this confusion back with v6.4.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
On Mon, 2 May 2016, Del Hoobler wrote:
>As you may or may not have seen, EOS (end of supp
han what I do to arrive at
the same number. Thanks, Maurice van 't Loo!
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016, Maurice van 't Loo wrote:
>Hello Gary,
>
>Ju
There seems to be a more overall issue with preemption not happening
when it should in Whatchamacallit 7.1.*. A few days ago, there was a
posting here that Client Restore was not preempting BACKUP STGPOOL.
DBB _must_ be able to preempt anything else, in order to prevent a log
fillup crash.
Roger
ding. This is a very specific
case where the Administrator's Guide manual is very much superior to the
online web-based doc which sort-of contains the same information. Keep
and update the Administrator's Guide!
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I h
". 10 hits none of which were the answer.
So I went to the PDF of the old Administrator's Guide and found it right
away. We need that book!
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
as existing customers seek to utilize features they
haven't used before, and as new customers explore the incredible depth
of features in the product.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
On Wed
and PASSWORDACCESS
GENERATE are in effect.
Am I understanding this correctly? Is there something I am missing here?
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
ntial to the product.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015, J. Pohlmann wrote:
>Hi Clare. The Admin Guide provided a one-stop shopping approach to all
>functional
wg21197133
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, Sami Ahomaa wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Have you tried schedmode=polling?
>Another thing you could do is take all p
to rebuild my collection from scratch all over again.
Despite the fact that it had become fairly large, I humbly ask that the
Administrator's Guide be published again, as a single PDF, in v7.1.4.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my m
4.
Many of us have had to do this, and it works. It is going to be very
difficult or impossible to do this restore using DB2 commands, because
this is not really a DB2 backup. It has to be restored in a particular
way to restore a TSM server that will run.
I would suggest calling IBM Support f
restrictions as noted for Windows 8.1.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, J. Pohlmann wrote:
>I haven't seen a support statement. Here is my experience (sample of 1 -
eager for relief, this is starting to come fast.
When might we see a client version that supports Windows 10? What have
others experienced backing up AND RESTORING Windows 10 with a TSM
client?
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind
3076895.
The fixing patch, 3092627, is included in today's "2nd Tuesday" updates.
For more information, see the Microsoft description at:
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3092627
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
"The only problem with
thresholds
to be difficult.
So, what's going wrong here? How can I make the Estimated Capacity of a
FILE storage pool match reality?
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
planning to change all TSM client nodes to BACKDEL=NO ARCHDEL=NO to
prevent a hacker from deleting backups. Anybody got a better idea?
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
=== ALL YUOR BASE ARE BELONG TO US!! ===
tapes that can be replaced with good
new ones. Just be careful here, not to free a tape with needed data on
it.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Srikanth Kola23
can read all about what I went through, and the good, helpful
recommendations from others on this list, by searching the ADSM-L
archives for UN-mixing LTO-4 and LTO-5. Thanks again to Remco Post
and Wanda Prather for their help back then in 2012!
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago
been many dozens of full backups.
Any idea how I can get the Archive Overflow Log to empty out?
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
== You will finish your project ahead of schedule. ===
= (Best fortune-cookie fortune ever.) ==
use GUIDs, not IP
addresses.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014, Anjaneyulu Pentyala wrote:
Please check the /etc/host entry on your tsm server. /etc/host entry
heavily that it was taking days. We encountered this with a
32-bit Solaris client and 18,000,000 files, that ultimately had to be
restored in parts. 64-bit clients do not have this limitation.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind
cancelled by preemption for a higher-priority process, such as
database backup or client restore using the same tape drive. Another
frequent cause is media or drive errors.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up
in a reasonable
amount of time is MOVE NODEDATA to an online storage pool. This applies
to all releases of TSM, Server v5.5 or later.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014
time you remove a bottleneck, you just
expose another one - which could actually be the network. If you can't
back up as much as you want, look at the whole system, not just the
network.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
On Thu, 15 May 2014, Tom Taylor wrote
the hill and through the woods. Sounds like it will be
a lot better than with V5. My only experience has been the V5 to V6
conversion.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
On Fri, 21 Mar
is doing the
mirroring, is there anything wrong with moving a TSM DB2 database by
this method? Anybody done this and had problems?
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
moved off, discard the
tape.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, mik wrote:
Hi people,
I have a question, i have a bad tape with 5 file on i do an audit fix=yes
!) A V5 to V6 upgrade is a couple of days of
downtime and very hard work, but then you're done. This decision to
upgrade instead of moving nodes, is why we now have multiple instances.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind
/exclude to make sure each one is backing up only the
data you want it to back up. It's easy to make a mistake and either back
up some data twice, or never.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere
, but it
works and then you're done.
We now have a v6.2.5 TSM server with the Server Installation Date/Time
in 1999.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014, mik wrote:
Hi
a drive that
can read this worn-out tape, make sure it uses that same drive for
MOVE DATA. AUDIT VOL with FIX=NO is a crucial tool if you've got a
flaky drive.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere
in forensic exploration such as legal e-discovery.
These machines are not cheap - repairing your broken Solaris machine
would likely cost less, take less time and effort, and give better
results.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind
the vulnerability, and also for announcing it after the
Thanksgiving holiday rather than before.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
it had succeeded before moving all of
the data. Perhaps a restore or reclamation underway? Beware that it
likely has to un-dedup the data as a part of the MOVE NODEDATA process.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up
backing up (and of course also
restoring) OSX 10.9 Mavericks with TSM? Is something about to come,
such as a clarification when TSM 7.1 is GA in a couple of days?
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape
, but it sure is a good idea! And it's a much better
idea than 'chmod 666' suggested in that IBM document. The sign of the
devil should be a warning of data loss if you use it, especially with
multiple TSM instances. (And I'm not just being irrationally
hexakosioihexekontahexaphobic.)
Roger Deschner
.
Another reason we use scratch FILE volumes, not preallocated ones. A 1%
full scratch FILE volume only takes up 1% of the space, whereas a 1%
full preallocated volume (like a tape) takes up 100% of the space.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have
to 25gb. Would making that larger
help? I'm not sure it would, since the random-access stgpool acted
mostly the same way.
This is TSM 6.2 on AIX, with LTO-4 and LTO-5 tape.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up
The problem should go away if you use the Client Acceptor Daemon. The
scheduler client program is notorious for memory leaks at various
release levels. With the CAD, dsmsched terminates after each backup,
releasing all its memory. We now use the CAD on all Windows client
machines.
Roger Deschner
command. For instance, search on the volume name of a tape
that you know got marked unavailable during that time period. You could
also search on UNAVAILABLE. The error messages giving the reasons are
in the ACTLOG, though finding them may take some searching.
Roger Deschner University
methods to detect two+ machines backing up to one nodename,
specifically if the GUID changes repeatedly.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
=== Klein bottle for rent -- inquire within. ===
On Fri, 24 May 2013, Karel Bos wrote:
Hi
had a strong feeling like I was the proverbial
restaurant waiter who pulls the tablecloth out without disturbing the
place setting.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
No one may throw an old computer across the street at their neighbor.
-- city ordinance
and somewhat excruciating TSM upgrade process look
like a walk in the park. Instead I will just have to change one DNS
definition after the upgrade is done.
In summary, do the upgrade. I think it will be easier for you.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have
was a pointless duplicate, and may possibly be corrupted. It appears
there is a window where the trigger does not know that a full DB backup
has just been run.
TSM Server 6.2.2.30 on AIX 5.3.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind
guess I'm lucky it only happened
twice.
Thanks Wanda and Skylar, it looks like we need to go to 6.2.5 soon. And
also increase the size of the main Archive Log because 3,000,000 small
files can happen again.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost
-upgraded 6.2.3 system has
issues that appear to be fixed in 6.2.5.
Prepare yourself for it physically. Be rested. Stock the fridge at work
with sandwiches and soda. This is a marathon.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed
larger number of clients to individually remediate.
Our clients are mostly 5.5 or 6.2.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
Academic Computing Communications Center
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
On Tue
question, are client versions 5.5, 6.1, or 6.2 vulnerable
to this security issue?
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
Academic Computing Communications Center
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
drivename f=d (serial num should have changed)
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Huebner, Andy wrote:
You probably already checked, but I would also check to make
and is doing OK on TSM6. Comparing the two methods, I can
recommend this in-place upgrade if you have a large number of clients.
You don't have to change anything on the clients, of which this server
has about 1,000.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
.
Crude, but it works.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
=== Beware of Geeks bearing grifts.
On Mon, 24 Dec 2012, Nick Laflamme wrote:
On Dec 24, 2012, at 12:31 PM, nkir tsm-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote:
Thank you! I
this server down for several days.
No huge problems yet; just wondering how many others out there are doing
the same thing right now?
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
= While it may be true that a watched pot never boils, the one =
you don't keep an eye
.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
Academic Computing Communications Center
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
On Sat, 1 Dec 2012, Welton, Charles wrote:
Hello:
I have a few questions about TSM 6.
# 1
solution - a
sleep loop querying processes after starting the AUDIT command. The
improvement I added was to get the actual results via Q ACTLOG after it
was finished.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape
at a time.
I could have set up this storage pool with preallocated files instead of
letting the operating system allocate and remove scratch volume files,
but dsmfmt on 55TB of space to prepare the fixed volume files would take
a very long time, like about a CPU-year.
Roger Deschner University
for reclamaiton. Certainly the lazy way to move this kind of data,
reducing the need for MOVE DATA processes.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Shawn Drew wrote:
Yes, just
. The
maximum practical database size is much larger on V6 than on V5.
Consolidating several V5 servers onto a single V6 server is good.
Also, the largest TSM servers are predominantly on AIX systems, not
Windows or Linux. The AIX platform scales better than others. See the
poll on adsm.org.
Roger Deschner
Gary Lee just did. Make
sure you get it right. Cheers!
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
Help stamp out and abolish redundancy.
On Fri, 5 Oct 2012, Bob Levad wrote:
The most obvious reasons would be a tape operator running
the
thing you are backing up, is Virtual Mount Points. The idea is to keep
the file count in each Virtual Mount Point low enough that the client
can work efficiently.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
Academic Computing Communications Center
We're starting to see people on Mac OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion, and we
will very soon start having people on Windows 8. What is the status of
these two newest OSs as TSM client systems?
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
Academic Computing
node restore. OTOH if the node is a server, we have started to
back up the System State to our new V6.2.3 server using V6.2.4+ clients.
We continue to absolutely forbid System State backups on our old V5.5
servers. They simply cannot handle it.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago
It won't be cheap, but an Index Engines machine can do this. We have one
that we use for e-discovery. It can actually read TSM backup tapes
without a TSM DB. http://www.indexengines.com/
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
Walking on water and developing
, and the LTO consortium
website. It doesn't.
This list remains a priceless resource, to which I try to give back.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Prather, Wanda wrote:
Hi Roger,
I've done this many times (creating 2 logical libraries in 1
the hardware library
partitioning feature, which has its own set of hassles.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
NO OVERNIGHT CAMPING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN OPERATION
--sign, I-70 rest area, Parachute, Colorado ===
On the LTO4 devclass it is ULTRIUM4C. On the LTO5 devclass it is
ULTRIUM5C.
Q DRIVE shows that the LTO-5 drives can both read and write the format
ULTRIUM4C.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Remco Post wrote:
check the format
TSM server?
This configuration of two logical library definitions for one physical
library would appear to have some risks. Or is it safe? Are there any
other problems I should expect with this kind of configuration?
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
elimination of collocation as
the library fills, but it keeps the lights on until the library can be
expanded. I tweak MAXSCRATCH frequently.
With some effort, full library situations can be managed. I've been
doing it for quite a while due to delays in approving upgrades.
Roger Deschner
in the campus cloud. Plus each server does its normal file backup
as an ordinary TSM client to a TSM server at the other site. It all
works fine.
The documentation in the TSM Administrator's Guide is pretty good on
this topic.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I
that systemstate and systemobject were aliases to one another
on the DOMAIN statement, because I have to constantly watch for people
who upgrade from Win XP (which has System Object) to Win 7 (which has
System State), and change their cloptset.)
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog
looking for any
obvious ways to get more data onto the same number of tapes. Ideally,
I'd like there to be only one FILLING tape per collocation group.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
Academic Computing Communications Center ==I have
not lost
, however CPU cycles may not be an issue on that new P7 machine.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Steve Harris wrote:
Hi All
I'm involved in a consolidation
.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
== You will finish your project ahead of schedule. ===
= (Best fortune-cookie fortune ever.) ==
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, David Bronder wrote:
Richard Rhodes wrote:
In the past
of 6.3.0, for better supported
working with existing V5 servers. V6.3 with V5.5 is not supported.
However V6.2.3 does support working with V5.5, and it will be supported
for a while. You could do this migration first to V6.2.3, and then
upgrade to the very latest version later easily.
Roger
running V6.3 clients on a V5.5
server? Is this something we need to actively prevent?
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
Academic Computing Communications Center
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
below.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
== You will finish your project ahead of schedule. ===
= (Best fortune-cookie fortune ever.) ==
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011, Sascha Askani wrote:
Am 22.11.2011 12:27, schrieb
a central
NAS/SAN infrastructure, and we do this. TSM does not fit this model
without a LOT of additional management effort. TSM needs fewer, larger,
faster computers, which is also cheaper in terms of environmentals such
as power, cooling, and floor space.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois
with V5.5 would help a LOT, at
least for some limited pain areas, such as Library Manager
configurations, and an Apple Mac client that can run on OSX 10.7 Lion
with a V5.5 server.
P.S. No documentation yet. The V6.3 infocenter is a broken link.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago
and useful program with
a not-too-friendly user interface. However, with lbtest you're talking
directly to the device driver, without TSM getting in between. Another
program whose output you want to somehow save in a file for more
contemplative examination. I save lbtest output via my SSH client.
Roger
That AUDIT LIBRARY on the library client system worked! Thank you. This
is a hint to file away, as I'm sure this will come up again as we expand
our use of TSM library sharing. It would not have occurred to me to
try that, although it's the first thing the doc for AUDIT LIBRARY says.
Roger
file.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
restore.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011, Strand, Neil B. wrote:
You might want to look into the AIX commands:
lppchk and/or tcbck
Thank you,
Neil Strand
Storage
; THAT was
the product that raised the bar for performance expectations for TSM
client programs - TSM v5.5 dsmmfc, not XIV.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011, Richard
the best way.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
== History does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme. -- Mark Twain ==
that deduped data CAN exist in
random access DEVCLASS DISK stgpools if client-side dedupe is being
used? I sure hope so, because that's what we're planning to do.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
== You will finish your project ahead of schedule
1 - 100 of 383 matches
Mail list logo
