I will be out of the office starting 24/08/2007 and will not return until
03/09/2007.
I am away from the office until Monday 3rd September. Pls contact Rik Foote
for any urgent enquiries.
Upgrade your client ..there are know VSS bugs (I think anything above
5.3.3)
There has been a few discussion threads, in this list, on Shadow Copy
problems. There are other things to check beyond this.
Go on the mailing list archive and search on the below error ...
How about virtualmountpoint, for a few folders, in the client options
file and have the tape stgpool collocate by filespace.
Cheers, Suad
--
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 21/03/2007
09:03:06 PM:
Hi everybody,
I am trying to backup a very large FS with 32 terabytes,
There's not a single tasklist you can work on because of differing
environments
(are both TSM servers using the libraries themselves? is there
non-standard inventory... like backupsets?)
The last time I did it, it was something like this.
On the old Library Manager (LM)...
- Identify(generate a
something like:
select node_name,sum(physical_mb) as Physical MB from occupancy group by
node_name order by Physical MB desc
You could be more specific and mask on the stgpool name (that is, if you
have a consistent descriptive naming scheme for stgpools)
TABNAMECOLNAME
Recommended to use the Automatic Cleaning method.
It's in the Planning and Operator guides of both the 3583 and 3584.
Cheers, Suad
--
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 22/12/2006
02:14:32 PM:
Those of you who have the IBM 3584 tape libraries - please weigh in on
Messages fileset are corrupt.
Get the messages filesets from another source (ask your Tivoli rep)
Cheers, Suad
--
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 19/12/2006
10:53:07 AM:
Hi all,
We are right now upgrading from TSM 5.2.3 to 5.3 .. however we encouter
this prob ..
We opted to logically partitioned the library (within TSM).
Drawbacks are managing 2 scratchpools and having to migrate some stgpools
from one logical library to another.
Haven't had many other problems, apart form that.
As Richard says, the Readme covers options in reasonable detail. You have
I will be out of the office starting 08/05/2006 and will not return until
09/05/2006.
I am away from the office until Tuesday 9th May. Pls contact Rik Foote for
any urgent enquiries.
I will be out of the office starting 09/03/2006 and will not return until
13/03/2006.
I am away from the office until Monday 13th March. Pls contact Rik Foote
for any urgent enquiries.
I will be out of the office starting 03/12/2005 and will not return until
13/12/2005.
I am away from the office until Monday 13th November. Pls contact Bruce
Campbell for any urgent enquiries.
I will be out of the office starting 31/10/2005 and will not return until
04/11/2005.
I am away from the office until Thursday 4th November. Pls contact Rik
Foote for any urgent enquiries.
I will be out of the office starting 07/10/2005 and will not return until
18/10/2005.
I am away from the office until Tuesday 18th October. Pls contact Rik Foote
for any urgent enquiries.
I will be out of the office starting 05/08/2005 and will not return until
08/08/2005.
I am away from the office until Monday 8th August. Pls contact Rik Foote
for any urgent enquiries.
Why not put in some 3592 drives in the 3494?
Unfortunately the number of files is going to be the limiting factor.
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 19/06/2005
06:08:42 AM:
From the movie Blazing Saddles ... You use your tongue better than
a $20 ...you-know-what. Couldn't
I will be out of the office starting 04/05/2005 and will not return until
05/05/2005.
I am away from the office until Thursday 5th May
I will be out of the office starting 22/04/2005 and will not return until
26/04/2005.
I am away from the office until Tuesday 26th April.
Sounds like a network issue..
/usr/include/sys/errno.h:
#define EPIPE 32 /* Broken pipe */
bit of a bummer.
cheers, Suad
--
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/11/2004
09:27:01 AM:
Sunday AM, after running 15 hours and transferring 2.5
Are there more nodes/filespaces defined using that stgpool?
Maybe you want to switch off collocation for that stgpool.
Cant really say beyond that as you have supplied little extra info.
Cheers, Suad
--
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/11/2004
02:02:26 PM:
Hi all,
I have
] Behalf Of
Suad Musovich
Sent: 08 November 2004 09:16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Storage pool
Are there more nodes/filespaces defined using that stgpool?
Maybe you want to switch off collocation for that stgpool.
Cant really say beyond that as you have supplied little extra info
I had a similar problem, I ended up physically pulling it out,
re-inventorizing and checking it back in.
The bugs in the 3494 are there but more subtle :)
- Original Message -
From: Prather, Wanda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 6:50 AM
Subject:
LANfree, effectively, allows you to directly attach the tape device to the
client node.
So it can run either near the speed you can directly stream to the device
(as you would from a
TSM server) or however fast the node can push data out in a single stream.
Pick the slower of the 2.
We have
a.k.a I dont want to reinvent the wheel.
Can anyone suggest an elegant way of feeding SQLBT summary data through to
TSM so we
can see it on the activity log?
Cheers, Suad
--
The FAStT flashcopy is very easy to use. It's the same as most snapshotting
features on other storage subsystems.
It creates a pseudo volume that utilizes cache area to record any changes in
the original volume.
You can mount the pseudo volume as you can the original to make a backup
copy.
For a
Um, you neglect to say how much gets backed up nightly, how long is you
backup window, is all backups going to diskpool, or how many nodes there
are.
Can you saturate that network connection without guilt?. (It helps if
it's full duplex)
150Mbit sounds like an OC-3 connection (155Mbit). I find
We are about to set up a 2nd server running Linux.
My main issue, so far, is I/O related.
I haven't been able to find anyone running sustained high I/O on a IA32
box (except for a NUMA-Q).
The new vendor offerings look promising but they have only been able to
supply database TPC style stats,
I hear your frustration. They have fragmented it in the typical IBM
non-intuitive way.
The Support Downloads is playing magic roundabout. So you have to go to
the client requirement pages.
The client requirements/search page has separated the platforms by age
and their is no hyperlinks to the
Realistically, if Array B dies, you lose the Database and recovery
log. The mirroring ain 't giving you protection from that.
I would separate the recovery log to array A and lose the mirroring on
both DB and log(maybe mirror log between arrays).
Restoration of a broken DB should only mean a
How about other older versions/platforms?
Has anyone tested older 3.1/7 clients with the 5.1 server?
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 08:22, Dirk Billerbeck wrote:
Sorry, OS/2 (BTW: IBMs OWN operating system!!) is no longer supported! :
-(( The latest client version is v3.7.2.27, you can find it here:
Depends if you are running other processes (especially expiration).
Also you havent mentioned your HW configuration.
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 04:54, Dearman, Richard wrote:
I haven't done aTSM DB backup in the last few days. So I started one today
and it is moving very slow I have a 30GB
It's probably adjusting to the narrow frame width of the browser.
Redirect to a file ( filename) and look at the output. Not sure if
you can do this with a browser
You can also run a commandline script and use the -commadelimited flag.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 07:27, brian welsh
Nice in theory but backup windows tend to stretch over the original
boundaries to suit customer needs and balance the external environment
(backup demand is now bottlenecking the network).
On Fri, 2002-10-11 at 07:51, Miles Purdy wrote:
A better solution is usually to schedule these events so
On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 22:11, Halvorsen Geirr Gulbrand wrote:
Hi All,
this sounds good, and I'd like to test it.
Do you have a link to where the software can be downloaded?
I couldn't find it on Tivoli's (IBM) ftp site.
You won't find any full releases on the ftp site, only updates. They
have
Just a note, we are running quite happily on 4.2.2.12 (from 4.2.1.9)
They fixed some common bugs in parallel on both 4.X 5.X series.
You will need to Install baselevel 4.2.2.0, which means not being able
to go back (short of a full DB restore). Remember to do a full DB backup
immediately
Hmm, I tried running the cleanup backupgroups command and got the
result:
ANR0106E imutil.c(8262): Unexpected error 0 fetching row in table
Object.Ids
Sigh Seems to be a known problem. (and I'm running 4.2.2.12)
Suad
--
APAR= IC34375 SER=IN INCORROUT
TSM SERVER
On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 03:34, David Longo wrote:
If I understood your note correctly, you still have to put
the disk in a volume group, then create Raw LV's on that disk as
opposed to Fielsystems.
Thats what I was afraid of. Adding another layer of complexity and
overhead.
Why can't AIX allow
To see how many scratch tapes in that pool run;
select count(*) from volumes \
where stgpool_name='TECH_TAPE_POOL' \
and scratch='Yes'
On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 18:20, Steve Harris wrote:
Murthy
Check the maxscratch parameter on the tech_tape_pool storage pool with q stg
tech_tape_pool f=d
Architecturally, Intel based servers have gone a long way in the last
couple years to close the gap on their RISC server counterparts.
Can they handle the load though?
We have a lot of Intel servers deployed in our organization, but none of
them are running anything that you could consider the
It's apparently out now. We are at the mercy of Tivolis blindingly fast
distribution network.
On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 06:48, West Suhanic wrote:
Hello All:
Any idea when the TSM server for Linux on an IA32 box will be available?
regards,
west
We are planning a similar implementation by using 2nd server
specifically for clients with small files (desktop/workstations) as it
is choking our main server.
The below comment about tracking a lot of smaller volumes is trivial
compared with the cost of larger volumes on network load.
A
Have you tested it from the OS? Large file test / small file test / mixed files
Whats your movebatchsize/movesizethresh set to in TSM?
The LTO drives work well with bigger files and start to suffer on small ones.
I get only aggregate 5-10 GB/hr when I migrate a stgpool with small
For those that are interested, we just completed a unload/loadformat/load of our
TSM database.
Our system is a RS6K-F80 running AIX4.3.3 running TSM 4.2.1.8. The database is
60GB in size with a 97% utilization. Disk is on an ESS connected via FC.
We used an LTO drive to run the unload/load.
The
Have a look at the Label Specification document on the 3584 doco page:
http://ssddom02.storage.ibm.com/tape/lto/ultrascalable_library/documentation.html
As quoted:
Human readable characters are allowed provided there isn t a conflict or interference
with the automation code. The format, colors
(in the dsmserv.opt file or using setopt).
The default value for AIX is 25, which is probably too small for the
number of
clients you have.
Cheers
Dmitri
- -Original Message-
- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
- On Behalf Of Suad Musovich
- Sent: Tuesday, December
AIX4.3.3/TSM4.2.1.7
The main listener on port 1500 of our TSM server is open but not acknowledging
when clients connect. They hang on SYN_RCVD
Actually, it only allows a small proportion of connections.
When the TSM server starts up, everything works as normal. But when a volume of
clients
Boyer wrote:
Check the MOUNTRETENTION in the device class.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Suad Musovich
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 4:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 4.2.1.7 Upgrade
the MOUNTRETENTION in the device class.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Suad Musovich
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 4:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 4.2.1.7 Upgrade-
Upgraded to 4.2.1.7 (AIX) from 4.2.0.1 this morning
I've had the same thing happen a couple times before. Restarting dsmserv
still shows those phantom sessions.
You can do a 'netstat' to see what hosts are trying to connect.
I ended up rebooting the system to fix it.
I didn't investigate properly as it happened at the most inopportune
moment.
And make sure you don't have locked ports down in the OS.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 04:09:34PM -0600, Davidson, Becky wrote:
Make sure that under the dsm.sys they exist and then use
dsmadmc -se=servername to connect
-Original Message-
From: Chan, Kien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Jorge,
Please turn off html editing of your e-mail messages, some of us don't
have browser capable mail readers.
Suad
--
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 02:01:37PM -0400, Jorge Rodriguez wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 07:43:11PM -0700, Kelly Lipp wrote:
What we finally wound up doing was using the HP Win2K driver. Still, the
drive reports as TSM Device Type Unknown, but it seems to work just fine.
Wow, that damn thing is very fast: ~10 GB in 15 minutes. I'll do more
comprehensive
Look at the cooling requirements of HP drives, apparently they caused problems
in some environments that did not have a decent air reticulation environment.
Suad
--
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 08:56:52AM -0600, Wu, Jie wrote:
we are trying to decide what LTO drives we should purchase: HP's or
How about jfs ?
It is now on Linux ;)
Cheers, Suad
--
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 06:19:26PM +0100, Remco Post wrote:
Coolness,
thanks for the hint. It is even in the readme, no hint about ext3 there so we
must assume ext3 is not yet supported. Luckily ext3 is sort of ext2 release
2.5, so the
Is there any advantage in creating multiple LUNs from a SAN to an AIX
host for stgpool volumes?
I have created a single large LUN on our SAN and put a bunch of backuppool
volumes within the filesystem.
As the system is growing I'm finding the need to do some tuning (as things
are not as springy
If you reduce the diskpool to 0 utilization before the beginning of the
window and keep the hi/lo very low for the first half of the window, with
a maximum practicable migpr set, you should be fine.
It's a juggling act we have every night. I know we have set it right when
I get in the morning
Yep, in dsm.opt file
DOMAIN systemobject
It will backup the system files as well though.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:12:58PM -0300, Christian Astuni wrote:
Hello everyone !!!
I want to know if exist the way with TSM 4.2 to perform a backup only of
REGISTY. Because I haven't
to the above sector switch
reducing routing overheads for the back-end/private traffic.
Does it sound Kosher??
Thanks, Suad
--
Suad Musovich ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Unix Support, ITSS Operations
University of Auckland
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 11:59:54AM +0100, Henk ten Have wrote:
On 30-Oct-01 Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,GL-IS/CIS wrote:
Andy,
do you mean 4.1.2.16 and not 4.1.2.6 ?
Nope. 4.1.2.6 is now available:
You are both dyslexic 4.2.1.6
:)
Suad
--
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 12:45:55PM -0500, Prather, Wanda wrote:
I think backing up desktops is a good thing, but I wonder why are you
backing up the System Object if you are only backing up the documents
directories? How could you restore the System Objects if you don't also
back up/restore
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 11:24:24AM -0600, George Lesho wrote:
Suad, Have you considered a strategy where you give the desktops access to
network drives on a few servers that would be backed up incrementally?
Trying to back up hundreds of desktops in a small window is a bunch more
resource
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 01:46:22PM -0700, Joshua S. Bassi wrote:
I am in the middle of a W2K 4.2 install. After seeing all the problems,
I am backing down to 4.2 - can't go to 4.1 because my customer didn't
buy 4.1!
Most of the problems seem to be from AIX systems, unless someone can say
It's a bug, apparently the PTF had been released.
APAR= IC30965 SER=IN INCORROUT
UNABLE TO REGISTER INDIVIDUAL LICENSE FILES MORE THAN ONCE ON
THE TSM 4.2.0 SERVER
Status: CLOSED Closed:
Apar Information:
RCOMP= 5698TSMAXTSM AIX
That will imply 3rd party SCSI copy functionality, which I haven't
seen any indication they have incorporated to TSM.
The physical data will still have to go through the TSM server, within the
SAN environment, before it gets put in a storage pool.
Suad
--
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 10:44:36PM
Have a look on the scripts archives on coderelief.
http://www.coderelief.com/depot.htm
In the TSM Scripts - Server Monitoring and Admin area there are a bunch
of Perl scripts, with a script called tsm-node-check
This parses the previous nights logs and e-mails the contact[s] of the
I've had several incidents where LTO Ultrium tabs slide to the write-protect side
while inside a library (we have a 3584 library, which has a fast robot).
The last one I examined the tape and it wasn't firmly switched.
It's not a major but the last couple of incidents caused a node backup
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 11:36:59AM +0800, Pothula S Paparao wrote:
Hi,
where do i get more info. on offsite backup.
here are some questions.
1) if i wanna setup offsite backup. how many tapes do i need. presently, we
have 3575 tape library with 323 catridges. 40% of its space is occupied.
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 04:48:58PM -0700, Joshua S. Bassi wrote:
From what I can tell it is not a bug. Instead IBM/Tivoli no longer ship
license files with multiple increments (i.e. 1mgsyslan.lic,
5mgsyslan.lic). Instead there is now just mgsyslan.lic and a flag
numberlicenses=the_number (I
HP now are in the process of buying Compaq so never isn't the operative word
;)
Suad
--
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 07:02:50PM -0400, Adolph Kahan wrote:
I don't believe that the HP support for IBM LTO is available yet. I
could be wrong. Are the drives in the 3584 native fibre drives? If they
My approach is modular, get the person learning one aspect for a few days
e.g. anything to do with backup schedules.
I lay a whole bunch of tasks in increasing complexity/thought until that
person starts being confident in it, then I start with a different one.
If you are training several
The easiest way is to put it in a CGI executable directory (in Apache it's
a directory with ExecCGI option in the httpd.conf file) and make sure the file
has executable permissions set.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 01:00:44PM +0200, Stan Vernaillen wrote:
Robin,
Thanks for you
Your questions on the drive don't make sense unless you are talking about a
LTO library as most physical interactions with drives usually rely on a couple
of buttons(and maybe a lever).
Competing with DLT they do well as they are a newer, faster, more economical tape
format, but they do have
Has anyone noticed when doing a restore from tape it almost grinds down
to a halt when another process/session requests the same tape?
We had this happen when an impatient client decided to run 2 restores, where
the data on the 2nd restore was on the same tape. The restore slowed from
5MB/s to
i don't see a reply, so I can answer.
Yes, there is an old ADSM client for linux, which was unsupported but
worked OK. Just do a search for it on google.
You should be able to run the newer clients but am unsure about licensing
issues.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 12:06:24PM -0500,
Is there any way to backup a Open AFS filesystem?
I see AFS support for AIX but I can't tell if it extends to Open AFS.
There is also a reference in the developerworks site that you can
compile in Support via the TSM api but aren't sure whether that is
equivalent to a TDP, or I'm barking up the
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 10:55:40PM -0400, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote:
What EXACTLY do you mean by VGA ?As in 640x480x256colors or anything
less than SVGA or XVGA ?
Careful, it might be a ploy to supplement their new creative licensing
scheme.
Suad
--
(We use crappy Wyse terminals)
The drives are the same as a standalone to a 3584.
There have been problems with firmware levels
One of the firmware levels gave me errors on a few tapes that did not
go away. The drives ended up freezing on 3 and would not go away until
they got power cycled.
Check you firmware level (latest
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:19:03AM -0400, Magura, Curtis wrote:
See a few folks are using ESS. So are we.
Does anyone know of a good forum to discuss ESS subjects. We have some
questions regarding VPATH's and HACMP.
It would be good, but wouldn't discussion be leaning more towards the SAN
, Inc.
WAL-MART CONFIDENTIAL
-Original Message-
From: Suad Musovich [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 4:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: 3583 LTO Tape Library
The drives are the same
The TSMXX.README.SRV file has the instructions to set up the LTO library/drives.
Yes, you should use /dev/smc0 as the library controller device.
Suad
--
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 03:09:44PM -0500, Jeff Bach wrote:
HELP
I need some specific help on defining a new LTO library to
For the archive option I was going to set date specific directories
(e.g. /staging/2001/06/02/) rather than unique filenames.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 09:17:23AM -0400, David Longo wrote:
One question pops up to consider in the planning. Do the files they put in the
staging
Before we got proper labels we made a bunch of labels on a crappy $200 colour
inkjet printer using light card that are stuck on with a glue stick, they are
hand cut so they are slightly crooked.
I can definitely say they none of them had problems (except a couple labels fell off
when we used
The install readme says use ultrium or ultriumc.
Also, as Richard mentioned, look at the microcode on the drives.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 02:18:23PM +0100, Fab System wrote:
All
We have 4 LTO drives in a 3584 libary which is connected using a SAN Data
Gateway. When I look at
some time ago I complained in a mail to this list that the recovery log
utilization is not reset after a database backup. APAR IC30181 was generated
for this problem. Its status is open.
I complained about the problem too. The response I got was, when the system was
too busy it took a while
have no idea how the library controller/tape drive communicates with the
TSM server, but it works.
Cheers, Suad
--
Jeff Bach
Home Office Open Systems Engineering
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
WAL-MART CONFIDENTIAL
-Original Message-
From: Suad Musovich [SMTP:[EMAIL
You just create different sequential access storage pools.
What reason would you want them to handle their own tapes?
(..just in case one of them purges their own tapes?)
The data on those tapes cannot be used in another server.
Have a look at the Tivoli Storage Manager Concepts redbook
from
Suppose that I have an environment with TSM and SAN (Storage Area
Network). Can I do backup/restore only with TDPs ?
or Can I do backup/restore of files without TDPs?
You will have to explain this a little better.
Are you talking about backing up _through_ the SAN?
i.e. File level Lan-Free
We have a similar situation..
Incrementals Mon-Sat and Full(+DBS to go offsite) on Sundays.
This is done on our DDS drive (created a manual DATclass).
The incrementals are DDS2 tapes and the full/DBS are DDS3.
(BTW. our DB is 18GB and hasn't filled the tape yet)
We have a compressed file
Be wary of upgrading the firmware on LTO drives. See the thread last week
entitled Re: LTO restore performance - seek problem?, there are some
major read performance problems in the last 3 releases of the LTO drive
firmware.
In the past two weeks i've gone from OBN1 to OCE1 to 12U7, and
You only need to run an Incremental backup to reset the recovery log.
Our regime is a full backup + DBSnapshot(sent offsite) on Sunday on hi-density
tapes and incrementals once a day (or twice, if recovery log fills up during the
day) on low-density ones using a 2 week rotation.
It is
I've just had the firmware upgraded to 1550 (don't know the patchname)
from 12U7 and, at this stage, it doesn't look like it has fixed the read
performance problem
I audited 2 tapes with ~25% utilization in a filling state (I don't expect
many gaps in data). One took 3 hours the other 5.
During
yep
http://search.adsm.org
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 12:54:15AM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
Is there a searchable archive on the web for this list?
Go to Richard Sims Quickfacts and search for NDMP.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 09:33:13AM -0600, Laura Buckley wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone out there backing up (and able to restore) a Quantum Snap
Appliance?
TIA,
Laura Buckley
SSSI
My tests recreated the bitvector in a matter of seconds, although my disk
storage pool
volumes were small. If the volumes are large and contain a lot of data I
would expect
the time to take something in the range of a few hours at the most, not
days. This
assumes that the server is very
Has anyone run the special recreate bitvectors introduced in a patch
recently?
I have fruitlessly watch my system for 4 days waiting for the process
to end but nothing seems to be happening(system has been sitting at idle)
If so, how long did it take? how big was your database? etc...
Suad
--
Get your users to archive their directories weekly (I think this can be automated).
It will create a 2nd file that will only backed-up once a week.
Also blame Microsoft for using a sucky way of storing e-mail data :)
Suad
--
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 11:46:35AM -0400, Vibhute, Bandu wrote:
I can get 30MB/sec transfer using /dev/zero but it would make sense to use
some sort of random data (no /dev/random in AIX) for a more realistic
result.
I didn't use the timer from dd as it includes it takes for tape negotiation
and rewind (I noted it from a throughput indicator from our
Can you run a "q devc","q libr" and a "q dr" to see how you defined them?
Suad
--
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 11:36:10AM +0200, Hrouda Tom wrote:
I have trouble with LTO 3583 library and TSM 4.1.3 in AIX 4.3.3.
I installed the device driver for 3583 drive and library to AIX system (from
We parse the Activity log and extract the data that way.
(using Perl)
Cheers, Suad
--
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 07:22:09PM -0400, Bill Robb wrote:
Folks...
I'm running TSM 4.1 on an S390 server, and have 85 clients divided into two domains
- Novell and AIX. Many of the clients run multiple
Have a look at:
http://adsmsalarysurvey.8m.com/
Cheers, Suad
--
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 09:56:47PM -0700, Dwight Wood wrote:
Hi everyone, I have searched the archives and found only a few postings
about the pay scale of ADSM/TSM Admins. But I didn't see any numbers out
there in the
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 06:17:10PM -0400, Adolph Kahan wrote:
I assume you mean 78 million entries for a total of 6.9GB. Then yes it does
take that long to do a LOADDB. I've heard of slightly larger databases
taking over 48 hours to reload.
I'm on 286 Million entries after 73 hours.
How do
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
