co-location question

2006-09-21 Thread John Bremer
Greetings, We are backing up several NetApp NAS filers using TSM NDMP capabilities. We have about 700 TB backup data. Aside from issues with TOCs, copy pools and some others (which I am confident TSM development is working to remedy !), we're pretty happy with the service. Since most NAS

Re: co-location question

2006-09-21 Thread Kelly Lipp
, September 21, 2006 11:13 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] co-location question Greetings, We are backing up several NetApp NAS filers using TSM NDMP capabilities. We have about 700 TB backup data. Aside from issues with TOCs, copy pools and some others (which I am confident TSM development

Re: Co-location

2002-11-06 Thread Zlatko Krastev/ACIT
--- We turned on co-location on the onsite tape pool a couple of weeks ago, because we just started using the SQL TDP, and the doc recommended colocation. We turned it back off this morning, because we were running out of tapes and had a lot of them that were only 5% full. There is another very

Re: Co-location

2002-10-23 Thread Matt Simpson
At 12:06 AM -0500 10/23/02, Chris Gibes said: You are absolutely correct. Co-location is by storage pool, not by management class. So yes, you would need to carve your disk up into multiple storage pools to selectively use co-location, Thanks for the confirmation my guess is that it's

Re: Co-location

2002-10-23 Thread Kelly J. Lipp
PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.storsol.com or www.storserver.com (719)531-5926 Fax: (240)539-7175 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L;VM.MARIST.EDU]On Behalf Of Matt Simpson Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Co-location

Re: Co-location

2002-10-23 Thread Chris Gibes
: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 7:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Co-location At 12:06 AM -0500 10/23/02, Chris Gibes said: You are absolutely correct. Co-location is by storage pool, not by management class. So yes, you would need to carve your disk up into multiple storage pools to selectively

Re: Co-location

2002-10-22 Thread Matt Simpson
, which we copy to another tape pool for offsite. We turned on co-location on the onsite tape pool a couple of weeks ago, because we just started using the SQL TDP, and the doc recommended colocation. We turned it back off this morning, because we were running out of tapes and had a lot of them

Re : Re: Co-location

2002-10-22 Thread Guillaume Gilbert
Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pour : [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc : Objet : Re: Co-location At 3:53 PM -0400 10/21/02, Thach, Kevin said: The person that installed our environment basically set up 6 Policy Domains: Colodom, Exchange, Lanfree, MSSQL, Nocodom, and Oracle. 99% of the clients

Re: Co-location

2002-10-22 Thread Jane Bamberger
IS Department Bassett Healthcare 607-547-4750 - Original Message - From: Matt Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 9:46 AM Subject: Re: Co-location At 3:53 PM -0400 10/21/02, Thach, Kevin said: The person that installed our environment basically

Re: Co-location

2002-10-22 Thread Chris Gibes
Matt, You are absolutely correct. Co-location is by storage pool, not by management class. So yes, you would need to carve your disk up into multiple storage pools to selectively use co-location, or you could set up a tape pool that was co-located and go directly to tapes but caution! you would