TSM 6.1.2.0 - Let's reclaim...well..maybe not.

2009-09-14 Thread Stefan Folkerts
Ok, I must be missing something here. Someboby please tell me why this is happening! :) The FILEPOOL storagepool is a deduped storagepool with a FILE device class backing it. 13:58:16 tsmserv01 : q vol f:\003c.bfs f=d Volume Name: F:\003C.BFS Storage Pool

Re: TSM 6.1.2.0 - Let's reclaim...well..maybe not.

2009-09-14 Thread Efim
Hi If you don't copy primary pool FILEPOOL to copy pool, for reclamation you must change option DEDUPREQUIRESBACKUP to no but it is not good idea. Efim 2009/9/14 Stefan Folkerts stefan.folke...@itaa.nl Ok, I must be missing something here. Someboby please tell me why this is happening!

Antwort: [ADSM-L] TSM 6.1.2.0 - Let's reclaim...well..maybe not.

2009-09-14 Thread Ullrich Mänz
: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 14.09.2009 14:11 Bitte antworten an ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU An ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Kopie Thema [ADSM-L] TSM 6.1.2.0 - Let's reclaim...well..maybe not. Ok, I must be missing something here. Someboby please tell me why

Re: TSM 6.1.2.0 - Let's reclaim...well..maybe not.

2009-09-14 Thread Stefan Folkerts
] Namens Efim Verzonden: maandag 14 september 2009 14:36 Aan: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Onderwerp: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 6.1.2.0 - Let's reclaim...well..maybe not. Hi If you don't copy primary pool FILEPOOL to copy pool, for reclamation you must change option DEDUPREQUIRESBACKUP to no but it is not good idea