Hello to you...
Everybody saying that LTO Ultrium drive is a latest drive technology that
why we quoting to this to replace our existing tape library, can you please
provide me info regarding the LTO vs 3590 comparisons in terms of
accessibility, availability, performance, etc.
regards,
Zosi
I tried that. filespace_name still wrapped. I selected enough fields so
that the output looks like this...
NODE: HOC08F5001
SPACE_MB: 704.00
PCT_USED: 91.20
FILESPACE: /export/AIX433_ML
BACKUP_START: 2000-10-03 00:25:39.00
BACKUP_END: 2000-10-03 00:25:46.00
I xfer
The actual production release we put in production was not 4.2.1.0. I
believe it was 4.2.1.1. We have the same fear of anything .0 . We had to
install TSM 4.2.1.9 because both the WEB client and the Admin interface
caused S0C4 abends in the OS/390 TSM Server. We are now experiencing NT
a further APAR to the problem:
APAR Identifier .. IC31865 Last Changed 01/11/09
UNABLE TO USE 3494 LIBRARY FOR RESTORE DB. HAVE TO DEFINE DRIVE
WITHIN 3494 AS TYPE MANUAL TO COMPLETE DB RESTORE.
Symptom .. IN INCORROUT Status ... CLOSED PER
Severity
I give client installation, maintenance, AND MONITORING, to the platform
administrators. I work with them to get them going and help as needed. We
give them the means to backup their data. But it is still their data. I
work with them and setup all the schedules, client and Admin.
Matt
IBM marketing has always done a great job at preventing side-by-side
comparisons on their specifications sheets. They often list different
performance specifications.
As far as I can tell, the IBM 3580 Ultrium drive holds an impressive 100GB
native (2:1 compression) whereas the IBM 3590-E1A can
-Original Message-
From: Zosimo Noriega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 4:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LTO drive VS 3590E1A
Hello to you...
Everybody saying that LTO Ultrium drive is a latest drive technology that
why we quoting to this to replace our
Hi *SM-ers!
We are looking at TDP for Exchange for backing up our Exchange servers.
The backups should be kept for 3 weeks. I'm looking for a correct TSM policy
definition. The easiest way to do this is defining a backup copygroup with
retonly=21 and retextra=21. However, I think this is not
I think you'll also need to specify SET SQLDISPLAYMODE WIDE.
Bill Boyer
DSS, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
John Monahan
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 6:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Select statement
You can
I would like to hear from anyone backing up Domino databases with the TDP
and relay their experience as it relates to backup/restores. Ours are on
WIN2K only. I'm wondering what seems to be the easiest, or best practice,
procedures. What kinds of backups are you doing? What book did you find the
Hmmm,
I've seen this behaviour before on dos/windows filesystems mounted under
Linux. Guess what, q file SI_GIULIA gives just one entry:
Node Name Filespace FSID Platform FilespaceIs
Capacity Pct
Name
Hello,
Server 4.2.1.8 on AIX 4.3.3
Client 4.2.1.0 on Linux86
Every night almost every file on the machine
is updated according to TSM:
02/18/02 13:05:26 ANE4952I (Session: 8234, Node: SI_GIULIA)
Total number of
objects inspected:
24,410
02/18/02 13:05:26
All,
Is it possible to have two storage pool's backup to the same copy
storage pool? I don't see anything in the manuals saying yes or no.
We currently have a 'TAPEPOOL' which is backed up to a 'COPYPOOL' .
Then the 'COPYPOOL' tapes are sent offsite. The original intention of
Yes you can do what you requested. Many primary pools, both collocated
and uncollocated can backup to one uncollated COPYPOOL.
David Longo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/19/02 09:55AM
All,
Is it possible to have two storage pool's backup to the same copy
storage pool? I don't see anything in
Absolutely, but you get what you ask for, it may not be what you want.
Typically, where it is used is a primary disk pool with a next pool (tape),
with a next pool (tape), etc. This group of storage would be propogated to
a storage copy pool in order as documented in the manual. There is no
expect works really well if you are used to TCL/c-shell type logic. If you
are more of a ksh person, or already know perl you will probably prefer the
perl version. It works well if you are running it from AIX or Solaris. HP/UX
handles tty's in a strange fashion, and perl expect does not work
The drives have the newest microcode.
-Original Message-
From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 3:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Backup NT Server via SAN with Emulex LP8000
This really sounds like down level microcode in the drives.
Time to call 1-800-its-brok.
-Original Message-
From: Gloeer, Kirsten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 10:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Backup NT Server via SAN with Emulex LP8000
The drives have the newest microcode.
-Original Message-
Hi NiklasYou can either choose to install multiple ba-clients in diffent directories.You can also create different dsm.opt files (server1.opt, server2.opt and so on), and the specify which opt-file to use with /optfile:.You can also use the same optfile for different nodes, using the servername
Awesome. I'm glad to hear they finally included those! Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 8:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LTO drive VS 3590E1A
I have a new 3584-L32 library (6 weeks) and it has the
Per our Netware Admin we do not have space restrictions in use.
The restore was apparently trying to turn them on! The other permissions
you listed below are all correct. But we still have the restore problem.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/18/02 03:23AM
David,
when you backup a file from a novell
I think about, wheter it makes sense to have several typepools (all primary)
chained together.
Disk- Tapepool1 - Tapepool2 ( - Tapepool 3)
Maybe it is possible to reduce reclamtion processing by putting the frequent
changing files
to the beginning of the chain and allowing the static files
We want performing an 'archive' using schedules. A few clients have a lot of
filesystems, about 50 or more.
We already encountered the limitation of 20 objects in the object-field, so
we made 3 archive-schedules per system. It is a lot of work to define those
schedules and it will be much
Well, I just noticed something weirder- I have two identical 6M1s both with
4.2.1.9 and AIX 4.3.3.ML09, with SELFTUNEBUFFPOOLSIZE set to YES on both, and
one is working (runs daily after expiration) and the other isn't (hasn't ever
run that I can determine).
No hits in the APAR database, either.
What SQL/Tables/Columns is needed to get the same information you get
from:
Q EVENT * * BEGINDATE=-1
When we use SQL to query the EVENT table, we only get the Scheduled ADMIN
events, not the CLIENT EVENT info.
Speaking of SQL, I have an old PDF with the following cover info:
Using the
We are moving to a Storagetek L700 (LTO) from 3570...(TSM 4.1.5 running on
AIX 4 .3.3). I have some questions on migrating the data. The current plan
is to connect the L700 to our box leaving our magstar connected as well. We
will change the 3570 tapepool to read only. Then we will create a
Hello in all
I collide has a problem of labelisation: I would like to change the label of
a cartridge being already in my robotics.
During the command{*order*} of LABEL, TSM reads the cartridge and realize
that this cartridge already possesses a label.
How to rewrite a label without the
With the LABEL LIBVOL command there is an option:
overwrite=yes. This will write new label you specify even if a label exists.
My standard caveat on this is be careful as you can overwrite good
data tapes.
David Longo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/19/02 11:46AM
Hello in all
I collide has a
Our test TSM DATABASE crashed so we began the restore process and when it came
time to run the restore db job we encountered the following.
ANR5099E UNABLE TO INITIALIZE TCP/IP DRIVER - ERROR BINDING ACCEPTOR SOCKET 0
(RC $EQ; 0)
From the old archives the only thing I could pick up was to
Hi,
Could someone please give me an easy way to remember how to convert
DATE_TIME into manipulative items? I've seen so many ways to convert to time
and date - I'm confused about the math that is being used - or if someone
knows of a good whitepaper? I have sql books and the TSM guides - and
The character representation of the CURRENT_TIMESTAMP is called a TIMESTAMP,
same for any date/time field in TIMESTAMP format. There are many functions
you can use against it to get portions of the field. The functions are:
DATE()
HOUR()
MINUTE()
SECOND()
to
Go to oracle.com and then find link to IT.
-Original Message-
From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Select statement: Data Time Stamp Manipulation
The character representation of the CURRENT_TIMESTAMP is
set up your policy domain for 27 or 28 days. This will always ensure you
have a 3 week recovery window. 27 will do what is needed as long as you run
your full backups on a weekly schedule and do not miss any.
-Original Message-
From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Not to beat a dead horse, but this is what I just received from my sales rep
as to the pricing structure for TSM clients. I hadn't heard this until
today, so thought I'd share it:
Clarification I just rec'd,
Old Way all clients were four Tivoli points= about $120
New Way Desktop
I'm working with TSM 4.2 running on AIX 4.3.3. I defined the Library,
drives and devclass with the element number 116 and 117 succesfully. But
when i try to label a volume, i receive the following error.
ANR8779E Unable to open drive /dev/mt2, error number=46.
ANR8302E I/O error on drive DRIVE02
Hi Gurus
I have an ACN5350E problem on an Exchange server. This is the configuration:-
Client:-
Tivoli Data Protection for Microsoft Exchange Server
Version 2 Release 2 Level 0.0
Exchange Server 2000, Service Pack 2.
Server:-
AIX 4.3.3 ML 08 TSM 4.1.2
From excfull.log:
Full:
Hi Justin,
a backup set is a collection of backed up files from one client. It is a
snapshot of active backed up files (files on the server) from one client.
You don´t need include or exclude lists for a backup set.
Kind regards
Stefan Oing
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Justin
I had to reboot the server because of an bad CMOS Battery. After the reboot
I did an ACCEPT DATE for the server because the TSM server had an problem
with the date/time configuration, that is why I forgot to change the BIOS
date/time settings to change.
Now the server is running but when I make
HiOn a Windows box, the license authorization file is adsmlicn.dll.On a UNIX box it's called dsmlicense.The file must somehow have been damaged. Just re-install your licenses.The file(s) are located under /usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin, or c:\program files\tivoli\tsm\server.Best RegardsDaniel
The NODELOCK file is the license authorization file. This has been
discussed before on the list. I believe the discussion was to just delete
the file and reregister your configuration. But, you will need the base CD
that has all of the registration files on it unless you copied them to your
40 matches
Mail list logo
