On Apr 28, 2010, at 11:30 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
I converted it to XHTML using HTML tidy and some manual tweaks. Please reuse
it on blogs.
Done and published to Perlbuzz. Thanks!
http://perlbuzz.com/2010/04/perl-512-released-perl-5-under-new-release-process.html
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy
On 04/25/2010 04:44 PM, Eric Brine wrote:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Mark Mielke m...@mark.mielke.cc
mailto:m...@mark.mielke.cc wrote:
Closing tags gives the processor more explicit instructions on how
to deal with ambiguities
There are no ambiguities in valid HTML.
There are
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Eric Brine ikeg...@adaelis.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Mark Mielke m...@mark.mielke.cc wrote:
Closing tags gives the processor more explicit instructions on how to deal
with ambiguities
If you're writing HTML, write HTML.
If you're writing
On 25 April 2010 22:53, Mark Mielke m...@mark.mielke.cc wrote:
On 04/25/2010 04:44 PM, Eric Brine wrote:
The combined open close tags such as hr/ should be used with a
space before the / to make sure it works on old and new browsers.
Try: hr /
That's not valid HTML.
What is
Interesting on exactly why hr / shows up as invalid in validators.
Apparently I and most browser writes never learned about the SGML short
tag capability. Perhaps, because we always thought of HTML as something
that was *like* SGML, but definitely not actual SGML. :-)
I think it is a bit odd
On 04/23/2010 05:26 PM, Eric Brine wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Shlomi Fishshlo...@iglu.org.il wrote:
I'm not sure even HTML 4.0 still allows stray opening tags (such asp or
td or
whatever).
stray? It most definitely allows the end tag to be omitted for certain
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il wrote:
On Friday 23 Apr 2010 18:40:38 Eric Brine wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:49 AM, Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il
wrote:
Thanks for providing it. However, it is not XHTML/XML-compliant
Correct, HTML is not
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il wrote:
Hi all!
So far the only announcement of perl-5.12.0 has been to the perl5-porters
mailing as plaintext E-mail. It was copied in LWN.net:
http://lwn.net/Articles/383203/
But it's still mostly plaintext there. A Google
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:49 AM, Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il wrote:
Thanks for providing it. However, it is not XHTML/XML-compliant
Correct, HTML is not compatible with XHTML.
In fact, I couldn't make it make it compliant with both HTML and XHTML
because I used HR.
Is this HTML required
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 19:53 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Hi all!
So far the only announcement of perl-5.12.0 has been to the perl5-porters
mailing as plaintext E-mail. It was copied in LWN.net:
http://lwn.net/Articles/383203/
Also here:
http://perlisalive.com/articles/42
Regards,
Denny
Hi Eric,
On Thursday 22 Apr 2010 20:14:49 Eric Brine wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il wrote:
Hi all!
So far the only announcement of perl-5.12.0 has been to the perl5-porters
mailing as plaintext E-mail. It was copied in LWN.net:
On Friday 23 Apr 2010 18:40:38 Eric Brine wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:49 AM, Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il wrote:
Thanks for providing it. However, it is not XHTML/XML-compliant
Correct, HTML is not compatible with XHTML.
It is not completely (as far as standalone tags are
Hi all!
So far the only announcement of perl-5.12.0 has been to the perl5-porters
mailing as plaintext E-mail. It was copied in LWN.net:
http://lwn.net/Articles/383203/
But it's still mostly plaintext there. A Google search for perl-5.12.0 yields
no good result for an HTML announcement. I
http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl5/index.cgi?news_perl_5_12
has a collection of links to the announcements about 5.12
in various languages.
Please update the page with link to further announcements.
Gabor
14 matches
Mail list logo
