In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jesse Erlbaum) wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathan Torkington) wrote:
http://web.archive.org/web/19990501151656/www.perl.org/advocac
y/tech.html
this turned into
In The Technology Review (March 2002, p. 21), Michael Schrage writes Wal-mart
Trumps Moore's Law [1]. He makes the point that Microsoft doesn't matter that much in
the big scheme of things, because if Wal-Mart decides to spend their four billion
dollar Retail Link investment elsewhere, whatever
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nathan Torkington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The advocacy document says:
If you explore the Perl Web sites, you'll find various claims about
why Perl is superior to Tcl. Many of these claims are either
incorrect or out-of-date
Is anyone here also familiar
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 02:57:42AM +, Dan Brian wrote:
2. Extensibility is one area where Perl has nothing to prove. It may be
true that not everyone is an XS fan, but XS is not as difficult as some
portray it. Nor is it the
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PHP *is* on more servers than mod_perl.
Excuse me, how do you know that? mod_perl is usually running on the back
end servers which aren't accessible by scanners like netcraft. The
front-end doesn't indicate that its
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gabor Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
During the beginner Perl classes I teach people often ask me why is Perl
better than X ?
you can't answer that question without more information. you need to
know what they are trying to do, and what their business needs
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kalim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
here's a question:
what's with your company's obsession with .NET?
let's talk about Perl here. if you have problems with another company, send
a note to them.
in other news, the more things Perl can interoperate with, the more
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a minor problem, which someone on the list can probably help me
on. Our outsourced sysadmins are holding out for a pkgadd version of Perl to
install on our Sun/Solaris servers, on the grounds that such a package is
i've brought back the Sucks-Rules-O-Meter for programming languages, along
with some other goodies:
http://www.theperlreview.com/at_a_glance.html
PHP has really shot ahead of Perl in terms of customer satisfaction (expressed
on things that AltaVista can find). i've been talking to a lot of
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Uri Guttman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A FOSS ban would have an especially negative impact on DoD software
development.
reference?
does FOSS mean Free Open Source Software?
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Uri Guttman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bdf == brian d foy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
bdf In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Uri Guttman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A FOSS ban would have an especially negative impact on DoD software
development.
bdf
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Uri Guttman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but perl was the number one example of OS used there which should be
trumpeted to the world IMO. any manglement that says no to OS should be
made to read that article (or be sent quotes from it).
In article 85879.1041554400@[192.168.200.4], Steven Lembark
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Problem is that by the time students graduate their minds
have already been fixed on whatever language they've been
taught.
an undergraduate program that fixes the minds of the students
it graduates has
13 matches
Mail list logo
