Thanks, Ben. If anyone knows more, I'd be grateful - that's such a huge,
fundamental claim - basically no computer can [up till now] recognize a cat,
or any object , that I think it's important to establish the historical truth
of it. (He actually didn't distinguish between drawings/fotos. I
On Sunday 13 May 2007 08:14:43 am Kingma, D.P. wrote:
John, as I wrote earlier, I'm very interested in learning more about your
particular approach to:
- Concept and pattern representation. (i.e. types of concept, patterns,
relations?)
As I mentioned in another note, (about the tennis ball),
Yes, there are many systems that do object classification from photos.
For example, this recent work of Poggio et al seems to me significantly more
impressive
than Hawkins work-so-far,
cbcl.*mit*.edu/projects/cbcl/publications/ps/serre-wolf-*poggio*-PAMI-07.pdf
both in terms of biological
On Saturday 12 May 2007 10:24:03 pm Lukasz Stafiniak wrote:
Do you have some interesting links about imitation? I've found these,
not all of them interesting, I'm just showing what I have:
Thanks -- some of those look interesting. I don't have any good links, but I'd
reccomend Hurley Chater,
A: I don't know of any that works too well (and invariantly, including
recognizing mirrored images different orientation etc... This is
fairly important for a system functioning in a dynamic world, and it
is obviously a tough nut to crack)
Well, too well is ambiguous...
There are plenty of
- Original Message -
From: Derek Zahn
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 1:49 PM
Subject: RE: [agi] Determinism
Matt Mahoney writes:
(sigh)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scruffies
I don't think my disagreement with Matt is about Neats vs
Saying that you don't trade time for memory in models or any computer
program just shows a lack of real world experience on the part of Matt IMHO.
David Clark
Of course CS is full of time/memory tradeoffs, but I think Matt's point was
that a finite-state machine just can't completely
On 5/14/07, David Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even though I have a Math minor from University, I have used next to no
Mathematics in my 30 year programming/design career.
Yes, but what do you program?
I've been programming for 24 years and I use math all the time.
Recently I've been
Pei Wang wrote:
[snip]
Can you be more specific here? What is the nature of a concept X?
How can it contribute to operator construction? What is a good
relationship between concepts?
Pei
Oh, rats! ;-) Now you are going to make me switch my brain on. Darn, I
should have seen that coming.
Have to blurb on this as it irks me -
Even if you write a Hello World app it is a mathematical entity expressed
through a mathematical medium. Software layers from source to binary to OS
to drivers are a gradation from the mathematically abstract to the physical
world as is with painting an
On Monday 14 May 2007 11:02:33 am Benjamin Goertzel wrote:
We use some probability theory ... and some of the theory of rewriting
systems, lambda calculus, etc. This stuff is in a subordinate role to a
cognitive-systems-theory-based design, but is still very useful...
ditto -- and for my
- Original Message -
From: Benjamin Goertzel
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 8:02 AM
Subject: Re: [agi] Determinism
I have never been impressed by complicated formulas and I have been many
slick (Math) talking people who couldn't produce anything
Well, since we are using C++, most of our code has to do with neither
Mathematics nor Computer Science but just C++ language muckery
Consider me to be tweaking you again for this . . . . :-)
Have you considered a real development language and platform? (No need to
reply . . . . I'm
dc: I have never been impressed by complicated formulas and I have been many
slick (Math) talking people who couldn't produce anything that worked in the
real world.
Ben: A fascinating Freudian slip! ;-)
Wow - you're the first AI person I've come across with any Freudian
perspective. Minsky
14 matches
Mail list logo
