On 1/12/08, Mike Tintner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The primary motivation behind the Novamente AI Engine
is to build a system that can achieve complex goals in
complex environments, a synopsis of the definition of intelligence
given in (Goertzel 1993). The emphasis is on the
This is not just
My problem with both these definitions (and the one underpinning
AIXI), is that they either don't define the word problem well or
define it in a limited way.
For example AIXI defines it as the solution of a problem as finding a
function that transforms an input to an output. No mention of having
At this point I'd describe intelligent machine as being able to
construct incremental internal models of wide variety of processes,
based on moderately explicit information about those processes (in
other words, being able to learn sufficiently general models, and to
elaborate them). Using these
On definitions of intelligence, the canonical reference is
http://www.vetta.org/shane/intelligence.html
which lists 71 definitions. Apologies if someone already pointed out
Shane's page in this thread, I didn't read every message carefully.
An AGI definition of intelligence surely has, by
Every time a dispute erupts about what the real definition of
intelligence is, all we really get is noise, because nobody is clear
about the role that the definition is supposed to play.
If the role is to distinguish Narrow AI from AGI, Ben's definition is
fine. If the role is to define a
On Jan 12, 2008 3:04 PM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every time a dispute erupts about what the real definition of
intelligence is, all we really get is noise, because nobody is clear
about the role that the definition is supposed to play.
Richard,
I fully understand how
