WHAT ARE THE MISSING CONCEPTUAL PIECES IN AGI?
With the work done by Goertzel et al, Pei, Joscha Bach
http://www.micropsi.org/ , Sam Adams, and others who spoke at AGI 2008, I
feel we pretty much conceptually understand how build powerful AGI's. I'm
not necessarily saying we know all the pieces
--- Ed Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WHAT ARE THE MISSING CONCEPTUAL PIECES IN AGI?
- Lack of well defined goals. What defines AGI? A better spam filter? A
robotic housemaid? Automating all human labor?
- Inability to reverse engineer the human brain. Why do we need 10^15
synapses to
Hi Ed,
As most already know, the problem I am trying to solve involves knowledge and
skill acquisition to achieve AGI. The proposed solution is a bootstrap English
dialog system, backed by a knowledge base based upon OpenCyc and greatly
elaborated with lexical information from WordNet,
Ed Porter wrote:
WHAT ARE THE MISSING CONCEPTUAL PIECES IN AGI?
One that appears to me to be missing, or at least not emphasized, is
that general intelligence is inefficient compared to specialized
techniques. In any particular sub-domain specialized intelligence will
be able to employ
Matt,
On 4/17/08, Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before giving my detailed comments, I'd like to comment that people who have
spent decades in wet laboratories know a **LOT** more than they are willing
to write down. Why? THEIR culture is to not write things down until you can
PROVE them
Matt, et al,
On 4/18/08, Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For this reason, I'm tempted to opensource my stuff, but where would
be my compensation? Do I really HAVE to sacrifice my pay check...??
Not at all. I released most of my data compression software under
GPL. If a
company
--- Steve Richfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/17/08, Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Blue Brain project estimates 8000 synapses per neuron in mouse cortex.
I haven't read the report, but I presume that is a PHYSICAL number developed
from microscopy. Typically, 1% have
