## RICHARD LOOSEMORE WROTE #
Now I must repeat what I said before about some (perhaps many?) claimed
solutions to the binding problem: these claimed solutions often
establish the *mechanism* by which a connection could be established IF
THE TWO ITEMS WANT TO TALK TO EACH OTHER.
Hey Steve,
thanks for the clarifications!
My point was that the operation of most interesting phenomena is NOT
fully understood, but consists of various parts, many of which ARE
understood, or are at least easily understandable. Given the typical figure
6 shape of most problematical
Valentina,
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 7:55 AM, Valentina Poletti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As I explained above, many/most complex problems and conflicts can be fixed
WITHOUT a full understanding of them, so your argument above is really
irrelevant to my assertion.
Yeh.. but i wasn't talking
=FROM ED'S ORIGINAL POST=
it is precisely because the human brains can do such massive searches
(averaging roughly 3 to 300 trillion/second in the cortex alone) that lets
us so often come up with the appropriate memory or reason at the appropriate
time.
==
Ed Porter wrote:
## RICHARD LOOSEMORE WROTE #
Now I must repeat what I said before about some (perhaps many?) claimed
solutions to the binding problem: these claimed solutions often
establish the *mechanism* by which a connection could be established IF
THE TWO ITEMS WANT TO
