Mike,
If memory serves, this thread started out as a discussion about binding in an
AGI context. At some point, the terms forward-chaining and
backward-chaining were brought up and, then, got used in a weird way (I
thought) as the discussion turned to temporal dependencies and hierarchical
Will,
--- On Tue, 7/15/08, William Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I would also say of evolved systems. My fingers purpose
could
equally well be said to be for picking ticks out of the
hair of my kin
or for touch typing. E.g. why do I keep my fingernails
short, so that
they do not
From: Abram Demski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John,
What kind of automata? Finite-state automata? Pushdown? Turing
machines? Does CA mean cellular automata?
--Abram
Hi Abram,
FSM, semiatomata, groups w/o actions, semigroups with action in the
observer, etc... CA is for cellular automata.
No, not especially familiar, but it sounds interesting. Personally I
am interested in learning formal grammars to describe data, and there
are well-established equivalences between grammars and automata, so
the approaches are somewhat compatible. According to wikipedia,
semiautomata have no
