Re: [agi] Two draft papers: AI and existential risk; heuristics and biases

2006-06-07 Thread Peter de Blanc
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 11:32 -0400, Mark Waser wrote: I think that we as a community need to get off our butts and start building consensus as to what even the barest framework of friendliness is. I think that we've seen more than enough proof that no one here can go on for more than

Re: [agi] Two draft papers: AI and existential risk; heuristics and biases

2006-06-07 Thread Peter de Blanc
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 16:13 -0400, Mark Waser wrote: I'm pretty sure that I've got the science and math that I need and, as I Okay. I supposed the opposite, not because of anything you said, but because the base rate is so low. said above, I don't feel compelled to listen to everyone.

Re: [agi] Heuristics and biases in uncertain inference systems

2006-06-07 Thread Peter de Blanc
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 07:56 +0800, Pei Wang wrote: Whether the common response to the Linda example is a fallacy or not depends on the normative theory that is used as the standard of correct thinking. The paper I linked described an experiment in which subjects were paid for making correct