On 04/02/2008, Joseph Gentle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't read any of Steels stuff lately, either. I'm not sure if any
of the language he's generating is higher order, but I wouldn't be so
quick to dismiss emergent language generation as a trick for just 5
minute demos.
Well if you take
On Feb 4, 2008 7:38 PM, Bob Mottram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well if you take something like the talking heads experiment
(http://www.isrl.uiuc.edu/~amag/langev/cited2/steelsthetalkingheadsexperiment.html)
and ask what it would take to scale this up to human-like language
abilities inevitably
Jeez there's always something new. Anyone know about this (which seems at a
glance loosely relevant to Ben's approach) ?
http://www.emergent-languages.org/
Overview
This site provides an introduction to the research on emergent and
evolutionary languages as conducted at the Sony Computer
I havn't read any of Luc Steels stuff for a long time, but he has been
researching the evolution of language using robots or software agents
since the early 1990s. This is really a symbol grounding problem
where the communication in some way needs to represent things or
situations which the agent
, USA 78704
512.791.7860
- Original Message
From: Ben Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Sunday, February 3, 2008 8:03:13 AM
Subject: Re: [agi] Emergent languages Org
Thanks for the references...
I found this paper
Kaplan, F., Oudeyer, P-Y., Kubinyi, E
I doubt that 3D object recognition is integral to 'genuine
intelligence'. Theoretically, if we had an AGI we should be able to
put it in a simulated 2D world and it would still act intelligently.
IMO language is integral to strong AI in the same way that logic is
integral to mathematics. If you
IMO language is integral to strong AI in the same way that logic is
integral to mathematics.
The counterargument is that no one has yet made an AI virtual chimp ...
and nearly all of the human brain is the same as that of a chimp ...
I think that language-centric approaches are viable, but I
On Feb 4, 2008 11:27 AM, Ben Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO language is integral to strong AI in the same way that logic is
integral to mathematics.
The counterargument is that no one has yet made an AI virtual chimp ...
and nearly all of the human brain is the same as that of a
Hi,
I'd be interested in what you see as the path from SLAM to AGI.
To me, language generation seems obvious: 1. Make a language and
algorithms for generating stuff in that language. 2. Implement pattern
recognition and abstraction (imo not _that_ hard if you've designed
your language well)
On Feb 4, 2008 12:12 PM, Ben Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The robotics path to AI is a lot like the evolutionary path to natural
intelligence...
Create a system that learns to achieve simple sensorimotor goals in
its environment...
then move on to social goals... and language eventually
10 matches
Mail list logo
