From: Kaj Sotala xue...@gmail.com
To: agi agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Thu, August 12, 2010 2:18:13 AM
Subject: [agi] Re: [agi] P≠NP
2010/8/12 John G. Rose johnr...@polyplexic.com
BTW here is the latest one:
http://www.win.tue.nl/~gwoegi/P-versus-NP/Deolalikar.pdf
See also:
http
2010/8/12 John G. Rose johnr...@polyplexic.com
BTW here is the latest one:
http://www.win.tue.nl/~gwoegi/P-versus-NP/Deolalikar.pdf
See also:
http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~stansife/pnp.html - brief summary of the proof
Discussion about whether it's correct:
This is a very powerful argument, but is not quite a rigorous
proof. Thermodynamics is like saying that because all zeros below 10^20 have
a real part of 0.5 therefore there are no non trivial zeros for which that
is not the case. What I am saying is pedantic, very pedantic but will still
affect