William,
On 7/7/08, William Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/7/3 Steve Richfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
William and Vladimir,
IMHO this discussion is based entirely on the absence of any sort of
interface spec. Such a spec is absolutely necessary for a large AGI
project
to ever
2008/7/3 Steve Richfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
William and Vladimir,
IMHO this discussion is based entirely on the absence of any sort of
interface spec. Such a spec is absolutely necessary for a large AGI project
to ever succeed, and such a spec could (hopefully) be wrung out to at least
avoid
Sorry about the long thread jack
2008/7/3 Vladimir Nesov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 4:05 PM, William Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because it is dealing with powerful stuff, when it gets it wrong it
goes wrong powerfully. You could lock the experimental code away in a
sand
William and Vladimir,
IMHO this discussion is based entirely on the absence of any sort of
interface spec. Such a spec is absolutely necessary for a large AGI project
to ever succeed, and such a spec could (hopefully) be wrung out to at least
avoid the worst of the potential traps.
For example:
