John G. Rose wrote:
[snip]
Building a complex based intelligence much different from the human brain
design but still basically dependant on complexity is not impossible just
formidable. Working with software systems that have designed complexity and
getting predicted emergence and in this case
From: Richard Loosemore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ah, but now you are stating the Standard Reply, and what you have to
understand is that the Standard Reply boils down to this: We are so
smart that we will figure a way around this limitation, without having
to do any so crass as just
Thanks again Richard for continuing to make your view on this topic clear to
those who are curious.
As somebody who has tried in good faith and with limited but nonzero success to
understand your argument, I have some comments. They are just observations
offered with no sarcasm or insult
Oh, one last point:
I find your thoughts in this message quite interesting personally because I
think that puzzling out exactly what concept builders need to do, and how
they might be built to do it, is the most interesting thing in the whole world.
I am resistant to the idea that it is
Sorry for three messages in short succession. Regarding concept builders, I
have been writing in my bumbling way about this (and will continue to muse on
fundamental issues) in my little blog:
http://agiblog.net
---
agi
Archives:
Well I can spend a lot of time replying this since it is a tough subject.
The CB system is a good example my thinking doesn't involve CB's yet so the
organized mayhem would be of a different form and I was thinking of the
complexity being integrated differently.
What you are saying makes sense in
Derek Zahn wrote:
Thanks again Richard for continuing to make your view on this topic
clear to those who are curious.
As somebody who has tried in good faith and with limited but nonzero
success to understand your argument, I have some comments. They are
just observations offered with no
--- On Tue, 7/1/08, John G. Rose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BUT there are some
circuits I believe, can't think of any offhand, where
the opposite is true.
It just kind of works based on based on complex subsystems
interoperational
functionality and it was discovered, not designed
