On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Mike Tintner [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
As I understand the way you guys and AI generally work, you create
well-organized spaces which your programs can systematically search for
options. Let's call them nets - which have systematic, well-defined and
Ben,
Some questions then.
You don't have any spaces or frames as such within your systems? (what terms
would you use/prefer here BTW?) Everything is potentially connected to
everything else? Perhaps you can give some example from say your
pet-in-a-virtual-world (or anything else). It
I guess the obvious follow up question is when your systems search among
options for a response to a situation, they don't search in a systematic way
through spaces of options? They can just start anywhere and end up anywhere in
the system's web of knowledge - as you can in searching the Web
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Mike Tintner [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I guess the obvious follow up question is when your systems search among
options for a response to a situation, they don't search in a systematic way
through spaces of options? They can just start anywhere and end up
The OpenCog Atomspace --- its knowledge-base of nodes and links --- is
totally free-form without any overarching structures imposed by the
programmer
However, hierarchies or frames can of course exist as structures within this
free-form pool of nodes and links
In building a particular app using
Ben,
Thanks. But you didn't reply to the surely central-to-AGI question of whether
this free-form knowledge base is or can be multi-domain - and particularly
involve radically conflicting sets of rules about how given objects can behave
- a central feature of the human brain and its knowledge
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Mike Tintner [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Ben,
Thanks. But you didn't reply to the surely central-to-AGI question of
whether this free-form knowledge base is or can be multi-domain - and
particularly involve radically conflicting sets of rules about how given
