Hmm.. well, but at least, using words related to robotics gives a flavour of
embodiment :-).
Anyhow, I still prefer sharing terminology with robotics, as opposed to
narrow AI. Narrow AI and AGI are perhaps closer, so the risk of confusion is
bigger.
/R
2008/3/29, Ben Goertzel [EMAIL
Robert/Ben:. In fact. I would suggest that AGI researchers start to
distinguish
themselves from narrow AGI by replacing the over ambiguous concepts from
AI,
one by one. For example:
knowledge representation = world model.
learning = world model creation
reasoning = world model simulation
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Mike Tintner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO there is one key in fact crucial distinction between AI AGI - which
hinges on adaptivity.
An AI program has special(ised) adaptivity -can adapt its actions but only
within a known domain
An AGI has general
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Mike Tintner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Robert/Ben:. In fact. I would suggest that AGI researchers start to
distinguish
themselves from narrow AGI by replacing the over ambiguous concepts
from
AI,
one by one. For example:
knowledge representation =
It sounds interesting. Can anyone go and try it, or does it cost money or
something. Is it set up already?
Jim Bromer
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Ben Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://technology.newscientist.com/article/mg19726495.700-virtual-pets-can-learn-just-like-babies.html
Jim,
Could you keep P=NP discussion off this list? There are plenty of
powerful SAT solvers already, so if there is a path towards AGI that
needs a SAT solver, they can be used in at least small-scale
prototypes, and thus the absence of scalable SAT solver is not a
bottleneck at the moment. P=NP
Here's another try:
I think the main reason for the failure of AI is that no existing approach
is derived from a theoretically consistent definition of intelligence. Some,
such as Algorithmic Information Theory, are close but not close enough.
Scalable (general) intelligence must recursively
Hey Jim,
Glad to hear you're making some headway on such an important and challenging
problem!
Don't read to much in to Vladimir's response... he's probably just having a
hard day or something :p If it's fair game to talk about all the other
narrow-AI topics on this list, talking about SAT is
Nothing has been publicly released yet, it's still at the
research-prototype stage ... I'll announce when we have some kind of
product release...
ben
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Jim Bromer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It sounds interesting. Can anyone go and try it, or does it cost money or
