Matt,
On 12/4/08, Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- On Wed, 12/3/08, Steve Richfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I appears obvious to me that the first person who proposes the
following things together as a workable standard, will own the future
'web. This because the world will enter
--- On Wed, 12/3/08, Ben Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, LTP is definitely real ... and I'm quite sure the scheme you
describe is *not* how learning works in the brain ;-) ,,,
but I'm equally sure that the full story has not yet been
uncovered...
I have attached a program that
--- On Fri, 12/5/08, Steve Richfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If only people included two absolutely critical pieces of metadata in their
postings, then you and Google would be absolutely right. Unfortunately, they
do NOT ever include this metadata, and it simply cannot be gleaned from the
Matt,
If your program can't handle natural language with all its ambiguities,
then it isn't AGI.
Internet AGIs are the technology of the future, and always will be. There
will NEVER EVER in a million years be a thinking Internet silicon
intelligence that will be able to solve substantial
