Judging from your posts, you have solved the AI problem in 2007, 2006,
2005,
On 1/15/07, A. T. Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Mahoney wrote:
[...] Lenat briefly mentions
Sergey's (one of Google's founders) goal of solving AI by 2020.
FWIW I solved AI theory-wise in 1979 and
--- YKY (Yan King Yin) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not an academic (left uni a couple years ago) so I can't get academic
funding for this. If I can't start an AI business I'd have to entirely give
up AI as a career. I hope you can understand these circumstances.
Aren't there companies
On 1/18/07, Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- YKY (Yan King Yin) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not an academic (left uni a couple years ago) so I can't get academic
funding for this. If I can't start an AI business I'd have to entirely give
up AI as a career. I hope you can
On 1/19/07, Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think if you want to make a business out of AI, you are in for a lot of
work.First you need something that is truly innovative, that does
something that nobody else can do. What will that be? A search engine
better
than Google? A new
I agree with Ben's post that this kind a system has been tried many times
and produced very little. How can a collection of Cats have claws; Kitty
is a cat; therefore Kitty has claws. relate cat and kitty and that kitty
is slang and normally used for a young cat. A database of this type seems
Well YKY, I don't feel like rehashing these ancient arguments on this list!!
Others are welcome to do so, if they wish... ;-)
You are welcome to repeat the mistakes of the past if you like, but I
frankly consider it a waste of effort.
What you have not explained is how what you are doing is
