James: There still would be abortion/noabortion xlaw/no xlaw that would be deemed unfriendly. Mark: No. There still would be abortion/noabortion xlaw/no xlaw that would be decried by some as undesirable, horrible, or immoral. once a sufficient number of lawmakers are friendly -- only friendly
nes . .
..
Mark
- Original Message -
From:
James Ratcliff
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: [agi] Re: Four axioms (WAS
Two draft papers . . . .)
James: There still would be abortion/noabortion xlaw/no xlaw that would be
deeme
Mark, Ok I have a little better understanding of what you are trying to accomplish. If not it would be stuck forever with its first created beliefs, which looking back on the human race, def does not seem to be a good idea. Yes, I DEFINITELY want the AGI to be stuck forever with its first
From: James Ratcliff To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 3:52 PMSubject: Re: [agi] Re: Four axioms
(WAS Two draft papers . . . .)you mentioned in a couple of
responses the volition of the masses as your overall formula, I am putting a
couple of thoughts together here
From: James Ratcliff
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] Two draft papers: AI and
existential risk; heuristics and biases
Hmm, now what again is your goal, I am confused?
To maximally increase Volition
actualization/wish fulfillment (Axiom 1).
