2008/6/2 Ben Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think the PLN / indefinite probabilities approach is a complete and
coherent solution to the problem. It is complex, true, but these are
not simple issues...
I was wondering whether indefinite probabilities could be used to
represent a particle
I would imagine so, but I havent thought about the details
I am traveling now but will think about this when I get home and can
refresh my memory by rereading the appropriate sections of
Probabilistic Robotics ...
ben
On 6/2/08, Bob Mottram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/6/2 Ben Goertzel [EMAIL
Ben said:
I think the PLN / indefinite probabilities approach is a complete and
coherent solution to the problem. It is complex, true, but these are
not simple issues...
-
I just started reading Ben's paper Indefinite Probabilities for General
Intelligence and while I
On 6/2/08, Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you give an example of something expressed in PLN that
is very hard or impossible to express in FOL?
Mary is probably female
Not impossible, as Ben says, just awkward. The problem is that nearly every
statement has uncertain truth
I have briefly surveyed the research on uncertain reasoning, and found
out that no one has a solution to the entire problem. Ben and Pei
Wang may be working towards their solutions but a satisfactory one may
be difficult to find.
I think the PLN / indefinite probabilities approach is a
