Re: [ai-geostats] Re: Geostats Scam?

2006-02-09 Thread Fran Manns
Isobel, I keep in mind at all times that wonderful sentence in Clark (1979), "Systematic errors, be they sampling , analytical, or whatever, will not be picked up by geostatistics and will be transferred to any estimates produced." (p. 119) Isobel,this wisdomshould be included in the

Re: [ai-geostats] Re: Geostats Scam?

2006-02-09 Thread Fran Manns
Isobel, I keep in mind at all times that wonderful sentence in Clark (1979), "Systematic errors, be they sampling , analytical, or whatever, will not be picked up by geostatistics and will be transferred to any estimates produced." (p. 119) Isobel,this wisdomshould be included in the

Re: [ai-geostats] Re: Geostats Scam?

2006-02-09 Thread Fran Manns
Isobel, I keep in mind at all times that wonderful sentence in Clark (1979), "Systematic errors, be they sampling , analytical, or whatever, will not be picked up by geostatistics and will be transferred to any estimates produced." (p. 119) Isobel,this wisdomshould be included in the

Re: [ai-geostats] Re: Geostats Scam?

2006-02-09 Thread Fran Manns
Isobel, I keep in mind at all times that wonderful sentence in Clark (1979), "Systematic errors, be they sampling , analytical, or whatever, will not be picked up by geostatistics and will be transferred to any estimates produced." (p. 119) Isobel,this wisdomshould be included in the

Re: [ai-geostats] Re: Geostats Scam?

2006-02-09 Thread Fran Manns
Isobel, I keep in mind at all times that wonderful sentence in Clark (1979), "Systematic errors, be they sampling , analytical, or whatever, will not be picked up by geostatistics and will be transferred to any estimates produced." (p. 119) Isobel,this wisdomshould be included in the

FW: [ai-geostats] Re: Geostats Scam?

2006-02-09 Thread Gregoire Dubois
Title: Message 4 times ! I guess my forwarded mail should be read by the rest of the list as well to avoid similar situations in the future. Thanks Gregoire From: Gregoire Dubois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 February 2006 13:32To: 'Fran Manns'Subject: RE: [ai-geostats] Re:

Re: [ai-geostats] Re: Geostats Scam?

2006-02-09 Thread Marcel Vallée
Francis Mann et al, This is a very interesting discussion, with several interesting and valid points of view. I aggree with most of them. Here are some additional comments from a mining geologist.. As one of my professors (F.F Osborne, petrology) repeated a few times when he felt that we

Re: [ai-geostats] Re: Geostats Scam?

2006-02-09 Thread Stephen Henley
Marcel - I couldn't agree more. As someone who has worked for many years with the Russian as well as the western system of reserves/resource classification, it is my experience that the Russian system - being more prescriptive - frequently yields better resource estimates than the western,

Re:[ai-geostats] Where's the variance?

2006-02-09 Thread anleite
I will suggest Jan to read some basic geostatistics theory, and more particularly on stationary random functions. But, Jan, you are all right, geostatistics is a particular case of mathematical statistics. Please, find the Matheron thesis and read it. De: "JW" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Para: