Re: aide checks over ssh

2004-03-04 Thread John Kristoff
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 00:22:40 +0100 Matthias Zeichmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes; maybe i'm too paranoid; but i was trying to avoid to write the database to the target host. Possibly a bit too paranoid, but your idea is a good one. I'm thinking of incorporating that into the script. i did

AIDE compilation under cygwin

2004-03-16 Thread John Kristoff
Does someone have any detailed notes about installing a current version of AIDE under cygwin? mhash appears to compile OK, but the configure script in AIDE fails in its mhash library check. From the config.log: configure:2996: gcc -E -g -O2 -I/[dir]/mhash-0.8.18/lib -static conftest.c

Re: AIDE / Solaris / libmhash compilation question

2004-05-06 Thread John Kristoff
On Thu, 06 May 2004 09:20:26 -0400 Michael Shirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had fun with this when I setup AIDE on my box. I believe you need it where the checksum is running. So if you have 10 severs, they will need libmhash. Please, others, correct me if I am wrong You don't need it. On

Re: AIDE compilation under cygwin

2004-05-29 Thread John Kristoff
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 22:04:37 -0600 John Kristoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does someone have any detailed notes about installing a current version of AIDE under cygwin? mhash appears to compile OK, but the configure script in AIDE fails in its mhash library check. From the config.log

Re: my dilemma

2004-06-08 Thread John Kristoff
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 06:36:56 +0200 (CEST) Roger Grosswiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: usually, the the output of irrelevant entries can be done by not checking those. so in your /etc/aide.conf just place a ! in front of the disliked entry. i.e. !/tmp will neither check nor output any result of

Re: [Aide] hash cannot be calculated

2004-11-03 Thread John Kristoff
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 11:57:43 +0100 Richard van den Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It means that one of the following attributes was changed between the moment the file was added to the inclusion list and the moment that the hash was about to be calculated. Everyone once in awhile I've seen

[Aide] Capturing changes in directory but a privileged subdirectory

2016-06-06 Thread John Kristoff
I'm using 0.16b1 on a Linux machiine and trying to do something like this in an aide.conf: /boot R !/boot/lost\+found I'm initializing the database and running as an unprivileged user. I'm struggling to figure out how to exclude the priviledged (root only) lost+found directories (and

Re: [Aide] Capturing changes in directory but a privileged subdirectory

2016-06-08 Thread John Kristoff
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 21:25:14 + Hannes von Haugwitz wrote: > I (hopefully) fixed your issue in git fe17bdd [0]. Please try and > report back if it works or not. Unfortunately not. Here is my aide.conf: database = file:aide.db database_out = file:aide.db.new