Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: Adding /bin/ldd

2010-12-12 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Sonntag, 12. Dezember 2010, 13:04:50 schrieb davidMbrooke: On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 12:55 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Sonntag, 12. Dezember 2010, 12:40:41 schrieb davidMbrooke: Hi, I keep wishing we had ldd as part of Bering-uClibc. Turns out this already gets built

[leaf-devel] Added 'less'

2010-12-12 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Andrew; don't know if the bb less has advantages over bb more, but if we add it, the alias for less in /etc/profile might be removed. kp -- Oracle to DB2 Conversion Guide: Learn learn about native support for

Re: [leaf-devel] libgmp

2010-12-12 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Sonntag, 12. Dezember 2010, 22:34:53 schrieb Andrew: Hi all. Currently we have libgmp 4.3.2 into buildenv, and separate libgmp 5.0.1 as package. I want to remove separate library and assemble one that already present in tree. I tried to build GCC with fresh libgmp 5.0.1 and fresh libmpfr -

Re: [leaf-devel] hang at boot due to ntpd

2010-12-04 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi David; Am Samstag, 4. Dezember 2010, 11:41:11 schrieb davidMbrooke: Hi kp, Nice to see that someone reads the documentation :-) On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 07:32 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Hi David; Boot-time hang at Starting BusyBox ntpd. With some system configurations the boot

Re: [leaf-devel] hang at boot due to ntpd

2010-12-04 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Samstag, 4. Dezember 2010, 14:13:25 schrieb davidMbrooke: On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 12:20 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Hi David; Am Samstag, 4. Dezember 2010, 11:41:11 schrieb davidMbrooke: Hi kp, Nice to see that someone reads the documentation :-) On Fri, 2010-12-03

Re: [leaf-devel] hang at boot due to ntpd

2010-12-04 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Samstag, 4. Dezember 2010, 16:25:18 schrieb davidMbrooke: On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 15:12 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Samstag, 4. Dezember 2010, 14:13:25 schrieb davidMbrooke: On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 12:20 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Hi David; Am Samstag, 4. Dezember 2010

[leaf-devel] hang at boot due to ntpd

2010-12-02 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi David; Boot-time hang at Starting BusyBox ntpd. With some system configurations the boot process can appear to hang at the message Starting BusyBox ntpd. This is due to ntpd not being able to resolve an IP address for its default NTP server. After some delay this will time-out (with the

Re: [leaf-devel] tagging beta1?

2010-11-30 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Samstag, 27. November 2010, 22:30:13 schrieb davidMbrooke: On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 15:58 +, davidMbrooke wrote: On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 07:28 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote: On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 08:07 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 00:20 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: Capturing changes from Beta1

2010-11-29 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Montag, 29. November 2010, 20:26:25 schrieb davidMbrooke: Hi, I am thinking ahead to the ChangeLog for Beta2, and we have a few minor changes already... Options: 1. We could log *every* change with a Trac ticket - Even the trivial ones, and even when one of the core

[leaf-user] [Announce] LEAF Bering-uClibc 4.0-beta1

2010-11-28 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
After a long time of silence the LEAF Bering-uClibc team announces the first beta version of LEAF Bering-uClibc 4.0. Bering-uClibc 4.0 is basically Bering-uClibc 3.x brought up to date with the latest versions of the main software components. But the most important changes are: - The Linux

Re: [leaf-devel] tagging beta1?

2010-11-28 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Sonntag, 28. November 2010, 12:29:18 schrieb davidMbrooke: On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 00:13 +0200, Andrew wrote: Hi all. It'll be good to include mawk in default image file - it's needed for iptables init script. Possible images should be replaced? In CVS I fixed config files. Hi Andrew,

[leaf-devel] [Announce] LEAF Bering-uClibc 4.0-beta1

2010-11-28 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
After a long time of silence the LEAF Bering-uClibc team announces the first beta version of LEAF Bering-uClibc 4.0. Bering-uClibc 4.0 is basically Bering-uClibc 3.x brought up to date with the latest versions of the main software components. But the most important changes are: - The Linux

[leaf-devel] apkg -u is broken

2010-11-27 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi; Pls see: https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/leaf/ticket/8 for description and testcase. kp -- Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App Earn a Chance To Win $500! Tap into the largest installed PC base get more eyes

Re: [leaf-devel] compiling openswan for BuC4 - update

2010-11-25 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Freitag, 19. November 2010, 17:18:18 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Folks I checked the openswan directory into CVS, so everyone can play with it now, let me know if you encounter problems with it. Mike, could you please release the src/bering-uclibc4/source/openswan/openswan-2.6.31 directory

Re: [leaf-devel] compiling openswan for BuC4 - update

2010-11-25 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Freitag, 26. November 2010, 00:16:17 schrieb Erich Titl: Andrew on 25.11.2010 19:56, Andrew wrote: 25.11.2010 20:45, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Am Freitag, 19. November 2010, 17:18:18 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Folks I checked the openswan directory into CVS, so everyone can play

Re: [leaf-devel] tagging beta1?

2010-11-24 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Mittwoch, 24. November 2010, 22:18:56 schrieb davidMbrooke: On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 20:38 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Gents; I think it's about time to tag 4.0-beta1. I'm aware that we do have outstanding issues - like apkg merge, lack of ISDN support, kernel config improvements

Re: [leaf-devel] tagging beta1?

2010-11-24 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Dienstag, 23. November 2010, 20:38:07 schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer: Gents; I think it's about time to tag 4.0-beta1. done. New commits will go into beta2. kp -- Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App Earn a Chance

Re: [leaf-devel] tagging beta1?

2010-11-24 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Dienstag, 23. November 2010, 20:38:07 schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer: What else needs to be done before release? 1) Add wiki to our webpages 2) Add a mailinglist (cvs-auto?) for trac Mike, can you pls take of 1) and 2) ??? 4) add an apps section in cvs with the lrp's done kp

[leaf-devel] tagging beta1?

2010-11-23 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Gents; I think it's about time to tag 4.0-beta1. I'm aware that we do have outstanding issues - like apkg merge, lack of ISDN support, kernel config improvements..., but the current code runs well for months (more or less) and it's time to get some feedback and help from the community. After

Re: [leaf-devel] cvs structure

2010-11-22 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Montag, 1. November 2010, 22:04:59 schrieb davidMbrooke: On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 21:32 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: David; Am Sonntag, 31. Oktober 2010, 22:09:54 schrieb davidMbrooke: On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 20:50 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010, 20:25:58

Re: [leaf-devel] microperl

2010-11-21 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Sonntag, 21. November 2010, 11:54:10 schrieb Andrew: 21.11.2010 10:38, davidMbrooke пишет: On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 21:05 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Hi; does anyone the need to still provide a microperl version? Currently it's somewhat broken, cause the perl 5.8.8 version

Re: [leaf-devel] microperl / OT

2010-11-21 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Sonntag, 21. November 2010, 16:16:12 schrieb Tom Eastep: On 11/21/10 6:11 AM, Erich Titl wrote: Hi This is a bit off topic, but on 21.11.2010 11:54, Andrew wrote: 21.11.2010 10:38, davidMbrooke пишет: On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 21:05 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Hi; does

Re: [leaf-devel] microperl / OT

2010-11-21 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Sonntag, 21. November 2010, 18:53:25 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Tom on 21.11.2010 16:16, Tom Eastep wrote: On 11/21/10 6:11 AM, Erich Titl wrote: Hi ... Do you package Shorewall-lite (and Shorewall6-lite) for Bering? Those products were developed to meet the needs of small

Re: [leaf-devel] grsecurity

2010-11-21 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Sonntag, 21. November 2010, 15:13:03 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Folks is there a reason we dropped grsecurity? Four :) (unordered list) - lack of manpower - I've read a lot of times that grsecurity is stopped, that I've stopped to keep track of latest development. - there seems no support

Re: [leaf-devel] grsecurity

2010-11-21 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Sonntag, 21. November 2010, 19:27:24 schrieb Tom Eastep: On 11/21/10 10:16 AM, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: - we're still busy figuring the best settings for kernel config, uclibc config and to lesser extent, busybox config. Speaking of busybox, are you using the full-blown iproute2 package

[leaf-devel] microperl

2010-11-20 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi; does anyone the need to still provide a microperl version? Currently it's somewhat broken, cause the perl 5.8.8 version overrides the 5.12 version of the real perl we need for shorewall. I propose to remove microperl from the current build until we'll find a use- case. kp

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: module options for auto-loading

2010-11-15 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Montag, 15. November 2010, 14:09:29 schrieb Eric Spakman: David, If I remember correctly, the option Check tainted module is needed. But I can't remember which modules needed it. Please check before commiting that change. Hi Eric I guess you mean this one: -enabled insmod tainted

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: busybox ntpd works?

2010-11-11 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Donnerstag, 11. November 2010, 12:04:20 schrieb Andrew: Hi all. I tried to test bb ntpd how it works. Unfortunatelly, for me it can't set system time: # ntpd -d -n -p 10.255.0.2 ntpd: sent query to 10.255.0.2 ntpd: reply from 10.255.0.2: reach 0x01 offset -10.105435 delay 0.003906

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: busybox ntpd works?

2010-11-11 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Donnerstag, 11. November 2010, 16:16:10 schrieb Andrew: 11.11.2010 14:04, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Am Donnerstag, 11. November 2010, 12:04:20 schrieb Andrew: Hi all. I tried to test bb ntpd how it works. Unfortunatelly, for me it can't set system time: # ntpd -d -n -p 10.255.0.2

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: busybox ntpd works?

2010-11-11 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Donnerstag, 11. November 2010, 12:31:17 schrieb Per Sjoholm: ntpd won't adjust the clock if the time diff is to big. Try using ntpdate to set time before trying to adjust time with ntpd. /Per Per, this is (almost) true for the real ntpd, busybox ntpd applet does set the time if

Re: [leaf-devel] autoloading modules

2010-11-11 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Donnerstag, 11. November 2010, 19:05:37 schrieb davidMbrooke: On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 18:31 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Hi; I've migrated from 3.x to 4.x and copied /etc/modules.conf to have a working setup ASAP. Therefor I wasn't aware of the huge improvements in the modules area

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: module options for auto-loading

2010-11-11 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Donnerstag, 11. November 2010, 19:25:34 schrieb davidMbrooke: On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 22:28 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Mittwoch, 10. November 2010, 22:14:53 schrieb davidMbrooke: On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 19:49 +0200, Andrew wrote: Hi all. I asked in other thread about

Re: [leaf-devel] trying to get to BuC4

2010-11-11 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Donnerstag, 11. November 2010, 22:14:57 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi reading along this list for quite some time finally got me to the point that I wanted to see if that thing would compile on my box. If I observe all these changes going into CVS I am wondering how you guys keep up that pace

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: cdrom with floppy disk for config changes - still required?

2010-11-10 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Mittwoch, 10. November 2010, 22:05:40 schrieb davidMbrooke: On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 23:34 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Dienstag, 9. November 2010, 23:09:52 schrieb davidMbrooke: On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 22:39 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Dienstag, 9. November 2010, 22:08:10 schrieb

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: module options for auto-loading

2010-11-10 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Mittwoch, 10. November 2010, 18:49:36 schrieb Andrew: Hi all. I asked in other thread about this, but IMHO question is enough important to create separate topic. We must decide before beta1, how we will maintain files with module options. One way I described earlier - to rename

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: module options for auto-loading

2010-11-10 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Mittwoch, 10. November 2010, 22:14:53 schrieb davidMbrooke: On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 19:49 +0200, Andrew wrote: Hi all. I asked in other thread about this, but IMHO question is enough important to create separate topic. We must decide before beta1, how we will maintain files with module

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: cdrom with floppy disk for config changes - still required?

2010-11-09 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Dienstag, 9. November 2010, 22:08:10 schrieb davidMbrooke: Hi, I am just fixing up buildimage.pl to cope with multiple kernel variants. (Actually the script is fixed but not in CVS yet; I am still working on the accompanying configuration files.) With BuC 3.x and earlier, one of the

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: cdrom with floppy disk for config changes - still required?

2010-11-09 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Dienstag, 9. November 2010, 23:09:52 schrieb davidMbrooke: On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 22:39 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Dienstag, 9. November 2010, 22:08:10 schrieb davidMbrooke: Hi, I am just fixing up buildimage.pl to cope with multiple kernel variants. (Actually the script

Re: [leaf-devel] iptables?

2010-11-09 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Dienstag, 9. November 2010, 23:46:50 schrieb Andrew: 09.11.2010 23:52, Erich Titl пишет: on 09.11.2010 21:45, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Dienstag, 9. November 2010, 16:27:52 schrieb Andrew: 09.11.2010 00:41, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Every other, possible intrusive, change should IMHO

Re: [leaf-user] Big thanks for leaf

2010-11-08 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Freitag, 5. November 2010, 12:49:39 schrieb Mark Berndt: Hi All, I'd just like to say a big thanks for leaf and its shorewall implementation. At first I was a little disappointed to see the removal of the shorewall prototypes pseudo doco files in the leaf distro, but I think it is for

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: buildpacket failure for kmodules

2010-11-08 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Montag, 8. November 2010, 19:59:26 schrieb Andrew: 07.11.2010 21:30, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Am Sonntag, 7. November 2010, 20:18:20 schrieb Andrew: 07.11.2010 20:56, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: They can always added as every other module, if someone needs those. I assume pptp

[leaf-devel] iptables?

2010-11-08 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Andrew; I see your commits to iptabels. Will those not interfere with shorewall? kp -- The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper David G. Thomson, author of the best-selling book

Re: [leaf-devel] iptables?

2010-11-08 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Montag, 8. November 2010, 22:10:26 schrieb Andrew: 08.11.2010 23:03, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Hi Andrew; I see your commits to iptabels. Will those not interfere with shorewall? kp If you leave iptables rules file blank, tables will be blank :) Ok hope that works. I've

Re: [leaf-devel] more kernels

2010-11-07 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Sonntag, 7. November 2010, 14:12:11 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Folks on 07.11.2010 13:07, davidMbrooke wrote: On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 23:46 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: .. Bering-uClibc - No argument, I hope :-) Version - Something like 4.0-beta1 KARCH - i686

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: buildpacket failure for kmodules

2010-11-07 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Sonntag, 7. November 2010, 16:19:58 schrieb davidMbrooke: Hi, I have just run a full rebuild and buildall.sh failed on kmodules: calling buildpacket for kmodules Generating package moddb-geode cp: cannot stat `/home/leaf/src/bering-uclibc4/buildtool/staging/lib/modules/2.6.35.8-geode

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: buildpacket failure for kmodules

2010-11-07 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Sonntag, 7. November 2010, 17:11:30 schrieb Andrew: 07.11.2010 18:02, davidMbrooke пишет: On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 16:35 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Sonntag, 7. November 2010, 16:19:58 schrieb davidMbrooke: Hi, I have just run a full rebuild and buildall.sh failed on kmodules

Re: [leaf-devel] more kernels

2010-11-07 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Sonntag, 7. November 2010, 11:49:37 schrieb Andrew: 07.11.2010 00:46, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Hi; I was concerned about support for different processor yet, but Andrew did a very job and it seems to work pretty well to add additional kernels (and modules). I added i486 (speak

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: buildpacket failure for kmodules

2010-11-07 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Sonntag, 7. November 2010, 19:14:20 schrieb Andrew: 07.11.2010 19:13, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Am Sonntag, 7. November 2010, 17:11:30 schrieb Andrew: 07.11.2010 18:02, davidMbrooke пишет: On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 16:35 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Sonntag, 7. November 2010, 16:19:58

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: buildpacket failure for kmodules

2010-11-07 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Sonntag, 7. November 2010, 20:18:20 schrieb Andrew: 07.11.2010 20:56, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: They can always added as every other module, if someone needs those. I assume pptp is not as widely used as ppp - maybe I'm wrong. In some countries (for ex., Russia, Ukraine and so on) pptp

[leaf-devel] more kernels

2010-11-06 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi; I was concerned about support for different processor yet, but Andrew did a very job and it seems to work pretty well to add additional kernels (and modules). I added i486 (speak the generic one) and geode (optmized for Geode based boards like the Alix2/3). Both are somewhat smaller

Re: [leaf-devel] buildclean kernel

2010-11-05 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Donnerstag, 4. November 2010, 22:19:43 schrieb Andrew: 04.11.2010 22:32, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Hi Andrew; I'd say the unoptimized 486 kernel should be the base, but that's nitpicking. ok, I start to get it :)) I've managed to build the necessary patch, removed kernel

Re: [leaf-user] Need help configuring hardware bridge OR proxy arp

2010-11-04 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Donnerstag, 4. November 2010, 20:10:52 schrieb wfdudley: Tom, Thanks for your reply. I've been mulling this over since then. I'm not sure what pulled all documentation from the up-stream config files in favor of man pages means, but when I type man shorewall-rules I get the helpful

Re: [leaf-user] Need help configuring hardware bridge OR proxy arp

2010-11-04 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Donnerstag, 4. November 2010, 20:50:06 schrieb Tom Eastep: On 11/4/10 12:10 PM, wfdudley wrote: Tom, Thanks for your reply. I've been mulling this over since then. I'm not sure what pulled all documentation from the up-stream config files in favor of man pages means, but when I

Re: [leaf-devel] buildclean kernel

2010-11-04 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Mittwoch, 3. November 2010, 21:36:50 schrieb Andrew: 03.11.2010 22:08, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Am Mittwoch, 3. November 2010, 20:41:23 schrieb Andrew: 03.11.2010 20:53, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Am Mittwoch, 3. November 2010, 18:12:59 schrieb Andrew: 03.11.2010 18:26, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: Busybox ntpd configuration question

2010-11-04 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi dMb; Am Donnerstag, 4. November 2010, 22:16:14 schrieb davidMbrooke: Hi kp, Quick question about the new Busybox ntpd - is there a lrcfg menu option to edit /etc/default/ntpd ? I can't see one... No there is no lrcfg menu option yet. Some users may want to change the peers, others may

[leaf-devel] buildclean kernel

2010-11-03 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Andrew; the target buildtool.pl buildclean kernel is broken after support for multiple archs. (Sorry, catched a cold and I'm too dumb to fix it myself, still trying to understand how to compile another arch :)) kp

Re: [leaf-devel] buildclean kernel

2010-11-03 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Mittwoch, 3. November 2010, 18:12:59 schrieb Andrew: 03.11.2010 18:26, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Hi Andrew; the target buildtool.pl buildclean kernel is broken after support for multiple archs. (Sorry, catched a cold and I'm too dumb to fix it myself, still trying to understand how

[leaf-devel] compiling nut

2010-11-02 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi; I've never been able to build the nut package... It fails with the message: checking whether to build serial drivers... yes checking whether to build SNMP drivers... no configure: error: USB drivers requested, but libusb not found. sed: can't read Makefile: No such file or directory any

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: Shorewall(6) logging (again)

2010-11-01 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi; I looked into shorewall logging and saw that ulogd is completly broken... So for the near future we should go with syslog-ng and may decide later if ulogd is worth the effort. Am Montag, 1. November 2010, 12:24:15 schrieb davidMbrooke: Hi, We need to make another decision about

Re: [leaf-devel] Support for multiple kernel subarchs

2010-11-01 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Montag, 1. November 2010, 12:54:53 schrieb Andrew: Hi all. I have done support for multiple subarchs (or even different configs for one subarch), and it seems that it will work OK. Currently new subarch requires: 1) record in KARCHS variable in MasterInclude.mk with it's name 2) patch

Re: [leaf-devel] Support for multiple kernel subarchs

2010-11-01 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Montag, 1. November 2010, 17:49:33 schrieb Andrew: 01.11.2010 16:23, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Am Montag, 1. November 2010, 12:54:53 schrieb Andrew: Hi all. I have done support for multiple subarchs (or even different configs for one subarch), and it seems that it will work OK

Re: [leaf-devel] cvs structure

2010-11-01 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
David; Am Sonntag, 31. Oktober 2010, 22:09:54 schrieb davidMbrooke: On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 20:50 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010, 20:25:58 schrieb Andrew: Ok; I propose: - just core and contrib repository (names are not fixed), testing isn't needed - we can

Re: [leaf-devel] Support for multiple kernel subarchs

2010-11-01 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Montag, 1. November 2010, 21:29:18 schrieb Andrew: 01.11.2010 22:07, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Am Montag, 1. November 2010, 17:49:33 schrieb Andrew: 01.11.2010 16:23, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Am Montag, 1. November 2010, 12:54:53 schrieb Andrew: Hi all. I have done support for multiple

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: Shorewall(6) logging (again)

2010-11-01 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Montag, 1. November 2010, 21:51:10 schrieb davidMbrooke: On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 12:04 +, davidMbrooke wrote: On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 12:36 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Hi; I looked into shorewall logging and saw that ulogd is completly broken... So for the near future we

Re: [leaf-devel] Support for multiple kernel subarchs

2010-11-01 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Montag, 1. November 2010, 22:28:32 schrieb Andrew: 01.11.2010 22:41, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Hi Andrew; ok it starts compiling buildenv. Do I understand the current process correct, that a) a new masterinclude is needed for each arch? No, just added arch suffix

Re: [leaf-devel] hostapd fails again...solved

2010-10-31 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Sonntag, 31. Oktober 2010, 14:44:21 schrieb davidMbrooke: On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 14:29 +0200, Andrew wrote: P.S. Also there is a new question against package management: I included pptp kernel module into accel-pptp package (and made modifications to scripts - to avoid duplication of

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: Status report

2010-10-31 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Sonntag, 31. Oktober 2010, 13:55:46 schrieb davidMbrooke: Hi, Like kp and Andrew I am running Bering-uClibc4 in production and it is working well. IMHO no issues preventing a Beta release, but there are a few annoyances I intend to fix as time allows: - I get errors from snmpd like

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: Status report

2010-10-31 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi David; Am Sonntag, 31. Oktober 2010, 17:26:54 schrieb davidMbrooke: On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 15:11 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Sonntag, 31. Oktober 2010, 13:55:46 schrieb davidMbrooke: - A minor point, but Shorewall startup logs go to /var/log/shorewall.log whereas Shorewall6

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: Wiki version of User Guide

2010-10-31 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Sonntag, 31. Oktober 2010, 13:04:14 schrieb davidMbrooke: Hi kp. Thanks for the feedback. On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 01:29 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Hello; Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010, 22:15:46 schrieb davidMbrooke: Hi, I have added a lot more suggested structure

[leaf-devel] cvs structure

2010-10-31 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010, 20:25:58 schrieb Andrew: 29.10.2010 20:29, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: - Shall we provide compiled packages, as we did with Bering-uClibc (packages page), better ideas? IMHO it'll be good to provide separate packages and prebuilt full image - like it was earlier

[leaf-devel] hostapd fails again...

2010-10-30 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Montag, 18. Oktober 2010, 20:17:09 schrieb Andrew: Hi. After rebuilding all with fresh kernel (2.6.35.7) I tried to test WiFi and found that it doesn't work. Authentication pass OK, but after it nl80211 returns error -12 (cannot allocate memory) in set_key call: WPA: 1c:4b:d6:85:2d:9f

Re: [leaf-devel] hostapd fails again...solved

2010-10-30 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, 18:27:50 schrieb Andrew: 30.10.2010 19:10, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: insmod aes_generic and all is well. It doesn't loaded by default with hardware autodetection script? Have to confess that I neglected harwdare autodetection until now, may have saved some

Re: [leaf-devel] hostapd fails again...solved

2010-10-30 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, 19:19:03 schrieb Andrew: 30.10.2010 19:45, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: What about the kernel?? kp IMHO we need to provide different kernels; one - for legacy i486 or Geode (or even separate kernels), and one - with SMP, more than 4GB memory support (at least

Re: [leaf-devel] hostapd fails again...solved

2010-10-30 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, 19:56:41 schrieb Andrew: 30.10.2010 20:37, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Am Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, 19:19:03 schrieb Andrew: 30.10.2010 19:45, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: What about the kernel?? kp IMHO we need to provide different kernels; one - for legacy i486

[leaf-devel] leaf-trac

2010-10-30 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Mike can you pls add/enable a mailinglist leaf-trac, where TRAC can send mails to? thx kp -- Nokia and ATT present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest Create new apps games for the Nokia N8 for

Re: [leaf-devel] hostapd fails again...solved

2010-10-30 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, 22:01:17 schrieb Andrew: 30.10.2010 22:44, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Am Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, 19:56:41 schrieb Andrew: 30.10.2010 20:37, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Am Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, 19:19:03 schrieb Andrew: 30.10.2010 19:45, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4 aiccu is fixed [was GCC update to 4.4.5]

2010-10-29 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010, 18:49:32 schrieb Andrew: 29.10.2010 18:53, davidMbrooke пишет: On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 20:49 +0100, davidMbrooke wrote: I am now going to investigate some of the suggestions from here: http://old.nabble.com/pthread-and-daemon%28%29-problem-td27029024.html

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: Suggested Change to Default Configuration for dhcpcd

2010-10-29 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010, 21:55:47 schrieb davidMbrooke: On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 22:58 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Mittwoch, 27. Oktober 2010, 22:14:14 schrieb davidMbrooke: On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 18:44 +0100, davidMbrooke wrote: I think this is different with Bering-uClibc4

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: Wiki version of User Guide

2010-10-29 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hello; Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010, 22:15:46 schrieb davidMbrooke: Hi, I have added a lot more suggested structure to the main Wiki page for the User Guide: http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/leaf/index.php?title=Bering-uClibc_4. x_-_User_Guide In particular I have suggested where

Re: [leaf-devel] echo -e in initrd

2010-10-29 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010, 21:35:14 schrieb Andrew: Hi all. I did simple fix for 'echo -e' error - '-e' key is added only when it's needed (when shell doesn't unescape special chars without '-e').I think it'll solve troubles. Yes, it works. kp

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4 aiccu is fixed [was GCC update to 4.4.5]

2010-10-29 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Andrew; Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010, 20:25:58 schrieb Andrew: 29.10.2010 20:29, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: What about the switch of gcc you mentioned a week ago? This should be done before beta1, so we have a fixed environment to work with for the release cycle. What you mean? Sorry

Re: [leaf-devel] Fwd: Re: Bering-uClibc4: shore wall startup error on boot - further details

2010-10-28 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Mittwoch, 27. Oktober 2010, 22:15:51 schrieb Tom Eastep: Original Message Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: shorewall startup error on boot -further details Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:06:12 -0700 From: Tom Eastep teas...@shorewall.net To: davidMbrooke

Re: [leaf-devel] Fwd: Re: Bering-uClibc4: shorewall startup error on boot - further details

2010-10-28 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Thx for quick response! Am Donnerstag, 28. Oktober 2010, 22:03:31 schrieb Tom Eastep: On 10/28/10 12:28 PM, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: The difference is the latest value for temp, as you may see. Let me know, if more info is needed. The problem appears to be that the VERBOSITY variable

Re: [leaf-devel] Fwd: Re: Bering-uClibc4: shorewall startup error on boot - further details

2010-10-28 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Donnerstag, 28. Oktober 2010, 23:13:44 schrieb Tom Eastep: On 10/28/10 2:03 PM, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Thx for quick response! Am Donnerstag, 28. Oktober 2010, 22:03:31 schrieb Tom Eastep: On 10/28/10 12:28 PM, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: The difference is the latest value for temp

Re: [leaf-devel] Fwd: Re: Bering-uClibc4: shorewall startup error on boot - further details

2010-10-28 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Donnerstag, 28. Oktober 2010, 23:16:04 schrieb Tom Eastep: On 10/28/10 2:13 PM, Tom Eastep wrote: On 10/28/10 2:03 PM, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Thx for quick response! Am Donnerstag, 28. Oktober 2010, 22:03:31 schrieb Tom Eastep: On 10/28/10 12:28 PM, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote

Re: [leaf-devel] Fwd: Re: Bering-uClibc4: shorewall startup error on boot - further details

2010-10-28 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010, 00:29:09 schrieb Tom Eastep: On 10/28/10 3:07 PM, Tom Eastep wrote: On 10/28/10 3:03 PM, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Donnerstag, 28. Oktober 2010, 23:16:04 schrieb Tom Eastep: How about capturing the output of 'env' when starting Shorewall at boot? Here

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: shorewall startup error on boot - further details

2010-10-27 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi David; Am Mittwoch, 27. Oktober 2010, 18:09:06 schrieb davidMbrooke: On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 22:42 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: David; can you try with a plain image created by buildimage.pl in a virtual environment? I use qemu for fast checks... kp Hi kp, Good idea! Right

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: removing obsolete packages + lcd4linux build error

2010-10-26 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Dienstag, 26. Oktober 2010, 10:07:27 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi at 25.10.2010 23:36, Andrew wrote: 26.10.2010 00:17, Erich Titl пишет: Hi Andrew on 25.10.2010 21:41, Andrew wrote: Hi all. IMHO it's time to check clean some obsolete packages from tree before beta release. I found

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: shorewall startup error on boot - further details

2010-10-26 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Montag, 25. Oktober 2010, 22:39:53 schrieb davidMbrooke: Hi, While waiting for a full rebuild with the new GCC I am looking at my Shorewall startup problem. I added set -x to /sbin/shorewall and I can see the cause of the error messages: + run_it /var/lib/shorewall/.start start

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: shorewall startup error on boot - further details

2010-10-26 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Dienstag, 26. Oktober 2010, 19:36:38 schrieb davidMbrooke: Hi kp, On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 16:38 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Montag, 25. Oktober 2010, 22:39:53 schrieb davidMbrooke: Hi, In summary, the output from /var/lib/shorewall/.start version is being seen

Re: [leaf-devel] GCC update to 4.4.5

2010-10-25 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi; Am Sonntag, 24. Oktober 2010, 11:59:45 schrieb Andrew: 24.10.2010 12:43, davidMbrooke пишет: Hi Andrew, On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 14:13 +0300, Andrew wrote: Hi all. After testing LEAF under load I had 2 crashes (on 2.6.35.7 and even on 2.6.35.2 kernel - that was tested successfully

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: hostapd works for me

2010-10-19 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Dienstag, 19. Oktober 2010, 12:27:11 schrieb Andrew: Strange, with 2.6.35.2 I still have error -12. KP, can you try to rebuild all from scratch to ensure that it's trouble of my system, not error of distro? Sorry; I'm afraid I don't have enough time yet - I'm about to leave tomorrow for

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: hostapd works for me

2010-10-18 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Andrew; replaced my hostapdconf with the your config below and it works with 2.6.35.2. kp Am Montag, 18. Oktober 2010, 20:17:09 schrieb Andrew: 02.10.2010 23:10, davidMbrooke пишет: Hi kp, Good news - hostapd works for me! (Well, good news for me anyway :-} ) On Sat,

Re: [leaf-devel] Trac

2010-10-16 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Samstag, 16. Oktober 2010, 14:29:24 schrieb Mike Noyes: On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 12:35 +0100, davidMbrooke wrote: On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 14:22 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote: On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 20:44 +0100, davidMbrooke wrote: Do we have aligned permissions across Trac and Mediawiki? In other

Re: [leaf-devel] Trac

2010-10-16 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Samstag, 16. Oktober 2010, 21:03:19 schrieb Mike Noyes: On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 18:29 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Samstag, 16. Oktober 2010, 14:29:24 schrieb Mike Noyes: On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 12:35 +0100, davidMbrooke wrote: On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 14:22 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote

Re: [leaf-devel] Trac

2010-10-16 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Samstag, 16. Oktober 2010, 21:18:09 schrieb Mike Noyes: On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 18:29 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: -snip- I vaguely remember we once had mailinglist for tickets in the old (bug)tracker? Can we revive a new for trac? We simply missed the first report, cause none looked

Re: [leaf-user] help installing lrp/leaf/bering/etc on pc-engines wrap/alix

2010-10-15 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Freitag, 15. Oktober 2010, 23:22:36 schrieb wfdudley: Hi, I've been using an ancient version of lrp on an old pentium 60 for ever and ever, but I want to retire it because it's big and old and draws too much power. (I made drivers available once, long ago, for NIC cards for the LRP

Re: [leaf-devel] Trac - was: Talks about versioning system

2010-10-14 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Donnerstag, 14. Oktober 2010, 00:55:14 schrieb Mike Noyes: On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 21:52 +0100, davidMbrooke wrote: On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 07:04 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote: KP, Please go to the page linked below, and click on Grant Admin in the Trac row. If that doesn't work, I'll

Re: [leaf-devel] Trac - was: Talks about versioning system

2010-10-14 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Donnerstag, 14. Oktober 2010, 15:27:34 schrieb Mike Noyes: On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 12:55 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Donnerstag, 14. Oktober 2010, 00:55:14 schrieb Mike Noyes: On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 21:52 +0100, davidMbrooke wrote: On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 07:04 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote

Re: [leaf-devel] Trac - was: Talks about versioning system

2010-10-14 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Donnerstag, 14. Oktober 2010, 20:29:27 schrieb davidMbrooke: On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 19:22 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Donnerstag, 14. Oktober 2010, 15:27:34 schrieb Mike Noyes: KP, Understood. David, What changes would you like us to make to Trac? Ok, meanwhile I

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >