Re: ssh-ing in inside private network

On Tuesday 31 May 2016 23:56:02 Richard Hector wrote: > On 01/06/16 07:31, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > Now to do what I really wanted to do all along, and ssh in to run level > > one as root: > > > > lisi@Tux-II:~$ ssh root@192.168.0.5 > > ssh: connect to host 192.

Re: ssh-ing in inside private network

On Tuesday 31 May 2016 21:51:30 Joe wrote: > On Tue, 31 May 2016 20:31:32 +0100 > > Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > > --- > > Now to do what I really wanted to do all along, and ssh in to run > > level one as

Re: ssh-ing in inside private network

On Thursday 31 March 2016 15:08:24 Brian wrote: > On Thu 31 Mar 2016 at 13:27:35 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Thursday 31 March 2016 12:28:57 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > 1. Each computer should have an SSH server running (on Debian that > > > would be package opens

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

On Tuesday 31 May 2016 19:11:37 Sven Hartge wrote: > Is your system 32bit by chance? Then there will be now recent Google > Chrome, as Google discontinued the support for 32bit architectures. You can't get 64 bit for Wheezy either. Lisi

Re: How to properly install Radeon drivers for Sid

On Tuesday 31 May 2016 17:44:48 Mostafa Shahverdy wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:50:14AM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Tuesday 31 May 2016 11:42:51 Mostafa Shahverdy wrote: > > > > Why not try with older kernel that works with the driver? > > > > > >

Re: [Hampshire] Bootable USB drives

On Tuesday 31 May 2016 12:12:52 Roger Munford via Hampshire wrote: > I am trying to replace an old failed Epos system which is no longer made > with a second hand pos PC. > > The new second hand PC had its disk wiped so I had to buy a copy of > Microsoft "PosReady2009" which is a version of XP for

Re: How to properly install Radeon drivers for Sid

On Tuesday 31 May 2016 11:42:51 Mostafa Shahverdy wrote: > > Why not try with older kernel that works with the driver? > > I always keep my OS up to date, that's why I use Sid, I always want the > latest updates :) Why?? Lisi

Re: [deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk: Re: Network manager (again) Re:]

On Monday 30 May 2016 22:49:52 Lisi Reisz wrote: > (Parlez-vois français, je parle le   > français?) My spell checker can't cope with French, and I'm a lousy typist.. :-( parlez-vo*U*s français etc. Lisi

Re: [deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk: Re: Network manager (again) Re:]

On Monday 30 May 2016 22:49:52 Lisi Reisz wrote: > "When I type "english" the spell-checker > tries to correct to to "English", why?" I'd have known immediately what you > meant. correction: "When I type "english" the spell-checker

Re: [deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk: Re: Network manager (again) Re:]

On Monday 30 May 2016 20:35:40 Rodary Jacques wrote: > Thank you, I didn't know. In French (I was careful > here) languages' names and peoples' nationalities > don't take a capital letter. But towns' and countries' > names do of course. > Jacques > P.S.:I still don't see where was the joke

Re: Improper visuals after update

On Monday 30 May 2016 18:05:51 Bhasker C V wrote: > anyone ? I, for one, can't make any sense of the visual you supplied and the message, so I just gave up. Perhaps start again with explaining the problem? Lisi > > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Bhasker C V wrote: > >

Re: Gnome top bar clock

On Friday 27 May 2016 14:24:31 Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Friday 27 May 2016 14:16:50 Hársfalvi Gábor wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Is there any way to move the clock on the bar top on the screen? For > > example from center to left side. > > What desktop?? Or is it a wi

Re: [deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk: Re: Network manager (again) Re:]

On Saturday 28 May 2016 10:11:39 Lisi Reisz wrote: > Thank you in > > > advance, and again, sorry for my poor english (kspell still tells me to > > write *English* instead and nobody told me why, and this proves nobody > > looks at the first post in a thread :-D) I thin

Re: WebRTC with Firefox in Debian Jessie

On Saturday 28 May 2016 10:08:56 Curt wrote: > On 2016-05-24, Juha Heinanen wrote: > > Markos writes: > >> I just found the WebRTC (https://webrtc.org/) project but I still don't > >> understand if I already can use it as an alternative to Skype. > > > > You need a web phone and

Re: [deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk: Re: Network manager (again) Re:]

On Saturday 28 May 2016 01:28:03 Rodary Jacques wrote: > Thanks for your comments I also use apt* commands, when necessary, but > the point is that people don't seem to read thoroughly the threads they are > answering to: I don't mind using wicd, I even tried it. But it also uses >

Re: Gnome top bar clock

On Friday 27 May 2016 14:24:31 Lisi Reisz wrote: > In TDE 3.5.13.2 on Wheezy, and TDE 14.0.4 on Jessie, you click just to the > left of the clock applet to bring up a small window which offers, among > other things, to move the clock.  You choose "move the clock" and move it

Re: Gnome top bar clock

On Friday 27 May 2016 14:16:50 Hársfalvi Gábor wrote: > Hi! > > Is there any way to move the clock on the bar top on the screen? For > example from center to left side. What desktop?? Or is it a window manager? I seem to remember that you are running Gnome3 on Jessie, but you really need to

Re: [deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk: Re: Network manager (again) Re:]

On Friday 27 May 2016 01:21:25 Rodary Jacques wrote: > > Could we have a reference please for "said unstable by debian's package > > installer"? (I assume you're talking about the wicd packages, because > > someone wrote "Please note, an entry does not work with network-manager. > > Use wicd

Re: What Mid-range USB Sound Cards Work with Linux?

On Wednesday 25 May 2016 02:07:30 Martin McCormick wrote: > the debian-user list as it is primarily for helping > folks install, adjust and operate good old Debian and ubuntu > Linux. No, it is NOT for Ubuntu. :-/ Lisi

Re: wireless without network-manager... is it still possible?

On Monday 23 May 2016 21:06:56 Joe wrote: > It used to be known as Notwork Manager, Or Network Mangler. ;-) Lisi

Re: wireless without network-manager... is it still possible?

On Monday 23 May 2016 20:13:38 Brian wrote: > On Tue 24 May 2016 at 01:17:44 +1200, cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote: > > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 08:35:22PM +0100, Brian wrote: > > > "Arseholes" is the correct terminology. You've not posted enough > > > nonsense in this thread yet for it to be

Re: What can AppArmor do?

On Monday 23 May 2016 14:13:34 cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 11:11:27AM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > But I am only using us-ascii, iso-8859-1, > > utf-8 (locale) and utf-8, with a locale of en_GB.UTF-8, so not > > very abstruse in view of

Re: wireless without network-manager... is it still possible?

On Sunday 22 May 2016 22:56:36 Richard Owlett wrote: > On 5/22/2016 3:23 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 08:35:22PM +0100, Brian wrote: > >> [...] it merely indicates your incompetence. > > > > Folks, I'm out of this

Re: What can AppArmor do?

On Sunday 22 May 2016 07:43:43 cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 10:17:22PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Saturday 21 May 2016 16:56:31 cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote: > > > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 04:08:05PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > >

Re: What can AppArmor do?

On Saturday 21 May 2016 16:56:31 cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 04:08:05PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Friday 20 May 2016 15:57:27 Richard Owlett wrote: > > > That statement reminds me of one of George Orwell's characters > > > sayin

Re: Repository problem

On Saturday 21 May 2016 08:00:03 Hans wrote: > Dear debian-team, > > I suppose there is a problem with one of your repos. Probably just that mirror. Try a different mirror. Lisi > Please take a look: > > LANG=C aptitude update > . > .. > Hit ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian stable

Re: Need Urgently solution or advice - start to give up on Debian

On Friday 20 May 2016 23:59:44 Brian wrote: > On Sat 21 May 2016 at 06:45:30 +0800, Bret Busby wrote: > > On 21/05/2016, Brian wrote: > > > The OP is beginning to wish he had not mentioned Ubuntu. > > > > So, you are the original poster, and you do not want a solution to the

Re: Need Urgently solution or advice - start to give up on Debian

On Friday 20 May 2016 23:45:30 Bret Busby wrote: > So, you are the original poster, and you do not want a solution to the > problem? He wanted a solution to the problem of installing Debian. You did not offer one. > > Okay then. > > Either that, or you are simply a troll. The OP could have

Re: /etc/init.d/networking does not start everything in /etc/network/interfaces

On Friday 20 May 2016 18:08:37 Rodary Jacques wrote: > I read quite a lot of the answers to your post, and I still think there is > a problem, not linked to the kernel's interface name name. I have a wifi > interface named *everywhere* wlan0. It isn't found by network-pre.target, > network-target

Re: What can AppArmor do?

On Friday 20 May 2016 16:45:03 Richard Owlett wrote: > On 5/20/2016 10:08 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Friday 20 May 2016 15:57:27 Richard Owlett wrote: > >> That statement reminds me of one of George Orwell's characters > >> saying "It means whatever I want it t

Re: What can AppArmor do?

On Friday 20 May 2016 15:57:27 Richard Owlett wrote: > That statement reminds me of one of George Orwell's characters > saying "It means whatever I want it to mean." No, Lewis Carol, Humpty Dumpty in Alice Through The Looking Glass. “When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful

[Hampshire] Final reminder: Portsmouth LUG meeting tomorrow, Saturday May 21st

The next meeting of Portsmouth Linux User Group will be tomorrow, Saturday, 21st May, from 13:00 to 18:00 at the Broadoak Sports and Social Club, Hilsea. http://www.portsmouth.lug.org.uk/venue.html You are all warmly invited. It will be our usual Bring a Box meeting: bring your problems, bring

Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one

On Thursday 19 May 2016 12:25:41 Gene Heskett wrote: > > > cramps, took big B-12, should kick in shortly. Didn't know that one! (B12) Doesn't being old _suck_? Lisi

Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one

On Thursday 19 May 2016 12:25:41 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Thursday 19 May 2016 05:56:49 Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Thursday 19 May 2016 10:48:19 Gene Heskett wrote: > > > Yes, its the link in the sig. > > > > Which has been unreachable all morning from here.

Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one

On Thursday 19 May 2016 10:48:19 Gene Heskett wrote: > Yes, its the link in the sig. Which has been unreachable all morning from here. :-( (Morning by BST=UTC+1) Lisi

Re: Grub won't install

On Wednesday 18 May 2016 19:57:00 Marc Shapiro wrote: > On 05/17/2016 09:13 PM, J Mo wrote: > > lilo is ultra-ancient. I don't even know if it works with modern kernels. > > Lilo definitely still works with current kernels. I started out using > lilo 17 or 18 years ago and I am still using it now

Re: /etc/init.d/networking does not start everything in /etc/network/interfaces

On Wednesday 18 May 2016 16:54:49 Gene Heskett wrote: > "auto lo eth0" auto lo and auto eth0 now?? Lisi It may not solve anything, but when rationality seems to fail one has to resort to magic, and just get the incantation right Lisi

Re: /etc/init.d/networking does not start everything in /etc/network/interfaces

On Wednesday 18 May 2016 16:14:36 Gene Heskett wrote: > auto lo eth0 eth1 > > Its there in the complete interfaces file I just posted, and you snipped. Gene - we have, I think, established that your set-up doesn't work the way predicted. The one thing that looks very different to me is the

Re: /etc/init.d/networking does not start everything in /etc/network/interfaces

On Wednesday 18 May 2016 14:42:27 Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > * Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> [2016-05-18 12:31 +0100]: > > On Tuesday 17 May 2016 18:29:36 Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > [...] > > > > /etc/init.d/networking stop does ifdown -a > > &

Re: /etc/init.d/networking does not start everything in /etc/network/interfaces

On Tuesday 17 May 2016 18:29:36 Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > * Gilles Mocellin [2016-05-17 19:09 +0200]: > > Le 17/05/2016 à 14:34, Mimiko a écrit : > > > On 17.05.2016 15:16, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > > > Ask your search engine: "init.d/networking restart is

Re: Something never understood: see USB storage in CLI & mc

On Wednesday 18 May 2016 12:14:00 Ron Leach wrote: > On 18/05/2016 10:40, Felix Miata wrote: > > Ron Leach composed on 2016-05-18 10:30 (UTC+0100): > >> I'd be grateful for any advice on where to find the physical device to > >> use in a mount command. > > > > # lsscsi > > ... > > [9:0:0:0] disk

Re: RANT: Virtual filesystems are getting out of control

On Wednesday 18 May 2016 07:52:03 Håkon Alstadheim wrote: > Den 18. mai 2016 06:51, skrev David Wright: > > $ mount -t ext3 ; mount -t ext4 > > Or, to get only real devices listed: mount | grep '^/' . > Frees you from knowing fstype. > > > $ man bash for info on aliases and shell functions. > >

Re: Need Urgently solution or advice - start to give up on Debian

On Tuesday 17 May 2016 23:01:35 YIM Programming Izhar Mashkif wrote: > Hello all. > > I have a problem with installing Debian as described at that discussion. > The problem is that my time is over I have a other computer that I must > install there OS or I will stay without Computer. > > I really

Re: /etc/init.d/networking does not start everything in /etc/network/interfaces

On Tuesday 17 May 2016 23:43:08 Gene Heskett wrote: [snip] If it ain't broke, hit it with a hammer? ;-) Lisi

Re: /etc/init.d/networking does not start everything in /etc/network/interfaces

On Tuesday 17 May 2016 15:38:52 Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > * Gene Heskett [2016-05-17 09:56 -0400]: > > On Tuesday 17 May 2016 09:08:55 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > [...] > > > > In my opinion, a warning is in order ("this might not be doing > > > what you think it does"),

[Hampshire] Portsmouth LUG meeting on Saturday May 21st

The next meeting of Portsmouth Linux User Group will be next Saturday, 21st May, from 13:00 to 18:00 at the Broadoak Sports and Social Club, Hilsea. http://www.portsmouth.lug.org.uk/venue.html You are all warmly invited. It will be our usual Bring a Box meeting: bring your problems, bring your

Re: Opera Won't Run on Wheezy [SOLVED]

On Friday 13 May 2016 09:44:43 Curt wrote: > On 2016-05-13, Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Friday 13 May 2016 01:39:23 Patrick Bartek wrote: > >> Guess I'm stuck with the unsupported Chrome.  No biggie. > > > > Because Chrome is unsupported

Re: Opera Won't Run on Wheezy [SOLVED]

On Friday 13 May 2016 01:39:23 Patrick Bartek wrote: > Guess I'm stuck with the unsupported Chrome.  No biggie. Because Chrome is unsupported for Wheezy and 32 bit, pepper flash is unsupported for Wheezy and 32 bit. It makes no difference which of the browsers that you use that uses pepper

Re: Chromium. Good Alternative for Chrome?

On Thursday 12 May 2016 08:12:22 Curt wrote: > You should probably run 'check-support-status' to obtain a list of > packages on your machine that are no longer supported security-wise. lisi@Tux-II:~$ check-support-status check-support-status: command not found lisi@Tux-II:~$ aptitude show

Re: Portable Debian?

On Wednesday 11 May 2016 23:30:52 emetib wrote: > I know this is a little off topic, yet I wrote this a while back because of > script kiddies messing with ssh on my server at the time. > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1voXlQpos4uI0qhndcIunBew1mmQbwTPl07xG5JF >8bNM/edit?usp=drive_web It checks

Re: all at a sudden Firefox

On Tuesday 10 May 2016 20:16:30 John L. Ries wrote: > traditionally hanged on Guy Fawkes Day. No, traditionally burned on Guy Fawkes Day. Lisi

Re: Flashplayer on 32 bit computers

On Monday 09 May 2016 23:38:02 Liam O'Toole wrote: > Therefore openjdk-7-* is not regarded as an > upgrade (in the Debian packaging sense) over openjdk-6-*. Instead, they > are different packages, and both can be installed at the same time. Therein lies the rub - and the explanation. Thank you.

Re: Flashplayer on 32 bit computers

On Monday 09 May 2016 23:38:02 Liam O'Toole wrote: > The openjdk-6-* packages are now obsolete and unsupported > (both by Debian and upstream), and will receive no further security > updates. Yes, I have discovered that!!! Lisi

Re: Flashplayer on 32 bit computers

On Monday 09 May 2016 22:37:06 Liam O'Toole wrote: > On 2016-05-09, Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It is also a pity that Wheezy LTS appears not to be a truly viable > > proposition for the desktop. > > True. The software versions are obviously quite

Re: Flashplayer on 32 bit computers

On Monday 09 May 2016 17:19:33 Brian wrote: > On Mon 09 May 2016 at 18:51:56 +0300, Piyavkin wrote: > > On 09.05.2016 17:18, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > >On Monday 09 May 2016 13:18:26 Dutch Ingraham wrote: > > >>what version of Windows could you purchase today that w

Re: Flashplayer on 32 bit computers

On Monday 09 May 2016 13:18:26 Dutch Ingraham wrote: > what version of Windows could you purchase today that would > operate on an Intel Pentium M 750? Windows 10 CLAIMS to run on 32 bit computers. I would have to pay £90.00 to test it, so I don't intend to do so. I haven't researched it much.

Re: Flashplayer on 32 bit computers

On Monday 09 May 2016 13:45:39 Stefan Monnier wrote: > > My client cannot run an up-to-date Flashplayer on Linux. > > Why not? AFAIK my daughter's computer (running 32bit Debian stable) has > a working flash player (and yes, I'm talking about Adobe's crap plugin, > rather than gnash which sadly

Re: Flashplayer on 32 bit computers

On Monday 09 May 2016 10:22:57 Markus Schönhaber wrote: > Lisi Reisz, Mo 09 Mai 2016 10:38:54 CEST: > > I seem to have hit the following: > > My client cannot run an up-to-date Flashplayer on Linux. If she insists > > on running Flashplayer, she can run an out of da

Flashplayer on 32 bit computers

I seem to have hit the following: My client cannot run an up-to-date Flashplayer on Linux. If she insists on running Flashplayer, she can run an out of date Flashplayer in her current Debian system (if I can get a functional one installed) or she can go out, buy and install Windows. She will

Re: libpepflashplayer.so

On Monday 09 May 2016 02:01:28 Sven Hartge wrote: > Beware: this is David who has this CPU, not Lisi, wo has not yet > provided any further info in her CPU. I have not yet gained access to the computer again, which is not mine. I have confirmed (just now) that it is a Dell Inspiron 9300

Re: libpepflashplayer.so

On Sunday 08 May 2016 12:59:27 Sven Hartge wrote: > Unless the computer is more than 10 > years old, it should be able to run 64bit. It must be because it won't! It's certainly pretty old. I'll try again - I have to admit it is a while, but I am pretty sure I tried. None-the less, I'll try

Re: libpepflashplayer.so

On Saturday 07 May 2016 23:25:35 Sven Hartge wrote: > Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Granted - but my client won't be in a hurry to buy a new computer. > > And Google says: "We intend to continue supporting the 32-bit build > > configurations on Li

Re: libpepflashplayer.so

On Saturday 07 May 2016 22:41:39 Lisi Reisz wrote: > Granted - but my client won't be in a hurry to buy a new computer. And > Google says: "We intend to continue supporting the 32-bit build > configurations on Linux to support building Chromium." Chromium still > bei

Re: libpepflashplayer.so

On Saturday 07 May 2016 19:00:54 Curt wrote: > On 2016-05-07, Sven Hartge <s...@svenhartge.de> wrote: > > Curt <cu...@free.fr> wrote: > >> On 2016-05-07, Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Has anyone got the 32 bit file of libpepflash

libpepflashplayer.so

Has anyone got the 32 bit file of libpepflashplayer.so? If so, are you willing to send it to me? Please, if you do, could you tell me which version it is. Thank you. Lisi

Re: Installing pepperflashplugin on Chromium on Wheezy which has not previously had Google-Chrome installed.

On Friday 06 May 2016 16:39:33 Sven Arvidsson wrote: > On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 12:41 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > The site in question says that it wants Flashplayer 11 but will not > > "speak" to  > > my Version: 11.2.202.577 on Firefox.   > > If I go to that si

Re: Installing pepperflashplugin on Chromium on Wheezy which has not previously had Google-Chrome installed.

On Friday 06 May 2016 17:46:52 Curt wrote: > On 2016-05-06, Sven Arvidsson wrote: > >> my Version: 11.2.202.577 on Firefox. > > > > If I go to that site without scripts, it claims to need at least > > version 13: > > Asks me for version 11 ("This content requires the Adobe Flash

Re: Installing pepperflashplugin on Chromium on Wheezy which has not previously had Google-Chrome installed.

On Friday 06 May 2016 13:08:34 Markus Schönhaber wrote: > Lisi Reisz, Fr 06 Mai 2016 13:41:50 CEST: > > I cannot get Pepperflashplugin installed on my clients computer.  I have > > aptitude installed it, but Chromium remains obstinately falshplayer free. > > You did >

Installing pepperflashplugin on Chromium on Wheezy which has not previously had Google-Chrome installed.

I know that Chromium with Pepperflashplugin can work on Wheezy because I have it working on my own desktop. A client who has never used or wanted Flash now wants to use this website: http://www.petersfieldphotographic.com/ to make a photo album. Her system had not been updated for a while.

Re: Sudo/root issues...

On Thursday 05 May 2016 20:51:45 Ralph Sanchez wrote: > Tried aptitude update and apt-get > commands, they needed root access so i did sudo on them Why not just run them as root?? Open terminal. $ su enter root password when asked. # aptitude update # aptitude safe-upgrade # aptitude

Re: Installing jessie on laptop from usb live iso

On Thursday 05 May 2016 08:19:58 Ralph Sanchez wrote: > After rereading the last response i got, i see why their issue is similar, > but the solution cant be used here because even if i had wheezy installed > before, im past the point where the hdd gets overwritten with random data. This is a fat

Re: Openssl -showcerts "verify error"

On Thursday 05 May 2016 08:08:51 Ron Leach wrote: > On 05/05/2016 00:13, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Wednesday 04 May 2016 23:58:56 Ron Leach wrote: > >> But ... following some other earlier posts by folk using a web browser > >> to reach the url (and seeming to have

Re: Openssl -showcerts "verify error"

On Wednesday 04 May 2016 23:58:56 Ron Leach wrote: > But ... following some other earlier posts by folk using a web browser > to reach the url (and seeming to have success) Curiouser and curiouser - I didn't just reach it successfully, I logged in successfully. Certificates weren't mentioned.

Re: Openssl -showcerts "verify error"

On Wednesday 04 May 2016 18:40:01 William O'Malley wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2016, at 12:25 PM, Ron Leach wrote: > > List, good afternoon, > > > > I'd appreciate some advice about how to fix an SSL error I'm hitting > > while accessing a government website required for online filing. > > Oddly, this

Re: [OT]: May Day

On Tuesday 03 May 2016 14:22:26 Piyavkin wrote: > On 03.05.2016 02:21, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > … > > So it is all a bit circular!! But I find the concepts of "International > > Workers Day" and "the proletariat" intrinsically unpleasant. I am in > &

Re: Multiple live iso's on a single bootable flash drive?

On Tuesday 03 May 2016 11:11:45 Richard Owlett wrote: > I hope the result will be a document aimed at the beginner but > not the picture book style that seems prevalent at that level. > Much Linux documentation is written by experts for experts. Or by "experts" for (those they consider) Noddies.

Re: Posting picture files

On Tuesday 03 May 2016 04:18:59 Gary Roach wrote: > I still haven't found a solution for the disappearance of all of my > desktop icons. They are replaced with little transparent squares. They > still work though. This problem got lost. I should start a new thread and explain it clearly,

Re: Posting picture files

On Tuesday 03 May 2016 00:38:53 Gary Roach wrote: > Someone needs to figure out a way to handle this without > penalizing the rest of us. "The rest of us" don't have any desire to send pictures and are not being penalised. Lisi

Re: debian-user-digest Digest V2016 #417

On Tuesday 03 May 2016 00:38:05 Ralph Sanchez wrote: > Tom-That's what I thought too, but I thought someone said earlier that > during the install w/ encryption, Debian would also zero the disk, or > maybe I'm mistaken. As far as the process if I did what your > suggesting and I was going to do,

Re: [OT]: May Day

Hi, Dan, I have come off list because I find all the politics of this very unpleasant. But I liked your response (inaccurate as it has turned out to be!!!) and felt that it deserved a reply. On Sunday 01 May 2016 18:58:57 Dan Hitt wrote: > On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Lisi Reisz <l

Re: [OT]: May Day

On Monday 02 May 2016 15:07:29 Piyavkin wrote: > professional > parasites OUCH! Can we keep politics out of this - be it far left or far right? This list is not the place. Lisi

Re: Posting picture files

On Monday 02 May 2016 15:01:12 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 02 May 2016 06:18:02 Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2016-04-30 23:20:07 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > On Saturday 30 April 2016 21:12:00 Gary Roach wrote: > > > > I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or > > >

Re: Posts don't show on list

On Monday 02 May 2016 11:51:46 Brian wrote: > I don't know where you (or anyone else) gets the idea there is a 10K > maximum size limit on attachments in mails sent to -user. Here is where I (recently) got it - the CoC just says "not large". :-/ -- "Do

Re: Posts don't show on list

On Monday 02 May 2016 02:57:32 Gary Roach wrote: > > Lisi > > Lesi Accuracy is obviously not something you bother with. Lisi

Re: all at a sudden Firefox

On Monday 02 May 2016 03:31:50 Doug wrote: > On 05/01/2016 01:07 PM, Juan R. de Silva wrote: > > On Sun, 01 May 2016 09:13:30 +, Curt wrote: > >> I suppose you've tried the obvious (cough) like starting Firefox in safe > >> mode, > >> refreshing the sucker, renaming prefs.js, using a virgin

Re: In stretch, how do I disable libinput and use evdev instead?

On Sunday 01 May 2016 20:57:56 Ian Kelling wrote: > Because the mouse acceleration is bad. > > I'm using a normal mouse, and the speed of the pointer is too fast when > moving the mouse slowly. evdev has a very rich set of options, while > libinput has just a single one at runtime, which does not

Re: all at a sudden Firefox

On Sunday 01 May 2016 19:43:37 Curt wrote: > As far as here goes, in mixed company, the masculine form takes > precedence (which may or may not have anything to do with anything). Depending. "Guys" can indeed sometimes be used as the common gender, and it is "man"kind. But I object to

Re: [OT]: May Day

On Sunday 01 May 2016 19:14:59 Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > oldest continuous democratic government! > > John Hasler wrote: > > Right. It's actually Finland, of course. > > Within europe, i bet on San Marino and Iceland. San Ma

Re: [OT]: May Day

On Sunday 01 May 2016 18:13:38 Dan Hitt wrote: > (And wasn't May day an American idea originally, which > our ruling class wanted to tone down?) I am speechless!! "The earliest May Day celebrations appeared in pre-Christian times, with the Floralia, festival of Flora, the Roman goddess of

Re: Sorry. :-( Re: Posting picture files

On Sunday 01 May 2016 17:59:13 Gary Roach wrote: > Dial up or no dial up I really think Debian needs to loosen up a bit > on the site restrictions. Why? Most people manage fine. If you would only answer the questions you are asked, you would get more help faster. Lisi

Re: Posts don't show on list

On Sunday 01 May 2016 17:45:44 Gary Roach wrote: > On 05/01/2016 04:22 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Sunday 01 May 2016 02:01:12 Gary Roach wrote: > >> On 04/30/2016 03:23 PM, Brian wrote: > >>> On Sat 30 Apr 2016 at 13:00:55 -0700, Gary Roach wrote: > >&g

Re: Posting picture files

On Sunday 01 May 2016 16:07:39 Sven Arvidsson wrote: > On Sun, 2016-05-01 at 10:39 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > I tried sending a screenshot 25 minutes ago.  It has not so far > > > > turned > > > > > up. But another email I sent 5 minutes ago has turned up.  Whilst > > > Debian Users list

Re: Fwd: kencunninghan

On Sunday 01 May 2016 15:41:53 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Sunday 01 May 2016 08:25:12 Ken Cunningham wrote: > > What do you want me to do with this > > Feed it to sa-learn --spam, because thats what it is. And meanwhile the two replies have nicely flummoxed the poor Debian spam filters. Gmail's

Sorry. :-( Re: Posting picture files

On Sunday 01 May 2016 12:33:18 Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Sunday 01 May 2016 02:12:00 Gary Roach wrote: > > I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or send > > anything other than plain text files. > > I just sent a screenshot half an hour ago a

Re: Posting picture files

On Sunday 01 May 2016 02:12:00 Gary Roach wrote: > I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or send > anything other than plain text files. I just sent a screenshot half an hour ago and it has not arrived, but another email I sent twenty minutes later has arrived. Although

Re: Posting picture files

On Sunday 01 May 2016 02:12:00 Gary Roach wrote: > I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or send > anything other than plain text files. I tried sending a screenshot 25 minutes ago. It has not so far turned up. But another email I sent 5 minutes ago has turned up.

Re: Posts don't show on list

On Sunday 01 May 2016 02:01:12 Gary Roach wrote: > On 04/30/2016 03:23 PM, Brian wrote: > > On Sat 30 Apr 2016 at 13:00:55 -0700, Gary Roach wrote: > >> I may have found the problem. When the majordomo message didn't return I > >> start digging into aol. I found the return message in the Spam bin.

Re: Posts don't show on list

On Saturday 30 April 2016 23:59:42 Mike McGinn wrote: > I bcc all mail to > myself and always get a copy. I said there had to be other simple solutions - I like that one! (Though mine makes better allowance for my appalling memory. :-/ ) Lisi

Re: Posts don't show on list

On Saturday 30 April 2016 17:26:48 Gene Heskett wrote: > Because gmail see's the echo from the list, going back to the address > that it was posted from, as a duplicate, and deletes it.  So you see the > post, confirming it got there by seeing it on the address you didn't > post it from. If, like

Re: Posts don't show on list

On Saturday 30 April 2016 15:13:06 Brian wrote: > On Fri 29 Apr 2016 at 17:17:11 -0700, Gary Roach wrote: > > On 04/29/2016 03:45 PM, Stephen Allen wrote: > > >On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 03:20:14PM -0700, Gary Roach wrote: > > >>address. But I don't think that aol or my mail client is the problem > >

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >