Source: commit-patch
Version: 2.6-2.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.6.2-1
X-Debbugs-CC: dko...@debian.org
Tags: sid trixie pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between
Source: commit-patch
Version: 2.6-2.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.6.2-1
X-Debbugs-CC: dko...@debian.org
Tags: sid trixie pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between
Hi,
On 29-02-2024 4:47 a.m., Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
@d-d:
- How can it happen that purge *t64 packages and at the same time install
the previous package, and then the so file is missing?
I mean it's clear that they use the same name, but shouldn't DPKG handle
the cleanly?
Hi,
On 29-02-2024 4:47 a.m., Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
@d-d:
- How can it happen that purge *t64 packages and at the same time install
the previous package, and then the so file is missing?
I mean it's clear that they use the same name, but shouldn't DPKG handle
the cleanly?
Hi,
On 29-02-2024 4:47 a.m., Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
@d-d:
- How can it happen that purge *t64 packages and at the same time install
the previous package, and then the so file is missing?
I mean it's clear that they use the same name, but shouldn't DPKG handle
the cleanly?
Source: fenics-dolfinx
Version: 1:0.7.3-5
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: issue
Dear maintainer(s),
Since a couple of days, our workers on s390x are dying because some test
is filling up all disk space. It *appears* that fenics-dolfinx is
Source: fenics-dolfinx
Version: 1:0.7.3-5
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: issue
Dear maintainer(s),
Since a couple of days, our workers on s390x are dying because some test
is filling up all disk space. It *appears* that fenics-dolfinx is
Hi all,
On Sun, 28 Jan 2024 10:52:38 +0100 Antonio Valentino
wrote:
Package: python3-tables-lib
This bug would need to be reassigned to the ftp.debian.org pseudo
package to actually do anything.
Version: 3.9.2-1
Severity: normal
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: antonio.valent...@tiscali.it
Hi all,
On Sun, 28 Jan 2024 10:52:38 +0100 Antonio Valentino
wrote:
Package: python3-tables-lib
This bug would need to be reassigned to the ftp.debian.org pseudo
package to actually do anything.
Version: 3.9.2-1
Severity: normal
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: antonio.valent...@tiscali.it
Source: r-cran-gbm
Version: 2.1.8.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.1.9-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: r-cran-gbm
Version: 2.1.8.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.1.9-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: r-cran-estimatr
Version: 1.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.0.2-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: r-cran-estimatr
Version: 1.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.0.2-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Hi Cacin,
On 25-02-2024 10:47 p.m., ca...@allfreemail.net wrote:
your package installs the filename brltty to both bin and sbin as opposed to
just one of those locations.
I haven't checked yet, but are these two versions of file:brltty
actually the same?
This causes a problem on a
Hi,
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:31:37 +0100 Chris Hofstaedtler
wrote:
Paul Gevers noted that src:pdns's autopkgtests fail every so often
on a large amd64 debci worker and on s390x workers. Apparently a
similar problem can be seen in src:pdns-recursor's debci runs.
The issue (or at least some
Hi,
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:31:37 +0100 Chris Hofstaedtler
wrote:
Paul Gevers noted that src:pdns's autopkgtests fail every so often
on a large amd64 debci worker and on s390x workers. Apparently a
similar problem can be seen in src:pdns-recursor's debci runs.
The issue (or at least some
Source: nut
Version: 2.8.1-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package. I noticed
that it regularly fails, e.g about half the time on armel. It seems that
the solution for bug #1023530
Source: nut
Version: 2.8.1-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package. I noticed
that it regularly fails, e.g about half the time on armel. It seems that
the solution for bug #1023530
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: retitle -2 FTBFS on mips64el, ppc64el and s390x
Control: reopen -2
Hi,
On 25-02-2024 5:25 p.m., Bastian Germann wrote:
As I have already written in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063799#16 this is not
true.
The failing architectures also fail
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: retitle -2 FTBFS on mips64el, ppc64el and s390x
Control: reopen -2
Hi,
On 25-02-2024 5:25 p.m., Bastian Germann wrote:
As I have already written in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063799#16 this is not
true.
The failing architectures also fail
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Jerome,
On 25-02-2024 11:39, Jerome Benoit wrote:
the upload of e-antic 2.0.2+ds-1 came with a shift of its SONAME from 1 to 3,
This is a normal library transition. Why didn't you coordinate it with
the Release Team as usual before the upload?
and autopkgtest
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Jerome,
On 25-02-2024 11:39, Jerome Benoit wrote:
the upload of e-antic 2.0.2+ds-1 came with a shift of its SONAME from 1 to 3,
This is a normal library transition. Why didn't you coordinate it with
the Release Team as usual before the upload?
and autopkgtest
Hi Bastian, Bo,
On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 00:07:10 + Debian FTP Masters
wrote:
Maintainer: Ayatana Packagers
Changed-By: Bo YU
Closes: 1052429
Changes:
snapd-glib (1.63-5.1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Update libsnapd-qt-2-1.symbols to support riscv64.
Hi Bastian, Bo,
On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 00:07:10 + Debian FTP Masters
wrote:
Maintainer: Ayatana Packagers
Changed-By: Bo YU
Closes: 1052429
Changes:
snapd-glib (1.63-5.1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Update libsnapd-qt-2-1.symbols to support riscv64.
Package: python3-pyment
Version: 0.3.4+ds-4
Severity: minor
Hi,
I just installed python3-pyment and apt informed me that it suggests
python3-pyment-doc (see below in the "System Information" section).
After a quick play, I decided I wanted to see the docs, but installing
python3-pyment-doc
Source: aflplusplus
Version: 4.08c-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.09c-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: aflplusplus
Version: 4.08c-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.09c-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: adios
Version: 1.13.1-34
Severity: normal
While looking into infrastructure issues on ci.debian.net I noticed that
we have both src:adios and src:adios2 in the archive. Should we migrate
the only reverse dependency of adios to adios2 and remove it from the
archive?
Paul
Source: peony
Version: 3.2.4-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.0.0.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: peony
Version: 3.2.4-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.0.0.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: dt-schema
Version: 2022.08.2-5
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2023.11-3
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: dt-schema
Version: 2022.08.2-5
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2023.11-3
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: amberol
Version: 0.10.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed
Source: amberol
Version: 0.10.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed
Hi Dalton,
Good to have this discussion. I'll add a few remarks on behavior in
Debian in this e-mail.
On 21-02-2024 23:50, Dalton Durst wrote:
test-src migrated after its amd64 and i386 binaries appeared. It also
has architecture-independent binaries that miraculously only showed up
after
Hi Dalton,
Good to have this discussion. I'll add a few remarks on behavior in
Debian in this e-mail.
On 21-02-2024 23:50, Dalton Durst wrote:
test-src migrated after its amd64 and i386 binaries appeared. It also
has architecture-independent binaries that miraculously only showed up
after
Source: breezy
Version: 3.3.4-1.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.3.5-5
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: castxml
Version: 0.6.2-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.6.3-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: breezy
Version: 3.3.4-1.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.3.5-5
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: castxml
Version: 0.6.2-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.6.3-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: gnome-keyring
Version: 42.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 46.1-1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: gnome-keyring
Version: 42.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 46.1-1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: ohai
Version: 17.9.0-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 18.1.3-2
Tags: sid trixie pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: ohai
Version: 17.9.0-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 18.1.3-2
Tags: sid trixie pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: ohai
Version: 17.9.0-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 18.1.3-2
Tags: sid trixie pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: ruby-omniauth-alicloud
Version: 2.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.0.0-2
Tags: sid trixie pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for
Source: ruby-omniauth-alicloud
Version: 2.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.0.0-2
Tags: sid trixie pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for
Source: ruby-omniauth-alicloud
Version: 2.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.0.0-2
Tags: sid trixie pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for
Hi Bastian,
On 21-02-2024 13:21, Bastian Germann wrote:
I am uploading a NMU to DELAYED/10 in order to fix this.
The debdiff is included.
Maybe you care to explain *why*?
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Source: endless-sky
Version: 0.10.2-6
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.10.4-1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1061241
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
Source: endless-sky
Version: 0.10.2-6
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.10.4-1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1061241
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
Source: python-pamqp
Version: 3.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.3.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: python-pamqp
Version: 3.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.3.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: expeyes
Version: 5.3.1+repack-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 5.3.1+repack-4
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than
Source: expeyes
Version: 5.3.1+repack-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 5.3.1+repack-4
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than
Source: rust-async-task
Version: 4.5.0-1.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.7.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: rust-async-task
Version: 4.5.0-1.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.7.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:37:22 + Michael Fladischer
wrote:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
src:python-watchgod has been superseded by src: python-watchfiles.
And should reverse
Source: btm
Version: 0.9.6-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed from
Source: btm
Version: 0.9.6-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed from
Source: r-cran-bigmemory
Version: 4.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.6.4-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: r-cran-bigmemory
Version: 4.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.6.4-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Control: found -1 1.5.0-1
Hi,
On Sat, 20 Jan 2024 18:47:50 -0500 =?UTF-8?Q?Jeremy_B=C3=ADcha?=
wrote:
numpydoc's autopkgtest is failing. Matthias added a path to Ubuntu to
mark it as expected fail, but without further explanation. I am
attaching a version of his patch.
The version in
Control: found -1 1.5.0-1
Hi,
On Sat, 20 Jan 2024 18:47:50 -0500 =?UTF-8?Q?Jeremy_B=C3=ADcha?=
wrote:
numpydoc's autopkgtest is failing. Matthias added a path to Ubuntu to
mark it as expected fail, but without further explanation. I am
attaching a version of his patch.
The version in
Hi,
On 15-02-2024 15:56, Dirk Hünniger wrote:
So could you Paul please post some information on
how to do that. Maybe an example.
See [1] after the first example. Replace [2] with
chromium [!armel !mips64el !s390x],
Paul
[1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html
Hi,
On 15-02-2024 15:56, Dirk Hünniger wrote:
So could you Paul please post some information on
how to do that. Maybe an example.
See [1] after the first example. Replace [2] with
chromium [!armel !mips64el !s390x],
Paul
[1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html
Hi,
On 15-02-2024 08:40, Dirk Hünniger wrote:
So it still wants to build on s390x armel and mips64el. Possibly its not
possible to drop support for an architecture that once was supported.
This is not the solution *I* had in mind. I was thinking about just
adding an architecture qualified
Hi,
On 15-02-2024 08:40, Dirk Hünniger wrote:
So it still wants to build on s390x armel and mips64el. Possibly its not
possible to drop support for an architecture that once was supported.
This is not the solution *I* had in mind. I was thinking about just
adding an architecture qualified
Source: cross-toolchain-base-ports
Version: 64
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't
Source: cross-toolchain-base
Version: 68
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: user-mode-linux
Version: 6.5um1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: user-mode-linux
Version: 6.5um1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: cross-toolchain-base-ports
Version: 64
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't
Source: cross-toolchain-base-ports
Version: 64
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't
Source: cross-toolchain-base
Version: 68
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: cross-toolchain-base
Version: 68
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Hi,
On 14-02-2024 16:53, Dirk Hünniger wrote:
If it helps to change the dependency to chromium and chromium-sandbox
from Depends to Recommends I would like to ask Georges to do so.
If you think the Depends is best, make it conditional on the
architecture, because ideally also Recommends can
Hi,
On 14-02-2024 16:53, Dirk Hünniger wrote:
If it helps to change the dependency to chromium and chromium-sandbox
from Depends to Recommends I would like to ask Georges to do so.
If you think the Depends is best, make it conditional on the
architecture, because ideally also Recommends can
Hi,
On 14-02-2024 14:27, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
At the same time, https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mediawiki2latex
says that the package could be installed,
I understand the confusing but the word "installed" on buildd.d.o means
something else than that you can install the
Hi,
On 14-02-2024 14:27, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
At the same time, https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mediawiki2latex
says that the package could be installed,
I understand the confusing but the word "installed" on buildd.d.o means
something else than that you can install the
Package: fail2ban
Version: 1.0.2-3
Severity: important
During an upgrade of fail2ban I noticed this in the apt output:
Setting up fail2ban (1.0.2-3) ...
Installing new version of config file
/etc/fail2ban/jail.d/defaults-debian.conf ...
Source: tailspin
Version: 2.0.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: tailspin
Version: 2.0.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: mediawiki2latex
Version: 8.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 8.7-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: mediawiki2latex
Version: 8.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 8.7-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: pinfish
Version: 0.1.0+ds-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.1.0+ds-4
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: pinfish
Version: 0.1.0+ds-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.1.0+ds-4
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: snapd-glib
Version: 1.63-5
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.63-5.1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
X-Debbugs-CC: Bo YU , b...@debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between
Source: snapd-glib
Version: 1.63-5
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.63-5.1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
X-Debbugs-CC: Bo YU , b...@debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between
Source: spaln
Version: 2.4.13f+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.0.2+dfsg-1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more
Source: spaln
Version: 2.4.13f+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.0.2+dfsg-1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more
Source: mathgl
Version: 8.0.1-4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 8.0.1-5
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1063599
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable
Source: mathgl
Version: 8.0.1-4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 8.0.1-5
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1063599
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable
Source: mathgl
Version: 8.0.1-4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 8.0.1-5
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1063599
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable
Source: plplot
Version: 5.15.0+dfsg2-6
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 5.15.0+dfsg2-7+deb13u1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-m...@lists.debian.org
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are
Source: plplot
Version: 5.15.0+dfsg2-6
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 5.15.0+dfsg2-7+deb13u1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-mips@lists.debian.org
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are
Source: plplot
Version: 5.15.0+dfsg2-6
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 5.15.0+dfsg2-7+deb13u1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-m...@lists.debian.org
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are
Source: plplot
Version: 5.15.0+dfsg2-6
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 5.15.0+dfsg2-7+deb13u1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-m...@lists.debian.org
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are
Hi,
With debugging on (-ddd to autopkgtest and -d to autopkgtest-virt-qemu):
Unpacking libc6:amd64 (2.37-15~deb13u1) over (2.37-14) ...
Setting up libc6:amd64 (2.37-15~deb13u1) ...
autopkgtest: DBG: timed out on ['/tmp/autopkgtest-qemu.r683hlu9/runcmd']
['su', '-s', '/bin/bash', 'debci', '-c',
Hi,
Currently the autopkgtest of autopkgtest is in a very sad state on amd64
on ci.d.n because of podman-init. The test times out after:
5171s Preparing to unpack .../libc6_2.37-14_amd64.deb ...
5171s Unpacking libc6:amd64 (2.37-14) over (2.37-13) ...
5171s Setting up libc6:amd64 (2.37-14)
401 - 500 of 19922 matches
Mail list logo
