GitHub email lists require running nnnfree JS to join.

2024-06-11 Thread Richard Stallman
--- Start of forwarded message --- Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2024 09:44:58 +0300 Message-Id: <86jzj0djbp@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: r...@gnu.org Cc: a...@alphapapa.net, y...@rabkins.net, emacs-de...@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (message from Richard Stallman on Fri, 07 Jun 2024

Re: Feedback on the GNU Coding Standards for command-line interfaces

2024-05-31 Thread Richard Stallman
b version hasn't been updated in a while, I can do that later > this week or so. Thank you. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: Feedback on the GNU Coding Standards for command-line interfaces

2024-05-29 Thread Richard Stallman
if I can get ii fixed in Trisquel. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: Feedback on our evaluation criteria

2024-05-27 Thread Richard Stallman
? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: Feedback on the GNU Coding Standards for command-line interfaces

2024-05-26 Thread Richard Stallman
e hyphen? I installed the other fixes. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: Feedback on our evaluation criteria

2024-05-19 Thread Richard Stallman
throw hurdles in the way, such as non-free code, > captchas, 2FA, or gatekeepers - those are all part of the web culture This is a very interesting point. I will show it to someone who might write about it. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https:

Re: Feedback on our evaluation criteria

2024-05-18 Thread Richard Stallman
t problem alike. But there are various manners of treatment that we could apply to them all. This point is important, and we should make that clear to the reader. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (

Re: Feedback on our evaluation criteria

2024-05-18 Thread Richard Stallman
dging repos does not imply that we try to dictate to everyone what they can do. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: Feedback on our evaluation criteria

2024-05-16 Thread Richard Stallman
erse would want to see. That way we could look at this question more clearly. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: Feedback on our evaluation criteria

2024-05-16 Thread Richard Stallman
s, such as encouraging bad practices. I think the current classification of these two is correct, but we should talk about the gravity of the B2 failure in a way that clearly makes this distinction. And yes, we should say that about each site that fails B2. Perhaps we should say that

Re: Feedback on our evaluation criteria

2024-05-16 Thread Richard Stallman
o heed our adcice, they ca do whatever they like. If they disagree with some critera, they don't need our explicit permission to disregard those. However, for those that want to heed our advice, we sh0uld give them the same advice we give each other. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallma

Re: Feedback on our evaluation criteria

2024-05-16 Thread Richard Stallman
about this. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards

2024-05-01 Thread Richard Stallman
r needed...? Let's not adopt the term "pre-standard". It presumes that a disagreement with POSIX stanrdads can only occur because someone has not yet changed to "obey" the standard. Thay may be the case, nowadays, but let's not presume it is true without exception. --

Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards

2024-05-01 Thread Richard Stallman
uld you state that in a more unambiguous way? Does "VLA" mean "variable length arrat"? Whatever feature it means, what specificallky is the way you suggest handling it, and why? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)

Re: GNU ed 1.20.2 released

2024-04-26 Thread Richard Stallman
ces on the new release. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: A+ 0

2024-04-23 Thread Richard Stallman
done that. However, I wouldn't okject to an A+ criterion of "no nonfree JS at all in the pages" or "no JS at all in the pages." -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (http

Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-08 Thread Richard Stallman
d post links to? Even better, to move it to a more fredeom-respecting repository. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-08 Thread Richard Stallman
d post links to? Even better, to move it to a more fredeom-respecting repository. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor)

2024-04-08 Thread Richard Stallman
directory.) Are the GCC developers discussing these questions? If not, please send them a bug report about this so they start doing so. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor)

2024-04-08 Thread Richard Stallman
e with anything useful. What do others thing of this question? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor)

2024-04-08 Thread Richard Stallman
e with anything useful. What do others thing of this question? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor)

2024-04-08 Thread Richard Stallman
directory.) Are the GCC developers discussing these questions? If not, please send them a bug report about this so they start doing so. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: purpose and implementation of code reviews

2024-04-07 Thread Richard Stallman
ink it would be good to make clear and concrete recommendations. But ther ecan be more than one option of policy that a package's maintainers could choose to follow. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundati

Re: purpose and implementation of code reviews

2024-04-07 Thread Richard Stallman
e to finish pending patch reviews before making any sort of release. That might be a good compromise between the strictest approach (see above) and no rule about this specific point. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Sof

Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-05 Thread Richard Stallman
those > blessed by the user. Could you make that last part more precise and clear> > > What is an "OS package manager"? > A popular OS package manager is Debian 'apt' Thanks, now I know what you meant. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GN

Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-05 Thread Richard Stallman
those > blessed by the user. Could you make that last part more precise and clear> > > What is an "OS package manager"? > A popular OS package manager is Debian 'apt' Thanks, now I know what you meant. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GN

Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-04 Thread Richard Stallman
e proposed changes in make disclean and may propose changes in our coding standards. When considering any such change, we still should consider the question: will this actually prevent cracks, or will it rather give crackers an additional way to check that their activities can't be detected. -

Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-04 Thread Richard Stallman
e proposed changes in make disclean and may propose changes in our coding standards. When considering any such change, we still should consider the question: will this actually prevent cracks, or will it rather give crackers an additional way to check that their activities can't be detected. -

Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-04 Thread Richard Stallman
, or increased the likelihood of spotting it. For instance, checking m4 files against standard sources. and maybe some others. So let's not discard completely the idea of preventing the XZ crack. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder,

Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-04 Thread Richard Stallman
, or increased the likelihood of spotting it. For instance, checking m4 files against standard sources. and maybe some others. So let's not discard completely the idea of preventing the XZ crack. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder,

Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-04 Thread Richard Stallman
rom gnulib and > > compared to the copy in gnulib, the nonempty diff would have been > > suspicious. I have a hunch that some effort is needed to do that comparison, but that it is feasible to write a script to do it could make it easy. Is that so? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https:

Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-04 Thread Richard Stallman
rom gnulib and > > compared to the copy in gnulib, the nonempty diff would have been > > suspicious. I have a hunch that some effort is needed to do that comparison, but that it is feasible to write a script to do it could make it easy. Is that so? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https:

Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-03 Thread Richard Stallman
think this subissue pertains directly to that. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-03 Thread Richard Stallman
please explain concretely what that means? Does it mean that, for some purpose, it supports _only_ the xz compression format? I removed autom...@gnu.org from this message because I don't think this subissue pertains directly to that. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of

Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-03 Thread Richard Stallman
think this subissue pertains directly to that. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-03 Thread Richard Stallman
please explain concretely what that means? Does it mean that, for some purpose, it supports _only_ the xz compression format? I removed autom...@gnu.org from this message because I don't think this subissue pertains directly to that. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of

Re: libsystemd dependencies

2024-04-03 Thread Richard Stallman
ting -- I don't know why it uses these compression liraries. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: libsystemd dependencies

2024-04-03 Thread Richard Stallman
ting -- I don't know why it uses these compression liraries. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-02 Thread Richard Stallman
sts, > instead of source or scripts to generate that data. In this case, that > binary data was used to smuggle in heavily obfuscated object code. If this is the crucial point, we could put in the coding standards (or the maintainers' guide) not to do this. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://sta

Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-02 Thread Richard Stallman
sts, > instead of source or scripts to generate that data. In this case, that > binary data was used to smuggle in heavily obfuscated object code. If this is the crucial point, we could put in the coding standards (or the maintainers' guide) not to do this. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://sta

Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-02 Thread Richard Stallman
he packager would need to specify another key and use that to sign the files perse modifies. Or maybe, to sign all the files in the distribution. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-02 Thread Richard Stallman
he packager would need to specify another key and use that to sign the files perse modifies. Or maybe, to sign all the files in the distribution. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-02 Thread Richard Stallman
Just as long as we don't insist on perfect or nothing. Because, as you said, no change in tools could protect perfectly against this soft of devious sabotage. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation

Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-02 Thread Richard Stallman
toconf and automake, what tools are involved here? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-02 Thread Richard Stallman
Just as long as we don't insist on perfect or nothing. Because, as you said, no change in tools could protect perfectly against this soft of devious sabotage. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation

Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-02 Thread Richard Stallman
toconf and automake, what tools are involved here? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-02 Thread Richard Stallman
y slow because many packages need to be changed. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-02 Thread Richard Stallman
y slow because many packages need to be changed. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

role of GNU build system in recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-01 Thread Richard Stallman
, but I want to make sure the GNU Project is working on it. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-01 Thread Richard Stallman
ct the bogus tar ball sooner? Or would it have been likely to help the cracker be more careful about avoiding such signs? Would they balance out? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) I

Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-01 Thread Richard Stallman
ct the bogus tar ball sooner? Or would it have been likely to help the cracker be more careful about avoiding such signs? Would they balance out? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) I

Re: coreutils-9.5 released [stable]

2024-03-31 Thread Richard Stallman
Congratulations on the new release. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: LibreJS (was Re: CodeBerg addition)

2024-03-19 Thread Richard Stallman
rification can be done with LibreJS. That avoids the need for various humans to "human-verify" it. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: LibreJS (was Re: CodeBerg addition)

2024-03-19 Thread Richard Stallman
gt; do we keep things progressing so they get completed? For reviews of repo sites, we use the list repo-criteria-discuss@gnu.org. I don't know of any other way, but it seems to be enough. We're waiting for people to finish the work of evaluating codeberg. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallm

Re: make-stds.texi manual feedback

2024-03-18 Thread Richard Stallman
the configuration of the system excluded). Those probably >belong in @file{$(localstatedir)}. I was already editing the file, so I checked it in. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (http

Re: make-stds.texi manual feedback

2024-03-14 Thread Richard Stallman
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] Thanks. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU

Re: make-stds.texi manual feedback

2024-03-11 Thread Richard Stallman
{$(localstatedir)}. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: Use of Vagrant in tests poses licencing question

2024-03-10 Thread Richard Stallman
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] WHat you've done seems ok. Thanks. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org

Re: Use of Vagrant in tests poses licencing question

2024-03-10 Thread Richard Stallman
Indeed, I now see it is not listed. So there is nothing to do there. I thought it was listed. The thing to say them _would have been_ to explain the situation with Vagrant so that they could fix the directory not to describe it as free. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Dive into Coding Awesomeness with Our Cheatsheet Collection Book!

2024-03-04 Thread Richard Stallman
o because they don't allow putting links in the book > description, or there might be some restrictions as far as I know. Who are "they"? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation

Re: Use of Vagrant in tests poses licencing question

2024-02-29 Thread Richard Stallman
ation of Vagrant? We need to stop linking to the place that distributes nonfree versions of Vagrant. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: Use of Vagrant in tests poses licencing question

2024-02-29 Thread Richard Stallman
like a reasonable plan. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: Use of Vagrant in tests poses licencing question

2024-02-19 Thread Richard Stallman
https://github.com/metalinjection/viagrunts/commits/main/ has commits > from https://github.com/hashicorp/vagrant newer that 2023-08-10. Can you report these problems to people who might fix them? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https:

Re: Use of Vagrant in tests poses licencing question

2024-02-19 Thread Richard Stallman
from later Vagrant versions. But I don't know where to look for people to do that job. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: EFF and ethical repository criteria

2024-02-14 Thread Richard Stallman
; > Is this text still appropriate? Not enirely. I will look at it. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: Translating the Emacs manuals (a summary)

2024-02-12 Thread Richard Stallman
people how to handle parts of translations, patches, and translations we have not yet approved. Don't worry about it for now -- we will do it when needed, -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://f

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Should the use of C#, Mono, and .NET still be discouraged?

2024-02-09 Thread Richard Stallman
the subdirectories of Junit vary from day to day? Does it vary from machine to machine? That seems surprising to me. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Should the use of C#, Mono, and .NET still be discouraged?

2024-02-09 Thread Richard Stallman
know how easy it is to build from source. And when they do that > they often forget to also package the source code. Are you saying that only nonfree distros include Java programs and they do so by treating them as nonfree software even if in fact they are free? -- Dr Richard Stallman (htt

Re: Translation of the Org mode manual (was: Translation of manuals (was: SES manual French translation))

2024-02-08 Thread Richard Stallman
nd Org format is now capable of doing this, I will consider that good news. > Another question is that having native Org mode constructs for > manual-specific markup would make things less verbose and ad-hoc. To handle GNU manuals using Org format would not require a feature like that. --

Re: Use of Vagrant in tests poses licencing question

2024-02-07 Thread Richard Stallman
-free program, because doing so promotes surrender of freedom. See section References in the GNU Coding Standards. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https

Re: Translation of the Org mode manual (was: Translation of manuals (was: SES manual French translation))

2024-02-06 Thread Richard Stallman
ago I raised this idea, but nobody wanted to work on it. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: EFF and ethical repository criteria

2024-02-04 Thread Richard Stallman
the EFF's "best practices" are wise, as far as they go, for avoiding other kinds of mistreatment. I will look. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Dive into Coding Awesomeness with Our Cheatsheet Collection Book!

2024-02-03 Thread Richard Stallman
ugh. "CC BY-SA 4.0" is answer enough. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: Seeking Guidance for LibreJS Contribution and Bug Fixes

2024-02-03 Thread Richard Stallman
mplement the option to treat all JS scripts as "nontrivial". -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: bug#68687: [PATCH] Use text/org media type

2024-02-01 Thread Richard Stallman
rg never evaluates any code automatically > without user explicitly asking for it. I understand now. I agree, that is not an issue for this specific point. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (

Re: bug#68687: Org mode code evaluation (was: bug#68687: [PATCH] Use text/org media type)

2024-02-01 Thread Richard Stallman
aid that there are > security issues and that they are known. Could you plesae post a pointer to a desciption of them? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Dive into Coding Awesomeness with Our Cheatsheet Collection Book!

2024-01-31 Thread Richard Stallman
determines whether we COULD use a book. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

rendering of singlequote

2024-01-30 Thread Richard Stallman
the @samp{'} character (single quote) in the character constant, @dfn{escape} it with a backslash (@samp{\}). This character constant looks like @code{'\''}. The backslash character here Is there a newer Texinfo release which fixes this? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief

Re: Seeking Guidance for LibreJS Contribution and Bug Fixes

2024-01-29 Thread Richard Stallman
isable > > librejs. Do you or anyone else know what this is about? I'm also cc'ing > > rms since the issue description says "Request by RMS". Icecat allows the user to enable or disable any extension that is loaded. That can be used to disable LibreJS. -- Dr Richard Stallman

Re: bug#68687: [PATCH] Use text/org media type

2024-01-29 Thread Richard Stallman
ived or fetched Org > files must be treated with some precautions, but it is another story. I was not aware of this issue. Let's look at it concretely now so we can determine what its implications are. Have people already written a list of these precautions? If so, I'd like to see i

Re: bug#68687: [PATCH] Use text/org media type

2024-01-26 Thread Richard Stallman
want to send files in Org format and why would it be useful to formally label them? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: Translating the Emacs manuals (a summary)

2024-01-26 Thread Richard Stallman
ure > that the files are properly reviewed before sending them to > emacs-devel (see above). That is not specific, so it won't be helpful. What constiutues proper review? Is that stated earlier in the document? (I can't find the whole document.) If so, maybe there is no problem. -- Dr Richard

Re: Translating the Emacs manuals (a summary)

2024-01-24 Thread Richard Stallman
to be updated or otherwise fixed, or even > bugs in Emacs. If you do not intend to provide fixes right away, > please file a bug report promptly so someone can fix it soon. > See the 'Bugs' section in the Emacs manual. > --- > Is that what you had in mind? Yes. --

Re: LibreJS (was Re: CodeBerg addition)

2024-01-24 Thread Richard Stallman
iles*, or (2) isn't necessary, so that the function works > properly even if JavaScript is disabled in the browser. I think this is a good change. Does anyone argue against it? How about if we copy the current C0.0 into level B? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNU

Re: Translating the Emacs manuals (a summary)

2024-01-24 Thread Richard Stallman
hat is the point. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: Translating the Emacs manuals (a summary)

2024-01-21 Thread Richard Stallman
f the web site use PO to help them do it. The master version of each page is in English and does not have PO markup; however, the translators maintain a PO-annotated version of each page. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Fou

New article: The Moral and the Legal

2024-01-19 Thread Richard Stallman
/philosophy/the-moral-and-the-legal.html. It's about how the legal level of an issue relates to the moral level, particularly for issues about nonfree software. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Should the use of C#, Mono, and .NET still be discouraged?

2024-01-18 Thread Richard Stallman
been possible to build GCC from source without a working C compiler. We can't hope to "fix" that, so let's not worry about it. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Should the use of C#, Mono, and .NET still be discouraged?

2024-01-18 Thread Richard Stallman
terms of use Clearly, packagin Mono would require checkin all this. I don't think we need to discuss this further here and now. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Should the use of C#, Mono, and .NET still be discouraged?

2024-01-18 Thread Richard Stallman
e. https://gnu.org/malware/ and other things we have published could be a good start towards this. We can work on adding whatever we find to be missing. But we must avoid saying that our list is complete so any behavior not listed is good. We should say only that "as of now we don't know of other

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Should the use of C#, Mono, and .NET still be discouraged?

2024-01-18 Thread Richard Stallman
Mono on GNU/Linux? If so, that could give us more reason to care about Mono on GNU/Linux than we had in the past. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Should the use of C#, Mono, and .NET still be discouraged?

2024-01-18 Thread Richard Stallman
long as that feature is inactive by default, and users who activate it can specify specifically who it talks to and control what topics it talks about, we don't object. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: Info download service

2024-01-17 Thread Richard Stallman
ssing has not been entirely clarified. I got the idea, a few days ago, that we were talking about managing development and release of translations of GNU manuals. You seem to be bringing up a different issue. Both issues are useful but we had better not mix them up. -- Dr Richard Stallman (

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Should the use of C#, Mono, and .NET still be discouraged?

2024-01-16 Thread Richard Stallman
d be good if they used different kinds of build mechanisms so a volunteer could have a choice of what problem to work on. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Fam

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Should the use of C#, Mono, and .NET still be discouraged?

2024-01-16 Thread Richard Stallman
quot;, that would imply it is not free software. I get the impression you mean something other than that, but what exactly does it mean? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)

Re: LibreJS (was Re: CodeBerg addition)

2024-01-15 Thread Richard Stallman
etween "is free" (verified at the time of review) for level C and > satisfies-LibreJS for level B Th enext step is to see what other people have to say about it. I'm the one who makes the decision but other people's arguments will affect my conclusions. -- Dr Richard Stallman (h

Re: LibreJS (was Re: CodeBerg addition)

2024-01-15 Thread Richard Stallman
go to > Codeberg docs instead of the choosealicense website. Unfortunately, > these fixes did not resolve the LibreJS flagging. Can someone figure out why not? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https:

Re: Info download service

2024-01-14 Thread Richard Stallman
hanges much the possibility of > having only online info manuals. Those words are alarming but vague. They seem to say that some problems are impossible to prevent, but I can't tell what problems you mean. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://g

Re: LibreJS (was Re: CodeBerg addition)

2024-01-11 Thread Richard Stallman
ter of voting, but that could be a good idea. "Satisfies LibreJS" could go in level B, leaving "is free" in level C. > Is there a chance that the simple fix to the licenses URL link will > address issues with LibreJS? Try it and see! -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://

Re: CodeBerg addition

2024-01-10 Thread Richard Stallman
ld not "give them credit for good intentions". But it is good to give them helpful feedback and encouragement in getting it right. We should tell them we're eager for them to properly implement those good intentions. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >