On 11/29/2010 5:46 PM, Mark Wall wrote:
Between the lines: Comcast wants to end mutual peering agreements (due to:
ratios, politics , greed) but we are going to spin it due to net neutrality
making it main stream media and hoping we can get comcast clients to
complain...
Not the worse angle
On 11/29/2010 6:45 PM, Aaron Wendel wrote:
I think what this really boils down to is an effect of shoddy marketing.
Access providers want to offer unlimited everything and don't want to have
to go back to their customer base and say, oh, sorry, we didn't really mean
unlimited. We didn't
On 11/28/2010 8:15 AM, Bob McConnell wrote:
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Sunday 28 November 2010 03:45:54 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:21 PM, John R. Dennisonj...@gerdesas.com wrote:
You run it in Permissive mode, you deal with the exceptions as
they arise
On 11/28/2010 7:55 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Bob McConnellrmcco...@lightlink.com
wrote:
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Sunday 28 November 2010 13:15:24 Bob McConnell wrote:
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Sunday 28 November 2010 03:45:54 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On 11/23/2010 9:18 AM, Nicolas Ross wrote:
Hi again !
I am begining to play with my new servers. I got for starter 2 nodes (1u
intel server platform, with a LSI Logic FC949ES FC card). I am like a child
playing with his new toys at christmas... I can't wait for CentOS 6 to come
out.
I do
It's on their website right now.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Debian isn't a bleeding edge distro but one built for stability. I'd
wager they had the enterprise in linux long before redhat coined the
enterprise linux term. Ubuntu is a good bleeding distro as is fedora..:)
On 11/2/2010 1:37 PM, Drew Weaver wrote:
Yes but 2 months after squeeze comes out
On 10/31/2010 3:27 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
Hi All.
Yesterday I was installing Centos 5.5 to my web server, and
it looks like the main hard drive has gone AWOL.
Fedora 12 put the file system into r/o mode.
The drive is an Hitachi, still under warranty.
There are bad sectors on it, and
my church just got some ibm x335's donated. Cent 5 is only relaly
dvd's. I do have a windows server using IIS for internal stuff. How
would i setup a local repo for the dvd so i can point the net install
iso to the windows box?
___
CentOS mailing
On 7/14/2010 1:16 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
On 7/14/10, William Warrenhescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com
wrote:
ok let me specify. Is there any real limit? I've seen some folks(and
been told by a few) that you can't more than 10 physical interfaces in a
linux system.
I think it's baloney mainly because i can't find a mention of it
anywhere. Is there REALLY a limit on the number of physical network
interfaces in the Kernel?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 7/13/2010 9:11 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Jul 13, 2010, at 8:58 PM, Eero Volotineneero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
2010/7/14 William Warrenhescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com:
I think it's baloney mainly because i can't find a mention of it
anywhere. Is there REALLY a limit on the
On 7/10/2010 10:59 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
Hi,
I have to install a small network in a school in a nearby village. The
network will be Linux-only, one server and fifteen desktops. Here's the
idea.
1) Authentication should be managed centrally on the server.
2) User home directories should
PERC s100-s300 are FAKERAID:
http://www.dell.com/downloads/global/products/pedge/en/Dell_Software_RAID_Functionality_White_Paper.pdf
I would not expect this card to work reliably due to it being
fakeraid. Take the replacement or get a real hardware raid card form
either areca or 3ware(however lsi now own 3ware so you may have to be
careful there to).
On 6/26/2010 10:59 PM, Rodrigo Trevisaneli wrote:
Well, I started that
I don't run anti-anything on my systems and haven't in over 7 years..I
have never gotten anything on my systems. it's pretty easy to do..it's
mostly behavior driven to keep yourself form getting malware. Also I
can't find it now but there was a research paper that showed the a/v
software
On 6/9/2010 7:44 PM, nate wrote:
Hey there..
I was wondering if anyone could share experiences they have had
with the Intel ICH10R SATA controller? I tried looking around
but all I could find were RAID references, I have no interest
in using the RAID functionality just basic SATA JBOD.
On 6/9/2010 8:27 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
William Warren wrote:
jsut put the bios into sata or ata mode and not raid..then the raid
functionality is zero..:
even when its enabled, the raid functionaliy of the ICH??R chips is
zero. :) enabling RAID in the BIOS simply sets
I can't find one in the tower section. AMD is gone. Any ideas anyone?
___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq
On 5/22/2010 3:39 PM, Aniruddha wrote:
Coming from Gentoo - Debian I am to trying to understand the way
CentOS works. In Debian very little happens in stable releases and you
use apt-get update to apply security updates and apt-get dist-upgrade
for a major upgrade.
In CentOS there is an
making sure i'm getting through.
___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq
On 4/17/2010 2:09 PM, Nathan Milford wrote:
Howdy
I have a Dell PowerEdge 2950-III (BIOS: 2.6.1) with a PERC6i (FW:
6.2.0-0013, DRIVER: 00.00.04.08-RH2) that is built into a single RAID5
array happily running CentOS 5.4, and has been running happily for
some time. We use it to dump
On 4/3/2010 1:39 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 08:06:44 EDT, Jeffrey Lyon said:
For small companies the cost of moving to IPv6 is far too great,
especially when we rely on certain DDoS mitigation gear that does not
yet have an IPv6 equivalent.
So? How many
On 4/3/2010 1:31 PM, George Bonser wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Larry Sheldon [mailto:larryshel...@cox.net]
Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2010 8:43 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: legacy /8
On 4/3/2010 10:34, Michael Dillon wrote:
That adoption is so low at this point
On 4/2/2010 2:22 PM, mattias wrote:
i no i can upgrade centos the new version
but can i downgrade?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Backup and reload..
I'm not surprised at the delay for RHEL 6. Consider 2.x is still
supported this means they are supporting 4 different RHEL versions right
now. I would actually wait until at least 2.x dies..if not maybe 3.x
before spitting out another version.
On 4/1/2010 7:16 AM, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
On
Having list issues..sorry.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 3/31/2010 6:55 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote:
Hopefully this e-mail is considered operational content :)
The recent thread on the new linkys kit and ipv6 support got me
thinking about CPE choice.
What good off the shelf solutions are out there? Should one buy the
high end
On 3/21/2010 9:31 AM, mattias wrote:
I upgraded my centos from 5.0 to 5.4
But i still see 5.0 n the version number
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
did you reboot?
On 3/12/2010 1:45 PM, Michal Zalewski wrote:
http://www.securityfocus.com/news/11582
While the news portal section of SecurityFocus will no longer be
offered, we think our readers will be better served by this change as
we combine our efforts with Symantec Connect and continue to
On 2/18/2010 12:50 PM, Crist Clark wrote:
On 2/18/2010 at 2:40 AM, Michelle Sullivanmatt...@sorbs.net wrote:
Laczo, Louis wrote:
Folks,
I'm looking for comments / suggestions / opinions from any providers that
have been contacted by spamhaus about excessive queries
On 2/16/2010 4:35 AM, Tino Schwarze wrote:
Hi there,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:52:04AM +0100, Tino Schwarze wrote:
I mailed my sales rep yesterday explaining my concerns and got a reply
today that he'll ask the marketing department for an official statement.
I got an answer
On 2/12/2010 3:44 PM, Sabuj Pattanayek wrote:
Hi,
Anyone know if the H200 also has this problem, e.g. I think this is
currently the lowest configuration on the R510?
Thanks,
Sabuj Pattanayek
___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
On 2/12/2010 3:44 PM, Sabuj Pattanayek wrote:
Hi,
Anyone know if the H200 also has this problem, e.g. I think this is
currently the lowest configuration on the R510?
Thanks,
Sabuj Pattanayek
___
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge@dell.com
On 2/11/2010 12:11 PM, Paul M. Dyer wrote:
Actually, Dell AMD sells a 6-way CPU. So, the CPUs can be 2-core, 4-core,
6-core, 8-core. I am not sure, but I imagine the AMD CPUs are still at
better prices than Intel.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Eric
On 2/10/2010 12:20 PM, Eric Rostetter wrote:
Quoting Mirosław Jaworskim...@ikp.pl:
We anxiously wait for further lock-ins.
I had a slippery slope rant in my last email, but I decided to remove it
before sending... See you think a bit alike...
The funny thing is, when we ran DEC
On 2/10/2010 9:15 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
At Tue, 9 Feb 2010 22:37:28 -0600 CentOS mailing listcentos@centos.org
wrote:
In our computer lab, there are 6 Centos 5.4 workstations. There is an
HP printer with jet direct card. It often works.
But sometimes users come and get me saying
On 2/9/2010 5:17 PM, howard_sho...@dell.com wrote:
Thank you very much for your comments and feedback regarding exclusive use of
Dell drives. It is common practice in enterprise storage solutions to limit
drive support to only those drives which have been qualified by the vendor.
In the
On 2/6/2010 8:57 AM, Drew Weaver wrote:
We haven't noticed this yet on R710s but ours have PERC6, As a customer of
Dell who has hundreds of these, if we do notice this, we will be using
something else in the future. It is plain too expensive, too slow, and too
difficult to get drives if we
On 2/6/2010 10:40 AM, Linda A. Walsh wrote:
I got an earful for ordering barebones machines -- Ordered the workstation
equivalent of the 610/710 with same processor.
But you can't buy a machine that's dual processor ready unless you
buy the processor from them now. They changed to a
On 2/5/2010 7:16 PM, Steve Thompson wrote:
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010, Philip Tait wrote:
Is Dell preventing the use of 3rd-party HDDs now?
This better not be true. We have an R710 on its way in which non-Dell
drives are to be installed. If this is true, the R710 will be going back
to
On 2/5/2010 7:35 PM, Mark Walkom wrote:
This thread Brandon mentioned earlier explains it a little -
http://en.community.dell.com/forums/p/19314432/19649799.aspx
From the thread;
/Yes, while on the surface I don't like the sound of it, the truth is
that Dell-certified drives have a special
On 2/2/2010 6:20 AM, Rafa? Radecki wrote:
Hi All.
I plan to use virtualization in my production environment. I plan to
use one of the following options:
- KVM;
- VMWare Esxi;
- VMWare Workstation.
I plan to install Windows 2008 as a guest. I want to use something
like LVM snapshots for
On 1/11/2010 1:33 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 1/11/2010 11:38 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
It seems X4500 (not available anymore) had Marvell SATA controllers, that
are not supported with RHEL5.
And those marvell controllers caused major grief for Sun,
On 1/7/2010 9:30 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Karanbir Singhmail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 01/06/2010 09:35 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
Hello everyone,
This is not directly related to CentOS but still: we are trying to set
up some storage servers to run
are appreciated..:)
Sincerely,
William Warren
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 12/30/2009 8:23 PM, Corey Chandler wrote:
William Warren wrote:
I have a new client that is running a fedora 4 system. Can i upgrade
that box to centos 5 with a reasonable expectation of success or should
i just back it up and do it from scratch? Also will the samba version
I'm looking at the controller myself. Have you tried updating either
the firmware on the card the drivers or both?
On 12/19/2009 10:55 PM, Gordon McLellan wrote:
The other variable is the two machines running drbd have promise raid
cards in them. I also have the same raid card in my personal
Do you have a BBU on this card? Various sites report the controller has
poor performance on writes without the bbu.
On 12/19/2009 10:55 PM, Gordon McLellan wrote:
I'm really at a loss on what to do next... Any suggestions?
___
CentOS mailing
On 12/15/2009 6:08 PM, Monty wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Todd Lyonstly...@ivenue.com wrote:
... The firmware is supposed to be fixed in the
latest released drives that the Tivo uses, double check that there
hasn't been a really recent firmware release since you last updated
On 12/16/2009 12:10 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
On 12/15/09 2:48 PM, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I have a client with a handful of USB drives connected to a CentOS
box. I am charged with binding the USB drives together into a single
LVM for a cheap storage data pool (10 x 1 TB usb drives = 10 TB
On 12/16/2009 9:34 AM, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Steve Thompson wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Steve Thompson wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I have a client with a handful of USB drives connected to a
On 11/26/2009 9:24 AM, Lucian @ lastdot.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 1:43 PM, James Bensleyjwbens...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't think you could access squid via a web front end like proxify.co.uk?
--
Regards,
James ;)
Mike Ditka - If God had wanted man to play soccer, he
On 11/25/2009 4:22 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
ML wrote:
Hi Mark,
I tried a yum upgrade php so that I could get to either 5.2 or 5.3
(currently 5.1.2) and It says nothing marked for upgrade.
How does one upgrade individual packages versus doing a plain system
upgrade (like just yum upgrade)
I'm a
On 9/14/2009 9:11 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 09/14/2009 07:42 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 14:28 +0200 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
On 09/14/2009 05:01 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 11:48 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
On 9/14/2009 9:51 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 15:11 +0200 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
However, I am not sure WHY you want to know these things. We do not
require anyone to donate to the project to use the software. We do have
expenses (like DVDs to hand out,
On 8/28/2009 6:11 PM, Peter Beckman wrote:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Hiers, David wrote:
Governments already license stock brokers, pilots, commercial drivers,
accountants, engineers, all sorts of people whose mistakes can be
measured in the loss of hundreds of lives and millions of dollars.
On 8/25/2009 11:07 AM, Claudio Beretta wrote:
HiI'd like to know your experiences with running srcds in a virtualized
environment. Searching mail-archive for past discussions about this subject
didn't provide a reliable conclusion to this topic.
From what i understand, only hypervisors such
Lanny Marcus wrote:
On 8/10/09, Ron Blizzard rb4cen...@gmail.com wrote:
I set up a CentOS desktop computer for my brother and his kids. When
Firefox 3.5 came out he decided to download and install it like he
would Windows (he doesn't yet understand the repository system). He's
been
David Hubbard wrote:
Sorry for the off topic post but has anyone else been
seeing serious shipping delays on the lower end servers
from Dell? We've had no problems getting R900's
shipped within days but have a large number of the
SC1435 and other two proc servers on orders that are
four and
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Julian Thomasj...@jt-mj.net wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:35:07 -0700 Mark Tomandl wrote:
I've had this issue with the 5.3 install as well. I found that using the
text interface (as opposed to the default graphical interface) and
for some reason cent 5 now wants cd 3 as well as 1. I make sure to
uncheck everything and instlal only the base system. Bad iso or new
default?
Sincerely,
William Warren
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman
Geoff Galitz wrote:
The aim was to create platform, not
strictly focused on enterprise. We wanted create something mixed.
Something with enterprise, testing, backport levels and efforts. The
project has been started but never really haven't happened.
I'll go on the record as being
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 21/06/09 13:28, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
That page does indeed reflect the current state of play - there is
*no* centos approved or recommended commercial support entity - but
it *is* something that is being
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Spiro Harvey wrote:
from a promotional standpoint, i would avoid getting into that
centos is a volunteer effort, and i would *seriously* avoid using
the word difficulty. all i was suggesting earlier is that there
are a
What? You'd
John R. Dennison wrote:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 08:23:16PM -0700, Linux Advocate wrote:
Hell, has my centos 5.3 box been hacked??? Help !!
Yes. Reinstall; fully update components; restore *data*
from backups (you have backups, right?) and review what
John R. Dennison wrote:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 08:23:16PM -0700, Linux Advocate wrote:
Hell, has my centos 5.3 box been hacked??? Help !!
Yes. Reinstall; fully update components; restore *data*
from backups (you have backups, right?) and review what
Tosh wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi Bill,
On 05/23/2009 08:37 PM, Bill Campbell wrote:
Any comments on CentOS 5 on Intel Atom CPUs?
Something I totally left out in my last email - atleast 2 people have
reported success using C5 on Atom. I've looked at one of the
Mike Lyon wrote:
Hello All,
I am curious what formulas/equations folks use to figure out required
cooling for small datacenters in offices.
The variables I am using are the size of the room, the total amount of power
available for usage and the lightning.
Specifically, I am using the guide
Zach Tate wrote:
I use super micro based systems (1U), with 2 x 2.5GHz Intel quad cores,
12 Gig of Fully buffered RAM, and SAS drives.
They seem to hold up extremely well, and I would suggest getting the
IPMI card for remote KVM, very powerful.
Make sure you have a good network, which is
RTL-Servers wrote:
Hey,
Out of interest, how are you guys rating the octo-cores game server wise ?
Regards,
Lee
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
MHR wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us wrote:
Can I get some recommendations:
We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with
1: SLA
2: SSH access
3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source.
Would like
On 2/23/2009 2:37 PM, A. Eijkhoudt wrote:
Back on topic... I am seeing this same odd CPU usage. 75-90% load
running 1 single 32 person server.
This also lags clients when there is a lot of bullet calculation close
together.
This has to be from some recent update.
Kernel: 2.6.25.10-grsec
On 2/19/2009 9:37 AM, Ryan Harden wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
While you could probably build a linux router that is just as fast as a
real hardware router, you're always going to run into the moving pieces
part of the equation.
In almost all scenarios, moving parts are
On 2/11/2009 8:06 AM, Mathias Wolkert wrote:
I'd like to know what software people are using to document networks.
Visio is obvious but feels like a straight jacket to me.
I liked netviz but it seems owned by CA and unsupported nowadays.
What do you use?
/Tias
network notepad
On 2/8/2009 4:38 AM, Paolo Supino wrote:
Hi
Last week I had a lengthy thread in which someone indicated the my
SIL card is a FRAID (don't know if F stands for the F word or Fake,
though it doesn't really matter). I want to replace the controller
with a controller that Linux will see the
3ware, areca, adaptec
t
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
careful on adaptec..a fair amount of their cards are fraid as well.
___
CentOS
the sil is fraid or fakeraid..it's actually software raid done by a
binary often proprietary driver,..if you want to do raid one buy a real
hardware raid card or use the linux mdraid.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 2/3/2009 6:06 AM, Paolo Supino wrote:
Hi Peter
I tried that and it the result is the same: Linux only finds,
initializes and uses only 1 core ... :-( Is there anything else I can
try to have Linux initialize all 4 cores?
--
TIA
Paolo
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Peter
Is there a projected release date for CentOS-5.3?
hedidnotask...this
search the forums..when it's done..unless you would like to help..:)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Vandaman wrote:
There are security updates upstream for CentOS (4 and 5)
and it looks like the CentOS 5 ones have been rebuilt
and rolled out. How come the CentOS 4 branch lags behind,
or are the CentOS 5 devs different from the CentOS 4 devs?
If more volunteers are needed I'm sure
Stewart Williams wrote:
I have just purchased an HP ProLiant HP ML110 G5 server and install ed
CentOS 5.2 x86_64 on it.
It has the following spec:
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 3065 @ 2.33GHz
4GB ECC memory
4 x 250GB SATA hard disks running at 1.5GB/s
Onboard RAID controller is enabled but at
Dragos Ruiu wrote:
On 2-Jan-09, at 9:56 AM, Robert Mathews (OSIA) wrote:
Joe Greco wrote:
[ ]
Either we take the potential for transparent MitM attacks seriously, or
we do not. I'm sure the NSA would prefer not. :-)
As for the points raised in your message, yes, there are
Rodrick Brown wrote:
A team of security researchers and academics has broken a core piece
of Internet technology. They made their work public at the 25th Chaos
Communication Congress in Berlin today. The team was able to create a
rogue certificate authority and use it to issue valid SSL
Matthew Black wrote:
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:10:33 -0800
Etaoin Shrdlu shr...@deaddrop.org wrote:
Matthew Black wrote:
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 09:51:41 -0800
Tomas L. Byrnes t...@byrneit.net wrote:
Cox Communications has fully on-shore support. Here in SD they are
actually LOCAL.
In Verizon
James Jun wrote:
How about: If there is a need, somebody will provide at a suitable
price?
If no body steps up, we don't need it.
There seems to be ample evidence, in many arenas, that naked
capitalism can have disastrous results.
And there are lot of examples and
John R Pierce wrote:
I recently put Cent 5.2 (64 bit) on a new server using a Supermicro
pdsbm-ln2+ sys board. I did the original installation at home using the
5.2 dvd I got via torrent.
Try a software-RAID.
(I just assume you used the built-in RAID, which is more likely than
not a cheap
Spike Turner wrote:
R P Herrold wrote:
yada, yada, grumble, mumble
You know after all this time the CentOS frontpage
is still showing out of date info. You and Ralph
could have stopped wasting time and simply edited
the link to 4.7 instead of 4.4 as is the case now.
Is the C in
Bart Schaefer wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bart: What version of CentOS are you running on that box?
CentOS 4.7.
Are you using GNOME?
Yes. It appears that all the evolution28-* packages on which there is
a dependency are
Pawel wrote:
Hmm that something with game sourcecode :)
I have the same configuration, but with only 1 CPU.
I can hold about 180 players with 6 public CS 1.6 servers and 5 CS:S server
(4 with TICK 100)
Everything takes about 80% CPU but we don't feel any lagging on it.
And tickrate in CS:S
Scott Silva wrote:
on 9-12-2008 2:54 AM Josh Donovan spake the following:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
The 4.7 release is syncing out to external mirrors right
now, we should have enough done for release by Monday night ( for
i386/x86_64 )
Any update?
Starting to sound like when my children
Steve Bertrand wrote:
With the time I've had, I've tried my best to keep up with every
message related to the current issue upon us related to DNS.
I am a small op, amongst many that I've met the last few days that may
need assistance. I would like at least someone from a large operation
to
the issue occurs even on a live cd so the machine's software load isn't
suspect. It's the nics.
Lorenzo Martínez Rodríguez wrote:
William Warren escribió:
post it on the centos bug tracker to start..:)
listmail wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:56:45 -0700, John R Pierce wrote
Stephen John
checkout the bugtracker..this is a long running issue. The issue stems
from newer servers/computers using sata optical drives.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I'm new to CentOS and I want to install CentOS 5.2 on an intel computer to
use it as a server.
I downloaded the CentOS 5.2 DVD iso i386
however booting from the cd's of 5.x works fine.
William Warren wrote:
checkout the bugtracker..this is a long running issue. The issue stems
from newer servers/computers using sata optical drives.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I'm new to CentOS and I want to install CentOS 5.2 on an intel
John Thomas wrote:
Rogelio wrote:
Can anyone recommend a hardened CentOS distro?
Perhaps you can find a Viagra RPM ducks
ROFL
--
Registered Microsoft Partner
My Foundation verse:
Isa 54:17
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
I'm not a fan of RAID 5 at all since it can only tolerate one failure at
all. Go with raid 10 or something like that which is able to handle
more than one failure. Intermittent, uncorrectable sector failures
during rebuilds are becoming an increasing problem with today's drives.
Rudi Ahlers
Beyond casutic...who's slaging here karanbir? He expressed his opinion
and last time i checked there wasn't a rule against that. While your
reply was inflamatory you also have the right to fire back..however
saying it's not ok to do something that wasn't against any of the rules
of this
That also doesn't take into account how many /8's are being hoarded by
organizations that don't need even 25% of that space.
Geoff Huston wrote:
Mike Leber wrote:
Since nobody mentioned it yet, there are now less than 1000 days projected
until IPv4 exhaustion:
I'm going to hit my own server with this and see if my IDS will stop
this attack.
Michael Jordan wrote:
Just Google Hackers Assistant, it's the first link.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chad Austin
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008
101 - 200 of 586 matches
Mail list logo
