G'day,
Just a small update on the Unifi security gateway stuff. They have a new
range of devices which are a lot more powerful.
(
https://store.ui.com/us/en/collections/cloud-gateway-ultra/products/ucg-ultra
)
The good news is that the limits set in the GUI now match exactly the
"rate" set in
G'day,
I'm chasing weird latency spikes in my wifi network, so on Dave T's
suggestion, I'm going to try using irtt to debug it.
I noticed irtt hasn't upgraded its Go version for a long time, and Go has
come a long way since 1.12. While I was there I spotted a bunch of lint
errors, so I just
Off topic, but awesome and I think you'll enjoy it
https://youtu.be/c2jiqkpw4VY?si=ju-H9ivyNAFBM_R0
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024, 20:57 dave seddon wrote:
> https://youtu.be/E7okBZ8NfQ8?si=Ip4Lxo1g1Xx7oy4Z
>
___
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://youtu.be/E7okBZ8NfQ8?si=Ip4Lxo1g1Xx7oy4Z
___
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
Nils - I guess you could run LibreQoS on N100?
On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 8:57 AM Nils Andreas Svee via Cake <
cake@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> On Jan 9, 2024, at 17:05, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 10:40 AM Nils Andreas Svee via Cake
> wrote:
>
> Though frankly, I don’t plan on
utor to "smart queues" they are not maintaining it well.
>
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Nils Andreas Svee
> >
> > On Jan 3, 2024, at 14:44, Pete Heist via Cake <
> cake@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2024-01-02 at 1
overhead 0b cburst 1596b/1 mpu 0b overhead
0b level 0
class fq_codel 100:2c8 parent 100:
class fq_codel 100:3df parent 100:
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 12:53 PM Sebastian Moeller wrote:
> Hi Dave.
>
> just a few comments from the peanut gallery...
>
>
> > On Jan 2, 2024, at 1
G'day,
Dave Taht and I have had a couple of phone conversations now, and he's
convinced me that rather than inserting the netem delay on each laptop,
that latency should be added by a seperate device. To this end, I've got
another little PC and a NIC coming, so that I can repeat all the tests
15 October 2023 17:11:23 CEST, dave seddon via Cake <
> cake@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
>> G'day,
>>
>> I've put more work into a test framework around the qdisc tests, but
>> unfortunately flent doesn't work easily with Ubuntu LTS (
>> https://g
G'day,
I've put more work into a test framework around the qdisc tests, but
unfortunately flent doesn't work easily with Ubuntu LTS (
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/232, which I think is an issue with
flent parsing the fping output ).
Results and graphs in this sheet:
My bad. There's a bug for this Looks like I have to downgrade fping
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/232
https://github.com/schweikert/fping/issues/203
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 8:59 AM dave seddon
wrote:
> G'day,
>
> I've been working away on automation of the tests. Pretty close to
G'day,
I've been working away on automation of the tests. Pretty close to having
much nicer tests with a lot more details. I've also got the risc-v device
working.
However, I've run into something funny with flent. Flent is not happy with
fping or ping.
to understand why )?
- What was the RTT?
- Load tool?
- ... so many questions :)
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 3:13 PM Jonathan Morton
wrote:
> > On 18 Sep, 2023, at 10:50 pm, dave seddon via Cake <
> cake@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> >
> > The cake tests so
G'day Mr David Reed,
Thanks for the comments.
Definitely agree with your sentiments and the tests definitely do NOT
simply represent Intel verse ARM.
Perhaps I should have been more clear about the objectives of the testing:
I'm curious to understand the performance of these lower end SoC
14 matches
Mail list logo
