After 7.5 update PowerBook stopped seeing iPhone hotspot

2024-04-07 Thread Sergio Had
Hi, has anyone encountered the issue? I literally used the same hotspot for sysupgrade from 7.4, that went nicely, however after rebooting into 7.5 the PowerBook cannot see it anymore. Wifi itself works: at least, ifconfig bwi0 scan shows other Wifi networks, but not the iPhone one. At the same

[neon] [Bug 434038] Please provide an updated version of Maliit that is usable

2024-04-07 Thread Sergio
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=434038 --- Comment #8 from Sergio --- To better frame my question: The development of Malitt seems to be halted 2 years ago (at least referring to github and the "framework" component. A tiny bunch of more recent commits exists for the "keyb

[neon] [Bug 434038] Please provide an updated version of Maliit that is usable

2024-04-06 Thread Sergio
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=434038 Sergio changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sergio.calleg...@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Sergio

[Discover] [Bug 485103] New: Discover 5.27.11 full screen whitout the possibily of minimizing and/or closing

2024-04-05 Thread sergio
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485103 Bug ID: 485103 Summary: Discover 5.27.11 full screen whitout the possibily of minimizing and/or closing Classification: Applications Product: Discover Version: git-stable-Plasma/5.27

[Discover] [Bug 485077] New: Discover opens full screen, covers the bottom bar, there is no button or menu to minimize or change window size.

2024-04-05 Thread sergio
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485077 Bug ID: 485077 Summary: Discover opens full screen, covers the bottom bar, there is no button or menu to minimize or change window size. Classification: Applications Product:

[SR-Users] Re: low performance with no apparent reason

2024-04-05 Thread Sergio Charrua via sr-users
s this > is per process. This much is never needed. > > On the other hand, you should probably increase the shared memory if you > are having a lot of transactions going on, TLS etc.. This is per server, so > you can configure more. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Hennin

[SR-Users] Re: low performance with no apparent reason

2024-04-05 Thread Sergio Charrua via sr-users
Thank you all for helping! I wasn't expecting such a large number of replies! I ended up partially solving the issue with a different approach. Modifying the size of the UDP Buffer did not reveal any improvement. However, modifying the memory management did improve a lot: from 330 CPS to 1800 CPS

Re: Requests to join DPT haven't been processed for months

2024-04-03 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
ber requests before and the offer was turned down. -- Sergio GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible https://sergiodj.net/

Re: [Bug 2058576] Re: FTBFS: armhf: build-time test failures

2024-04-03 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
yrings/ubuntu-archive-keyring.gpg > > > Or is there some other trick specific to the state noble is in now? Not that I know of. I only commented because you didn't mention noble-updates on your first message and I thought it was worth bringing it up. -- Sergio GPG key ID: E92F D0B3 6B14 F1F4

Re: [Bug 2058576] Re: FTBFS: armhf: build-time test failures

2024-04-03 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Wednesday, April 03 2024, Andreas Hasenack wrote: > This is very hard to troubleshoot at the moment, because I just can't > get the build-dependencies installed, either with noble or noble- > proposed: I think you need to enable noble-updates. -- Sergio GPG key ID: E92F D0B3 6B14

[Enterprise-support] [Bug 2040470] Re: MRE updates of squid for noble

2024-04-03 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
** Also affects: squid (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: squid (Ubuntu Noble) ** Changed in: squid (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sergio Durigan Junior (sergiodj) ** Tags added: server-todo ** Description changed: - Backport sq

[Bug 2040470] Re: MRE updates of squid for noble

2024-04-03 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
** Also affects: squid (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: squid (Ubuntu Noble) ** Changed in: squid (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sergio Durigan Junior (sergiodj) ** Tags added: server-todo ** Description changed: - Backport sq

[Bug 2060016] Re: package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.36-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed mysql-server-8.0 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2024-04-03 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2019003 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019003 Thank you for reporting a bug. This is a duplicate of bug #2019003, so I marked it as such. Please take a look at that other bug, there may be a workaround available for this case. Thanks. ** This bug

Wednesday Triage Report (2024-04-03)

2024-04-03 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
… [David Krauser] (https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/15507) └─ +109566 [Alberto Contreras, 2024-04-02] (https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/15507/11) Nothing to triage. -- Sergio GPG key ID: E92F D0B3 6B14 F1F4 D8E0 EB2F 106D A1C8 C3CB BF14 signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ubuntu-server

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Fedora Plasma Workstation (System-Wide)

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Belkin
> > it’s not a change. > -- > -- > Sergio Belkin > LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org > It's not a change already decided I meant :) ! sorry for the noise -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- ___ devel

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Fedora Plasma Workstation (System-Wide)

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Belkin
El mar, 2 abr 2024 a las 18:32, Adam Williamson () escribió: > On Tue, 2024-04-02 at 17:37 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: > > > > I am a happy KDE user, since the good old days of version 1.0. I > celebrate > > this decision! My recognition goes to the enormous and sustaine

[Bug 2055776] Re: After updating ubuntu, the network to which the subnet address is assigned does not become active in KVM.

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
I was able to reproduce the bug on Focal, and since we seem to carry the same version on Jammy/Mantic (and likely Noble), it's probable that the bug also happens in those releases. For future reference: # apt install -y libvirt-daemon-system bind9 dnsmasq Reboot, and try bringing up the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2055776] Re: After updating ubuntu, the network to which the subnet address is assigned does not become active in KVM.

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
I was able to reproduce the bug on Focal, and since we seem to carry the same version on Jammy/Mantic (and likely Noble), it's probable that the bug also happens in those releases. For future reference: # apt install -y libvirt-daemon-system bind9 dnsmasq Reboot, and try bringing up the

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Fedora Plasma Workstation (System-Wide)

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Belkin
ations Architect > > Fedora Project > > Matrix: @amoloney:fedora.im > > IRC: amoloney > -- > _______ > devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to >

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [mlir] [MLIR][OpenMP] Make omp.simdloop into a loop wrapper (PR #87365)

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
of testing. >From 0326e2d10e34f63cb7f32b767a611de108bddb0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sergio Afonso Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 17:20:37 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] [MLIR][OpenMP] Make omp.simdloop into a loop wrapper This patch updates the definition of `omp.simdloop` to enforce the restrictions of a wrap

[llvm-branch-commits] [mlir] [MLIR][OpenMP] Make omp.taskloop into a loop wrapper (PR #87253)

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/skatrak updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87253 >From daaf4f7fec79aeebf37b4a1d83d89d19904fb417 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sergio Afonso Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 17:05:38 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] [MLIR][OpenMP] Make omp.taskloop into a loop wrapper This pa

[llvm-branch-commits] [mlir] [MLIR][OpenMP] Make omp.distribute into a loop wrapper (PR #87239)

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/skatrak updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87239 >From 4537071171506b17de3727800e3754e412c9a967 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sergio Afonso Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 14:08:33 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] [MLIR][OpenMP] Make omp.distribute into a loop wrap

[llvm-branch-commits] [mlir] [MLIR][OpenMP] Introduce the LoopWrapperInterface (PR #87232)

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
@@ -69,6 +69,74 @@ def ReductionClauseInterface : OpInterface<"ReductionClauseInterface"> { ]; } +def LoopWrapperInterface : OpInterface<"LoopWrapperInterface"> { + let description = [{ +OpenMP operations that can wrap a single loop nest. When taking a wrapper +

[llvm-branch-commits] [mlir] [MLIR][OpenMP] Introduce the LoopWrapperInterface (PR #87232)

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
@@ -1730,9 +1730,28 @@ LogicalResult LoopNestOp::verify() { << "range argument type does not match corresponding IV type"; } + auto wrapper = + llvm::dyn_cast_if_present((*this)->getParentOp()); + + if (!wrapper || !wrapper.isWrapper()) +return

[llvm-branch-commits] [mlir] [MLIR][OpenMP] Introduce the LoopWrapperInterface (PR #87232)

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
@@ -69,6 +69,74 @@ def ReductionClauseInterface : OpInterface<"ReductionClauseInterface"> { ]; } +def LoopWrapperInterface : OpInterface<"LoopWrapperInterface"> { + let description = [{ +OpenMP operations that can wrap a single loop nest. When taking a wrapper +

[llvm-branch-commits] [mlir] [MLIR][OpenMP] Introduce the LoopWrapperInterface (PR #87232)

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
@@ -69,6 +69,74 @@ def ReductionClauseInterface : OpInterface<"ReductionClauseInterface"> { ]; } +def LoopWrapperInterface : OpInterface<"LoopWrapperInterface"> { + let description = [{ +OpenMP operations that can wrap a single loop nest. When taking a wrapper +

[llvm-branch-commits] [mlir] [MLIR][OpenMP] Introduce the LoopWrapperInterface (PR #87232)

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/skatrak updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87232 >From 2452bc75a7f2efb67a0522bbe8b0e7ba5bc3365b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sergio Afonso Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 13:04:14 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [MLIR][OpenMP] Introduce the LoopWrapperInterface This pa

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [Frontend][OpenMP] Refactor getLeafConstructs, add getCompoundConstruct (PR #87247)

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
skatrak wrote: Thank you @kparzysz for sharing your thoughts. I think it's a reasonable solution, so it's fine by me. I'll leave it to someone more familiar with the directive emitter to approve the PR though. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87247

[llvm-branch-commits] [mlir] [MLIR][OpenMP] Introduce the LoopWrapperInterface (PR #87232)

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
@@ -69,6 +69,74 @@ def ReductionClauseInterface : OpInterface<"ReductionClauseInterface"> { ]; } +def LoopWrapperInterface : OpInterface<"LoopWrapperInterface"> { + let description = [{ +OpenMP operations that can wrap a single loop nest. When taking a wrapper +

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [Frontend][OpenMP] Add functions for checking construct type (PR #87258)

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/skatrak approved this pull request. Thank you, based on the current proposal in #87247 this LGTM. If that changes, this will need another review. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87258 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [Frontend][OpenMP] Refactor getLeafConstructs, add getCompoundConstruct (PR #87247)

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/skatrak edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87247 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [Frontend][OpenMP] Refactor getLeafConstructs, add getCompoundConstruct (PR #87247)

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +//===- llvm/unittests/Frontend/OpenMPComposeTest.cpp --===// +// +// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. +// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. +// SPDX-License-Identifier:

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [Frontend][OpenMP] Refactor getLeafConstructs, add getCompoundConstruct (PR #87247)

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/skatrak commented: I think this looks reasonable if we want to both split a construct into leaf constructs and also merge multiple constructs into a single compound one, if it exists. I'm just wondering if we need that much flexibility (and complexity associated with it).

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [Frontend][OpenMP] Refactor getLeafConstructs, add getCompoundConstruct (PR #87247)

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
@@ -8,12 +8,74 @@ #include "llvm/Frontend/OpenMP/OMP.h" +#include "llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h" +#include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h" +#include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h" #include "llvm/ADT/StringRef.h" #include "llvm/ADT/StringSwitch.h" #include "llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h"

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [Frontend][OpenMP] Refactor getLeafConstructs, add getCompoundConstruct (PR #87247)

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
@@ -8,12 +8,74 @@ #include "llvm/Frontend/OpenMP/OMP.h" +#include "llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h" +#include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h" +#include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h" #include "llvm/ADT/StringRef.h" #include "llvm/ADT/StringSwitch.h" #include "llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h"

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [Frontend][OpenMP] Refactor getLeafConstructs, add getCompoundConstruct (PR #87247)

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/skatrak edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87247 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [flang][OpenMP] Move clause/object conversion to happen early, in genOMP (PR #87086)

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
@@ -58,17 +58,15 @@ void gatherFuncAndVarSyms( const ObjectList , mlir::omp::DeclareTargetCaptureClause clause, llvm::SmallVectorImpl ); +int64_t getCollapseValue(const List ); skatrak wrote: It looks like this function is only used within

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [flang][OpenMP] Move clause/object conversion to happen early, in genOMP (PR #87086)

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
@@ -2357,44 +2332,44 @@ genOMP(Fortran::lower::AbstractConverter , converter.genLocation(beginBlockDirective.source); const auto origDirective = std::get(beginBlockDirective.t).v; - const auto = - std::get(beginBlockDirective.t); - const auto = -

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [flang][OpenMP] Move clause/object conversion to happen early, in genOMP (PR #87086)

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
@@ -49,9 +49,8 @@ class ClauseProcessor { public: ClauseProcessor(Fortran::lower::AbstractConverter , Fortran::semantics::SemanticsContext , - const Fortran::parser::OmpClauseList ) - : converter(converter), semaCtx(semaCtx), -

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [flang][OpenMP] Move clause/object conversion to happen early, in genOMP (PR #87086)

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/skatrak edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87086 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [flang][OpenMP] Move clause/object conversion to happen early, in genOMP (PR #87086)

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/skatrak approved this pull request. Thank you Krzysztof, LGTM. I have a couple of suggestions, but this should be ready if you don't agree with them. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87086 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [flang][OpenMP] Move clause/object conversion to happen early, in genOMP (PR #87086)

2024-04-02 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
@@ -597,14 +599,11 @@ static void removeStoreOp(mlir::Operation *reductionOp, mlir::Value symVal) { // TODO: Generate the reduction operation during lowering instead of creating // and removing operations since this is not a robust approach. Also, removing // ops in the

[Bug 2059272] Re: libvirt domain is not listed/managed after libvirt restart with messages "internal error: no monitor path" and "Failed to load config for domain"

2024-04-01 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
Mauricio asked me to review the debdiff for Focal as well. This debdiff is different because he had to implement some code to synchronize the destruction of the worker threads with the free'ing of the thread pool. I looked at the new code, analyzed it as best as I could, asked a few questions to

[llvm-branch-commits] [mlir] [MLIR][OpenMP] Make omp.taskloop into a loop wrapper (PR #87253)

2024-04-01 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/skatrak created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87253 This patch updates the definition of `omp.taskloop` to enforce the restrictions of a wrapper operation. >From daaf4f7fec79aeebf37b4a1d83d89d19904fb417 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sergio Afonso Date: Mon

[llvm-branch-commits] [mlir] [MLIR][OpenMP] Make omp.distribute into a loop wrapper (PR #87239)

2024-04-01 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/skatrak created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87239 This patch updates the definition of `omp.distribute` to enforce the restrictions of a wrapper operation. >From 4537071171506b17de3727800e3754e412c9a967 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sergio Afonso Date:

[llvm-branch-commits] [mlir] [MLIR][OpenMP] Introduce the LoopWrapperInterface (PR #87232)

2024-04-01 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
that these operations meet the wrapper restrictions, which would break existing OpenMP loop-generating code. Rather, this will be introduced progressively in subsequent patches. >From 2452bc75a7f2efb67a0522bbe8b0e7ba5bc3365b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sergio Afonso Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 13:04

Bug#1068154: ITP: poke-elf -- GNU Poke pickle for editing ELF object files

2024-03-31 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sergio Durigan Junior X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org * Package name: poke-elf Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Jose E. Marchesi * URL : http://www.jemarch.net/poke-elf * License : GPL-3+ and others

Bug#1068154: ITP: poke-elf -- GNU Poke pickle for editing ELF object files

2024-03-31 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sergio Durigan Junior X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: poke-elf Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Jose E. Marchesi * URL : http://www.jemarch.net/poke-elf * License : GPL-3+ and others

Bug#1068154: ITP: poke-elf -- GNU Poke pickle for editing ELF object files

2024-03-31 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sergio Durigan Junior X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org * Package name: poke-elf Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Jose E. Marchesi * URL : http://www.jemarch.net/poke-elf * License : GPL-3+ and others

Re: Requesting sponsorship for the httprobe package

2024-03-30 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
Just stick to {salsa.,}debian.org and you should be fine :-). That's all I have for now. It's getting late here; I'll take another look tomorrow. Thanks! -- Sergio GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible https://sergiodj.net/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[Bug 2055422] Re: Please sync xz-utils 5.6.0-0.2 from Debian experimental

2024-03-30 Thread Sergio Oller
I just read about the backdoor on xz-utils from CVE-2024-3094 (not yet synced to Launchpad CVE, I can't use the Link to CVE feature) and I wanted to know more about Ubuntu's status. Please avoid syncing any vulnerable version. ** CVE added:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2055422] Re: Please sync xz-utils 5.6.0-0.2 from Debian experimental

2024-03-30 Thread Sergio Oller
I just read about the backdoor on xz-utils from CVE-2024-3094 (not yet synced to Launchpad CVE, I can't use the Link to CVE feature) and I wanted to know more about Ubuntu's status. Please avoid syncing any vulnerable version. ** CVE added:

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [Flang][OpenMP][Lower] Refactor lowering of compound constructs (PR #87070)

2024-03-29 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
@@ -710,6 +710,81 @@ genOpenMPReduction(Fortran::lower::AbstractConverter , } } +/// Split a combined directive into an outer leaf directive and the (possibly +/// combined) rest of the combined directive. Composite directives and +/// non-compound directives are not

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [Flang][OpenMP][Lower] Refactor lowering of compound constructs (PR #87070)

2024-03-29 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
rom ec0ed50b0d5f9606f0e9a1a3af601bec310f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sergio Afonso Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 13:57:40 + Subject: [PATCH] [Flang][OpenMP][Lower] Refactor lowering of compound constructs This patch simplifies the lowering from PFT to MLIR of OpenMP compound constructs (i.e. combined and composite). The

Re: 10.5 and gcc8 x86-64 ok but ppc bails with dlerror

2024-03-29 Thread Sergio Had
> K > > > >> On Mar 29, 2024, at 04:00, Sergio Had wrote: >> >>  >> Ken, the last time you objected to having gcc10-bootstrap building for ppc >> on 10.6 in gcc13 port. >> Because that was extra 10 characters of code in the macro, which was too &

Re: 10.5 and gcc8 x86-64 ok but ppc bails with dlerror

2024-03-29 Thread Sergio Had
t supporting the bootleg crippled 10.6 PPC pre-beta had > anything to do with why nobody had gotten around to updating the gcc version > used on older systems. > > At least, it was not anywhere on my radar. > > Just -- nobody did the legwork. > > Ken > > > On 2024-03

Remove me from this list please

2024-03-28 Thread Sergio Casero Verdial
I have been receiving emails for 2 years, it's okay, I don't want to continue receiving emails, ALL the emails in my inbox are from Hurd and I'm fed up, I move all the emails to spam and nothing, please get rid of this, I can't take it anymore and I can't see my email without coming across 357

[Bug 2055151] Re: kea-ctrl-agent segfault in ppc64el dep8 test

2024-03-28 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
After some more debugging/testing, it seems like the problem is indeed caused by compiler optimization. More specifically, LTO. Disabling it seems to have done the trick, and I can't reproduce the segmentation fault anymore. Basically: ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),ppc64el) export

[Bug 2051754] Re: Live migration fails (missing vmx features)

2024-03-28 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051754 Title: Live migration fails (missing vmx features) To manage

[Bug 2012763] Re: qemu-system-amd64 max cpus is too low for latest processors

2024-03-28 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
Thank you, Andreas. I will wait for bug #2046439 to clear -proposed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012763 Title: qemu-system-amd64 max cpus is too low for latest processors To

Re: Tuesday triage report (2024-03-25)

2024-03-28 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
; >> First glance: >> >> Missing build dependencies: sssd-common > > The cause is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/2058576 I've been meaning to look into this one, but getting an armhf machine to test it is... tricky... to say the least. -- Sergio GPG ke

Re: 10.5 and gcc8 x86-64 ok but ppc bails with dlerror

2024-03-28 Thread Sergio Had
may do this today itself: I have everything working for months, just need to sort commits to make it readable and implement a solution for what I want. As a bonus, you will get IEEE intrinsics in Fortran – something that never existed on ppc. On Mar 29, 2024 at 02:36 +0800, Sergio Had , wrote

Re: 10.5 and gcc8 x86-64 ok but ppc bails with dlerror

2024-03-28 Thread Sergio Had
You should not need gcc8. I had gcc11 working on 10.5 ppc (and ppc64 too). I have seen people using gcc13 on 10.5 ppc following my instructions from the PR. What is the point of gcc8? You build gcc10-bootstrap and then use it to build gcc13. Nothing else needed in between. On Mar 28, 2024 at

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [Flang][OpenMP][Lower] Use clause operand structures (PR #86802)

2024-03-28 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/skatrak updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86802 >From 7af7e9d13fc2134e76bb532bfa4313aa3df17924 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sergio Afonso Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 16:46:56 + Subject: [PATCH] [Flang][OpenMP][Lower] Use clause operand structures This pa

[Bug 2012763] Re: qemu-system-amd64 max cpus is too low for latest processors

2024-03-27 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
Performing the verification on Mantic. First, verifying that we can reproduce the problem. # apt policy qemu-system-x86 qemu-system-x86: Installed: 1:8.0.4+dfsg-1ubuntu3.23.10.3 Candidate: 1:8.0.4+dfsg-1ubuntu3.23.10.3 Version table: *** 1:8.0.4+dfsg-1ubuntu3.23.10.3 500 500

[Bug 2059272] Re: libvirt domain is not listed/managed after libvirt restart with messages "internal error: no monitor path" and "Failed to load config for domain"

2024-03-27 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
OK, I tested the fixed package from your PPA and verified that it indeed solves the issue. Just to reiterate, then: LGTM, +1! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059272 Title: libvirt

[Bug 2059272] Re: libvirt domain is not listed/managed after libvirt restart with messages "internal error: no monitor path" and "Failed to load config for domain"

2024-03-27 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
Hah, I didn't see your comment before I posted mine. Mid air conflict! Anyway, thanks for providing the PPA. I'll take it for a spin :-). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059272

[Bug 2059272] Re: libvirt domain is not listed/managed after libvirt restart with messages "internal error: no monitor path" and "Failed to load config for domain"

2024-03-27 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
Mauricio, Wow! Such an awesome reproducer. Very detailed and easy to follow. Thanks for providing it. I was able to verify the problem here, and looked at the upstream patch[1] that fixes it. The rationale makes sense to me, although that cleanup function is pretty involved and it's hard to

[Bug 2059267] Re: Ubuntu patch reverting another Ubuntu patch

2024-03-27 Thread Sergio Costas
Which do you think would be the best way of managing it? I can see these possibilities: * Merging the whole "Update-style..." patch into "0001-Add-Ubuntu..." * Removing gis-apps-page.* files from "0001-Add-Ubuntu..." and completely creating them in "Update-style..." -- You received this bug

[Bug 2058277] Re: [SRU] 2.62

2024-03-27 Thread Sergio Cazzolato
Also manual tests have been executed in noble using snapd from the ppa. I ran a smoke tests and everything was ok. Also the integration with the app center was tested. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2059267] Re: Ubuntu patch reverting another Ubuntu patch

2024-03-27 Thread Sergio Costas
Oh, wait... That is the last page, isn't it? Ok, now I see what you mean. You are right, it should be simpler to merge both patches. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059267 Title:

[Bug 2059267] Re: Ubuntu patch reverting another Ubuntu patch

2024-03-27 Thread Sergio Costas
Ops... it looks really like an unintended error during patch creation... "Update-style..." shouldn't touch all that C code. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059267 Title: Ubuntu patch

[Bug 2058277] Re: [SRU] 2.62

2024-03-27 Thread Sergio Cazzolato
About the results: Those tests failed: - google:ubuntu-24.04-64:tests/main/listing (this is because the execution was not done with SPREAD_CORE_CHANNEL=stable) - google:ubuntu-24.04-64:tests/main/snaps-state (this is a test for a testing tool) -

Re: wget errors - malloc

2024-03-27 Thread Sergio Had
This should fix it: https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/23248 > On Mar 27, 2024, at 11:14 PM, Sergio Had wrote: > > Oh, I can confirm the error on my side too. > > Let me try fixing it. > > > >> On Mar 27, 2024, at 9:53 PM, Sergio Had wrot

Re: wget errors - malloc

2024-03-27 Thread Sergio Had
Oh, I can confirm the error on my side too. Let me try fixing it. > On Mar 27, 2024, at 9:53 PM, Sergio Had wrote: > > You could try adding this to its portfile: > > PortGroup legacysupport 1.1 > legacysupport.redirect_bins wget > > And rebuild it.

[Bug 2058277] Re: [SRU] 2.62

2024-03-27 Thread Sergio Cazzolato
tests executed with ppa https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/XngqW6FsYt/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058277 Title: [SRU] 2.62 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

Re: wget errors - malloc

2024-03-27 Thread Sergio Had
You could try adding this to its portfile: PortGroup legacysupport 1.1 legacysupport.redirect_bins wget And rebuild it. If it solved the issue, perhaps submit a PR. > On Mar 27, 2024, at 5:41 PM, Riccardo Mottola via macports-dev > wrote: > > Hi, > > I just noticed this on 10.5

Re: cmake-devel --> cmake coming .... please test if you care to

2024-03-27 Thread Sergio Had
Just for the record, cmake-devel 3.29.0 works fine for me on native systems where 3.28.1 was failing (10.6 ppc and 10.6 i386). It does not build on 10.6.8 Rosetta, likely due to an unrelated issue, but this is not a stopper, since no one uses Rosetta outside of testing/development. If anyone

[llvm-branch-commits] [flang] [Flang][OpenMP][Lower] Use clause operand structures (PR #86802)

2024-03-27 Thread Sergio Afonso via llvm-branch-commits
924 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sergio Afonso Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 16:46:56 + Subject: [PATCH] [Flang][OpenMP][Lower] Use clause operand structures This patch updates Flang lowering to use the new set of OpenMP clause operand structures and their groupings into directive-specific s

wxWidgets-related question

2024-03-26 Thread Sergio Had
Does anyone know what is responsible in wxWidgets 3.0 for dialog windows handling, and specifically buttons in those like Okay? Those are broken on 10.6 for me: any dialog window which opens does not respond to Okay or Cancel at all. Everything works fine on 10.8 though, from the same port. I

Re: Uscan no longer works with GitLab tags

2024-03-26 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
highlight/releases /archive/@ANY_VERSION@/@PACKAGE@@ANY_VERSION@@ARCHIVE_EXT@ -- Sergio GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible https://sergiodj.net/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Uscan no longer works with GitLab tags

2024-03-26 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Monday, March 25 2024, Shriram Ravindranathan wrote: > Dear Mentors, > > I noticed from the past couple of days, uscan seems to be having trouble > finding files from the gitlab tags page. > > ``` > $ uscan > uscan warn: In debian/watch no matching files for watch line >

Re: Passed: Resolution 2024-03-25.jln.1: Rocket (RWF2) as an associated project

2024-03-26 Thread Sergio Benitez
for Associated Projects, SPI Resolution   1998-11-16.iwj.1-amended-2004-08-10.iwj.1, a copy of which can be found   at https://www.spi-inc.org/corporate/resolutions/2004/2004-08-10.iwj.1/4. Sergio Benitez is recognised by SPI as the authoritative decision maker   and SPI liaison for Rocket (RWF2). Successors

[Bug 2039017] Re: [SRU] 2.61.3

2024-03-26 Thread Sergio Cazzolato
Manually tested all the supported versions and ran tests. https://warthogs.atlassian.net/jira/core/projects/ST/board?selectedIssue=ST-1958 ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-mantic ** Tags added: verification-done

Re: Passed: Resolution 2024-03-25.jln.1: Rocket (RWF2) as an associated project

2024-03-26 Thread Sergio Benitez
for Associated Projects, SPI Resolution   1998-11-16.iwj.1-amended-2004-08-10.iwj.1, a copy of which can be found   at https://www.spi-inc.org/corporate/resolutions/2004/2004-08-10.iwj.1/4. Sergio Benitez is recognised by SPI as the authoritative decision maker   and SPI liaison for Rocket (RWF2). Successors

[Bug 2012763] Re: qemu-system-amd64 max cpus is too low for latest processors

2024-03-25 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
Fixed package uploaded to Mantic: qemu_8.0.4+dfsg-1ubuntu3.23.10.5_source.changes -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012763 Title: qemu-system-amd64 max cpus is too low for latest

[Bug 2039017] Re: [SRU] 2.61.3

2024-03-25 Thread Sergio Cazzolato
In mantic-proposed I see snapd 2.60.4+23.10.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039017 Title: [SRU] 2.61.3 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 2012763] Re: qemu-system-amd64 max cpus is too low for latest processors

2024-03-25 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
Performing the verification on Mantic. First, reproduce the problem. # apt policy qemu-system-x86 qemu-system-x86: Installed: 1:8.0.4+dfsg-1ubuntu3.23.10.3 Candidate: 1:8.0.4+dfsg-1ubuntu3.23.10.3 Version table: *** 1:8.0.4+dfsg-1ubuntu3.23.10.3 500 500

[SR-Users] Re: low performance with no apparent reason

2024-03-22 Thread Sergio Charrua via sr-users
Thanks Alex! I already knew that article, and followed it. But it doesn't seem to have had any positive impact *Sérgio Charrua* On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 8:44 PM Alex Balashov via sr-users < sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> wrote: > Sergio, > > You may consider giving this a re

[SR-Users] Re: low performance with no apparent reason

2024-03-22 Thread Sergio Charrua via sr-users
lists.kamailio.org> wrote: > >> I assume that you are using udp. >> Please increase the length of the udp queue: >> >> https://medium.com/@CameronSparr/increase-os-udp-buffers-to-improve-performance-51d167bb1360 >> >> Regards. >> Ovidiu Sas >> &

[SR-Users] low performance with no apparent reason

2024-03-22 Thread Sergio Charrua via sr-users
Hi all! I have been doing some performance tests with Kamailio 5.7.4 and SIPp. The infrastructure is as follows:3 VMs running on VMWare ESXi running: UAC on 10.20.0.1 with SIPP-> Kamailio on 10.20.0.5 -> UAS on 10.20.0.3 The Kamailio VM has 6 dedicated vCPU of type Intel(R) Xeon(R) Silver 4216

[Bug 2049672] Re: Should welcome screen be included?

2024-03-21 Thread Sergio Costas
Here is a PR https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gnome-initial- setup/-/merge_requests/22 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049672 Title: Should welcome screen be included? To manage

[Bug 2049672] Re: Should welcome screen be included?

2024-03-21 Thread Sergio Costas
Capture of the proposed Welcome page. The picture is just a placeholder; the mascot logo must be there, according to the design team. ** Attachment added: "Captura desde 2024-03-21 17-50-11.png"

[Bug 2012763] Re: qemu-system-amd64 max cpus is too low for latest processors

2024-03-21 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

Re: [Bug 2058576] [NEW] FTBFS: armhf: build-time test failures

2024-03-20 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
l check more tomorrow. -- Sergio GPG key ID: E92F D0B3 6B14 F1F4 D8E0 EB2F 106D A1C8 C3CB BF14 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058576 Title: FTBFS: armhf: build-time test failure

Re: Proposal to modify Flink’s startup sequence for MINIMUM downtime across deployments

2024-03-20 Thread Sergio Chong Loo
just go. Did I misunderstand anything from your suggestion? Sergio > On Mar 19, 2024, at 1:55 PM, Asimansu Bera wrote: > > Resending -> > > Hello Sergio, > I'm a newbie(not an expert) and give it a try. > > If I presume you've only a reference state on Flink and n

[Bug 2012763] Re: qemu-system-amd64 max cpus is too low for latest processors

2024-03-20 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
** Tags added: server-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012763 Title: qemu-system-amd64 max cpus is too low for latest processors To manage notifications about this bug go to:

Wednesday Triage Report (2024-03-20)

2024-03-20 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
. -- Sergio GPG key ID: E92F D0B3 6B14 F1F4 D8E0 EB2F 106D A1C8 C3CB BF14 signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

[Bug 2058447] Re: Bug in transcoding wide chars

2024-03-20 Thread Sergio Ĥlutĉin
** Description changed: The following example throws an exception when using wide character strings with Cyrillic characters. - $ g++-9 -std=c++17 path.C && ./a.out - terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::filesystem::__cxx11::filesystem_error' - what():

[Bug 2058447] [NEW] Bug in transcoding wide chars

2024-03-20 Thread Sergio Ĥlutĉin
Public bug reported: The following example throws an exception when using wide character strings with Cyrillic characters. $ g++-9 -std=c++17 path.C && ./a.out terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::filesystem::__cxx11::filesystem_error' what(): filesystem error:

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >