Re: My Conclusions
I have never had any issues moving keys between boxes. In fact I moved my keys just last week to a box at work. What exactly is the nature of the problem? On Friday, November 14, 2014, da...@gbenet.com da...@gbenet.com wrote: Hi All, After spending 62 hours on what I thought would be a simple task namely to get a fully functioning gnupg mirror on my 64 bit Linux system - I realise this is an impossible task to do. In the past I've ended up creating a new set of certificates - but this time round I thought that I would apply some effort. My conclusion is It IS Impossible To Transfer Your Keys From The Same O/S To Another Machine. There is no one in the entire universe that has ever attempted it. And if they have THEY HAVE FAILED. Not one person on this list knows how to do it successfully. No one. NOT ONE OF YOU can transfer a mirror image of your .gnupg folder and expect it to work. This tells me what I have long suspected - yes it's good at encryption and signing but the programme is fundamentally flawed as to make it utter crap. My keys are PERFECT but the software is CRAP. Werner Koch knows it's crap. Every one knows it's crap. So, If I want to go on signing and encrypting my emails I HAVE TO CREATE ANOTHER SET A BLOODY KEYS I am not a happy bunny!!! David -- “See the sanity of the man! No gods, no angels, no demons, no body. Nothing of the kind.Stern, sane,every brain-cell perfect and complete even at the moment of death. No delusion.” https://linuxcounter.net/user/512854.html - http://gbenet.com ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org javascript:; http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Recommended key size for life long key
On 09/01/2013 02:45 PM, Johan Wevers wrote: Why? What's the advantage of that? I replace keys after I they have a chance of being compromised, but not before. Same for my mail domain - I created a ssh certificate that is valid for 50 years (unlimited was not an option) and I'll replace it whan I fear intrusions or crypto breakthroughs make it unsecure. Not before. The longer a key is in use the greater the chance of compromise. Just because you believe it has not been compromised doesn't make it so. By regenerating keys every so often you drastically lessen the chances of a key being compromised or of a possible compromise having as much effect on you. There is a reason things like IPSEC keys are renegotiated after so many minutes or after so many bytes are transmitted. :) -- Larry Brower, CCNA Fedora Ambassador - North America Fedora Quality Assurance lbro...@fedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraproject.org/ 0x0806CF8B.asc Description: application/pgp-keys ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Why trust gpg4win?
On 08/24/2013 11:34 PM, mirimir wrote: Small flash cards are cheap enough to use once and then destroy. This doesn't resolve the problem of the device being compromised as soon as it is plugged into a compromised system. There is a lot of malware that will copy itself to any disk that gets plugged in the instant it is plugged in. -- Larry Brower, CCNA Fedora Ambassador - North America Fedora Quality Assurance lbro...@fedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraproject.org/ 0x0806CF8B.asc Description: application/pgp-keys ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Why trust gpg4win?
On 08/25/2013 08:24 AM, Josef Schneider wrote: I would suggest OpenBSD for that. If BSD is to exotic, then Debian Stable. Flas is known to have more security holes than one can count, so I would stay very far away from it! BSD might have too high a learning curve for most ordinary people. A custom BSD distro targeted at non-technical people would be useful here. Perhaps one which took Security and Privacy into account as design goal. Staying away from flash would be easier if all these people who think they are web developers would stop using it. -- Larry Brower, CCNA Fedora Ambassador - North America Fedora Quality Assurance lbro...@fedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraproject.org/ 0x0806CF8B.asc Description: application/pgp-keys ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: No secret key on 1 file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 08/16/2013 07:56 AM, Steven Bonda wrote: --batch --passphrase Have you tried to do this without --batch and --passphrase? Is there any change? - -- Larry Brower, CCNA Fedora Ambassador - North America Fedora Quality Assurance lbro...@fedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJSDjkmAAoJEDtLZtIIBs+LCu4H/i1DZgWHsbqFbpxgNaHsiPZ9 FsLmQSurt1HOAn/UEfK33FUN6BOS1Gk3G8s3AjqUoBvurpTb8SXuDNavTIvBBlRL 2gYnsukGMG769DifHvsgVCc0bWePxzGl08m97kZttO/MmFnpT7rJF7j3hgVUyhLB /wfgOCVqmCnScy1L2KbLRydH4hfyuP+Wt7EtNHhE5Wh/gVfEQdaIHwPQNKIPtIZo vBb/cya6SdFVii6YCZwT3/uq9YqqOqWv5VnboTW4FSwun//N5nCgRCudtxcRCuSA RAaIueMzNwJUU932VqsAQOIorjl2KWKyTp+gZX7608TTmyvmNxSFySrZNKNcs6w= =KcoN -END PGP SIGNATURE- 0x0806CF8B.asc Description: application/pgp-keys ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: [#INN-651-31269]: Re: key management APG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 08/04/2013 10:27 AM, TeamSpeak Piracy wrote: Hauke Laging, Thank you for contacting us. This is an automated response confirming the receipt of your ticket. One of our agents will get back to you as soon as possible. For your records, the details of the ticket are listed below. When replying, please make sure that the ticket ID is kept in the subject line to ensure that your replies are tracked appropriately. *Ticket ID: *INN-651-31269 *Subject: *Re: key management APG *Department: *Piracy [English] *Type: *Issue *Status: *Open What is with the helpdesk being a list member? - -- Larry Brower, CCNA Fedora Ambassador - North America Fedora Quality Assurance lbro...@fedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJR/riTAAoJEEP/g4ToY9/OF3sP/00gYsJuAS5Q/iZoCgpRx89G 0A+WVt9k56MY8x1LFqgZ9DnOXYoKEzzDxwDpvmTpq6gZPeFvDp1+pvcybfJi9ntG PS37v+YfbshrFoCOML0G7R8FcB5Z4WfgFoVxGe2uODwbjEyQe5WmvWfgkOXUtx4Q D5gA8uW1m1I/J1rvFyx71Vx47yrdY45l8DGNvw2H/pwI9Jmw2VsVDYQapGzUSxyJ x/XwOg8Dd+F7ZpiOzBkT3tScabZKbhotTBlHfvlybfinx9fGeYrHcdX3aPQdGGST FBKI31pP/7bud8r30vyKztXSH9L3byFeYeuwETjKfQQ8UyWbuwQa5wRJ6G7IxfMw kOKL6hyhnLHNo5uY8I3SqgmbrIcADLRTX3TrHO9MwK/W8uOpdcUxJ5RrQa8S64Iq ETsaqQVZMW008k2L+/dQh/i7xFfivjN+60cSfYkaqyaZ7KGpim/BeICL5BBLu7/f FFHjVurxQrAFuUANc4GLu+pn1P3qw0kh1uOIgeQXRQeZSsOIXwVthEZZnFwZXzz3 0zeTQZ0CvndWxda6Eqjxawq5mELAqxeMf/2GF3Qn7JyysCvQo23lUDpTtGX5kqee bTigs92r7EYugqPHp6gP5EkloaidhCPJU0xGMB0RLQbyW9Oli+q5o+hSgPf4DaKa rhz9xwrI3MqEmRWSp5qZ =7tr+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: License violation: GoldBug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Perhaps you should just forward the information in a friendly manner to the legal departments of all the involved vendors :) On 07/27/2013 07:00 AM, Randolph D. wrote: Does the friendly License Soldier speaks that OpenSSL is not useable with Qt gui framework? 2013/7/27 Robert J. Hansen r...@sixdemonbag.org mailto:r...@sixdemonbag.org See, e.g., https://people.gnome.org/~markmc/openssl-and-the-gpl.html ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users - -- Larry Brower, CCNA Fedora Ambassador - North America Fedora Quality Assurance lbro...@fedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJR87fUAAoJEEP/g4ToY9/Oy7YP/3cXkF4V4fVl8LCwXorqoyfL 5h0UFraSz2RBQ7fs+okRzJ+YQU759bmjpbKfhFhAwtSqHP8zH7rnbdpxp1E7iIjN l8ohVhDQ+5eHxIbz695LqXe6wlWInkekzEpXacYwME1C+fNh84ZkTJ85kYlQ0XS4 GfzDdPJ0HHqx8Vec1TuZp1xhlZ0zCsOhkKiEqJhlpjvDK/4fhNBP/V+aGeA6VxCG tNTJcNDKmTqu7AfD3M5lDyzZBlhjAepxJPtVxMb8IUR8tqNs4BmygSO/a+48vnRH stT2jXbvJGdAJYA3un8q0kBRmwuVTMJU25HlOB6ijm8bZIogma4e1ozCB57HUQ4s WQOA3/ptke8JkwyicBIdhqKiOXb10llzplCeObI7I1AzLtX3vE0Wyzuh3z3jM21v /AmvzmmR88yAwK5YDlab77MqlMePnqu8nI85Omatm47j3XsneaVRIXXS6SP6AU+e vSzI+NtbJNXIZur3+4fzyLYBAiRxvZ4yhxTpen+p6OciUW3on+woRkwfVb3h8cyj LOxGlVwi5CmJjg0MdqTVhrGu6JWm0uVD9qumlgMl2mzsDhvr6nqcMTOzMX0igCHz t7uOF4iT8m5iv2Q5ycZl67aIFpFp2MuA1OIou3xFeU0lQCekU13B5Vpgc56OhGnD Pf1gJRWmssxbiYFGVGqw =Qh6T -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: searching for keys
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 4:56 PM, kardan kar...@riseup.net wrote: Hi, When I search for a key via browser on [1] I get an unencrypted answer from [2]. This happens for some keys that are onlyavailable on some servers. The problem is that the info, whose key I am searching is presented to sniffers in plaintext. I think the encrypted pool should not forward to unencrypted web interfaces. [1] https://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net/ [2] http://keyserver.stack.nl http://keyserver.stack.nl also uses SSL. Is your main t that someone will see the keys you are looking for or retrieving? If this is the case then why not have them send them to you encrypted via email? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJR4ftIAAoJEEP/g4ToY9/ODA4QAJoqRPXuv0LKlF9sHo/0XTD4 rNQmn4dD5EYWJWiBmaP3x+M8cxuJsOo35yTNOS8l095dw9VRKIfW82mf8LV+TD8Y k0xFH3E/UIfuDiPTM7+B2Jcj7Mw2n+GaxC40k90P9PV4C8PNKxxXuT391ibHxPsT ezdu2rRxOFt8lTTSmaWR9masKoNvjE0l9J8tM+pm8ApSDmsZkedObcgDxVyFP5Kp 9QRh+50HkGhfSZmJcdySYawqmSzNOR2z1cu/CLd8CCH8Akr/hSpjDhXInqoYbeO0 beJGWO5kCI3Akym4PiIE93anGBL1SLkBxgPBh5nxMH5yS7S936it4UAFbNzR4Cx3 BYWOfZxEfsOQvTbAjiWd9/sioOO0VEdnD87MMPMURdvXQzmHZ+v6afsMHWZA+FRd HPYsJuC9Wq4PyTGXI5pScNo6iQba5i+ImwpSyZW1ilB4pbh3/3LhJPMIB8Hi4859 XcNo8915KFZCyOidaibdvK7DnTHb8WT9xGnV2VNVjnBH7lo6mDsCfrDqUOG3oSwx 24gYfonmebmsD7vg3oh6uPdAytXt7poE2wmy9DSCIPuOEvEchpQdLkgGeHmAzbiX y/okqYflXC6aZGXhXj8ULFz5XDhP3DUE2YYw44A+nxfLNubQ3228JG3rVOl3mDdd OAcEChXQbPnTF/jhqyxx =0ofg -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Proposed ALpha Criteria
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 09/03/2012 09:19 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: I propose the inclusion of two critera for an alpha release. 1. safe and stable custom disk partitioning choice 2. Mate desktop install choice 1 because Fedora needs to be a real Linux, not a toy 2 to add a bit of excitement among Linux boffins (including Linus?) Fedora is real. What exactly is unsafe and/or unstable about the disk partitioning? I just used it a few days ago and it seems pretty stable and safe to me :) I have no opinion on the mate desktop - -- Larry Brower, CCNA Fedora Ambassador - North America Fedora Quality Assurance lbro...@fedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJQRWcVAAoJEF1Xw4ZWTEoJrHoQAKnedjcIooRsFAiQFtQZcmdO hNZcMA9QIxvmQCElyuxDohdI7GtIhk1DPUsn2Uadu3ILbDWh9kL6XqFHLig2JkMe JH1uiciJkYGLZXB4g2F4MWuVdZzTyY6NsRSAbAPqOxBwsTkUNMO0WTLBeWQM6Eta EgnKwLIWprk4Ent0DAnm5jimuFixzazYhyWo9az4quGRbmy++YYt9u6t6RncXfCZ CHZlRTrBnNtYVzqHxW69tq17VUU2/8ZmBBriStVcyGpgkjaLYlm24MNewo66zjq0 dp8aFxXjF5w9SNlKeyrRT0631dVvBC3Hll1917rpkMp5tCvxboqdaa3GAb6/jFD5 MGzPZafdyRXTg8MJye5l6UmiQ0oxxyb64RrUk+2iy+GVQjbSIAIWecZsl3HyroM2 uVVt5tVYwZ+1JhhpaFoRrnZD9OVJH6eYwiHy3YTPP4LHem48UGm1n3zuqHSrmvZG rPKDlO2Za5NLAM9pZK9E6rm48DEJWmzoVbIi2yINLUua1eNq8jVZgv1pxhuHZ1eh h6DXSWU6uEwPYi7iSpoR/v/zfth30eGiDMhw0c3Sr1RpQwtLTP2yt9h82Ba5f5aw W9t2J6+LHfHUrYZqjr1eRYfQ/vyFUqj4szObRpRseTehORvCKPYqXipY3ZiW4Odb BOxgdyvXZ7g6HZfJzJg1 =/9qo -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Question about Preferred Applications
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 08/19/2012 02:57 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: My sister uses Linux, and has Thunderbird installed. However, her primary email address is at gmail. She'd like to be able to click on mailto: links and have gmail come up instead of Thunderbird. AFAICT, there's no obvious way to do it. Does anybody out there know how that could be automated? (My sister isn't technically oriented; something that takes several steps every time probably won't work. However, I can either set it up for her or talk her through doing it, as long as the end result is easy for her to use.) You should be able to go to settings and then Preferred Applications or Default Applications. It all depends on the DE in use. Which Desktop is she using? - -- Larry Brower, CCNA Fedora Ambassador - North America Fedora Quality Assurance lbro...@fedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJQMU1zAAoJEF1Xw4ZWTEoJIBMQAJHxcuGQyUliu11Z3vc8mch/ xcpfWLQmPOQbuVlxgQdsLDNwhMQoPHMtv2p3pDX+SsKDTnpOZDJIdNuOm2IaxpTZ uztYqgXd7+cFX8pSALmDJbZw9ub7SwU0OJ+HG6ISNRHi/TSl4CDUo1Lg9sY673VX UorNbpPMpEnZkMAZmsQk5o+0Kfwx14ncZWT1TjhF8uVexH65pm2iRJPNGNdIOavu /BgGqGoKhvM+KbFaeIAnc3qlW+1i5mTmmrldxtas9CWKSOTnZjnpXxL/YHgnLimX vKsbQS6nD85jjNq/ooOuMdn7O8k/m4WRarKbBdps7h83FkRC4JFRT5yd8EyFcTfj fuboe9RopAzl3rLS7mQ96M+b0ikXChzyKVwUvATWcamhUnDSwyWVJJ+coeRGfDoX b+0Jb2MZfgEC+vU/FbQL6yLZWchi5q5SdtXzrpkBW5ri4cYnwtO5mLcZlDX6vapL QBru7vbg5gGFtJi/BOOAQ1vRVEpHwLe8kW4sO2+C19fxQLpeoHlAsUHkVnx63Vwl TYrB1AG015drlb9ADM4hM3R9RedW0+5AtUnWzx1ser5zbg7HU+CgYybzqMrYoag3 1t7JbeU42cR5akZCqsBYvo736CdJgYvuwIM0Tg5bmNaB+h6Q30BpgJHcqcRu2P0t KWz2KTqyXBZp9ny/4FFN =DIub -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora Account Change
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/28/2012 03:25 PM, Michael Scherer wrote: What happen if the email was redirected to a manager ? If someone from HR for the previous company can confirm the identity, would it be sufficient ? The problem with that could be, how do they verify the person without meeting them in person? - -- Larry Brower, CCNA Fedora Ambassador - North America Fedora Quality Assurance lbro...@fedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJPw/ltAAoJEF1Xw4ZWTEoJMn0QAIze03SsBPkG0M2jOP8hM7FL ZqrsvwIL9wFXCQSu1zeKqABgw5Ieu6KADSs25pqIylpM60SjINNgl0i6lUi3icf4 vLSm3TRytXAxLrgUyEwG+P5B5kxVMBqzR600Y7Xa8DxlhWhihFQ/Iojqi8VpaV7h 9L16z1i4fEOYBzIUO+rMljs5WnLr5G1vyTuwcJEk4ZN8p+38AQudM9FeaRFSrRg7 /qy+46ts0LLrwRCDAUFlVaW3C0KeEWoPQ7NbIVci+q7YHdHqG1uLSjUuAjw3NeEI j6+LByZUuvNvlGZ/NBW++JqywWPbvmISeCBFm5I58Qz39gbZvqWFC6yXmleGzOY5 nmssbu6uWfQo51nM499tm+CSglP4n3fKeClJkrLg4GUIYtR925iBsj1XUXjxzJ7S 4fRae030o1p7WonNMNyLfuCo82+zR9PRb5yHYgqYKHp3DN6XJbLHir4bju7mc3c5 trj4UFtUozDz8rCd0q2hCAKEJ8BSDhDL9YOdeSUm0NipZJD87qYJOHvzvyXoJj+K Z6CWcQ1FgZwi2NsD3SgN0iFMERLeS7Sc/dyXzKmQwhk0a38K+fZAukR2bbEuPIZ9 CH6x94cPm0eKsOjuSyPORTv+0I+u8DVy3FlXGTauSMAZ3jquIqJcWnOfffeCqAsS acc6jsb0IJoxV63lWuvv =4I+w -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Re: Fedora Account Change
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/28/2012 05:24 PM, Chris Dix wrote: If they don't remember their password to log into their account and their email address is no longer valid, they should do what the rest of us do and create another account. Chris I would agree that this is the best option. Perhaps we should research adding a password / login recovery feature. - -- Larry Brower, CCNA Fedora Ambassador - North America Fedora Quality Assurance lbro...@fedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJPw/uMAAoJEF1Xw4ZWTEoJeVAP/0q2zOXe0XBEPYa6xExXzvJO sCCH9+nMYDkWFV1YReN2RsBnPL4RDNjd8Xq0c/Zwl+13EUyusPiJhexfccZIhpLp KTUW0c1iZ7E3gXjpPjddutv9ePdgl1drR3qkIIyL2l/ML00ANQMoTMOfjdglNkh+ X9esanHaleeTkX28/Dux9xwAUOiTOmyXabbJEkYFlnr3buBCKWQj7PG2K8Fh9/CN hBQj4SlelMclca60NWCZ3mg5wr5oBGXXbNg3s+z77y3E8wWLb7JNc9/wz/JpCfQV Wb+BmBvUBuCDFeM3FrGacTVwR+hDK6NsBlqj3r1RD7vsUhS2CzAVkSxIgX2gVwnY MjRmzKJd4hvxPBxbR30RXFa6aFekH7Bkf78+ZRlz2dNYL2lOB92DBU/3+HRTyujn orMV9JCqDK597PgUqksPWNQQuAeV0ypNSBm/jne+zVA8Ior2zWP3OdYbVDAi/UdE NyBS8ny8aq6WJq2BMJ85CSY+Vd0lRlvQ7pMQyqMxXP5vi/zAOo3BbXOeblPy8lhy RBSQKfCJzaSrWZpPb3+Mk3IPDvLaJYWsrpAR0f+IrxI9vimSI93IqGjn+n88gmAl R67eWbCmwDlCFPIFFT2E9pu687cn+uRj98/jAolVZossaw/bsbpdByD0TpozLC8U rkdT+bI0qWtV486lBOfC =j5bw -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Re: Fedora Account Change
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/28/2012 05:32 PM, David Nalley wrote: There is such a feature already. It does require access to email though. If he has contacts that still control access to the email - surely he could use the 'forgotten password' functionality and have individuals in control of said email forward it along. --David Couldn't we expand on this feature to allow somethign like answering account security questions similar to how banks and other organizations do ? While this would require more work to implement, it would reduce support overhead when people lose access to email and forget their password as well as lower the number of extra accounts in the FAS which are not in use. Less clutter is always a good thing :) - -- Larry Brower, CCNA Fedora Ambassador - North America Fedora Quality Assurance lbro...@fedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJPxAACAAoJEF1Xw4ZWTEoJcF8P/2nbMNv0ECt93mvFv/HncW2V ZP2mCqUdBLjkAxfg0Al5Dq//ipqnP6ExV17s0Bj18+aUUQ97fc6OjI361CfHt+Tq YkolqTmxslSwvMoQT+77JeN9SpHMWH7n67q1otc4vYm5BTWtLzSHq4HsdMsLHYf/ Pp4s8NncWMzPwkshGLrk1ZYGrwx0e+L6jf+ZyzdOrpXS05/pLXgU+F+86TCfpPXx ZwgiWtOTSKJ7HjhL/yQy3U6wnM77LKzmgFu3Kh1ii4SGfxkd+XOQS5mKEBy9SDvc 6Ivu1CDByiNtyfk3Cfbh12v2DZz0sN/39fsbJK3u7ssK+D4nnVQWSe9EBQzJP/wC 5c1lhfngX7Zl/0e518h6LUADHe2TZVclAOvlm2KJC3DJqW3y9UwVcpdzgp+uyZyU XkTUT+CKUcK4UpDJr9VSnofBep8Hm90N8rlONDDQt3WAemLGRZr+WKWi94hZ5ee8 wuf1zYUgaetXk2NEnDasvuTQgBt37n9QKBFq6lGMw/b/6bKADDWa9vu/MdXwteOv 4yEPwP+peeQBjyucas6JEWqp5GgPlZ2eRMDo7NwPGBKYf0H5qAUH1pMP8/hl96yk KpRsaCtP2Ov+4o9GJBrF7oVZar1PST/xmlHVxWQL7kpxRYTPxKi46ao5Z5bkoSVn vNngBAqqO7lotcZqukCl =h5pS -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Re: Convice Bind to listen on IP alias with a range of IPs.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/30/2012 04:56 PM, Augie Schwer wrote:
I must be doing something wrong, because what I want to do doesn't
seem that difficult.
I have a range of IPs bound to a local interface:
lo:1 Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:10.0.0.1 Mask:255.255.255.224
And I want to convince Bind to listen on sub-set of the given range (
10.0.0.2 for example ), yet when I configure that IP:
listen-on { 10.0.0.2; };
Bind won't listen on that interface:
named[15035]: not listening on any interfaces
is 10.0.0.2 bound to the server?
can you show the ip address or ifconfig output ?
- --
Larry Brower, CCNA
Fedora Ambassador - North America
Fedora Quality Assurance
lbro...@fedoraproject.org
http://www.fedoraproject.org/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-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=G6Ta
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: Convice Bind to listen on IP alias with a range of IPs.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 04/30/2012 07:13 PM, Augie Schwer wrote: Thanks for the reply, please see my previous e-mail about the address being perfectly pingable on that interface. Whats that have to do with anything? It being pingable only means something is responding for it. This does NOT mean it is on THAT specific server. If it is not on THAT server then bind cant use it. This isn't rocket science :) - -- Larry Brower, CCNA Linux System Administrator II HostGator.com LLC lbro...@hostgator.com Http://www.hostgator.com Http://support.hostgator.com/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJPn15TAAoJEF1Xw4ZWTEoJlK0P/0wCGKtzfFr7jCrxq2YQlZbj 2DBwCO9gjZWHnHr35DQ/iYz7U+gU9rzKvXMdDWNKsr8zXoqiyMgt0N1Yp+llHQdj zgGOIlEuqIcL77hGBNQ7zlrutfiPaUuIG/vZe8mLX31M8yDOG2fa38cGtSNKILZL aSejkv5u+4QfRBhWGqtWtcUwslWdBc3TLoxKoI2YidPALjtkGXsPF/qYoke80b+Y 0YPxZ/lyS85KovK9ZgG3dCXl35r0hyLTbHBeD9JTUw6g28CKPq8HX5nKdo1hTYQv +Wdb5cIQGIovVF1QZcXkdGWnhIh9AkGXQ3J4RasCUPi6TuKTlWNhlQjYiYWAl5BB WmvPGSm3gczEJS2VGkTeJbDMKSfmNzRruzObBbVBhUr4rp/xCuJITfltne5PEmaJ 3acBm1fHi1SGifueJeK9LdFPDW27Xog2+1FDbdJFrTGO1qjwGfrEyJ9FFtk9ve2U FZWvyOdomoKapAtI4sxbKG54LTmgAazXflRa4CowEA8EhykX2qGgFhv3rKy3Y9Gf hXnNlVJUIOif9kotAem50MsgTLmMpHkOOcb6ADNDMZ91hxRvJrZ/Eb7E4UtU/g+S UDlb28WT5Cu8okrhqS1uiVjvl4dhnr0ZIz6AZMgMgKTOUw0vihvDgIZ6Ve6Ws+HB PLdxKpjwi6pt6RvHk+al =+qgi -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: new here
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/22/2012 10:05 PM, David Milholen wrote:
listen-on {
9x.1xx.104.14;
};
Perhaps add 127.0.0.1; into the listen on clause.
- --
Larry Brower, CCENT
Fedora Ambassador - North America
Fedora Quality Assurance
lbro...@fedoraproject.org
http://www.fedoraproject.org/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-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=zXKb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: [funsec] !! in /etc/shadow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 03/22/2012 03:20 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Stephanie Daugherty sdaughe...@gmail.com wrote: If I recall correctly, that means no password has been set. !! effectively prevents any password from matching the hash, therefore password login can't be used for the account, but depending on SSHD configuration, SSH keys *might* be able to be used to log in. OK, thanks. The account in question (tomcat) is actually in sudoers with NOPASSWD. Its on a box with SE Linux, but its not enabled. Jeff On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Jeffrey Walton noloa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guys, Does anyoneone know what causes !! to show up in /etc/shadow (the account is enabled and has a login shell). Jeff !! normally shows up when the account is locked, ie usermod -L account man usermod As previously stated they could still possibly be able to login using ssh keys. - -- Larry Brower, CCENT Fedora Ambassador - North America Fedora Quality Assurance lbro...@fedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJPbmDkAAoJEF1Xw4ZWTEoJNkgP/iSKmBgNachxAhBcLxVAzG9M 73DSGfr4jMzcgn0JxRG6SP92gtTugBnDK0oqBjsenDRd3mMTJBFJ/AKejyeYOTWC sjI+BlELBKkKsRt5hiKmFHISfv30+LIM0qvh+J9d9TmxZG1KBGNNqmJUMbIq7n2Y fiUgMIy7Re35H39SB1bUHgEG2ee8WVSlATeBt9E6fW5r+KR5yOroPWeo0z3fw737 HmD1SBS+VdrPIdtvC/e6rKCB5+50PuHNdgL+Z5/o1G3DaJsXEBdA0BajME9m7/u1 WnvDYrYxQQoDCbg0s3HwYBCH0nhPWYPuIEJ6KlVLVQGcVnSLnvtH1YGRoh+Gr3uy 6vEnhQMuWnYb2vXBiks2gWVz0tY9od+dBqZBex3cuI8tmwCdf6O62jKZ/D2QNDJO 9uXMgykKOHcCoenIH0r9PPbnFMnH7Z4NJ70zeEcISF6NwzSqUQaTRUv4fR5h6mvi 4ryhgUQQq9P5vhemaQeUW/GG1UT/sh6+ha3KblZ1DtBosoXnUhJzOIy0mmRrtL7U ZTxnpwT/dHYmdVlpAcy00dHBgECx5MDExaPvv54kI0VXhSL3EG+tHpaZIpLp3uLL jfmHROkBQLJqPVsoNxowef+nvf7MRaB6x16/ShyA2D9gifg2Em95xEk8EP6bGGcX gMv9M1tltHBxDxJyHTE6 =qXTb -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Re: Link/place for unsubscription
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 03/04/2012 12:11 AM, Roopesh Majeti wrote: Iam going for a long break and would like to know the place/link , where i can place the request for un-subscription. Can someone help me in this regards. TIA Regards RM. The bottom of the emails you receive. - -- Larry Brower, CCENT Fedora Ambassador - North America Fedora Quality Assurance lbro...@fedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJPUxb+AAoJEF1Xw4ZWTEoJJEwP/3ZwPwNmXu2KINofVHsN/8Iv EXBudKT4rOLwa6gx3VUlsn0rH0ZoHAZrq1oaj6O5GKCtvrC/ec3/SFjQbHtst03/ pa1CBshmVazNwonLj0VKZa8KSav9hJVBoEwlgePYLrrHqjXExtJAC/RLsYCoHKB4 4waAiTCvlGJ4MWWJy/nZO5QCt9AgqhPjUkxS0JffzSebWC5uJbWHT6a1C7ylSPH8 bxx9w67+jUBDUqONPxmIo2h4UBmRumQBmLaMSKr+2M0kXO01OteWegtv2C+uYTsn GiEemMnJhOtEMkZKbSSMjC0qGvr0x6F5gSulLKfFI6aGnvGWOB2C5PQ37RVAnylk L2DglYGH5OLYbBpmzunXTgRdTqJJY5Mri0Pyo79V885sGXRL3zZy8w7LYLeKpe3z 0N05C+aZhSLl04o3vehJiKYQd4lzh5PNs30mwImiQa3UB+IhJOiQbY7LCWB4NAiP huYAvQCdNpkvsfGt3scn5fk/J3lKJ5BoaWPnayfBYdjegTE24O8+5xQxZeM/j1VL 5xa4lNrZthMy+BdN/aB3Mbn5k+0DOhSHuA7soP5XaKRcUnZRFyT8ftovQ6Wdxv5V 4O/nGkG1vgDyrikHbMD0DkHVuvg/dEw4Y5W6MolUm1OACbR9kcMxddGAFpEtQZZc 3Aiz20DVYDfxOsslwfVp =b8uQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Giving Up On Fedora
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 12/25/2011 03:30 PM, Swapnil Bhartiya wrote: And this is a snap of the error on Dell XPS. http://ubuntuone.com/6nVaGW1YHkXnHiFZ3rp9DR Have you tried an older kernel? I have seen something similar to this occur on CentOS once and reverting to an older kernel at the time allowed the system to boot. - -- Larry Brower, CCENT Fedora Ambassador - North America Fedora Quality Assurance lbro...@fedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJO97IOAAoJEF1Xw4ZWTEoJEVEP/1uzFLSNHDffpoFCIpol3135 ud3jNiNJPMqYUB1oi//E++rKRW0mymfRID0VpzlJQ8RZZ65M7RcR1xKfBQzGCr7U aqvEvSTq2e//fwYeITCzEr3OIUFu91ijK1bG5DLXC6cDw2op9m3md/qO+JZbM/VW 5Wex2FZtHm++TURZ3dT5+ylPkpGz/VHdccoYLopiNcnS4Q021IEMMu36Z0sxkfoZ vDZoh9aqG7LEInwvRMtNNIwofNPD/hHH9IggJfdP4hku8kfB/8ZdiVJbXTORNCGR AB0hzgOSSZDfKE8aQrPpe0kqNrsuAABr3/m4LY/9CkJDpC8Yqfz3qk96hXdbqWtN Bg/7PU8YAIO9NCygyyq9ADffKOXylH/7dVhW0ZYDYFdGbwdnJVs7Tj/QU9rSmcvD PJV2iKOx9pIpqnLojeabhwuh28aRyHnm4G3eFGrGHXCeXXScqammOUSWKgdkRRzy Nj9qQxghomQkKmGuHa/7DdusOyQFdwvQ88hM1Q6xvo1EWAwanPDH/8ZwZy9Z+7Cu zfHfrV4/cVAOBt3FXT2WYOOVoogCAYbkMuGF0P/oMK1wycbxiAHBdl3xuPX5sVom 8VhNlFvOWxmG0JPRjnHaJqw8Gx139jLYlHsoVZrDfe+ORCMX3BnojlEPVs8sQQSV oS4Lz7V3/O5OOEK8h96n =Jx3Q -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Some businesses and professionals need an extremely secure OS lock, that even the best of the best can't crack...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 12/25/2011 08:05 PM, Linda McLeod wrote: I lost the encrypted login PW for one of my many hd's, and found that I can easily over-ride to restore it if I do a little cracking with codes.. The data was easily found in a Google search, which means that an encrypted OS isn't really a locked OS.. So I'm wondering how can we have sure-fire fool-proof crack-proof keys that maintain a private corporate computer totally safe and private from the crazy world's bullying and messing..? What? What password are you referring to exactly? BIOS? encrypted LUKS partition? encryptfs? Truecrypt? Please provide more details. Do you suppose a flash drive can somehow made to be the only key that opens an OS..? Can there be layers of keys in a key..? I.E.: ones multi-layered PW might be something like: 18erty 239de frosset (for this one the user must wait 5-seconds of no keyboard activity before being keyed in) 18 su78 ddhe I have never seen anything like this. I wouldn't trust it if someone came up with something like this since they could easily just add their own key into the algorithm. - -- Larry Brower, CCENT Fedora Ambassador - North America Fedora Quality Assurance lbro...@fedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJO994EAAoJEF1Xw4ZWTEoJsGgQAIkRy0bpZVeRz2uz6LK9hfjL S/KbE/LzjKZmlRPI7rm6UjKgZP0JOBbciGwt+2WO27BHFwkBBAqBnv7fINPCNSr7 5Oy6dD2nT3m4SDpF77TmAPiRj67QaQKXrr1H3bxUPOhZs3rFtnJ11eAtNyMvJp6e J2DEnjMaUZEHPfyh2Jby5OzPTxspoHV7bPE03UJUYWflAOyaX9HcrhrWXu6jklx/ vYWOQcEl7vsI86a2BEcH3fkpnmH+CmkbyOaR9Sv5LSHjtTtzoITkv7MuJ34YkUb8 fNudKZnZfBl1ohKtuwt8cGIuECCZbJtuvxyv+YbwafcNyiJXXKYFIwCG50K761ys /Q5p9WPh5TSJmuHZVJRK7DMHcu3KptoTPtrVsMe1M0wr19VqNNcvbCFOed4O7xC/ WjxlTXR6hiKTUXwe+0kNlw7WZBgj2uExdsG2v0KDWcKuEqDFGkXibmLXcI9PeqHA MHRVI/8qgOLqC1bFy2BYTVsekmvvGcIbj6Adt3o0j5+80+nobhnnW9k8iU4XN4A+ NCPzpS1iRFvSGYiuMhs+rmzVIWR832Ha8kJ28mIb5XJFYa4tDEaMfG74IH7YryFW RSKXBF7bFJ0nG2D6tZjIstkYA/P6yELbfxMgf//9IvR6FL9B81tMPoF+x0FTgBD8 S9gm85tVdxgl7qIgyp5y =fy8S -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How can someone know Sub-Domains?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 12/24/2011 05:48 PM, Michelle Konzack wrote: Hello *, I have installed inside my corporated domain a subdomain for a customer and now this subdomain is under attack, exactly, the Domains with 37 Courier-Servers and 140 Web-Servers are DoS'ed. This mean, someone is trying to bring down the whole network using 200k IPs. I use a CISCO 12008 which work nicely with its filters, but not always. My Dual 1 GE connection is nearly fucked! And yes, I have a big problem with extortion since arround 2 weeks and I am not willing to pay. Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening Michelle Konzack Why would you give them a subdomain? How do you know they weren't being targeted prior to coming to you? Why haven't you nulled them yet? Why do you think this belongs on this list? - -- Larry Brower, CCENT Linux System Administrator II HostGator.com LLC lbro...@hostgator.com Http://www.hostgator.com Http://support.hostgator.com/ Fedora Ambassador - North America Fedora Quality Assurance lbro...@fedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJO9oI9AAoJEF1Xw4ZWTEoJJq8QAIpMWiaLUsZnhDJ5ccZxnlJ5 L8rDF9W0jE2E95lk3yqXmCza2AsZCLxXxAwfud8/cjLjxPF4xzPoLZSyN5RtSVT8 X6xiNpYD9Geqn2xrQsyY94cGgTkz+LfndCpuTuCiTLAwh3Pn4jkhfnu8RIPcqIXg 2uFLtguRfzHirXb+NUaxGI3b8V7mJGnHCdVAsxvZtUoN7QCHIP1hIyMYfZqvXc4H GHp9K9jGjYIU/uIe8gXxSifXGtRzTIhWIIXRQvJo1SQ/kWzx3acnw0kC2H69EL9D dH198amEqk1aLs+3DefK2uskaEr1f/8v+Ps1F6UsZSkcdNGlX2Nwp0plBoL8J84s h80PVcprAMhiWyvyNjMNhjHw5Cm4oaomZ8myqK2qFwge4mMASCX3T/ntvr6MrKQz Yfd7WcfMDOI4cHT7OMoVnTLrZ7aslYN9WEsaFqE6tZXWu49a9+GWzObyuTA+23Lm WBScdcLawir34a0T/d+K+1zWq9es7YqEn6l8U89tqmb5weMAyXAMVYxKU+k36dTu AADE4JuAmFoYrSLabBNb9I3txNfEeLNMTqQGeBctn9fr2kGjL1OswcAxqijzZakF xiOcrzYmJnpeSN9VNcJ7DQF1Y98wUjIxO3FXFwXqYgaNlOfDvVUB5lkr6/9/R6Td Jqr8/u9+FQLshN44Gqak =ui1u -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: Trends - how to save Fedora ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 We should probably refrain from feeding the troll. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOwFLYAAoJEF1Xw4ZWTEoJPH8QAKSmeG0Jfo3ZwwAAD8SGSA4y rH3aR61QeEOEEJNF35RIr93YirR+vPR47Cx28SK81JfCBXIW3AyZR049xdDy28ML cSmg11XcMgQ4uWHZpaQgQvF5KZiljKYEFE8lCWHv+ydcXWsZmaB7YMhm1WaT6uuj tzK0Cfn3zSD/gtkW+jP5lSIaUN2d4qDTDMRCj4Mue1grevvkU6ewIvyj95DoafB+ IRWGnjSauG2KnWW1ginNB4yNOJXUOb8GoB9b8FeUlGByJ3a5e6w/BWodazVTyHl4 vgyIPN8qk/5yBDBK+7rMLphKAQloGNLc2fl3CJEiupWPBcTMOts8p8zoryGPFPRo Yzvyg93/Rb94L7TzpoaI3MNRfzNQiFGWxY9QmyIRNgZaYpCUl6iVlPRc21I5XWDI ux3Ov7TijHBVLWnddnbvXjs5jmKydwOhPOfxs+7AZbB2YpRpCZ2j3vsNJVsfsWi8 u7Wq8bqLZDaf4g1OETgnGNgyVKnptp/YZSxRXmU1nsBweOjCIJo7D8tuBb94PlrH eVI/8p8U43SZBulrYxYzh6Lz5Z6QLiB1UFi9J0nw7oXRMaZAlCsJrrhLgDD069m5 NUTfqFc4p6fua9aFoJHJxNlV1+Jy72Au8hupBJFqGtEu7mfWQIYxhOW+sRohqX4p Sd3S8jY+Wzaf9pFI7XMf =Amtx -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: help me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/24/2011 11:10 AM, shailesh wrote: mmx 352 modem (micromax) not connecting http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle? Follow *_Rediff Deal ho jaye! http://track.rediff.com/click?url=___http://dealhojaye.rediff.com?sc_cid=rediffmailsignature___cmp=signaturelnk=rediffmailsignaturenewservice=deals_* to get exciting offers in your city everyday. If you want help Id suggest you actually provide a better description of the problem as opposed to not connecting. The phrase not connecting is not helpful and you wont get any real help. You may want to reference http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOpZK5AAoJEF1Xw4ZWTEoJxKcQALINkAe23Yms2cQq/nwSZ9YP OAC9irUk/VafsqtMqZsstSg4ynRbrX2p7AC8tb7/OEUd6YUkdnpk1lAHBmHwFXRo bRggfCYoGO4FHm4Wq/vey9++CqN8de+ghyBPj+eunw5BFsZ0UNP4Ejke45Yas5Gj TYmXrMoD0aVwZQagQM1Odp9+aKtvyxgDH0ROJZSjCdYUkuZG+T5ud+tHh+Q4w0fB 6Skfkle2ICHsO2IgLRu1fSgp/Pj1KtHZdyT/aQm09ExljRrHTeqBO2MIFfoZo5dP InC7KdR0xOD9XoYCtzYz5Cj+S8jppMYQHe2VNoCREI6Zll3v54PmiRbnHctLxAJb HBQxIgilsrQutHDJQyljnacUGxggW2gznxydqGHwXmcufh9XAO5fC8NLlHu+Neq7 DpXRU0NWIcb42yYCdJmxklutrB9Q/JDDqscoh/X0IS7mPi8IvgY4fixanzMu+NVB XrWisCiLqchxpPDTlWxaHpPe+roV39z7lz7WZdz+NWsj9Dgigbiaa4I4bcHJEEFT SxzTyZ5jUYsYtBxySVNo1PBwy2pBtFyrh8WGJMrQK9Tl/gF5ICcaa6+FN/VEnnIL e/+uulY0PjiYAKrhcb9GszrB6jgnUtoGw/Dt+KMsM8UD8DN8a6bPLXGF755aGDhg 52yH/0gJSKcv6hfvOgne =YWIw -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: udp vs tcp query
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/22/2011 10:24 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: can i control this pr zone when bind is dns client ? Why would you want to? Just fix the problem. remote server is rbldnsd with is not supporting tcp, how to solve this ? Use a server that is sane and supports tcp? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOo4tYAAoJEF1Xw4ZWTEoJzBcP/1J5fxBZ8gzgLlTsAbFPILbn vfCTFnRJ8DX1WDHg1UMFp5Z3P/KisfyXUaGxN/+PhZoCh8elAzc6TY8Kw1Hqv9fJ rvyevVjfbmk0jOmroCE9uX6ztlgIgn8r7MoHEbYXWmN1MrElUMvVU1ZwY6lbLg9M Egmh+07ps9U/KFjme6/LRsbBytGX5TuvNTENW/Q+Xt+mrmqZ4cI5G3kHwZH/UqRf 05pWI7mdp7XJT3Wp6jfjpXrIJJ//46MrUFevIhDdfWWVJILmrQL+87RFnfk71p2R 1YSsQpwQRKic4J+6ptq1OJD9+idj/Kw7PxO2OBIb7giu+x3nmM0biv0uW129OEc7 v6nemGK6RJtrgKRZop7XYGrxFX5wPJk5wSbuuz3zy20Wuu40y896SfKwUvYNPD0i pSVFXNIkUXqhoVGd13e1bH0EJF0SFkN8dqO3HF8XI1NrIbBmu53uuCmwi7/vO2VD a8ck6+qnC1nlk1yZV4A1OJv6HO8j1p/Jvktd4d1czBXEuAq2o1TZ3DENLBmRhyS6 yBSpSGozoZNP43t0LatrVqiKGAdhcGf4D1HHByiHFGX0iOxjQoOKf8+d1J53ae5P fncIxEhmvXQK+MczYVEXumSKnj7p7EpJB0nVDc1wQHeVpGko1MOO+eC7YH4g0dcx s0PUPxrMCYunnLKEMwTh =iHaT -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: how to bind single interface with more than one cpu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/18/2011 02:42 PM, Benjamin wrote: Hi, Any guidence on this requirement. I don't think your question makes any sense. Perhaps ask a question that does? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOnddgAAoJEF1Xw4ZWTEoJm4IP/ju62Gddy7LgIbo1/AArbu1w sScJgikaOOOnlow4GoN/aATYHg5bdjBGNDZRUqufk+0wa88/pCzITI8O9syjgBy4 Jj1VtEysD+QbexwnvNHREE72Aqy/3nrHF7R/9kwQtssMwbeRnwj2T37/Y5rQaJMB j8ugFXleVUdi6P/MB0QLL+V8O+2Uxk3Tlro0p0Bu6Iqudjm0v3BMR+CUlEVhXs8Z ABD0EYYnQ9alItxpg9iihs3uMpma+7Yv//XcJxelqvG1+q0A6TR2Ogm4CfCxMD1L u9q5tlLYEUY+7fACuHv5s9NjbXbpQ0C6UIYiUQfufcj4x5uS1kyNly95Gt/0Km79 IcLUCEsByFWdjGQfLtyC9EmSBuOTVwyfCeLOVKOXfakSYyYAnqrxf8hSnuzCJ6Iz K69Qlo5a/08oUJkoiThipLaDAfMnnfr5+3wAoQJhyLKsNkln8g0Sx91XXQaUOKCp 0m6jprAa/nb9aMrj/0R3yIP7O0RCbE+yvA+WJ5prG6GEzJVOlkaWD+lz2wYnY2Y9 S9XJPlEL89KmjuAx7a2mCwCoVcR5yrhNemHddf9zS1PG/+Pxgz3yPcQSsbKN+tLP /PwDgFbPbkWvZ8i58BLiML7g+um4x76A4gU4c2/u4AlpD4Hm5wipqup6HsYJtSCJ u/pA2ykzWicr8PEw1aQb =uDO0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Restoring from a tarball
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/18/2011 03:33 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 10/18/2011 01:18 PM, Ian Malone wrote: Yes by default it will have stripped them on archiving. Since they were archived with the full path otherwise you can using -C / will get the original full path back: tar xf marcia.tar.bz2 -C / Do this as user 'marcia' and you should be okay for UIDs on extraction (it will also prevent it accidentally extracting somewhere else on the filesystem). Note that I did this as root (using sudo, as it's on Ubuntu) to make sure all permissions were preserved. Wouldn't it be best to restore it the same way, for the same reason? And, there was exactly one user on the old box, as there will be on the new installation. Yes, you would want to do this as root. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOnePFAAoJEF1Xw4ZWTEoJd8MP/269AGElefvPNUJEKJ6lse7A HpZ90kHXju+BmvH4M1Iy+rJD07UoGzQ0vr2CTY8Ky0p8kRPlQ3FS+ERygBi/lBpB r2AM1cqYh88XLkI4oHI3WDOqX49dQkaOIR+6baLYB6lPtKYWmbq6kk0jbz5O8tUC 5Wu2vVn/F//Y6GTJdawcCN+NT9nCrMViG7V6z0JUtlHI87CTlwrkqSYKv9JfvhqW DxADFN/UTeCfGS/ogWBbgcO7KwXxUnRpsoAf0WTBq0ZN5bU7niPLad+ECGenKvLb Bc10fydAKIGSH7bbt+wODoIHfZJr15OF3RbwYf71SDbfn0hA6tF+APPhZvjmAaLW Axp7FrKSWHABL7zBfSUeXhLOmTqoTePLy6e5akADcAdRI6cvCatBWrkcHyb1lDbM ufWQ411O17vVsVV5j/TXJBxsHLn5CSDsJ3tBUr5e79PgDHrVMr1X/D3go3o7YeWh Eb1FNRY9RtOXeXlCgdT1udjYZ63fBxonj26YHJP9Y1vneDqmWrOirzZdSj7t7upz s/VaQ7MJgJqvQJuDND48FmvtMBpBZISSqwse1QLkqxwomat7jvKizFffAevQ5wZD VK48ioEvF965rN9h4Pidqd3u49Wx/p43abMf+eKmoPRjbCiQJvqjxUGNMkQWdERo GdEXivvMTcKa/bvw/Jdf =h4uu -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: OT: need bash help
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/17/2011 02:39 PM, Mike Wright wrote: Hi all, I'm trying to write a bash script and having problems. If I execute this: ps x | grep mongod | wc -l it returns a value. OTOH, if I execute this: LINES = ps x | grep mongod | wc -l it returns command not found. How does one assign the output of a command to an environment variable? TIA, Mike Wright I think you are looking for: LINES=$(ps x | grep mongod | wc -l) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOnIVZAAoJEF1Xw4ZWTEoJHhoP/ArT7LZCFrjkhGS+ECi47rWK xEelC7IC5oyZ/++LAp7dOimhLT3dV9B5UJxqffdXl4zxTbx+TrxulZhEjPG1vGz+ j1VfH9kPI3TawjQqO5soH0reWONfNDa0YIrl44CTnW+Drt9rqXl4c9tlNDfGilW2 zkj1zDCbegTdlVWlkiYvicWwFNfDx4qO0oh8hTKsCwqEhOMeL+swsnaKRhWn6Qke tIV+zwUXiRTtBOaYvwd0KPJrZb6P8yfHSh2cDWkzpwHSH8t4pPvEgE8Z5rYTgy0M AbSFOuMdotbgWyfHNMQHQNesHHAIipIr7OyYnVQ/rEM5pe4nKMtOknaSxonOkPcM hNFwJNL2gOUL+xf77BO5jqu6YKw31+lkliuR6kiY/UYGOfN5vJFOxfz7R8x6Rde7 A5oo0Ta76BN75q0obNZiS+Rj+fn5cuIZyy657cDccLwK9VSF+vlAfhBZ1qb88nAr ss9FvGwLhJeoxPw+nnFxlPAD0byl78TwbXEoQMDfLzwlPCHFAAqqVARlJcFtEmjG yjEc4d5Jlps7MckD41FNBTkGQLXkyh78zpq82G7x0BRE/yluOAcZ9AZAjWTaToND YD9kfT2kM86NxDzKvYHZPxqRpmzk8z+25j6oHNmwcjTY8Fe6kcWflriPXdSOvyxI xdA/4NJzmb9wwP0OQzIz =AcJ1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: undelete files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/14/2011 07:03 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: No. This seems to be a short sided answer. They could be recovered using something like testdisk most likely On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:40:48 -0500 Adel ESSAFI adeless...@gmail.com wrote: Hello if I delete some files with rm; is it possible to restore them? Regards -- PhD candidate in Computer Science Address 3 avenue lamine, cité ezzahra, Sousse 4000 Tunisia tel: +216 97 246 706 (+33640302046 jusqu'au 15/6) fax: +216 71 391 166 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOmM70AAoJEF1Xw4ZWTEoJHGAQAI85Hv83AC3Ox2IYzhTXWRcA LkvLelKK343suDKmiEYa1xrLtl/U2hAsXUqSh6HOVuTOfAt/BmFIH4UXDWif2nUX 0yeXX7Dc0EPcULaYUD5nFNyBMy3dqEMjYI/vQMzDU3mIe0ev9Y78QA4bpgxIpgub Fqz3nNKD4jgOwqaM1npj2cr8Nm4+k8mFdTRYk9qo9QwhybPY7W4oG7NenvoIE/zD GFxksxC+SYTT0hSDDrdo07kelQckk5b+3Mcjp/CFUhbCMnYmLvIwiUjT1noTKO7Q Id9ruunhNqqJfg0Rim7nniu5abIT4qZvLfIfr9cFw3+Ns1mUWKOsQnuu/59ENIG6 UaVjlQAE/xDq7BG/e6flv2ccuVJhkYDOuMXy7At/pbwcFxg7FCTMiHwPAAaXlfQT mlSRujcLNNsxZE8hjWGWVS8WZ5HgclTqA558ALiMz8Nh82qq1eoAUJ2MDR2x1Ozk hjdg3nN6aLzsfzWpkv34SLTyfuJeFCd/yGDK9HFnc8+MZAos0EwOCI9/jHDL9XOk 37PHVhDD6eISZlzI+GCtSzihV6vPWGKiO+t3vx0TlG7vxRChTeOuMJDwQ6ytgpN0 GanaoevYnzGWQb9kZn+i//tfi3mReak/X0iS/RExoQSK0rfV4kR/v0x6szsUfSh4 1p8BltW+ZFHFJOKFlFYR =cX8w -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: No, I don't want to maximize my window
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/10/2011 06:31 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: And this makes you feel like you need to throw a tantrum on this list like a small child? Perhaps you should direct this to the developer responsible... you know the ones... the Gnome devs. Oh wait, You didn't think of that did you? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOk4JTAAoJEF1Xw4ZWTEoJXX4P/AraLB+/vQPHXQirhLcSloXP pzMXOwVVt1A6BfJI3KVXHQ0myD7WY7I69/vH+ygIPgZ+bmE0jkDndw017QYNPt/0 98UOEddPwgrLUaIFIRgjz1gUpPox53Vm7GJEOeRYXYsV8zaz4zvY0VjfdmtDGvy1 5Rw4EFu6O9fTB/UsnybahbOkKzkEGP2Jt/Ky3jLSEDZDKDMCo9hGRTiafaihCrQS Z6GQiJHoQYvh/Iy4I88mYuhoCy+aW7RmGXTfkPzH4k9mUHJUTo25P3JwA+g8TZoj qHgglH0wuN/lXREEColUAgVDo3B2bBBS4kwJSkpwUGlG9tyctcvUUZtKqmCf29HP 59BD6CvYiOLHku9Dg+Q4FIFGM9UXEWfn8PBg12dDQP6YYDxwUYyW9EHrW4L61VS1 lysyAGpV7BqXb29onACGAV/VncR9lU4nic8rqmd7CMFqxDlbTFNYgyrrR5efb5d3 sZ0zywi26SpaRxSjAe9JWF19C7B8ox4JMSC7QZiAhVbL8h3yrpZfT/aI6ntV6IWh VNzjYFhbNQ5DKcge8KVxWVZLBKv8JaYpbmf2hec/ddFS82NYmrQkk9qWTCB7II/3 4XMZ6ay5tWNcPYt7YZTosLkbi7YFGcpDBBNBsLfTyBAhGZjdUT/6/QQ2vNMsKbfl OcbRzGdk691IeKuwqWBV =vwHF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/10/2011 12:07 AM, Enrico Montich wrote: Enrico Montich Strada di Oselin 80 33047 Remanzacco (UD) T. 0432 649303 F. 0432 668770 Was there a question somewhere ? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOkn3ZAAoJEF1Xw4ZWTEoJl80P/0RSlOV5I3Do88TUOcqlhEeT 3DeR5gqh+n7nRn1/qeabJ3TSgwaLVleO7KoFTvT6IUg+zp+yi+F7PDcZiKgMWeSx X8mO4G+1FIG8AfC1QKRNZJ5ZEuoDHJvCjsJeQviFcLUGGBW1JD3sGQ40g0xgBE5o ZOg8oBX58U3EUyaHxeWboHo+OjtqIODfdcNBdN2eI3dcicdyS7V36Hx4mA6xIQCs 84Js2d7XtWwka3yNkwmFeUsZqlK5gZVM4njr5HHgOv5WN+O1+UD/v5IMyMpC2eBn n+JVWsbNuEOcRsSt/GQ3V8kxUbCZhRqYJnuMTNZU/edvuXkq0yG5SqkonpeewPzp oUbhlmkl8phRFQEyyZiTRcBWbYE8AVJLL/seGVJkHVVMqGS9wznSzTHwx8Yahg77 vm83oJNhI3yJeS3roYz5a9Rm7m35zrC3xqnjvf6MaJvV7QPQ54hUM+E0crvymk8t 0V/RIQtfCNk8lLXx2q8A2gfZiNSdv6PCLsQCI2ehb1nQgF2WxxKKY+9fjtB2Pq0U Az+NhB/NaGOk/FjvlKH76ub9OnB4bdBM5W86cSFdh6eVHS64R9oxCXlGr456CmSr nVmhx0lwvCQ74+/wMA1tovJbyUzx4JcVJJL2amUBXSe61g+v0aRXyzVq9ImM+zh9 nWWJQUCb6Tog/7UiPQbV =OqKq -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: I find FireFox is Fedora's biggest security flaw..
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 09/30/2011 11:53 PM, Linda McLeod wrote: I find FireFox is Fedora's biggest security flaw.. FF is way too easy to hack and crack by demon-bullies to get into to mess-up the browser... Please tell: What be the most secure browser for Linux Fedora?.. Is there such a thing as a secure browser..? Have you got any ideas when Mozilla might make FF reasonably secure..? How do I get you and/or Mozilla to link to my PC to tap into my OS to catch a glimpse of the damage and entries the kooks do to FF in my Fedora-14 OS hd..? How about providing some sort of proof to backup your far fetched crazy claims. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOhp4CAAoJEF1Xw4ZWTEoJh7kQALJ0oihgK0u9sPA9wVaTUVcQ YgcQLVgqEAj1XnRbALqGrbR5W3LZUZ8MLcgqYnJdJUb//+uVAW2lgZAgXYM4Leo5 Lf7nYXDPsXfEvcExCPGo4t82Vra8VHVftiN1x0JzSx5P7msg9TvdusglASazgpvI PxK1kAL/3EFeT+W/kqG4kjVCc2DTfj/5pvElreFyBG2ICEhFHv8Ua2r9TBmgFX9P lb1ClqDG/0VepDWK5pzZm5pZQv9XyI2LROuvMHTmM2HCvukmqVdD+CzQXJOoK+a9 xVZ3uHK5pnJW4UAMEkblj5GqWFidVxwxnJg1UKUxIfWMF+CeJlJVC7vcO4pTRRSH hbqewOizK4QqdvEIe916ptuMpPTyEbkqJA10JInvFLZp1zAeK7e64+4JI9V5/E4B X30nr3kIkn19gvXhT4+QtvF9Gh1yyzlszRR930bJPQ8xF1Ma3GAwmdCpGNRTdJ0u 3fw56vc8zzMt31VYHRlpAQod6q0fUoJq9iPexaURqHIBMz9DxrHqZJZlBaIlbhMU Z0ouqV94wgrVwPvbniPcQGzilucv3SKi856Vp3gemzzQwGfFIFX9BrzRLEHjqgyX PCpVATrvtkUw8g57qxEnIsXah0L+QKtRcB30UWT9+UH+AoQNdBS8FGJeuAFImPX6 agVUvILhTjrV4X4+DIIZ =xnGH -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: [Fedora] about mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 09/13/2011 09:23 PM, xinyou yan wrote: I suggest we put [Fedora] in subject .So we can find the mail for the list . or you could just create a filter on the email address and dump it into a folder :) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOcBNvAAoJEF1Xw4ZWTEoJDT8QALArItyBmmq0DR5+3k46rUU1 gp9mRQgMrwIshmEcg4UkuWR8Sbwuv63u9R1HmXGNE5IJIXDciAzZOHWN+TyjZ+La lrwFfYKYrYbr4Ler7gvhAQCFjvAd+hRr3L/d0od//lz0KHcfUHibQMqW4lq3Lf+u ipQZjlWS0D4eEyflXpRT7hcpZlVulpMp/IK/Dl0CinAcQbMwQg7VGURrhR6OKX2t QZeXL2cmAGMNOd1IzFF3r+8DIrKYsPLbh8gOBYKVkTc2LVMTt0u5ifjY+zazZZM/ KF1AfysMCuJqsu+o7CfMnQviIRVIl/kTtPUfjhvrKcT9bX4tXtMvcFtdBvIMyfg1 6xSAIjjJEBrkZvzpJ2cXdhnLulQcFCvEY4TiEtOcEucy5LB2d4IIjwV2hBiQiQ5t 1GYboSIulLQfHU/QElBb1oCr80EikDPysMmp4aOY5p8OzJ4gcy0YHkBrh4MExFdq UR9zs678EC+SrWY1bpRYz81L/y0oHdA+M/MOyYuDiqueJmXYv/TphFxrFBCrmdIT Jlt7RzbuZjteRfSzGLKTuc09g03ZrDfvQBo/EJ+qzEZGj95m7iv3tMRljQaXCo2T j5/Nr4RiAUZZqNFi8LN1D9P9Yo/B79A61lKGnAKh7zHZEiU5N8odlrWooTor5BUN pE/hO8CaETmxnd1iyHlx =suMf -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: /USR/SBIN/CROND
On 09/12/2011 05:55 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote: CROND in Fedora 14- distros are OK, crond childs are running with this name. But, what shit are F15 crond records (usually directed to /var/log/cron) aka: Sep 13 00:30:01 x /USR/SBIN/CROND[11095]: (root) CMD (/usr/local/... I hope that isn't next step nearer to ass of some case-insensitive OSes? It cannot have any meaningful significancy. Or I'm bad? Franta Hanzlik what? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: infrastructure
On 09/09/2011 06:15 PM, rexchou wrote: Hello Does fedora on the C language project? What? ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Re: Progress and advice so far
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 08/20/2011 12:23 AM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 08/19/2011 09:56 PM, Lars Eighner wrote: Evidently linux does not have which and apropos is not extremely helpful. Yes it does. Well, *my* computer has it and I don't remember doing anything special to get it. Linux has which by default. The only reason I can think that you may not have it is if you did some sort of a minimal install and left a bunch of stuff out -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJOT0bUAAoJEBgaXYoZ++87WLsH/1rOhNFP0Pnug+uo9BWXPZZB CVgqK9+iS3tHytcfXZ4Y2dP32BfZD+7yfoSZ0w6k5o1owyJrYVeMAyLYCXGBHO27 P7JmjPwPvzFyycg2rP0lnOFsSehm9mJkhtIxkHeECSqZ2Sf9LnMpjgfs0TuKrK1y TB4Yws+iooKpx7PmqkNGRPgdoiTkhSGmxyeZZX46OcvDBVxkgolOPhBAb1zS0fM5 ThipVaZQootliOINrbT+llBtQegFLqtAS+YCP3Lwd1eQs3ChZw4/EBfgC6Jn8udc Q/wbtBuG47NiKtjQbVaN6HXnrT3vafD2f441TbeafqCUp9JOzZ4EvHARnlofYkA= =7A9s -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: GPG keys listed are not correct.
On 05/17/2011 06:56 PM, Lucélio Gomes de Freitas wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear GnuPG staff, I have Virtualbox-4.0.6 installed ok on my Linux machine, but on updating to the newest one . . . . I got the following messages using(KDE) kpackage kit: === 1 - The GPG keys listed for the Fedora 14 - x86_64 - VirtualBox repository are already installed but they are not correct for this package. 2 - Check that the correct key URLs are configured for this repository. === Sorry for this question but: How to install the correct GPG keys for this package? where are the correct key URLs, and where to configure it? Please. Ps. Besides Virtualbox I have installed Firefox Thunderbird. Thanks. Are you just trying to update virtualbox or Fedora in general ? If Fedora, have you verified that the GPG key's for that release are installed? You might want to reference https://fedoraproject.org/keys If it is just that one RPM you are trying to update and the key is failing I would suggest contacting the packager of Virtualbox or making an inquiry on the Fedora Users Mailing list which you can join at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: [CentOS] Problem Making Tarballs
On 05/15/2011 11:32 PM, John J. Boyer wrote: I have a CentOS virtual private server from 1and1.com If I checkout or pull something from a repository, it will contain an autogen.sh file Running this and then configure seems to work. However, when I run make I get a lot of error messages from libtool saying that such and such a command could not be found on some line or that there is a syntax error. This happens even with the latest updates. Several people have been unable to help. What is the problem, and what should I do about it? Thanks, John If you try actually providing more information as well as some of the errors we might be able to help you. Im pretty sure that libtool isn't telling you such and such a command could not be found on some line or that there is a syntax error. Again, to reiterate, provide useful information as opposed to just ranting about how something doesn't work and we might actually try to help you. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: I Installed gcc using yum install gcc, Where can I find the Header files Declarations
On 05/14/2011 01:26 AM, Varuna Seneviratna wrote: How to get float.h included Try yum provides */float.h You might also try typing man yum -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: ecryptfs and password
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 04/24/2011 11:58 PM, Gregory Hosler wrote: alternately, you can setup /etc/crypttab so that the password is not entered manually. All the best, -Greg Would this not then defeat the purpose of encrypting the partition ? :) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJNtQAQAAoJEBgaXYoZ++87P5QIAJEupvOmmb27lniddR4D1e1A 2H/3YRzMCARXGPqm3Ur71JAmGP3yisRqpIXiOyrvtqB/JlBnuPtRb5HSWm+3Z7Is dbnURU5ON8Qh96Q2Z6FO1JUAD5UwGxT6tcsAQ6lGJ+AVw/bYMWjpC//q8vWW0G6E O4URImH1mX6uWcfldEdczbvUzbUTlVI9UP130At7z3mJRFYkUqbbitKnkDlD+N46 xfsP3A+n/dOeuCTeOwzRCwsxoqQAyxNiGUI2mLWwyli9YvYqcWgnSbRsnVyH3mSv HqaPkTkJCECs42v0S24mgBwY7rCqGiGIgcu4xR16dkHQfClFTUN9uQ3dJbxhq0k= =lHzC -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Signing a key (meaning)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 04/11/2011 06:09 PM, MFPA wrote: That's all fair enough, but I still think the standard MITM attack is an example of some hypothetical exploit by some hypothetical attacker compromises your communications. MITM is not hypothetical and has been used quite a bit with SSL based systems. There are even companies who have entire product lines geared towards LE / Intel org's that perform SSL MITM attacks for intelligence gathering and such. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJNo4vwAAoJEPXCUD/44PWqc40QAIKXhSHTZRVk8dBzO7hwMUrr b89uLITHGzuHK0lP3Y0QJB78mZAaL65HjTIcfqWKkjfaiJige06wb/iwoCQLPlE+ YCqACYwg4ByVQB+YOCFJ2H00aOXFq67rm7WkDoCvvrstVMQLmK3TW0uRFld7cNwu vkPcFj/Sz6HE5Yoo9yFrU2IFAGAKjjHsSrpoNXQzZn+5OdqTrM3zDlzfkNHFw6da zSd/uP+gBjo85e6mgseloI8WVSSDnYmuww5RMiTSfAYcSJCu5t6Pa1nA0bQzk4O2 BWQwjbmvfat0soy5cChyZLONvXV3DfReMWRzrz4rauNoyn7BDZSbsBcL+QC0OwQb 0L3iIGVXhKtQWmQiZXvEPHsto/JKWq6B4TvM6tWXN3H5MTuIe2ecl1VtMPF0x7F6 UQGcD6kAIaYIiL1x0wapQ8xwbVAzbxcwsZpNfjiUcc8YWrrnQLBvzOd95EcsLstH ntx6wBK2Jg9lWZmiSHO7tTPbbvnDXTev+WTBd6xVnDNrBRaAl2zGUOv6aP9lduOv m0t5tkX4OV5IT4aqh4xu6B1MSEIYBb2toJ5Gm8sIPIYi9j7BFiXW6QxTIP+g/C72 jCej+foHl5cKG/F4wjmT75907r7RzUdzaASVW/A5h8a6p7cS3z1YtO3NERrczszN WJYy19kpRZw9VcI8Cijk =knMv -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Help to solve ROOT DNS query
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Your questions seems more geared towards a list that deals with Microsoft Perhaps try the NT System Admin list or the AD list: http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/communities/ On 03/30/2011 02:34 AM, babu dheen wrote: Hi, We are using Microsoft AD server as DNS server for our company and we have configured FORWARDER to ISP DNS server for external domain queries. What we noticed that our internal DNS server is able to use FORWARDERS all time but firewall logs shows that internal AD servers is contacting root DNS servers parallelly. Please help us to resove this problem. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users - -- Larry Brower Level II Linux Systems Administrator HostGator.com LLC lbro...@hostgator.com Http://www.hostgator.com Http://support.hostgator.com/ Fedora Ambassador - North America lbro...@fedoraproject.org http://fedoraproject.org/ PGP/GPG Key: 0xAE838321 Key fingerprint = 4F4D 41D7 12D5 DD3F 5A20 1398 7503 FCEC AE83 8321 ?So much of what we call management consists in making it difficult for people to work? -- Peter F. Drucker -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJNkuC8AAoJEBgaXYoZ++87wRoIAJdmIZugQJig+X/VbrPTJ3X8 cW116ev02J6OtQlxPOLX/zNyMu1I+rST/MlvdhXO53x+9+kYEoXWfFi14phe5Cnt jvw0/7o2ZAB4TEf2fhdBfeRLvooD1YwPkdFg0Cdkh5ZyaQ2fnnXnWSw5TRaVE42T ORhLpeuVaewYhZcyo2SUsNrUsoWVOZTJGTvRF1LZeJGznQ8ds63S5/GKhBc6fqkh 2UE5qoollN0ekrrUJx/CcU6sR4BLxTzoNK61uCNJH39xc+pB6QSj0ArfJ9kwDkDH d5KgGNtG+Eni+p9Qx9fO+pPWGBE8JmM//MeUrBzgCW49qFXkPbsNtmxb6WEdgWA= =3fSA -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: 4096 bit keys
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 03/22/2011 06:32 PM, Jonathan Ely wrote: What is ECC? Now I want that haha. Elliptic curve cryptography http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptic_curve_cryptography -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJNiTL8AAoJEPXCUD/44PWqF5EQAL+WCIFd0ylULGW9LacvRS84 5tXtYQxShj2onusspDfMQdiFJoUYAA1MIVrFe1S8IXBOG4PSnNkZuos9arPgPFz4 Vt2epmtd0fF1hcbi7kfJrftyMW4F4j0HO+XWgM6l2EKxWYHzDKnxO7aDzwddpcyc 9VWXz0B8eMJWhfcQjW7K9XZJJrCuijzXcejD3ObXbOcTjIhBrcl30xKtyPt4aJPt ekuMl7rgM0lMP2uXXHzGgOaU4c21f0kAOlcfF8VQ9uorZEK8ngRovyyoNwYcGKw8 VqrW5WGgZb1so8hGMgaK6/nRcsEDW5HFWX4lNV5md46oddldMuKbh64Bvc0OBFC+ 0zT/pSb60DhTuomDKj7M15Z2ezVWA1179zwFAcpi0M/2xMSmx/PiuD7y/mdNggka bo72eyh9kttNwuX6+8QIi6wVn0CgEoY5lXUGUjaDkwlzswqnn3PCZN1dYVZRVSWW NIPOgGG0N2cuH4pwCQQ9I17sD+xLHbDV11ddphe3ect95LP2/Ope5fDOvNeMS2KF E8U1m4ON40PW3jIYg72OhoRSHHQzp9JVFjRCczDtMmMsJPk5YD2Njg+4RaUkjSw1 NKZbpa0UJD0gwB3zyWI+goxwICWsrD6LveqlZBtg1F48/qx6NTcb0HIou29dYBSs lu74QTku+2rNvYWnZi0j =hTLX -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: System policy to shutdown as normal user?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 03/20/2011 10:58 PM, Alex wrote: No, what I was referring to was similar to providing the ability for normal users to apply package updates using System-Administration-Software Update (packagekit?) without being prompted for the root password. I recall there being some selinux command that could be used for this? I believe similar capability exists for changing runlevels as well, but haven't had any luck finding the info again... Thanks, Alex I believe you are looking for sudo with NOPSSWD and not for selinux to do this -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJNhtKMAAoJEBgaXYoZ++87OwMH/if0ZYPgasScJ3M2TdGLtQxL Frb3X7x2vTDlbIdSm13mwLFaRCffSBu8+DGrEwdCqVkSaw4nmLhTq+ud5eYkUmLC /+szq7mDH8kwPqZm13hLijbujA0OJ1goCgY5bcnJWsAgFchqPQZlnoG3OeumSxdU edsunFfRaHhGk0jfkr3WXudswyeqgsQ0cClj1MoTMCa/KENiOJFjdi1GQxKIDguu wFyD19DUabw51YEywTECbx4VSpoTdjGOkRMdTNag35lLdqzTB+8Y4c+RoKL25CVt C7FT2vPG8dRZWhk6Kc0zJlGLUwdxAU/w/r4+3Lh3WiWBJUtgrAFTh44/9Debmp8= =r36X -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: FAS password complexity requirements
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Minimum 12 characters Alphanumeric Mixed case Minimum 2 special characters - -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. Ricky Zhou ri...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Hey, so we discussed in the meeting, FAS's password requirements are currently very lax - just a minimum length of 8 characters. What do we think the requirements should be changed to? One possible strength checker that I mentioned during the meeting was: http://www.nongnu.org/python-crack/ This can use a dictionary to detect weak passwords. Thoughts? Ricky_ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: APG v1.0.8 iQE/BAEBCgApBQJNgs6pIhxMYXJyeSBJLiBCcm93ZXIgPGxhcnJ5QG1heHFlLmNv bT4ACgkQGBpdihn77zsO0QgAhDC4pZCi7ozWO/HtgIMtHSkkUp7n9ug5RgY6slLc FBDEA9v/6y1xH1lky8IM4/1XP++AxPfDDA9oX2pwZfnWEX70vPvOnhVQsvsddnga INAYTv00tzvK+xSqZTGdhcdluJzluqbyWC8Y3ws+bwRyuRDSs2Wmi8SgLR//UAjV a0tLnR8y246i6ovA+2v/Pr6OwjvFTWop8gTTpdVeTJSlqHKgSInzFwoFQbB7P7wx NAQT+5cRRY+v9SMTfCvAr2GhhdbOnNBJoBEdxeGqKFB3+T2KqK9Yok5PuJMA75fu GOWxIUKUByBDZNtqIn4sETVgu4sYbgLaG9Qz5DN/DnZKWw== =OcbC -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Re: Why does abuse handling take so long ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 03/13/2011 05:34 PM, goe...@anime.net wrote: On Sun, 13 Mar 2011, Alexander Maassen wrote: On 13-3-2011 18:31, William Allen Simpson wrote: On 3/13/11 7:45 AM, Alexander Maassen wrote: Why o why are isp's and hosters so ignorant in dealing with such issues and act like they do not care? So, part of the problem is *your* upstream. Why didn't your upstream actively remove the entire abusive netblock? Why didn't your upstream contact other providers with your evidence, and together remove the abusive network from the global routing tables? My hoster did mail, his upstream is EGI, however, EGI does not want to block/filter since it would pollute their routers they say. I asked through my hoster if they would be willing to place a simple UDP filter, blocking all of it. They refuse. again make it a question of economics. vote with your wallet, vote with your feet. if they won't block, leave. leaving is not always as easy as you imply. There are some areas with only one real provider. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJNfUvcAAoJEPXCUD/44PWqje8QALqCB5SmUamIvItQSsJZ+B0t bKSDxmUszgAkFMxc9y7n1TuymOKx2lsCQmO8aQmE95NXOUloH1R89aA51DMaxxsX vt9GspDi2zuzoGngMUhl7Xuho5lxekg0nw8zEqa14MdZK/iMQw1e9D+pfl2GF43X 4KyFBqL85DrpnJhaNpQ3BB/EsM4+hMxxZYm5CAqZYKa2ywuR9LGVjQ5i0zoqc3e9 wFUAk2C/0ATf+eUhBaw6OHtpj7E2JgGfkP8K8npr27U9WVMpjBjd1ERZVy7FZ+7n rEVj+bUrW57VVvdv1UzE4rHa49Y0YXALnq05rGxuE0iCkIcth8pDI5YVYwTwsvDx gZR5H0Kmm9bQvOpvUR8TmW7BXlamVOHC1beCYHhI6Oig1bTx1DfCP+CniMnz5l3o G+sweZA589nJxonawl5qGhySCBg6a9Z4gtoYRaFsTVe8sI59JtzsbyvjdVvUwSkR UOPdPpHUuG72i3dB+/bdTKWDeGjghn6oTheVY/03oYvOLAg+8zZPupb3Ql9FARnw qb2Qc5ebzEG6wuaXlC/iHzTuc4DHp4rWvwm9tE1sQ379ntZJiKpfm0eMcdeo+xJ9 RxDg5fksOaihhM8MVRi4recdHyySzHZw9JPrx1VfhPWv3umPYt/csT0/L/EeyAJu Ybo7ahfzII26suzrAr43 =M/H6 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: history
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 03/11/2011 04:07 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, history gives me: bash: history: : numeric argument required I check my file .bash_history is present ! So, what is wrong ? Thank. Do you have an alias for history possibly with cli options specified? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJNerzpAAoJEBgaXYoZ++87JeQH/1ytGlHli3+ysh7rSGWykg1/ 5UbpgcA2CRH9P/JPRwV9WiziUUuJyhcXZTjZmiWavLBKHd97giZZJdr5yu8hZC11 WLfJ/+bWP9UPkpInfavFE1qe+CB1d1bHrJEFSyOP4qboAhXjK11m4LN7VlK/Ormh ossp/ttAH8vxWiWP0dsCGaEDrNKwZRw2kfKGFBL25vwSznmCJypIe5TEqjpF1ha9 3xzVTPPb4pnHPJ5mqqELabNtfSW6Pr26ga3UN+JX2DGKnGVP0Yi7eb7VWhM10xMW tP36ZmuwaC2GPnfR8B3QOXKkBOhUQxOZOZf9Nib0s/ZTYje50V9215isAP1cM/Y= =rA9B -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Duplicate accounts?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 02/28/2011 07:47 AM, Alain Spineux wrote: So I did SUDO -i, and from root as shell I tried to chown -hR * fcassia on the Desktop folder... You must switch the star and our user name chown -hR fcassia * You should also avoid doing chown -R with just a * wildcard as this could possibly recursively follow ../ which would then try and change ownership on things you don't want changed. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJNbCMNAAoJEBgaXYoZ++879UYH/jFEdn65GnvK3cMNq5JL2eAX W5wa+BG4nb1xOG6OHe//36fVMLk9YU1bd8zf2s8R3D8yVEw/cxndnGvyZegr8XYy 8eYq5ZFG092yIcKVSu3spTMz5U4UCwHRNj57y3qpapzzs8ENxt9Dmq17U5oFxvzy kUxCSp26WajYOz1q6Kx2poHoAOMPSVwSHaQWJhFKkhUPkYJ/RPl6wS83peBMSFc3 f1UzaTH0qG5FwQ3LxFKXkZwYGr3UOdJsjuDrFzeAeSA0F7p1c8ekffIycDBSnKIE GQ1xuTB1+sdmGmFFCdqChRvrO0fGfL/pLbI+lIZ2tbvQSfSUecfpedXAdMUOE2k= =CJ9j -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Duplicate accounts?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 02/28/2011 05:15 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: The Shell will not normally expand * to a name beginning with .. Try it: $ echo * See info bash: When a pattern is used for filename expansion, the character `.' at the start of a filename or immediately following a slash must be matched explicitly, unless the shell option `dotglob' is set. poc I would say this all depends on the application being invoked and would still say it is bad to just use * as opposed to say ./* I can't count the number of people Ive seen do things like rm -rf * in a directory and it recursively started working on / and /bin etc... -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJNbC6BAAoJEBgaXYoZ++87K7EH/jQPzxF5a2hKwOamptZnuAb2 BNd0Tm7rUUvNItkMVjhA032WoYO75Atftmh8dn0kVmD4Ha9UvQSTFRYszWh6NdpM nZ+vGaNIe0O3OvH5ASK55f+sd+6s0sKVLT7QXykixEaiq1h4CUhox03LD7OfhABr XpgQK/RL3Ca3OlfL4WyeAMC2Hk7hG6WOvVWlJBt523KS21/SXOp3QUgq2fIh05Tl oWbcPwChPxeGJPKSpvpbsvAVS6i1+F+ZQyYC4IoxxglULBzJa5eBdez2ZBoTpteJ h9oNuslNcz+SN6ha5uswixJhHBnqXsJdD04HM8dpwQMF68ZMPPEu5JjMk7nBxSc= =plTa -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Duplicate accounts?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 02/28/2011 06:54 PM, Steve Ellis wrote: On 2/28/2011 3:23 PM, Larry Brower wrote: I would say this all depends on the application being invoked and would still say it is bad to just use * as opposed to say ./* I can't count the number of people Ive seen do things like rm -rf * in a directory and it recursively started working on / and /bin etc... Not to be a pest, but if you worry about '*' expanding to include dotfiles, then why do you think that './*' is safe? Furthermore, '*' expansion is handled by the shell, not the application--in other words, dotglob rules the day. The '*' there will just as well include dotfiles (i.e., it won't unless dotglob is set as another poster indicated). I definitely agree that caution is warranted when using '*' in any command that can do horrible things to your files, especially for things like 'rm -rf', but don't travel under the misconception that './*' is going to save your bacon--because it won't. -se ./ explicitly specifies the CWD so what is your basis for saying it wont? While I will admit there could be other factors at play for rm recursively working on the systems Ive seen it happen on I can't say with certainty that there was as files like /etc/profile and /etc/bashrc were already removed by the time I had to work on the issue. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJNbFOIAAoJEBgaXYoZ++87XkAIAIzlq2qo6+Y2gG+DVOd0vXfa g9dMYgqhn7Z6UOkbFoLVKY7Jb/fksivp04Np4Y2+psksqrL+6ZqWjCDZVQ4ukwU0 zHFQDpEg4Tw9oXL2qHPVK407XH7ibIp2wKU5nql7X2y3F3qC6ji0l2TzclR18cRm lj/gF+YFUtgEajWf2qgmv9cnCZuRJA5qpL9vwml/DPiEo4D2Bz/hfV9Bl2vvQypY yc+0nhJJZKmG/mnPAnamluU5DnvGr99z2sk01o6zff1J9fznI/pMXC+9gxZWb12W MLVynsp9IHD0Ir63xCsBLXUnJ2NJmvGErcsltQnOmwoppUKT/PyIYwVaFylzNJA= =E6zh -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Anal?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/30/2011 12:33 AM, Santino Codispoti wrote: What does the group feel about What? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJNRQkBAAoJEBgaXYoZ++87jVUIAIxVEQ7GYCAg4CVvokye4RtA 54r/dYUt+FNIV7j8HKkl1rTIr0dKw0wQz9PhiQCPjdjKhQQM/vfdyG4w+4Miwm2R 9jW1+FLBd+CuqeiT8TDHHf7i8zSz7cQsIrqi2IZ4m9ukyKkRBIhY0/ZH6NOKSehq eP4zSWr+/wS573Nzv54m/yagBtswfrDyW3FTvw2wEZmTM7c7offOI5PSdKAHy0/b e4BJRk2+ngmvIE6/zoOJxiw98f1xe8T5WGwdDQ0GOPyDrcXuKe4EjdDL9bIyFpOM +wrLPvE91vBGRHfO4/OPWnm3frspCPsC7JPzD3cFwNfFMcV9tZ37Y2bwsGsnRTI= =2//w -END PGP SIGNATURE- ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: crontab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/09/2011 04:44 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, To have the same shell running twice a week, I am using crond and anacron if I understand correctly. I have a file in /etc/cron.weekly (file.cron) and I also schedule the same file from crontad -e. However, it appears that I have the same file command (/etc/cron.weekly/file.cron) started at 2 slightly different times started at Sun Dec 26 03:04:01 GMT 2010 and at: started at Sun Dec 26 03:00:01 GMT 2010 according to my log files. This is a real problem. How, can I run a cron file twice a week ? Thank. Add it to root's crontab with crontab -e Example: 0 0 * * 0,4 /path/to/command -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJNKj7NAAoJEBgaXYoZ++87JjkH/RkwT11djFSBCBA7gVDiLDNd ixWmGQ2y/AG9aXVSVkudMKZgHoA6OEsC2tXGlNeGZ9c81bjPo5rqMsNX1AZbAN7E nm2sPn4er2lYBGtaEQXPk3O2ZpverI4ENgpAUoduXJWy+A7GqDOKFL+h5xgvYWaR xs3FHUplEfGpMx8dNiUHzrXQB75NoDpiqf02U9AxD//d687avp7g47Q5kELejn/o Hvgw2IaOaNBKLC7NRRFKPk/y26g4mHtieLaDcJuAP6aEW+QmmkAazC56VHnAOUc4 uTAWMS5vueN5nwt4OENYaodzAUvaZXHGAYz1MCxCu2r8J9tWEZj4oZCmPMyZH+0= =mxi1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: a perl question
You haven't asked a question. Also, this is not a perl mailing list. You keep sending messages asking how to do things instead of doing your own research. We are not Google, but I hear if you actually use Google and do things for yourself once and a while you will magicaly get answers. Connected by MOTOBLUR™ on T-Mobile -Original message- From: S Mathias smathias1...@yahoo.com To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Tue, Jan 4, 2011 04:27:35 CST Subject: a perl question cat asdf.txt bla-bla bla-bla bla[XYZ] importantthing another important thing [/XYZ] bla-bla bla-bla [XYZ] yet another thing hello! [/XYZ] bla-bla etc. $ SOMEPERLMAGIC asdf.txt output.txt $ cat output.txt importantthing another important thing yet another thing hello! how can i sovle this question? what is SOMEPERLMAGIC? are there any perl gurus, that have a little spare time? Thank you! :\ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: [CentOS] why is this html looks like this?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/04/2011 07:10 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 14:16 -0800, Mark wrote: smathias1...@yahoo.com this is how to do one's homework - have someone else on the web do it for you. The 1972 in the address kinda made me laugh. Do you think he's posting from his daddies address or just pretending to be more mature than he actually is? ;) Leonard. I vote for pretending -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJNI8fKAAoJEPXCUD/44PWq0+oP/iYNiyh2qpxskYIqWIvxJoBg nmH24jdm/rjSx6KwxQanukb9ypR0mqduIswdSpAILypGdhIKML4Cj8BnLw+8NKVr F6AUsrBOYkn4f0qLlB/JhH6L+09nAaHLwde7Z5thUIahlsfAWFbO/TaaCPsiAeBN ZKQr4I6cvCNmMrj7K66wsp1NxI4KLKmQCnmdcW43OJ+3FOiq5yoRchqbVYxKHWPw Ntb6EhyDJXDpylBB7J7uMxi5OA55EtX+785rt4PHbvtl3st7IKm0qNkmbZsQEtsu pmQMeYThOpZI+lgDAkx8EsKR7QHofP3KZSlU0WLvxlHgtRiyYCxhFdaqvXyDSRL+ QPZx6FSnWmZoLmUR2fFG5eHaJnXdT4SJml8LqUUpI8nXQFsxyBxupa7AGkSGU9EK KNMdfQ/mRA/BbgDSj/Qxp5uEY4K9lvtlmmWkJl6+pRZe4Xb58qvTAqTJmyj53hry 1MqnE8bp1nedv6+ATltzF+pelTpuLBAkIhoyB+68vOAVPFPLr62+peQI9Z5NveLm kELAyIQHstbuXFmPng2sb6kM8dk0QjRIueVMGjllB1Bb8YOK7Nt1TyX2Nu2CLOp7 GCVnXzNkgem+c5pkpKrQWLd38O4GshkBcQGPiEr+bSMCn4hd5KHzt2Bwo9XYf5Z3 JF406R6tFCatp5bm1WpX =OwDM -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] why is this html looks like this?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/04/2011 04:16 PM, Mark wrote: On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Sven Aluoor alu...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:52 PM, S Mathias smathias1...@yahoo.com wrote: (...) WHY? (...) Why you post the same message on different mailing lists? Here at Ubuntu users https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/2011-January/237967.html Clearly this person thinks that a) all OS technical discussion lists are unbounded resources for asking any old question, regardless of how it applies to the OS in question and b) this is how to do one's homework - have someone else on the web do it for you. Perhaps we should just ignore him/her. Perhaps they should have the moderation bit set. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJNI8gaAAoJEPXCUD/44PWqQHwP/0EFKUF86VOrrS3dmDE9IasM tuH5XiDDWaXsY0b/o/id5cVvozV/p2l3/DYCqhZIhWMJs/+pBZvOu6vR96bcTLvq 0soLFzHriAm+YrKkOPiHvmNojWDY0Rh/cHVOrcfucmLJpNLgbXuTffI28ODiP07l x7UPZqhmPdD5c1qnbZM99bnu/mBY5Jt21bzdLXHnaK2gGzhw4AHODERq3tpHFHbF GQfQ2CJlGY8r0RS4PqKwhA4NiIL8P1OP3HVePc5zGY6UUTZ8V5xXAnVj9GtvYqBk N9+3+z0zO/WfG5t3va5HvpSx6tmUNDvdpXNIoNatBVVROFawB2fK39KNwTykprTm LY2XF4+pZHIEMEbv8DISSi9B1c4jnvNfRen7Q/AHx+kd0S8xs7FN4YzmBnKi+rrH iC/GKBmer39EcamneBVdeecdUlYlH4Gw/C4vNZtxkR5KLzgUHnCpwzw22alqxVxb zviYBQ/zhQ3LLgKmYCfM2f0JXeT6L/rV0wIWdlJHAVy37auITlgjAuXTl6EzfKiD 5B7Wq+8m6aGgvPwSiAybCQkCQgSlcWol7b/spz8iw+45QSTNkWW6gv4b+BhZvFMU O0DaOLPS8uHCZJJS6otdiaFr+RahoZDDAIT78OS/QeeeJclzv3W1KE+x0f5nWOz/ H85e75ScYDSL7CrCQtvG =PuPz -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Default GPG Encryption Algorithm (symmetric cipher) is?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/02/2011 12:14 AM, frankexcha...@nospammail.net wrote: As mentioned I am a Linux newbie (command line adverse) and like many users of Ubuntu they would not know how access details of what the default symmetric cipher is. Use of the term default was provided to mean the one GPG uses without any user intervention IE: Default So at risk of sounding silly, what is the Default symmetric cipher used in GPG under Unbuntu 10.04 LTS? Thanks Frank Perhaps try looking in ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf ? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJNICscAAoJEPXCUD/44PWqzpIP/Rc15kfAPtt3ZWFH1BYQEGIx hoPHsYHr5+mTAoDd0gGNo/7JRLJwEnLxb539VCUfDSBXgvwfPNfYLydw0lY+43xh vxlGbsSAu3qwXySeSToozdVItav2ERwQ7rkMPfoJ8J0itRUj8cJyRp8Rzj8iBxvP KvDTnwEdtB1nwb2SZeNSug2Z08bvoBWPoMbfRxlNXaam2rMpiX7+SelsU52cyD0Q WdUbDI/ue2F4nnPmuuyul0fMkU54RtkU2mHF2RJfOyP6iaHpVIgmEc+VNILP9hBT FSs7GkPjvvfNw8R3smJUxMIncMNyEKIs/R4hl+OxJmBay6EimEmVnkyifioEK5+H zmp4rVa0jwOoqXhqWs1v0W5Djl/hWPtpetFnBluOsaN1/3n7cAl9kFWzyMRi4Vwb dE5iKAdXNZS9YFyWHrlO/Ztzh8+jBtoETFCgLxdid6AFoDwl+yikTpDaY/NBdJ3I XAeDkXZ7OJxNKvT6XL72nDs3jwQI9raJaOnOebHKDz1VnRWy6ymhDVMxCjqzxBke zXAOKgcbukXkqEi6j6btrJEdO8qqJL6js6yEqsywlnipGBAbOqVERpm9HLws8Dna SU7+N8Pd8xxTJx5NQKJoZ3vc0A5bOgfKyYmmPnkpKKsiUzUd3sX4unBlvmXOwrob VbC5puSVCkZpo442WOcQ =62Di -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: [CentOS] do i need a dedicated ip address for https?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 12/22/2010 12:53 AM, S Mathias wrote: http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054 # Set up SSL protection on your website. is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip address, when i want to use ssl on my domain? thank you happy Christmas! :) Yes it is -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJNEaR9AAoJEPXCUD/44PWqFhAP/33q9sCa7q4a594qSJBPkv8A Twf+AkHc0H6siFikhAgi9RhpXDQXaAHusepf3s1UgD9lUGjOU1xtjiGFlbsTGE8T KDDb7fHSqzrEaE0HND8QBBXsccMbiYSozTXE5VT8QRz9G8wlCMA1+HLCEwUvGF9u 5x9WbzusMjlsTaHHOadOU55xcbBuNlNMq6V5jmbvdouriVfDg95xiwFEb3k+HVo8 fZAgodU8vuvVax9ycHgfbGLYC8ueJw/RW5H94OVh5465EY9ObVBHFSd01B7qlZrO TQxI/gtKcZTj8TYPn9mBRmzyIenhy6joU+ZBawff4P+1RLtAjxJHbYbpRa/r4Wmh HqoJNKi0TpJ4l+t04an5I1RWHOlA6JT+GGDOnOGNbgfmFwG3/h2Bh3QeILPOZBzV qznFA9JLaHl6ZitWffqav2XxzQaxzElWdJftt71YAGLe+6h+WA/HCtFots/O6GY2 9F9k7Lv+cy/a44qnQOu7fKJsihHT/uzKrSMn+c3209JJVFrBvFg0ow6lpfK2rbLj O79jsbZ4IbtlQQKhiSqXz1gj26xd2X9Qfw5ePOj+DuOjgqgIy8q9IBiuvnL8zXik MvedQTXtwHIy3UBI/tCfKQ6itJGUMhIoEWqrO7yP6KYf1NSqWvDxGLLar26Lfp93 W6B3tUG4tdNN3ahY09Pu =56E3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Introduction and request for sponsor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi all, My name is Larry Brower and I would like to help out with the Fedora Infrastructure team. I have been using Linux since Red Hat 5.2 and have been working with Linux as a system administrator full time since 2004. I am currently employed as a level 2 system administrator for Hostgator.Com, a large web hosting provider so I work with most of the technology in use on the Fedora servers almost daily and have work with everyone from small sites to large payment processors and ad networks over the past 6 years. I currently do not spend much time on IRC but am always available via emailand phone and should be on IRC more often in the near future. I am also a Fedora ambassador so can be found in the FAS already. I have no issues with asking questions for things I am unfamiliar with since I am fully aware that every organization does things differently. I am interested in helping out with the sysadmin-noc, sysadmin-hosted and/or sysadmin-releng FIG's but am willing to help where needed. Thanks for your time, Larry -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJM6enNAAoJEBgaXYoZ++877zEH/0t0BuNCs6cjmiiHRv6A5uM2 i0lo/vcFOsLRPyjpS6GT8h3bOfKMJIPvx1CXCxtCZOSYYd/9eCNhYDLJ8R/go/Fj k8k3yGtpxwJ9BML7N5dz89T62AO7HRb713I7QTUoK0u6fbA1NqzPmwgjE//v+G8J ZcTbr1c+GrUDM9uXzlFccbjcmRvv7fWR7d9AOVOe6e98dt6hiAl17o6S2xEMwpJy /Uz3JdU7gCbmYTniExTyrR80sXC9prkFiM0GTvxNoCgxMZLLuRn3DB0bP1eVJWHo ReesUltnSbxpPrxI+lSTjiLzK53co0HGTZojnNsRElmTA+NGHuHUqS/zUt8tOx8= =uoYY -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Introduction and request for sponsor
Hi all, My name is Larry Brower and I would like to help out with the Fedora Infrastructure team. I have been using Linux since Red Hat 5.2 and have been working with Linux as a system administrator full time since 2004. I am currently employed as a level 2 system administrator for Hostgator.Com, a large web hosting provider so I work with most of the technology in use on the Fedora servers almost daily and have work with everyone from small sites to large payment processors and ad networks over the past 6 years. I currently do not spend much time on IRC but am always available via emailand phone and should be on IRC more often in the near future. I am also a Fedora ambassador so can be found in the FAS already. I have no issues with asking questions for things I am unfamiliar with since I am fully aware that every organization does things differently. I am interested in helping out with the sysadmin-noc, sysadmin-hosted and/or sysadmin-releng FIG's but am willing to help where needed. Thanks for your time, Larry Connected by MOTOBLUR™ on T-Mobile ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Re: Workstation names and who it belongs to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 11/15/2010 08:21 PM, Ben Scott wrote: On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Don Kuhlman drkuhl...@yahoo.com wrote: I have our logon script set to automatically populate the machine description in ADUC to the username, department, and date and time of the logon, so we always have a pretty good idea who should know where a machine is. Gotta ask if the code is available for looking at? Sounds cool. I, too, would be interested in seeing this. -- Ben As would I. - -- Larry Brower Level II Linux Systems Administrator HostGator.com LLC lbro...@hostgator.com Http://www.hostgator.com Http://support.hostgator.com/ Fedora Ambassador - North America lbro...@fedoraproject.org http://fedoraproject.org/ PGP/GPG Key: 0xAE838321 Key fingerprint = 4F4D 41D7 12D5 DD3F 5A20 1398 7503 FCEC AE83 8321 ?So much of what we call management consists in making it difficult for people to work? -- Peter F. Drucker -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJM4fSeAAoJEBgaXYoZ++87eIMH/1kT85NTKzHUQ+7SRg7wOrDR YgJHaUsujw1hsvYmdGSPTbO1cMi86dVxKQ+WRNCakx9B1qVkwTIBQJPUWcc4IgY8 NqQTFeS28MkgPmNmbZ8O+aKbu6CQsBZxnw7c0Ek71xluhWI6oYQ6uBPhfcLanQlK juAn/GyEEtkILy3LVaC340Ly/8a8cCkLwwW/mIHj9AUQpBNXwL6wNgqSJamFssnH uxXJxJk/oT6G7w1RlxOzsoMH6tjyJvwGXOJO43swFQg11at4hDjkvdULx5WdTioc zoGKMmynGHRxk4r6w7qJQfmdSUYOhNkAgls6d0b6lUg63NOwhgHWvipvSFBiFoA= =BcrO -END PGP SIGNATURE- ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: lost gpg key
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dj YB wrote: Hello, In my previous installation (FC11) I used a gpg key to sign\encrypt mails\files. However I don't know where I put the private key, is there a default location it is located at? If not, should I revoke the key? how do I do that? Thanks, YB. ~/.gnupg is the default as others have said. gpg -K will show your secret keyring. When you say previous installation I am assuming you either upgraded or reinstalled. Is this correct? If so, how did you do it? Did you just upgrade or was this a clean installation? If you reinstalled completely then you deleted the private key which is needed to generate a revocation certificate. As such you can not revoke the key. If you did this you may be able to use something like TestDisk[1] to get it back but no guarantees. 1. http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/TestDisk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMvhqzAAoJEBgaXYoZ++87OWEH/3iSwBhjQaNHfGnsu+LOPWud Hlhd9dUYGGDKTjlSVscSE6dyteahU7I0QL2qBBKIZAZR9DoH3B2jbPy2WZhTmVij POhEARbuvNRJmo3+AysydV9Uj/QmzYX/0ahNCCBg6u6DMhLuOAw0OQSFs3DJFG1M hTl2jQ8OmkCqTYoDPWcI1qboBvK8kyAf+uixOTP4/PVLBgMJET1e9+9X1fQknAU0 /281LZCt7mDqyiBLm38VXt+AXcbQ4L2g2WC9uLXwNv6z/k7SpGezmCNs544BgZXv t+qPn4nCyRoWut8tUYgSiP4YTc8JUvJBmyYvxRj3kVJNwjILWD++aqYdrh6s7lM= =RvLc -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Confirmation for cached passphrases useful?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hauke Laging wrote: Hello, I just had the idea that it might be a good countermeasure against malicious software not to use a cached passphrase without any user interaction (and thus without user notice). A good compromise would be to open a dialog which does not ask for the passphrase but just for the confirmation that it's OK to use the passphrase. The dialog could mention the process accessing gpg-agent. CU Hauke This seems like something that would get really annoying really quickly. Why not just change settings to not cache the passphrase if you do not like using it this way ? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJMs8A+AAoJEPXCUD/44PWqVHUP/i2jbdt/AsYx2IlrrNqMdtjw 8lnxlUTeOfM11vOHD1CWctJsUH1LyhihKmf+0WZZRSv7k3S1vkVcIPD6zRmee4IS AI+3wvtlGdsF/+BlMeelCMMdaU8ys4OB4YbfQdaftAsBsO3IqZ32K1VLkMcje6Wd YdREF/dDEzD41tJ/oQLwxW8Ek9IBTUDrA7p1HdCuzf5YfqdDF0eLvTaGXCK6mO7e RJeSLlelQs7kgTq1KEvOAMGgpF8vye8soLN3aJcxkZnjp991Eeus6ZIhxdYRoXIz o7sPTf8ejctUrgGrW00hVUoUMhCdKN+ELx4Ux0fIgDGzMVItYRDXrAnbTeuZ2z3x /3gBAQbAQWWvFXQZ6CQT3uNJQVtOmTwber8DjSaSRsRxNsQbh15SeOIHEGgI73wk xEfvoL7iirMOcVmjndGc6063nUPvhJyotvefafrOKbL3vae7C8480x1kc0uhB2Ry U9daKonVyCPGyqAhqem1oYpPjjD2aUuyDzLM4y7t0yfKAwEqjL+vQogGfilyKYhy U+g/OybkgQLckG5RgnEcqzlIcSWPdnl6eIxc/YF8EMxYpcXrZhXMrGkk8fDVC36R 3TM/siVhttdo7v9ekFxT3eOF/6vsKoASpP1Vz4aZXpSQ8a3/WRW5eDyQ6li4goKH Ub+vZOmMc14HvzSAlBpt =+JVD -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: [CentOS] recommended way to install source rpms?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Shaun Jones wrote: On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 8:23 PM, JohnS jse...@gmail.com wrote: Warning: No matches found for: rpmdevtools No Matches found John Rpmdevtools for CentOS is available from EPEL. http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Rpmdevtools -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJMsmnWAAoJEPXCUD/44PWqSWAP/igLh9I3KtMotN2k56b7rjGq noDp55170eMWx+fN1geYeRNskahRiLFZfAnG3d7Zid4mSpiHvgK3HyIxxkdpIPo0 FI96h8qgDDkbYofpe2HCXHICyn7ei9p9nwJ5WrINbjHJSytfFQZBGve57KiNzLVJ zZXW05Nq5JpAHQAQ365EwHpsgiTga7PVdPfVv6NhgI3OliaJfvL1pc6VzPqJpq3w xI+h4UcWOJbipwrC5AK7GPMbLhHQl+T5uKl1OQAvJ3GIh3FEMuRsxKE9mg9opMY9 d9LOEwWbbsoExa3qBRU9vQoNQjP6HbJsQpNYiTxlir81u3vPfqbxc78RK5iySjlj ctaq15uZ/JSLAb2jTXk4yu8QovFX4jTrigGrD0gdx/itWOccywgcAXqQCB5QJMJZ jAoDHvoIcRe4xgRr7dtqVxxGY25mcY+vC76Q9r1cUIAm8A4qTXxS0B2TLLQq/sfb Fg2avvsV4dw7ATezcFOL7Y08pwKgCip+evHzLfvpJ0YOZA6bAc2UCMKsUjbdGuXb qCJ513s73JzbdX6GpXnVW0ET7lraTqXCoaD+XvfRPHAx9I16b4RO3d8q91oXyW67 4U0h2aivWqP81FjzzsGXdE7/f9qcFKXdZKHIzULaDEUegfEHBMXzuMQndAma/RXw mjns7pyjFLZLqb+X3ZTg =ZjtA -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Encrypt Error - There is no assurance this key belongs to the named user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Chitwood wrote: Robert, This is a error that is preventing us from encrypting. The key has been trusted and signed. pub 2048R/F56DBCBE created: 2010-09-28 expires: never usage: SC trust: full validity: unknown sub 2048R/CEA16A49 created: 2010-09-28 expires: never usage: E [ unknown] (1). Patrick Ashbrook pashbr...@chcw.com Can you provide the output of --list-sigs ? That doesn't look like it has been signed or perhaps you didn't issue save afterward? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJMq6qrAAoJEPXCUD/44PWqGvsQAMrRIyqk8yl42aHga1uMXZde bEhzA4oO8IEZZlRTQ0Lvz58DHpP+pIxvGhZERYqgo+jiv90Jntwj+Rz4LhZi/qUZ iap7POF+EcNEaw/JpNvZ1ubLt9CriRJYHyhhmL5nZ3UQwdIVcDBADrNdPHxnWZpE IQ/6WI1hTEibHx8QmbTnt5jSJy31O9IUPQaMa5tcjd99iJz2nT3cR3u6WaTgkbUW eQYOnJgONBKAi0D/rS0szz39wONI2QZ6krx56jjOOTZNuXQ2HuODQ1WRMuamVGbf sAANUgljz6HErbsgb16mru/fWTaNnD4UEttYqTlaMyrsHetrfGNewkyE5hIE1PgD TW/wA/HJrGVAu3aNWvFd1aiS5Uz9fxEWBYp0pd02A3/c7AJKN84EntkrMYfDM01v Bv/Nq6dTImHVHwvyjqErZYCHQbJ79s7qqGZl3sMEmVbOifLGvebQ6vkunO/+Oe1D QEKcBoNDtJn8PYCXC9ixkT3oD7gS8QzFVfIQOlJrqsxNO6x4ET7RGTvGg0bbaUPJ PTPGq+m9XrSopscY5efs8SwR6v7uu4okrhvEM+7FQ796qD3QYw8HVgHHlJ/P9Ewn b42krovPFDgZ0Ffx6DD96DeySFN/wpjy2lebVegdXFMetdh6UMZzT2BneKvByKr7 z4Zuq70fFAXxsg+viUKX =Zttz -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Encrypt Error - There is no assurance this key belongs to the named user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Chitwood wrote: Here you go. $ gpg --list-sigs F56DBCBE pub 2048R/F56DBCBE 2010-09-28 uid Patrick Ashbrook pashbr...@chcw.com sig N F56DBCBE 2010-09-28 Patrick Ashbrook pashbr...@chcw.com sig 359B3EB2 2010-10-05 it.security@bcbs-ga.com (Key created for adp on 2/1/2005) it.security@bcbs-ga.com sub 2048R/CEA16A49 2010-09-28 sig F56DBCBE 2010-09-28 Patrick Ashbrook pashbr...@chcw.com Is the key you signed this with the 0x359B3EB2 one? If so, is this one marked as trusted in your keyring? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJMq8PeAAoJEPXCUD/44PWqviUQAKBzwb/B7MHJqqDuNKpvNjN8 /r0f0O/46SB0lvl59bHcN6pLWMHCNgCp1tNNoQrwNmgltZ9vC58KMSUe5iQl6AeC h9t0Fi62lmNifaqogz9cVX2To1m9d1cy7fC9KKK9NH4wl3hbgBgq+Cq1r1xptUk7 NcfoxSJdEV4ia/vFg8Fb8Igxh30jSteaxzPe6H/Ti0moY/V1S/x30Fyhu8rOOi4j tQ3U4Ai9tqjJx5jCzN6HMitodTNOgF/HVLdMH0QKrVgY+Cvo6nuqNlCDgPvc/JSF fw6OjGzjCJxLMhwkktClsTh/EA4ASzf/kcKjxxkYs+YF6hpHR/h6gJA/YMRn2OYQ 3+XOG5n/qxd9AQM3/P4kiFq8pJpQm7b9a6499diqpe0U5xXJ+7dBSeaRBOcbIyGb 79DZowkIXw5HRpKo5roovfVmzEzHKKFU2rjLGCEJRJYDe5NS0Twu3WdQbhoasVXa S2SCeDK74pnF8ybHJiXTiIP2ma9V1yFBrc1tI5YYNx5TW8oPX0oW/UhUXRnT4Z7n KrLsnKrmFkri7xDYill6GFOBMmaibjRNAqim26EY0fGkgrE42yVg0InuFiNAJ2cr io2m9tQD0YY004OX5xwWRo4V++X+HgZfztXyI2vO4QygbvedcQOvWimcBRZYxYpg JwW3N3uvwjs+tBuqL/Zj =fqLi -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Encrypt Error - There is no assurance this key belongs to the named user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Chitwood wrote: Yes, that is our key. Have you verified it is trusted on the system you are trying to use it on? Perhaps the key isn't trusted. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIbBAEBAgAGBQJMq9eiAAoJEPXCUD/44PWqevsP+JdrIt71gjQg1TVXB2cxie45 oeIe7pEX5/kL7welfwbPwAPjRBCERHYfJTeh13qXvxMEtJ/ilqMJtJFipiIM+0DH 6RbmvNVDViFfsqTnSbrHpDKnPbXzYhbr5k67jU2uUP34saUA7oZJgT1A3FVe67Pr iD93pjzxyeXM8t0WMTY01duQWVOBsfdsCjQCrKx3ouZLq10S/peYwhRv9hRCQDUA TLfXDnLgbumRu1c5+3yyInztUGAznWqLcKoqc+2K6CEwTkPYB2OwRw2ZVyc1zfjm xR4Zlec/9BYagq4w6zN1g7LocQ3OwiiUnRCafl6ZU9gZU2oeS6ULL003reFfcSER SNKMUxgUzH6YNBQmh7d8qhUTktPC8XSiQZRun8iil7PoeWfhcBC0/tdCw7/9OnkL m0bAA1jFeQcEHEjWlQMZvFKhfsn/OMUju52X3m3SrhxUx0HQt/uYTMttpxyJwvnN GH2o3+klajfAfZUfzlUYk342hPYyK3O7jI5j04S1jJSTar8kLB02vqj4basD3+Uv mTlvK2TWOUZBW1kqefUx6GNnIPHUwl0dMrOoe/JtE6JRBbTFVYdCNEyOPjUeFQeS kR76YmQTmOufKAOa0sMYiPoDhJhwpjwQfm+3+/kaqFwlYZtijXrMP2fxtFrPgRqI i1TY+s6p9zTMmiTpflw= =SEBx -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Facebook down!! Alert!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Smith wrote: At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down. Please confirm in the USA. ~SmithwaySecurity Sent from my iPhone We need Alert and ! in the subject? seriously? Sorry, but I don't see a reason to get all excited. FB is down, omg, alert the media. geez -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJMrAOfAAoJEPXCUD/44PWqa2sP/AuUU0WnM4UUtAO3mazyRPIa gJ/xuguEgYWNbl7j/EZgHEu7fSYgkbo+Y/H+T2F5nl0PO3UqJz5sjyfD654OSy0h FAERgpR2syfRFM17EaLai4VgHsiVdm82Fzqs8xXwumu9OVfQAbk/eWsg6d0wOzp8 cuO7OUmb06i66VHbmWrSSJKmJKkhYvxf89o3NbPI6i0eIqr0wADJLIRbDQLLTt1i YnCj1urxClGnw9ChoCe0meNITllKx9nluzKEDy6P1eRWxTMGCn9xOnWlKHW2/6Rs sW/klZeOFxLDFEkufNLPr6w9vWxee648j0fjkCU6PGn6GRxaS6Qq0je1e/15f8cI MlfA1CCO/hNvSA07EBbpz9th2wyx69ninnv7Y3mjly//YB0EY/9H2j21wCDsDoJ4 SY/ttYOKQEZ3XoTAKa0RLzRmkR/GQwVsnGUfa//kA1Msf541VG8i98dYF6tpqFVt RJ0SDEHv53XSP+tuT4HdCyj8BtgwqIQTlughqynPM74kbYc6jYrZ6mxHxfhJkeXD wsYoJmHVcUgg/WKsa0eGk7sPhHEgR1alW5KnBYAjBtsStO9sLmESSTculvEQ7VXS OvuYUTfqgl3mkRtW0ttJvB/b5VvCQ70eUIkcmRUEvrX30WJldjupFxkyCaJtB3s4 Cq0MnisvbZZcpLoAJ0Qp =HLWx -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Solved - SSH can't connect
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim wrote: On 10/04/2010 01:03 PM, JD wrote: On 10/04/2010 08:54 AM, Jim wrote: And today his computer has Flat out refused any more SSH connections, It's a Fedora 13 box, Then your friend's computer is either NOT running sshd or his firewal simply refuses incoming connections. SSHD is running, i checked that yesterday and the firewall is checked for SSH. What model is the ATT box? can you login to it? A lot of ATT provided modem / routers have an internal firewall as well as perform NAT. You may need to login to it and change the settings. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMqlDMAAoJEBgaXYoZ++87ql4IANSIVa852izdKoTHOeOwGU7c DTN2+n6oy7rwGjDWbtmPtvNC5tbbuVhkNFO8jM33LDI+RQMEvakkwKfFc2nBk7yU kFbZVpyzMJC441CG8BtJNNEx6XgajkPdbOVuHnrtKvTh6KnhZkanRM26TXx7z2cn qjdtql7U85Lhu7NGoEHuX4KNHz1VVF3F3tIkk9BTE1RZ3W75qFCwT2I4lSU+J/GY JOVVmJ+2vg/XY+RfRiULof2kntQapR7KU5U0flCkX4HR4zonzYR1tmq3iIlh20A7 FIs8SU7M24xMot8P5MOlLy3ZZnbhg5VO/+G8a3HR+mPMDmbrXg/l7Wv/LKVUHtk= =I1Hc -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Setting up a Linksys WRT54G router for SSH port forwarding
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim wrote: Fedora 12 on both computers I have two computers setting behind this Linksys WRT54G router and I want to connect to both of them by SSH remote across the Internet.I have the internet IP for this router. #1 192.168.1.100 #2 192.168.1.101 In the The Applications and Gaming Tab - Port Range Forward Tab , I have setup one computer as ,ssh22 22Both 192.168.1.100enable and it works okay. But how do I setup computer #2192.168.1.101 . I have Googled the Internet and found out how to setup one on port 22 , but not Two computers using SSH port 22 Short answer: You can't. This would require you to have 2 public IP's for NAT to use. You would need to run one on port 22 and the other on an alternate ssh port. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMql2wAAoJEBgaXYoZ++87ovYIAJq52OflNWe75RJ5Whji95aw qYls5lnigDWKqKqq3Gz09JNQVSe0qatIGf/NqTYY9owjmnIrWD/bvU/G1bRDC5xp IueTieE8mH2LuJj/czxe3dZOanHx9ehETdz07c4QZy5YkJsdEp8v8lQTyWOpEW7M A+WAj5LNn1xl8RJxYrLH4fLuzGwq2G/QTzZ1o8hEQy3qiRq/ACY8f7L0YRe3JNrA vbPVxiarx63uduKf2u5wU2QfVdK755Xd4PwGZ9O+Yw3I3yAltof7jsins3Ju9NKR dD9+Mi+DsBVjGxhNRQTIVFYjnKWfL71YkG/D6iNrwNS+LB7srA9q2/ZzdyVtWp8= =iuww -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: SSH can't connect
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim wrote: On 10/02/2010 07:05 PM, JD wrote: On 10/02/2010 12:14 PM, Jim wrote: On 10/02/2010 02:52 PM, JD wrote: On 10/02/2010 11:43 AM, Jim wrote: ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:22 Have you made sure that the port is open for outbound connections on the system trying to initiate the ssh connection? iptables -nL OUTPUT|grep :22 Have you tried running ssh with -vvv for verbose output? ssh -vvv $u...@$host Have you tried stracing the connection attempt? strace -ffv -s 300 ssh $u...@$host -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMp8VlAAoJEBgaXYoZ++87CSoH/3DrlF+ZK/aBkyQHka/nHErD DfX5QvUiTyR288KWwGW2TRBvMSeg1tivtEKkW8noBBywahk4rvjEU9p+BEH5XS/s rn8IUZkj6Z21MlmlstNDzvH35UuUhSrmT5AfmitYeC590mYvTSNGigvYeVcOColk hgcKDoEG4neZeNL3sT67i4Rj+Vy/iJw8KpA+RVbaI2Ag6fyHJrWU3680nUcbhxEa Mtnf/mlAIyaJclK+hAdbmGPcRL2NLC84zc4SbzKWhsk8AoUFM9liu7u+tpBFjr+y iafRTnIIVDFnPizEcDJX+MxWtxustPaWqRABXZUF0DwUjlKfsHz5xj7zZv3lYJo= =3L/Q -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Rsync + Windows 7 - backing up to linux server
Max Pyziur wrote: Greetings, I have successfully been using rsync to backup my Linux desktop and laptop for several years. My current goal is to automatically backup a Windows 7 desktop to a linux server using rsync. I've found guidance here: http://www.gaztronics.net/rsync.php I have installed Cygwin along with the rsync option. For the Windows 7 machine I've written a short batch file who's critical line reads as follows: c:\cygwin\bin\rsync -vrtz -e c:\cygwin\bin\ssh -i /home/someuser/.ssh/id_rsa /cygdrive/b someu...@leeloo:/var/backup/arrakis The above does not look right. The path to the key would need to be on the machine calling rsync, in other words the Windows box. That being said /home/someuser/.ssh/id_rsa wouldnt be the correct path. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: OT: soundcard Oscilloscope.
Mick M. wrote: Hi Bryn; thanks for the email. I tried then all, no luck. The closest was xscope, it ./configured but would not make. Mick M. What were the errors when attempting to build it ? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Why do /usr/lib/.libssl.so.1*.hmac file exist on my system ?
steve wrote: Thanks JD. Yes, my system was compromised :-/. I'm to blame, although my system was online with sshd running, the postgres user password was guessable ! Like I said, the box is unimportant so I don't mind recreating ...lesson learned. You might consider using AllowGroups or AllowUsers in sshd_config to restrict who is allowed to login via ssh. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: [CentOS] directory permissions set to 600?
Ski Dawg wrote: Hello all, Today, I ran across a directory in /etc/ on one of our servers whose permissions where set to 600 (drw---) with root being the owner. The directory is for the firewall package for the server, so it is not something malicious. Checking some other systems, they also have this directory and the permissions on those servers is also 600, so it isn't just a messed up permissions on this one machine. What is the difference between permissions of 600 and 700 for a directory, that is owned by root (group root)? Is there a reason why some directory should be set to 600 instead of 700? 600 is read and write for the owner whereas 700 is read write and execute. If there is nothing in the folder that needs to be executed than 600 would be correct. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] directory permissions set to 600?
Robert Heller wrote: At Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:57:11 -0700 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: On 07/20/10 4:54 PM, Larry Brower wrote: Ski Dawg wrote: Hello all, Today, I ran across a directory in /etc/ on one of our servers whose permissions where set to 600 (drw---) with root being the owner. The directory is for the firewall package for the server, so it is not something malicious. Checking some other systems, they also have this directory and the permissions on those servers is also 600, so it isn't just a messed up permissions on this one machine. What is the difference between permissions of 600 and 700 for a directory, that is owned by root (group root)? Is there a reason why some directory should be set to 600 instead of 700? 600 is read and write for the owner whereas 700 is read write and execute. If there is nothing in the folder that needs to be executed than 600 would be correct. um... on a directory, the X bit means you can LS the contents of the directory. of course, root ignores this anyways and overrides it. Note that execute access is only needed on a directory if you want to list its contents (eg ls). If you know ahead of time the name of the file in the directory you seek to access, you don't need execute access on the directory. Not having execute access on a directory keeps 'noisy' people from discovering the contents of the directory. This is a not unreasonably security setting. This is what I meant to imply, however was not clear when I responded. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Who's moderating this forum?
Marcel Rieux wrote: Thanks! So this message should be formatted as simple text now. Unfortunately if means the links won't be clickable, I suppose. Test: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-July/ Was RTF causing you problems too? Thunderbird is parsing the message and keeping the link clickable. Maybe your client doesn't. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Defining custom root zone by subnet.
Nadir Aliyev wrote: Hi friends, Its possible in bind define fake root zone by subnet? (in this case just for zone1) Sounds like you need to use views. Why would you want to do this though? It is silly. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: [CentOS] test
mattias jonsson wrote: Failed, please study harder. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Connection activation failed: Device not managed by NetworkManager
Fedora User wrote: I have this (WLAN) configured as managed by NM in network configuration. Now what? The magic 8 ball says Answer Hazy Perhaps if you gave more detailed information it would have a different answer? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Connection activation failed: Device not managed by NetworkManager
Fedora User wrote: On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 21:46:42 -0500 Larry Brower la...@maxqe.com wrote: Fedora User wrote: I have this (WLAN) configured as managed by NM in network configuration. Now what? The magic 8 ball says Answer Hazy rant The whole frigging thing is hazy. And, I am no newbie - going back to RH-7.2. Every friggin time I upgrade Fedora, something changes in NetworkManager. Moreover, the relationship between NM and Network Configuration is obscure at best. Now I am not getting the error message when I restart NM. And what the frig is this? warn connection(1) /org/freedesktop/NetworkManagerSettings/1 failed to activate: (2) Device not managed by NetworkManager If that (/org/freedesktop...)is a path, it neither exists in the file system nor proc. /rant Now I see what you are saying, and honestly I do not have an answer for you. Someone else perhaps might. I tend not to use things like network manager. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: How to block, but not block?!
What about using something like pgp desktop ? Sent using MOTOBLUR™ on T-Mobile -Original message- From: gro...@beachcomp.com To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed, Jun 16, 2010 10:09:18 CDT Subject: How to block, but not block?! Hi all, I have been asked to provide a solution which I don't think can be provided, but figured I'd get your input any see if you know of anything out there. The concept is as follows: There is an excel file which is highly secretive and guarded. The CEO wants to make sure people have no way of leaking it out of the company, but be free to use it. He wants to know if anyone prints it, or saves it externally, or e-mails it. This would be fine if the user was on a locked down machine, but he wants them to be able to do this on their daily use workstations. Anyone have any thoughts or ideas? Thanks! ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: How to block, but not block?!
Which can probably be duplicated if you are serious enough to want to so it. Sent using MOTOBLUR™ on T-Mobile -Original message- From: gro...@beachcomp.com To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wed, Jun 16, 2010 11:03:09 CDT Subject: RE: How to block, but not block?! Those have a special reflective ink inside from what I read. -Original Message- From: James Kerr [mailto:cluster...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 12:55 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: How to block, but not block?! You beat me too it. That reminds me, I always laugh when I see cars with the bar code on the side off them that lets them enter their homes complex. What's to stop someone from taking a photo it it and printing it on their printer and sticking it on the side of their own car? - Original Message - From: Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 12:45 PM Subject: RE: How to block, but not block?! And cell phone cameras. -Original Message- From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 12:40 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: How to block, but not block?! From a security standpoint, wouldn't you also need to block screen prints/screen captures with the spreadsheet open ? Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, Security ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! ' -Original Message- From: gro...@beachcomp.com [mailto:gro...@beachcomp.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 12:13 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: How to block, but not block?! Hi all, I have been asked to provide a solution which I don't think can be provided, but figured I'd get your input any see if you know of anything out there. The concept is as follows: There is an excel file which is highly secretive and guarded. The CEO wants to make sure people have no way of leaking it out of the company, but be free to use it. He wants to know if anyone prints it, or saves it externally, or e-mails it. This would be fine if the user was on a locked down machine, but he wants them to be able to do this on their daily use workstations. Anyone have any thoughts or ideas? Thanks! ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Subject: Re: Amazing problem of /boot
Here, after updating the system (from the GUI, SystemAdministration---Software Update), i see in above two titles of Fedora, and why it is so? but the no. is bracket for two are different, respectively: 'title Fedora (2.6.30.10-105.2.23.fc11.i586)' 'title Fedora (2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i586)' i am confused why it is so. thx This is because you updated which also updated the kernel. The two options are for the two kernels you have installed. The old one and the new one -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Another funny update?
Marcel Rieux wrote: Some might argue that those who might be blamed by the unenlightened should do something to keep people from crashing their new systems and not knowing why or how to work around it. While you are correct in what you say, at the end of the day, really doesn't matter. Gonna have a lot of people angry and blaming Fedora. Exactly. It's no use trying to find culprits: it must work. So what exactly is Fedora supposed to do short of removing 3rd party repositories from yum altogether ? fedora does not control the policies of other repos. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: [CentOS] unsuscribe
Pitshou Asingalembi wrote: ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Perhaps you should try the link in the footer. In the event you missed it: http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos If you look near the bottom of the page you'll see a nice little box with a nicely worded description: To unsubscribe from CentOS, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options enter your subscription email address: Did you already try this or were you attempting to be lazy? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Is this the Linux list for beginners
Mercury Rising wrote: Linux seems a bit overwhelming to me, but I am determined to get it and learn it. Is this the right LISTSERV to be on? Elwin It is the right list to discuss and/or get general help for issues related to Fedora. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Recover stupid mistake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tom H wrote: On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Aaron Konstam akons...@sbcglobal.net wrote: On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 08:07 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 13:32:51 +0100, Mike Martin redt...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi when I was trying (and failing) to get a bootable pen-drive, with the F13 live image I accidentally did the following dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb bs=512 count=1 which returned nearly immediately and now I have no data on the disk. The disk is 750 gig , of which about 400 is used. I am hoping that only the partition table is gone, if not is there any way to recover from my disaster I believe that command just changed the first 512 bytes. If you know how it was partitioned you can probably get things back by making a new partition table. The MBR and the partition tablrhave been destroyed. If you know what the partition table looked like fdisk can restore it. Restoring grub might also restore the MBR. You can try to use gpart to determine the partition boundaries and sizes and then use fdisk to restore them. You may want to try testdisk. http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/TestDisk_Download -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEbBAEBAgAGBQJL/v3bAAoJEBgaXYoZ++87xlQH+LNe5InZxVA8es4mXGN8XoFf AFCq4lWnpvDLQtq2hNZ+BtJ2p/k6DbDe7Mw5dxEPiKFcKwEq13L9J+xEHk7hBvIG 7c+Bp65qj1Q/nYUzsPrQKt4heDVFrpkd0iSt3FQjRi2drYR9YK13lohbUQw4C9V1 6T64Os4MLYIPnetTIE2mKxOnsInLI5wEOfceoaW9vg+8YyEt/EOXwd3MqI/PM6Q1 cBd8HJCNBYwJ+ykJsZdpbi0a2r24CqQPdXoXu9BgaE1fGXbPNyYFFL0uVxoABisA cRTjxzDmVSk5tOdtQ0Fijydvcuhb4u2Rb9qx2wnEhCVG8Cwe+LGFPvA3uuyxUA== =VT84 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: synchronization between maste and slave no working
Yunfeng Xu wrote:
Hi, all
I tried to add one A record on the master, but the slave did not get the
new record.
my slave settting is :
zone mydomain.com.cn http://mydomain.com.cn IN {
type slave;
file mydomain.com.cn.zone;
masters {10.69.3.1;};
};
10.69.3.1 is my master ip. bind version is bind-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2.
I guess I may lack some settings. Can anyone give me some advise?
Many thanks
hywl51
What is shown in the server's logs?
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: Need an eth0:1 temporarily, howto?
Gene Heskett wrote: Greetings; CRS is catching up with me I believe. What is the invocation of ifconfig that will bring me up a working eth0:1 at an address of 192.168.1.3? One that will let me ping dd-wrt at its std 192.168.1.1 address on a different 192.168.xx.xx subnet from the regular eth0 . I've apparently nuked my dd-wrt install on an x86 box, and I need to talk to it via the eth0:1 address long enough to configure it to work with a *%$# cable modem that marries itself to the first MAC address it see's. Thanks folks. ifconfig eth0:1 192.168.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.0 up Don't forget to also add a route ;) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Bios
Henry Wyatt wrote: I have hp dv6000 series laptop running fc12 86_64. According to setup I have phoenix bios version f.42 Just want to know bios date and how to flash bios with more recent version. Also running fedora only no windows This is not the correct list for this ;) BIOS is independent of the OS. You should be referencing your MOBO's instruction manual or website for assistance. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: pki
Rambod Kamaei wrote: hi all how can i install pki in to the fedora 12. Could you be moire specific on the question? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: [CentOS] A
Steven Vishoot wrote: - Original Message From: m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Tue, May 18, 2010 1:17:46 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] A On 5/18/2010 10:59 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: Yes, A is the first letter of the Alphabet ;) Not for all values of the LANG environment variable. (Trying desperately to keep it on topic. Not being funny. No, not at all.) Ok, let's see if this email goes through - I've had two bounces, and dnsorbs was blocking my hosting provider. At any rate, I was assuming it was aleph 0 mark B :-D C ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: accouting
rosect...@yahoo.com wrote: I have installed the following two rpms: freeradius-mysql-2.1.3-1.fc9.i386 and freeradius-postgresql-2.1.3-1.fc9.i386 on my Fedora machine. However, when I tried to configure sql server by using mysqladmin ..., system says command not found. Do I need to install anything else (and where I can download them) before executing that command? Thanks a lot in advance. Actually installing MySQL might be a good start considering that is what installs mysqladmin - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: [CentOS] Vim - In INSERT Mode, the Backspace key does not work
Wang, Mary Y wrote:
Hi All,
I'm not very good with Vim.
I noticed when it is in INSERT Mode, the backspace key no longer works.
How to do I configure it so that it will work with the backspace key?
Any ideas?
Thanks
Mary
try using :set bs and/or :fixdel
'backspace' 'bs'string (default )
global
{not in Vi}
Influences the working of BS, Del, CTRL-W and CTRL-U in
Insert
mode. This is a list of items, separated by commas. Each
item allows
a way to backspace over something:
value effect ~
indent allow backspacing over autoindent
eol allow backspacing over line breaks (join lines)
start allow backspacing over the start of insert; CTRL-W
and CTRL-U
stop once at the start of insert.
When the value is empty, Vi compatible backspacing is used.
For backwards compatibility with version 5.4 and earlier:
value effect ~
0 same as :set backspace= (Vi compatible)
1 same as :set backspace=indent,eol
2 same as :set backspace=indent,eol,start
See |:fixdel| if your BS or Del key does not do what you
want.
NOTE: This option is set to when 'compatible' is set.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Vim - In INSERT Mode, the Backspace key does not work
Wang, Mary Y wrote: Thanks for the info. It worked. I'd like to have the Backspace key acts like a delete key (delete the key and move the cursor -1 position to the left) by default (like vi in the INSERT mode). Can I configure it something in the .vimrc file, so that it acts the way I wanted every time that I bring up a Vim session? Thanks Mary try adding set nocompatible set bs=indent,eol,start ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Encryption
Angus Scott-Fleming wrote: On 4 May 2010 at 14:52, Jon Harris wrote: Do you actually believe they will leave a good product alone? I'm sure they feel they need to add value to the product to justify the purchase. Go with something other than PGP unless you are not going to be updating it then it will be safe to use. ;-) Sounds like a good time to move to GPG :) ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: [CentOS] NIS question
ann kok wrote: Hi How can we use NIS to control a user in different servers? eg: serverA /home/userA/javaapplication serverB /export/home/userA/javaapplication serverC /vol/home/javaapplication Thank you Could you be more specific on what you are trying to do ? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Where is everything?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 are...@bigpond.com wrote: What's the fuss I find that it's very easy to keep the database up to date. Roger I do agree that it is easy to keep up to date. It just takes a long time if you have say a TB worth of data :) Considering what was being referred to in the question which and whereis seem more logical options. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJL3xYKAAoJEBgaXYoZ++87arQIAL0ftUGK7uRJ3snchdbenPsI hjwAvKHi36tdONqUVg6/313OQ7Cr8jluwjH925kKKUITl6mg0qNIUhYzk6Fw3f8E NEodjyG/oUYNZ98yOLAx1bYOy+rd50scZgIaoc4VTRsYDYipemYFedOqXk4FLZf4 b9j0OcxApaVUnzsgSUy4GSnN9jZhFoB7aaM7D2Kvn0RhLLQ5aiWiFRy1+qRR2qZJ uqNxPClXxXM2BY4ulUIAwCg7+1Wf4lRy3cQ6EJHM+ayZIeB+3UjhYlJVr8wdMfth 7IxY29w3YTFm72/r1ujYzMZu+T0X4iz37smROT8Pa07ZAUDc0JvzYI/EmtGLnJU= =ycrn -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: internet access
terry wrote: Hello, When I start the next day, after shutting off the computer, I must turn oneth0each time after reboot or start up in AM. Could SE Linux be doing this or is it something else in some start up script? everything that I use works okay except for the aforementioned problem. The computer is hard wired to a Cisco wireless router then to a modem. Have you made sure that eth0 is set to start on boot? By I must turn on eth0 are you referring to ifup eth0 or something like service network start ? Can you provide the contents of /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 ? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: How to list what users are in a group
David Burns wrote: On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com mailto:ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote: The message contains References: in the header which is used by real email clients (maybe not gmail) to sort messages in threads. Wow, if real clients thread together stuff with different subjects, I prefer the fakes. Dave Threading is normally down by the message headers and not by the subject. Before saying stuff like wow and seeming so shocked and amazed, perhaps you should RTFM ? In-Reply-To: 4bce3381.6090...@greshko.com References: 421043.49468...@web52608.mail.re2.yahoo.com 4bcb5d62.7050...@gmail.com 1271698173.5279.7.ca...@suspishus.lan.cameratim.com ed7ac2d81ab74ad887c31b0613b6d...@wizardess.wiz 1271768442.27945.17.ca...@suspishus.lan.cameratim.com 9c0a1e3889e549e2b8ce435e56d71...@wizardess.wiz 4bce2d08.8060...@edingo.net 4bce3088.7000...@greshko.com k2y943be0b11004201558jffb1d4e4qc07b652ef62d5...@mail.gmail.com 4bce3381.6090...@greshko.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: How to list what users are in a group
Ed Greshko wrote: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4685.txt In addition, you may wish to reference RFC 2822 which obsoletes RFC 822 http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
