Bug#1081047: devscripts: debrebuild from branch debrebuild fails to download .dsc file

On Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 06:17:49PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > holger@osuosl4-amd64:/srv/data/holger/devscripts$ ./scripts/debrebuild.pl > --builder=sbuild+unshare ../codespell_2.3.0-1_amd64.buildinfo < h01ger> josch: i believe i found the condition to trigger #1081047: have the

Bug#1081839: debrebuild: E: mmdebstrap failed to run

Package: devscripts Version: 2.23.7+MR415 Severity: normal Dear josch, when trying to run debrebuild --builder=sbuild+unshare --cache=./cache/ --buildresult=./results/ ./yq_3.4.3-1_amd64.buildinfo it failed with probably this being relevant part of the logfile, the full log is below. E: Unabl

Re: Removing Jenkins Lintian job

hi pollo, On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 10:14:10PM -0400, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > > [1]: https://jenkins.debian.net/project/lintian-tests_sid/ > It's been more than a week, no one replied, I don't think anyone cares :) > If you could remove the job Holger, I would appreciate it very much. don

Re: Removing Jenkins Lintian job

hi pollo, On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 10:14:10PM -0400, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > > [1]: https://jenkins.debian.net/project/lintian-tests_sid/ > It's been more than a week, no one replied, I don't think anyone cares :) > If you could remove the job Holger, I would appreciate it very much. don

Re: regards to the dc24 local team which couldnt be

hi, (for documentation purposes only) On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 08:13:54AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > I'd like to propose to take a group photo to send to the DebConf24 local team > in Israel > and would suggest to meet for this tomorrow, Friday, August 2nd at 14:00 > localt

Bug#1081050: devscripts: debrebuild from main branch fails to create a debrebuild.tar

Package: devscripts Version: 2.23.7-78-gee16294f Severity: normal User: devscri...@packages.debian.org Usertags: debrebuild X-Debbugs-Cc: jo...@debian.org, reproducible-bui...@alioth-lists.debian.net Dear josch, when trying to use debrebuild from the main branch this fails for me like this: holg

Bug#1081050: devscripts: debrebuild from main branch fails to create a debrebuild.tar

Package: devscripts Version: 2.23.7-78-gee16294f Severity: normal User: devscri...@packages.debian.org Usertags: debrebuild X-Debbugs-Cc: jo...@debian.org, reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net Dear josch, when trying to use debrebuild from the main branch this fails for me like this: holg

Bug#1081048: devscripts: debrebuild from main branch does not work with a proxy

Package: devscripts Version: 2.23.7-78-gee16294f Severity: normal User: devscri...@packages.debian.org Usertags: debrebuild X-Debbugs-Cc: jo...@debian.org, reproducible-bui...@alioth-lists.debian.net Dear josch, when trying to use debrebuild from the main branch and when using a proxy to cause le

Bug#1081048: devscripts: debrebuild from main branch does not work with a proxy

Package: devscripts Version: 2.23.7-78-gee16294f Severity: normal User: devscri...@packages.debian.org Usertags: debrebuild X-Debbugs-Cc: jo...@debian.org, reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net Dear josch, when trying to use debrebuild from the main branch and when using a proxy to cause le

Bug#1081047: devscripts: debrebuild from branch debrebuild fails to download .dsc file

Package: devscripts Version: 2.23.7-87-g6f7811f0 Severity: normal User: devscri...@packages.debian.org Usertags: debrebuild X-Debbugs-Cc: jo...@debian.org, reproducible-bui...@alioth-lists.debian.net Dear josch, when trying to use debrebuild from the debrebuild branch, this fails for me very ear

Bug#1081047: devscripts: debrebuild from branch debrebuild fails to download .dsc file

Package: devscripts Version: 2.23.7-87-g6f7811f0 Severity: normal User: devscri...@packages.debian.org Usertags: debrebuild X-Debbugs-Cc: jo...@debian.org, reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net Dear josch, when trying to use debrebuild from the debrebuild branch, this fails for me very ear

Re: samba-libs package in bookworm-backports has version dependency errors

Hi Paul, On Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 07:28:17AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Just for info and highlighting the service [0] once again: sssd has an > autopkgtest and already for several years autopkgtest runs for backports are > automatically scheduled on amd64 and arm64 [1]. oh, wow, TIL. > PS: is a

Re: Please review the draft for August's report

On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 11:14:16AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > > I still need to publish my slides for both my r-b talks at DebConf24 > > and then the 2nd talk needs to be mentioned in the report as well. :) > Ooh, good idea. I'll hold off on publishing until you can land those. I've pushed my slid

Re: lintian.debian.org off ?

On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 08:21:04AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > After lintian.debian.org went unmaintained (beginning of 2022) [...] > After providing stale data for a long time, which confused many people, > lintian.debian.org was shutdown in September 2023. in Debian timeframes, this is basica

Re: Please review the draft for August's report

Hi Chris, thank you for writing these great monthly reports! On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 10:49:14AM -0400, Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for August's Reproducible Builds report: > https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2024-08/?draft I still need to publish my slides for both my r-b

Content and translation status for the debian-edu-bookworm manual

The (translated) debian-edu-bookworm manual in PDF, ePUB or HTML formats are available at https://jenkins.debian.net/userContent/debian-edu-doc// To understand this mail better, please read /usr/share/doc/debian-edu-doc/README. This mail is automatically send by a cronjob run by Holger Levsen

Bug#1080021: trixie-pu: package chromium/128.0.6613.113-1~deb13u1

Control: tags -1 confirmed On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 07:53:33PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Control: tags -1 cconfirmed -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ Was seid ihr

Bug#1080021: trixie-pu: package chromium/128.0.6613.113-1~deb13u1

Control: tags -1 confirmed On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 07:53:33PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Control: tags -1 cconfirmed -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ Was seid ihr

Re: (java) Builds not reproducible on armhf

On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 06:46:35AM +0200, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote: > > I'll note that fakeroot was probably broken on armel, armhf since > > the t64 migration until mid-August. > > Is fakeroot involved in any way? If so, it might make sense to > > discard any results from that period. > Thanks for

Re: (java) Builds not reproducible on armhf

On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 06:46:35AM +0200, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote: > > I'll note that fakeroot was probably broken on armel, armhf since > > the t64 migration until mid-August. > > Is fakeroot involved in any way? If so, it might make sense to > > discard any results from that period. > Thanks for

Bug#1077883: gpg-sq: Unknown argument "show-photos"

control: clone -1 -2 control: clone -1 -3 control: retitle -1 gpg-from-sq: Unknown argument "show-photos" control: retitle -2 gpg-from-sq: Unknown argument "show-notations" control: retitle -3 gpg-from-sq: --keyserver option should not require protocol control: tags -1 + upstream control: tags -2 +

Bug#1076358: gpgv-sq: fails to verify some good signatures with reason "Bad public key"

control: retitle -1 gpgv-sq: fails to verify some good sha1 signatures because of default policy thanks hi, thanks for the bug report and clarifications! On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 07:55:51PM +0900, Paride Legovini wrote: > Well, in my case using `gpgv-sq -vv` clarified: > > gpgv: Signature made

Re: Removing more packages from unstable

Hi, I also like us to remove more broken and unused packages from unstable. On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 11:20:10AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Maybe we could also reduce the cost of removals for users and potential > new maintainers, by improving the information provided in various places > on how

Re: DEP18 follow-up: What would be the best path to have all top-150 packages use Salsa CI?

On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 10:44:30PM -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > > Advertise widely and frequently that there is a pool of people which is > > happy to help investigating the failed CI jobs. > > Then start personally advocating the benefits of CI to the maintainers > > of these packages: I expect

Re: mark wpewebkit unsupported in bullseye once bullseye becomes LTS in July 2024

On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 02:31:02PM -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: > I have updated > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/debian-security-support/-/merge_requests/29 > accordingly. will you also merge it? :) -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer

Bug#1078944: diffoscope fails to build from source and fails to run in debian sid/unstable (#389)

source: diffoscope severity: serious justification: kaboom forwarded: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/-/issues/389 On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 07:10:45AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 09:08:27PM +, FC (Fay) Stegerman (@obfusk) wrote: > >

Bug#1078944: diffoscope fails to build from source and fails to run in debian sid/unstable (#389)

source: diffoscope severity: serious justification: kaboom forwarded: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/-/issues/389 On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 07:10:45AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 09:08:27PM +, FC (Fay) Stegerman (@obfusk) wrote: > >

Bug#1078944: diffoscope fails to build from source and fails to run in debian sid/unstable (#389)

source: diffoscope severity: serious justification: kaboom forwarded: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/-/issues/389 On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 07:10:45AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 09:08:27PM +, FC (Fay) Stegerman (@obfusk) wrote: > >

Bug#1070176: fixed in debian-security-support (1:13+2024.05.15)

version: 1:13+2024.05.15 -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ If it feels like we’re breaking climate records every year, it’s because we are.

Re: on the formal significance of vetoing something

On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 10:19:08AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > > I wonder if such a veto has any formal effect? > It doesn't. [..] > > IOW, anyone can veto anything, but a veto as such has no power on its > > own, right? > > Correct. The Policy Editors are responsible for judging consensus. We

on the formal significance of vetoing something

hi & just for context, though my question is NOT about this case: On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 05:11:21PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > [...] I note that if > our proposed change #somebug to the Debian policy that has received six > seconds and one veto comes into effect I wonder if such a veto has a

Bug#1078248: "sequoia-octopus: rnp_identifier_iterator_create: parameter "ctx" is null" with thunderbird 115.13.0-1

On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 08:28:42AM -0400, Gabriel Filion wrote: > The upstream bug report was closed with a new release 1.10 Apparently there > was already a fix committed upstream and now it's part of a new release. > > Could we bump the version (again) to 1.10.0 in the hope that this error gets

Bug#1078248: "sequoia-octopus: rnp_identifier_iterator_create: parameter "ctx" is null" with thunderbird 115.13.0-1

On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 08:28:42AM -0400, Gabriel Filion wrote: > The upstream bug report was closed with a new release 1.10 Apparently there > was already a fix committed upstream and now it's part of a new release. > > Could we bump the version (again) to 1.10.0 in the hope that this error gets

Bug#1078505: developers-reference: document corner case of debian version and rational

On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 07:44:08AM +, Bastien Roucariès wrote: > I believe that policy is like law and devref is some kind of circulaire in > civil law country > (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circulaire) an interpretation of a legal text > that do not > introduce new rules but clarify law.

Bug#1078505: developers-reference: document corner case of debian version and rational

On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 07:44:08AM +, Bastien Roucariès wrote: > I believe that policy is like law and devref is some kind of circulaire in > civil law country > (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circulaire) an interpretation of a legal text > that do not > introduce new rules but clarify law.

Bug#1076788: adequate: Messes up the console apt was running from

On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 11:41:54PM +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: > apologies for this. adequate 0.16 onwards is a complete rewrite, I think it would have been adequate to upload that rewrite to experimental first, until the full functionality of the old tool has been reached and no bugs like

Bug#1076788: adequate: Messes up the console apt was running from

On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 11:41:54PM +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: > apologies for this. adequate 0.16 onwards is a complete rewrite, I think it would have been adequate to upload that rewrite to experimental first, until the full functionality of the old tool has been reached and no bugs like

Re: lintian.debian.org off ?

On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 10:32:13PM -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > Nicolas' implementation (https://lintian.club1.fr/) to list all tags > on one page and link to UDD seems like a reasonable compromise in > functionality and maintenance effort. any DD can point lintian.debian.net to that machine (o

Bug#1078248: "sequoia-octopus: rnp_identifier_iterator_create: parameter "ctx" is null" with thunderbird 115.13.0-1

package: rust-sequoia-octopus-librnp severity: serious justification: prevent package from entering trixie forwarded: -1 https://gitlab.com/sequoia-pgp/sequoia-octopus-librnp/-/issues/110 thanks meta data says it all. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-bui

Bug#1078248: "sequoia-octopus: rnp_identifier_iterator_create: parameter "ctx" is null" with thunderbird 115.13.0-1

package: rust-sequoia-octopus-librnp severity: serious justification: prevent package from entering trixie forwarded: -1 https://gitlab.com/sequoia-pgp/sequoia-octopus-librnp/-/issues/110 thanks meta data says it all. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-bui

Bug#1077381: gpgv-from-sq: Please downgrade sq Recommends to Suggests

control: tag -1 +confirmed thanks On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 02:02:59PM +0900, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > In order to consider switching the default gpgv implementation in apt > to gpgv-sq, we need to demote the Recommends to Suggests, as we don't > want to pull in sq when choosing this. ack, wil

Content and translation status for the debian-edu-bookworm manual

The (translated) debian-edu-bookworm manual in PDF, ePUB or HTML formats are available at https://jenkins.debian.net/userContent/debian-edu-doc// To understand this mail better, please read /usr/share/doc/debian-edu-doc/README. This mail is automatically send by a cronjob run by Holger Levsen

Re: Bathhouse #3?

On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 02:19:34PM +0900, Clément Hermann wrote: > I can confirm that, and that no one seemed to care about about my own tatoo. > (even though it's so small it might be mistaken for a skin disease ;) ) there was a korean guy with several large tattoos too -- cheers,

regards to the dc24 local team which couldnt be

hi, I'd like to propose to take a group photo to send to the DebConf24 local team in Israel and would suggest to meet for this tomorrow, Friday, August 2nd at 14:00 localtime in front of the Mirae building where we met for the dc24 group photo the other day. If you think this is a good idea, p

Re: Breakfast on day trip day

On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 02:10:12PM +0900, Sruthi Chandran wrote: > Jongmin updated on the IRC that breakfast will be 07.00-08.00. I plan to go on the daytrip but I've heard others not going wondering if there will be breakfast later too, for those not going? -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦

Re: GPG Workshop during DebCamp

On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 11:40:26AM -0300, Jose-Luis Rivas wrote: > Maybe Sequoia could make a good landing page about these differences? I > am not that bad about googling and I couldn't figure it out by myself > when you mentioned it before :) there's https://wiki.debian.org/OpenPGP/Sequoia but

Re: DebConf24 Daily Announcements - 2024.07.26

hey Gunnar, On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 05:33:02AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > We discussed the issue at the daily meeting, not only thinking about > us that have already seen our best years and are old and brittle, but > also about the newer genration that is willing to climb mountains > before break

Re: DebConf24 Daily Announcements - 2024.07.26

On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 05:51:05PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 08:55:10AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > > === Day Trip sign-up === > > > > Since this year's conference day trip options require payment in advance, we > > are handling signup

Re: DebConf24 Daily Announcements - 2024.07.26

On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 08:55:10AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > === Day Trip sign-up === > > Since this year's conference day trip options require payment in advance, we > are handling signup and payment via the registration system.  You can see the > day trip options at https://debconf24.debconf.o

Re: GPG Workshop during DebCamp

On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 06:39:17AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > On the contrary, I believe forking when you disagree with something is > at the very heart of the free software spirit. forking tools is one thing, but forking standards is something entirely different. -- cheers, Holge

Re: Swimming

On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 06:28:28PM +0900, Changwoo Ryu wrote: > The beach is not closed, just swimming is banned another time. This is > for safety, because their life guards are at work only during 9am-6pm. > > It is known that somones often patrol the beach and yell at the people > who try to sw

Bug#499167: developers-reference: please explain deb/debian/ds suffixes in versions

Hi Daniel, On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 10:10:19AM +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote: > The convention seems to be documented in > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#What_does_.2BIBw-dfsg.2BIB0_or_.2BIBw-ds.2BIB0_in_the_version_string_mean.3F [...] > The text in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor

Bug#499167: developers-reference: please explain deb/debian/ds suffixes in versions

Hi Daniel, On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 10:10:19AM +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote: > The convention seems to be documented in > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#What_does_.2BIBw-dfsg.2BIB0_or_.2BIBw-ds.2BIB0_in_the_version_string_mean.3F [...] > The text in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor

Bug#1076291: munin: dynazoom.html stopped showing graphs recently (June 2024-ish)

Hi Paul, On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 09:09:28PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Thanks for maintaining munin, we use it at ci.debian.org (main node running > bookworm) to monitor our nodes. I regularly use the dynazoom function [1] to > be able to get more details. Yesterday I noticed that the page doesn'

Bug#1075856: Clarify filename conflicts for programs

On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 06:29:20PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > diff --git a/policy/ch-files.rst b/policy/ch-files.rst > index b34c183..40bfa42 100644 > --- a/policy/ch-files.rst > +++ b/policy/ch-files.rst > @@ -7,7 +7,9 @@ Binaries > > > Two different packages must not install p

Bug#1075856: Clarify filename conflicts for programs

On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 06:29:20PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > diff --git a/policy/ch-files.rst b/policy/ch-files.rst > index b34c183..40bfa42 100644 > --- a/policy/ch-files.rst > +++ b/policy/ch-files.rst > @@ -7,7 +7,9 @@ Binaries > > > Two different packages must not install p

Re: Reproducible Builds Summit 2024

On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 09:46:41PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > This conflicts with Linux Plumbers, and almost conflicts with Qubes OS > Summit :( we've been aware of this, however we couldn't really schedule it at a different time. and sadly (though probably rather: gladly) there wi

Reproducible Builds Summit 2024

Hi, I'm very glad to be able to announce that we will be having the Reproducible Builds summit in 2024 from September 17 to 19 in Hamburg, in the same venue we've been in 2023: https://reproducible-builds.org/events/hamburg2024/ Again and as previously, the exact content of the meeting will be

Bug#1058029: I could fix this on my two systems (qemu-guest-agent not starting)

On Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 07:18:18PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 06:46:21PM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: > > subject says it all, one was freshly installed with bookworm, the other > > was upgraded. both don't use backports. happy to give more data. t

Bug#1058029: I could fix this on my two systems (qemu-guest-agent not starting)

On Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 07:18:18PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 06:46:21PM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: > > subject says it all, one was freshly installed with bookworm, the other > > was upgraded. both don't use backports. happy to give more data. t

Bug#1075914: developers-reference: issue with sidebar in singlehtml variant on small screens

Hi Holger, On Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 09:25:38PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: > This has already been filed as an issue in sphinx' github project in 2020: > > I will mark this bug as forwarded to that github issue later. thank you for fili

Bug#1075914: developers-reference: issue with sidebar in singlehtml variant on small screens

Hi Holger, On Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 09:25:38PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: > This has already been filed as an issue in sphinx' github project in 2020: > > I will mark this bug as forwarded to that github issue later. thank you for fili

Bug#1058029: I can reproduce this on two systems

On Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 06:46:21PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > subject says it all, one was freshly installed with bookworm, the other > was upgraded. both don't use backports. happy to give more data. as per Debian's defaults, I'm also running apparmor on these systems,

Bug#1058029: I can reproduce this on two systems

On Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 06:46:21PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > subject says it all, one was freshly installed with bookworm, the other > was upgraded. both don't use backports. happy to give more data. as per Debian's defaults, I'm also running apparmor on these systems,

Bug#1058029: I can reproduce this on two systems

hi, subject says it all, one was freshly installed with bookworm, the other was upgraded. both don't use backports. happy to give more data. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AA

Bug#1058029: I can reproduce this on two systems

hi, subject says it all, one was freshly installed with bookworm, the other was upgraded. both don't use backports. happy to give more data. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AA

Content and translation status for the debian-edu-bookworm manual

The (translated) debian-edu-bookworm manual in PDF, ePUB or HTML formats are available at https://jenkins.debian.net/userContent/debian-edu-doc// To understand this mail better, please read /usr/share/doc/debian-edu-doc/README. This mail is automatically send by a cronjob run by Holger Levsen

Bug#1074014: encode mandatory merged-/usr into policy

On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 08:27:56PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > For these reasons, I propose changing section 10.1 and encoding the > avoidance of symlink vs directory conflicts into policy. To get a > discussion going, I suggest the following update. > > - To support merged-/usr systems, package

Bug#1074014: encode mandatory merged-/usr into policy

On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 08:27:56PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > For these reasons, I propose changing section 10.1 and encoding the > avoidance of symlink vs directory conflicts into policy. To get a > discussion going, I suggest the following update. > > - To support merged-/usr systems, package

Frans Spiesschaert: Advocate

heMhg8wvVJ+gWVkINksMmq14RM0RoaLO3 pjTz28WexYMsWpOLUZezRUrBW4HGLurmbtb+65aXnFkzHd/VdnPpjEJzZq7qzoal TThwBLe3BWGOAlJdyV98zwXl1IsvnJNUYRO1qpIHKLB/Hbqz3p0= =0xrE -END PGP SIGNATURE----- Holger Levsen (via nm.debian.org) For details and to comment, visit https://nm.debian.org/process/1290/ -- https://nm.debian.org/process/1290/

Re: Videos of MiniDebConf Berlin 2024

On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 02:12:05PM +0200, Henning Sprang wrote: > well, besides that on meetings-archive i don’t even find the directory > where the conference videos are located… but the UI looks good. I'd usually just type video.debian.net/2024 (or whatever year) into the browser's address field

Re: Videos of MiniDebConf Berlin 2024

On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 01:41:40PM +0200, Thomas Lange wrote: > I like to do a friendly reminder that the videos of the MiniDebConf > Berlin are still only available on https://meetings-archive.debian.net > using this horrible user interface. it's the *best* user interface! far better then any of

Re: Nearly reproducible Bookworm 12.6 live images

Hi Roland, On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 06:44:37PM +0200, Roland Clobus wrote: > I'm sooo close... [...] hehe, congrats & thanks for keeping us in the loop! In honor of your work I've manually written the signature of this email...! :) -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|re

Re: Nearly reproducible Bookworm 12.6 live images

Hi Roland, On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 06:44:37PM +0200, Roland Clobus wrote: > I'm sooo close... [...] hehe, congrats & thanks for keeping us in the loop! In honor of your work I've manually written the signature of this email...! :) -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|re

Re: General Resolution to deploy tag2upload

On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 01:05:40AM +0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > I'd like to submit a ballot option. > > Not really happy with the current text though. The idea is simple : I > have been convinced, reading the previous discussion, that no formal > opinion from ftpmaster has been provided. >

Re: Q: Ubuntu PPA induced version ordering mess.

hi Alec, please stop mailing this thread and just use an epoch. Before adding^wintroducing an epoch one should consult debian-devel@l.d.o, you have done this, arguments were exchanged and (IMNSHO) no better solution was found, so please do what has done to >1000 source packages in the archive alr

Bug#896834: retitle

control: retitle -1 sequoia-chameleon-gnupg: unclear bug report, possibly solved with new upstream version control: severity -1 important juliank: you reassigned #896834 to gpgv-from-sq amd made it serious, while keeping the title ("apt-key fails in stretch") and in your last t

Bug#896834: retitle

control: retitle -1 sequoia-chameleon-gnupg: unclear bug report, possibly solved with new upstream version control: severity -1 important juliank: you reassigned #896834 to gpgv-from-sq amd made it serious, while keeping the title ("apt-key fails in stretch") and in your last t

Re: Q: Ubuntu PPA induced version ordering mess.

On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 05:17:09PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > I would use an epoch. yes. [...] > Basically, you'd be burning a lot of social capital with upstream for no > really good reason and you probably still wouldn't be able to convince > them. I don't think it's worth it. yes. > I wo

reproducible Debian containers exists today (Re: Reviving schroot as used by sbuild)

hi, On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 02:02:11PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > I have to ask: > > Could we use a container framework that is also used outside the Debian > bubble, rather than writing our own from first principles every time, and > ending up with a single-maintainer project being load-bear

Re: mitigating non-determinism

Dear Bernhard. On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 12:57:33PM +0200, Bernhard M. Wiedemann via rb-general wrote: > In https://github.com/bmwiedemann/theunreproduciblepackage/ I had collected > the many issues that introduce non-determinism. > > Today it is time to talk about mitigations - how can we avoid w

Bug#1073408: rust-sequoia-sq: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: librust-zstd-0.12-dev, librust-zstd-safe-6-dev

On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 03:16:49PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: rust-sequoia-sq > Version: 0.33.0-3 [...] > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build > on amd64. thanks, this will be fixed by a new upstream version soon to be uploaded. -- cheers, H

Bug#1073408: rust-sequoia-sq: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: librust-zstd-0.12-dev, librust-zstd-safe-6-dev

On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 03:16:49PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: rust-sequoia-sq > Version: 0.33.0-3 [...] > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build > on amd64. thanks, this will be fixed by a new upstream version soon to be uploaded. -- cheers, H

Bug#1073272: gpgv-from-sq: prevent 0.9.0-1 from entering testing

package: gpgv-sq, gpgv-from-sq severity: serious version: 0.9.0-1 hi, latest apt in unstable fails to 'apt update' with gpgv-from-sq 0.9.0-1, while the issue has been addressed in sequoia-chameleon-gnupg 0.10.0, so filing this bug to prevent migration of 0.9.0-1 to trixie (which else would happen

Bug#1073272: gpgv-from-sq: prevent 0.9.0-1 from entering testing

package: gpgv-sq, gpgv-from-sq severity: serious version: 0.9.0-1 hi, latest apt in unstable fails to 'apt update' with gpgv-from-sq 0.9.0-1, while the issue has been addressed in sequoia-chameleon-gnupg 0.10.0, so filing this bug to prevent migration of 0.9.0-1 to trixie (which else would happen

Re: Eternally paradigmatic Debian discussions...

On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 11:44:04PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > 1. Nobody really opposes what is being proposed. I oppose to vote to implement a design proposal. I also oppose to force certain work on volunteers. This is very similar to voting to publish -private. I didnt have time to even read th

Re: Upcoming stable point release (12.6)

On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 09:07:14PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > The next point release for "bookworm" (the delayed 12.6 release) is > scheduled for Saturday, 29th June 2024. Processing of new uploads into > bookworm-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend. time for an De

Re: [RFC] General Resolution to deploy tag2upload

On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 12:43:42PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > I think we probably need to provide more links, then. > Let me try to help. [...] > Hope this helps. It does help, thank you. Will reply with more substance later. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reprod

Re: [RFC] General Resolution to deploy tag2upload

On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 11:14:53AM +0200, Ansgar 🙀 wrote: > As far as I understand, the GR is about pushing the design and > implementation as is, without any changes. It very explicitly says so. the RFC for this GR only links to some design documents, at least that's what the RFC says, I haven't

Re: [RFC] General Resolution to deploy tag2upload

Am Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 10:27:56PM -0700 schrieb Russ Allbery: > > As I said several times before: the implementation has known security > > bugs (unless you fixed them). But I guess this is going to get ignored > > again anyway... > Could you describe what known security vulnerabilities you believ

Re: Mandatory LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 during package building

On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 02:32:14PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > And I think forcing a locale on buildds makes perfect sense, because > we want easy access to build logs. But forcing LC_ALL from the build > tools implies that no tool invoked will get translated messages at > all, and means that use

Re: Mandatory LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 during package building

On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 07:11:46PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > I would prefer that dpkg-buildpackage provides a "sane" build environment by > default (which I think includes a LC_ setting pointing at a .UTF-8 locale) > and fewer packages explicitly setting those things via debian/rules. same her

Re: Reproducible Builds Summit 2024

Hi Justin, On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 12:55:46PM -0400, Justin Cappos wrote: > I'd love to help host this in NYC. We can certainly provide space to meet > and work. that's an interesting offer! thank you! > I'm not sure if cost / travel time would be prohibitive though. true. -- cheers,

Re: Bits from DPL

On Sat, Jun 01, 2024 at 09:52:32AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > in connection with MiniDebConf Berlin there was some discussion about > what expense per attendee of some in person meeting is OK. Quoting > Chris Lamb from his "Bits from the DPL (March 2018)"[meet1]: > > Debian is willing to rei

Content and translation status for the debian-edu-bookworm manual

The (translated) debian-edu-bookworm manual in PDF, ePUB or HTML formats are available at https://jenkins.debian.net/userContent/debian-edu-doc// To understand this mail better, please read /usr/share/doc/debian-edu-doc/README. This mail is automatically send by a cronjob run by Holger Levsen

Bug#1072205: prevent re-using package versions for NMUs

Hi, very "nice" find, josch! On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 11:16:48AM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > This example with bash is especially problematic since bash is Essential:yes > so > there will now be a large portion of buildinfo files where it is not possible > to figure out with

Reproducible Builds Summit 2024

hi, I'm very happy to announce that this year we'll be holding the eighth Reproducible Builds Summit! The dates and location are not fixed yet, however if you don' help us with finding a suitable location *soon*, it is very likely that we'll meet again in Hamburg in the 2nd half of September 2024

Re: May 2024: whatsrc.org distro status

On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 08:36:05PM +0200, Simon Josefsson via rb-general wrote: > > As of May 2024, I have imported source code data from the following > > distributions: > This is awesome! indeed! thanks and kudos, kpcyrd, both for the code in the first place as well as taking time & efford to an

Re: Debian NMU Sprint Thursday, June 6th 17:00 UTC!

On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 01:21:10PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > I am hoping to schedule some Non-Maintainer Uploads (NMU) sprints, > starting with two thursdays from now... yay! though I won't be able to join on June 6th. what's the other Thursday you have in mind? > Unapplied patches: >

broad goals (Re: finally end single-person maintainership)

On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 12:25:49AM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: > > I would rather see a small but very stable base distribution, with the > > option to add features on top. > Doesn't this conflict with debian being universal? for some it surely does, while for others it's needed to make Debian

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >