Noel Jones wrote on Thu, 8 Aug 2019 10:49:54 -0500:
> That looks like a policy service and not a milter.
Yeah, right. It's a dovecot authenticator I think.
>
> Regardless, postfix accepts mail, running it through all configured
> milters, restrictions, and policy services, then puts it in the
I have still one question, though.
I fear that forwarding the mail via transport may not consult the milter.
At the moment the remote Exchange is still not configured to accept the
domain. I'm still waiting for that to take place.
In the meantime, though, I would have expected that the course of
Maztec wrote on Thu, 8 Aug 2019 01:13:18 -0700 (MST):
> However, Mailman3 does not use a socket -
> nonetheless I tried.
I wrote that because your service specification in master.cf says it does
use a Unix socket.
I think you have to specify that in the mailman3 service in your
master.cf!
I went back to my original config with virtual users and domains, with and
without the milter. I left transport and mynetworks as they were. I have
no idea why, but it's working now and I get a bounce from the remote
server (= it's not yet accepting the mail). No more attempts to deliver
Wietse Venema wrote on Wed, 7 Aug 2019 19:33:05 -0400 (EDT):
> Once a message enters in the hold queue IT WILL SIT THERE FOREVER
> unless something releases it from that queue.
Understood. Thanks! I should have known from the past (see below).
>
> You need to figure out why messages are placed
Noel Jones wrote on Wed, 7 Aug 2019 13:37:08 -0500:
> Postfix logs all delivery attempts.
I thought so, but ...
In that case it just hangs in the queue and nothing happens after the
milter was consulted. I can see it getting logged in rspamd and then it
just sits in the hold queue.
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Wed, 07 Aug 2019 19:11:19 +0200:
> Should I remove the domain from $mydestination ?
I did that now and postfix still accepts the mail.
However, it doesn't deliver it to the remote server.
It hangs in the queue.
It's possible that the remote side is not accept
Thanks for the reply, but no.
I had to, indeed, remove the domain from $mydestination to not deliver
locally, but it's still not working correctly.
Your map configuration lines may be wrong.
I think the only thing you need is this as a destination:
/^List@List\.TLD$/mailman3:
(no
Postfix 3.1.0, set up with virtual domains and users in a database via
virtual_ directives in main.cf
rspamd set up as a milter
-> everything works just fine.
I have one server where the client wants to get mail delivered to his
Exchange server remotely instead. He wants to have the mail
Stefan Bauer wrote on Wed, 19 Dec 2018 21:10:10 +0100:
> the threshold is at default, so 1.
This may not be part of your problem, but using a threshold of 1 and then
using this weighting scheme is nonsense:
postscreen_dnsbl_sites = zen.spamhaus.org*2 bl.spamcop.net*1
b.barracudacentral.org*1
Phil Stracchino wrote on Sun, 16 Dec 2018 16:34:23 -0500:
> relay recipient table
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#relay_recipient_maps
may be helpful.
Kai
Btw, what sizes are we talking about here? I assume it would be really
huuuge?
What's the max size of the .cache file and how many mails might create
this size?
Kai
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote on Thu, 8 Nov 2018 12:12:49 +0100:
> the problem lies in "parent_domain_matches_subdomains" which is (and should
> be) empty in postfix and apparently even is in new postfix version.
As I wrote earlier, it *is* set implicitely by backwards-compatibilty.
> First I
Noel Jones wrote on Wed, 7 Nov 2018 13:30:08 -0600:
> With the above list, check_sender_access comes first. Postfix does
> not reorder the list you have specified.
Thanks for the answer. But, please look again.
/etc/mail/access:
createsend.com REJECT
cmail20.com REJECT
The order is:
> >
Wietse Venema wrote on Wed, 7 Nov 2018 12:10:40 -0500 (EST):
> HOWEVER, by default Postfix evaluates all of these at RCPT TO time.
which means smtpd_delay_reject = yes is the default?
Am I correct in assuming that with "yes" it doesn't matter if I list the
client restrictions in
Addendum.
Currently, I get client rejections with the setup shown in my last mail
(despite the delay). I don't know if it hits *always*, though. I can't
check if it didn't hit for some client where the name matches, there are
too many entries.
I expected it to carry out the helo checks before
Carsten Rosenberg wrote on Wed, 7 Nov 2018 16:23:54 +0100:
> So if you reject somebody with an access_map, you won't see any scan
> result in rspamd.
This would be fine ;-)
> Do you have any problems with this situation?
Yes, it's the other way around here. e.g. there is no rejection happening
I'm having trouble with access_maps kicking in after an upgrade from a
Postfix 2.something to Postfix 3.1. on Ubuntu 14.06 and using postscreen
and rspamd milter.
After some testing I'm not sure yet, but it looks like the recommended
smtpd_delay_reject = yes in connection with having the
unsubscribe
I changed this now to a more standard setup using a mysql passdb/userdb
for virtual users and a passwordfile auth (auth-passwordfile.ext) as
described in doc/wiki/AuthDatabase.PasswdFile.txt for a few other users.
I'm still getting the same errors concerning dict access when running
doveadmin
I am testing a special setup on one machine where I want to put some local
users that get mail locally to /home user directories via postfix
transport map local: for historical and practical reasons. Other users are
setup as virtual users.
The local users are *also* setup as virtual users for
I forgot to mention that you have to change owner for the /var/log/dovecot
directory before rsyslog can log.
Kai
This works for splitting off lmtp traffic, for instance.
syslog_facility = uucp
rsyslog:
:msg, contains, "lmtp(" -/var/log/dovecot/lmtp.log
& stop
uucp.=debug -/var/log/dovecot/debug.log
uucp.=info -/var/log/dovecot/dovecot.log
uucp.=warn
I'm not going to log dovecot to mail, that creates only the same mixup as
before, even worse, now postfix and dovecot mixed. I had to stop/start
(force-reload would also work) rsyslogd to pick up the changed config. A
restart doesn't change the config as with other daemons. Now I can filter
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:43:28 +0200:
> But it logs only to /var/log/syslog
It seems that "service rsyslog restart" doesn't correctly restart
rsyslogd. You have to stop and start it. Then it picks up the changed
config.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Inte
I hoped I don't have to switch to syslog logging. Well, anyway.
I changed
10-logging.conf:
syslog_facility = uucp
and commented out the other log lines.
rsyslog.d/50-default.conf:
uucp.debug -/var/log/dovecot/debug.log
uucp.info
Is there a way to split the auth logging (logins and failed logins) from
the other logging that goes to
info_log_path = /var/log/dovecot/dovecot.log
?
This log gets a lot of other info as well, most notably the lmtp
notifications about every filed mail (with no level stamping, btw).
This makes
Thanks for all the replies. I didn't have time to reply earlier.
I went with my first proposed solution. Everything else is simply too much
hazzle. You would have to set this for every single exception/address/user
and so on and you cannot be sure that it doesn't bite you some time later
with a
Gerald Galster wrote on Tue, 11 Sep 2018 20:49:17 +0200:
> Is this a dovecot problem on your side? dovecot usually accepts mail
> from MTA like postfix, so it would be better to remove example1.com from
> postfix relaydomains (mailbox domains, alias domains, ...). Then there
> is no delivery to
Given the following:
mailboxes:
us...@example1.com
us...@example1.com
us...@example1.com
etc.
aliases:
whate...@example1.com -> us...@example1.com
whate...@example2.com -> us...@example1.com
whate...@example3.com -> us...@example1.com
Now the problem:
example1.com MX goes elsewhere (doesn't
I would like to transfer mail for some users from an old dovecot (with no
doveadm) to a modern dovecot (2.3.2). I've read up on
https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Tools/Doveadm/Sync
https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Migration/Dsync
and I'm not sure if I can use doveadm for this purpose.
I need doveadm to login
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Mon, 20 Aug 2018 13:32:59 +0200:
> So, is this config correct for domain quota dictionary-based and how
> should it work?
Hello,
resolving a problem and knowing that there is a problem are two different
things. I would still like to know if this config is correct a
Ok, thanks!
Kai
So, is this config correct for domain quota dictionary-based and how
should it work?
Kai
I noticed that most of the time with dovecot 2.3 I get this output,
showing systemd listening on the port as well:
lsof -i TCP:993
systemd 1 root 38u IPv4 3388360574 0t0 TCP *:imaps (LISTEN)
systemd 1 root 41u IPv6 3388360575 0t0 TCP *:imaps (LISTEN)
dovecot 11607 root
Aki Tuomi wrote on Sun, 19 Aug 2018 20:56:28 +0300 (EEST):
> openssl gendh 4096 > params.pem
Ok. I then misunderstood what's written at
https://wiki.dovecot.org/SSL/DovecotConfiguration
I thought I need to create dh.pem in two steps:
1. openssl dhparam 4096 >
Well, on that machine it took now more than an hour. But it created the
same 769 bytes file as on the other machines. And, foreseeable, that one
fails to transform as well.
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 360 Aug 7 2017 ssl-parameters.dat
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 769 Aug 19 19:25
Aki Tuomi wrote on Sun, 19 Aug 2018 18:21:31 +0300:
> Just generate new parameters on some machine with good entropy source.
So, if it fails to transform (although bigger) the machine hasn't enough
entropy (because it's quite new?)? I'm generating now on the original
machine from last year
I did that the last time one year ago, now on another machine with the
same software (Ubuntu 16.04) it fails.
openssl dhparam 4096 > /var/lib/dovecot/ssl-parameters.dat
dd if=/var/lib/dovecot/ssl-parameters.dat bs=1 skip=88 | openssl dhparam
-inform der > /etc/dovecot/dh.pem
last command fails
Christy S wrote on Fri, 17 Aug 2018 18:05:47 -0500:
> I see the
> connection in the log, but no errors.
what do you see?
And, also, what exactly do you want to do? (e.g. with what do you send
which email from->to via what, how should this affect your server and what
do you check on your
Aki Tuomi wrote on Thu, 16 Aug 2018 21:03:44 +0300 (EEST):
> Can you provide doveconf -n please?
Thanks for the quick reply. I think I already provided the most relevant
portions of config. I ran a doveconf -n and it doesn't reveal important
information like sql setup. I'll do my best to sum
Hello,
I'm in the process of moving users from an old dovecot setup with system
users to a modern virtual user setup.
I can't find good documentation on domain quota.
It is mentioned in the docs as
quota2 = dict:domain:%d:proxy::quota_domain
but not much more.
Searching the mailing list or
From: Kai Schaetzl <mailli...@conactive.com>
Tom Ehlert wrote on Mon, 15 Aug 2016 16:00:55 +0200:
> an amazing amount of effort to get a german keyboard driver
Not really once you know that you don't need the .kl file.
According to
http://help.fdos.org/de/hhstndrd/base/keyb.htm
you ha
From: Kai Schaetzl <mailli...@conactive.com>
Eric Auer wrote on Sun, 14 Aug 2016 17:50:31 +0200:
Hi Eric,
thanks for the quick reply. In the meantime I found out that I can load a
German layout with just "keyb gr", just not the layout file itself or the
/E switch t
Tom Ehlert wrote on Mon, 15 Aug 2016 16:00:55 +0200:
> an amazing amount of effort to get a german keyboard driver
Not really once you know that you don't need the .kl file.
According to
http://help.fdos.org/de/hhstndrd/base/keyb.htm
you have to run (as an example) "keyb GR,,GR GR.KL /E".
You
Rugxulo wrote on Mon, 15 Aug 2016 11:35:27 -0500:
> Assuming you have the "full" (official) FD 1.1 install, do you not
> find KC.EXE anywhere?
No, I don't have kc. I'm not running FreeDOS 1.1 iso. I don't remember the
history. I grabbed files for FreeDOS b1.0 and 1.1 some time ago from a zip.
Eero Volotinen wrote on Mon, 15 Aug 2016 11:00:51 +:
> Maybe your repodata cache was a bit old :)
Yeah. I would have thought it checks the date of the file and tries to
update it when it's that old. Anyway, clearing the whole yum cache was a
good idea as I don't need the 5.8 rpms anymore.
Hi!
I revived an old disk with CentoS 5.8 on it and want to update it to
5.latest (=5.11). However, it insists on getting 5.8 files. From the past
I remember I would get a major release jump from 5.n to 5.m automatically.
Or do I remember this wrong?
I googled a bit around, but couldn't really
Eric Auer wrote on Sun, 14 Aug 2016 17:50:31 +0200:
Hi Eric,
thanks for the quick reply. In the meantime I found out that I can load a
German layout with just "keyb gr", just not the layout file itself or the
/E switch that is mentioned in that article. I assume the gr.kl is
embedded in the
I worked on an old R200 the other day and must have fingered a weird key
combo when rebooting or so. The bios screen and any other output is now
not blue on white/grey (if I remember right), but it's yellow on black.
It's bearable, but the original color would be better. Anyone knows what
I've been trying for the last two hours or so to find out how to use a
German keyboard with FreeDOS. There is enough information, but some of the
files cannot be downloaded anywhere. I'm running in circles. Or I'm
missing something obvious.
What I found out: I have to use keyb with a command
I've been using IUS in the past. They have a good way of naming their
rpms, so they don't interfere with the RH rpms. But they don't support
older CentOS versions still on extended support as long as I needed them.
And they don't provide as much php-related rpms (f.i. pecl-stuff) as remi
does.
Nux! wrote on Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:27:26 +0100 (BST):
> It's irrelevant in this case that PHP 5.3 is EOL. It will continue
> to be supported by Red Hat with security patches.
Exactly.
Nevertheless, PHP 5.6 is not "bleeding edge" as someone else said. 5.5 and
5.6 are really state of the art and
I would rather work on single files or tars on directory basis. Using a
single big file creates a very large single point of failure.
Or use an encrypted file system (of course, also a single point of
failure, but probably better handling).
Kai
___
As you learned by now co.at ist just as valid as any other TLD. There are
many like that. Some have just shifted to that scheme, others are moving
away from it (for instance uk is now offering raw .uk registrations which
you couldn't get until last year or so). Unfortunately, there's no
That's ridiculous, you don't even know what's wrong or if it's wrong at
all or what you want him to do but you have to cry it out loud to the list
to put social pressure on him. Please move this to private mail and
understand that Gmail is *not* what rules email best practice and also try
to
Les Mikesell wrote on Wed, 12 Nov 2014 10:13:07 -0600:
Well, no.
Well, *yes*. It's not business to be carried out on the list nor does the
guy who moans about it seem to know why. And if you are the second from
Gmail then please move it off-list as well. It's really not anyone's
problem on
I noticed this as well but did some homework ;-)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147189
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-6277
If I understand it correctly they think it's not exploitable anymore.
Still think it should get patched immediately as there is an upstream
What you want to do it seems is change the hostname for access of some
users. Although, if it is local access, they should have access to
localhost and it doesn't matter which hostname the machine has.
Also, initially, you have to set the root password.
Almost everyone uses PHPMyAdmin to
I made a test update of only Postfix and don't see a problem.
There's indeed a new main.cf file saved as main.cf.rpmnew and there's also
a new main.cf.default file which contains all default settings of
postconf.
The data_directory apparently changed from /etc/postfix to
/var/lib/postfix which
FYI, this person is banned from some lists for trolling.
Might be worthwhile for list-admin to consider that.
https://www.google.de/search?hl=deas_q=Harald+Reindl+troll
Kai
Digimer wrote on Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:18:17 -0400:
I think it would be really good if everyone took a step back, took a
deep breath, and relaxed. This thread has generated a surprisingly (and
to me baffling) amount of negativity.
I don't know how long you have been on this list, but it's a
Mingfei Hua wrote on Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:05:33 +:
This issue happened again, who can help on this? system load up to
72, but /proc/stat only show that 2 processes were running and no
process blocked
As others have already said, you are not giving and you are not looking at
relevant
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote on Sun, 31 Aug 2014 07:08:11 -0700:
Out of the box the default decision point of 5 is too high anyway.
No. You can always lower it yourself. With the result of more FPs. If you
or your users can live with that. Fine. Many can't.
I think the emphasis on avoiding false
EasyBCD is an extra software, just google it.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
James B. Byrne wrote on Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:06:20 -0400:
23.102.173.124
Google says: http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/26486/failed-rdp
-brute-force-attack-from-microsoft-ip-address
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
It seems the syntax for AllowUsers in sshd_config is not the same that is
given in man sshd_config and in several documentation on the web.
(http://www.openssh.com/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=sshd_config)
e.g.
AllowUsers root
does work.
AllowUsers root username
does not work.
If I try to login as
Reindl Harald wrote on Thu, 26 Jun 2014 13:04:21 +0200:
not true
Don't say it's not true. ;-) I tried it at least half an hour with all
possible combinations and only the user@* pattern worked. I made
absolutely sure that I restarted the ssh server each time. I know also
pretty well, that I
David Vrabel wrote on Tue, 27 May 2014 13:04:21 +0100:
still do a text-console (in theory).
Is this an interesting use case?
It comes in handy for instance if there's something wrong with networking
in the guest ;-) Also, I've used it in cases where the load was very high
or when the
Lennart Johansson wrote on Thu, 20 Feb 2014 13:58:21 +0100:
Which SA versions do get this new 999 rule? e.g. I have also older
installations with 3.2.4 and 3.2.5 that would need careful updating.
Just adding your rule seems to add 999 to the set of older setups as well,
although it wasn't
Kevin A. McGrail wrote on Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:06:59 -0500:
3.2.0 hasn't had updates since at least Jan of 2010 from looking
I thought there may not have been any updates since then. Time to do
upgrades :-)
But the eval rule nevertheless works if you add it manually.
Thanks for all your hard
Timothy Murphy wrote on Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:40:24 +:
As you see, there is an empty (and slightly smaller) slot
between the SATA connectors and the power connector.
That power connector is a jumper bay. As Miguel explains the two L-
shaped things are what gets used for SATA (the short one
Timothy Murphy wrote on Sat, 08 Feb 2014 13:28:18 +:
I had better check if these do support SATA3 drives.
That jumper bay usually allows for setting to slower speeds. There should
have been a small leaflet with the drive explaining it.
Kai
___
Timothy Murphy wrote on Sat, 08 Feb 2014 13:50:07 +:
I'm having problems communicating with a remote server, with openvpn.
First, did you check that it works fine without OpenVPN (e.g. firewall
open)?
Second, what exactly are you doing/do you want to achieve?
VPN makes sense if you go
Andrew Holway wrote on Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:05:37 +:
You will need another server set up on the same L2 network that will
serve DHCP and TFTP and HTTP. You can set it up similar to the
following.
Well, I think he's lacking that option (e.g. setup DHCP in the same
network). What he wants
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 5 Dec 2013 14:37:29 -0500:
And here's two thoughts that just struck me: first, they have no way to
apply to be whitelisted.
I think there are ways, they do maintain a whitelist. Maybe Hostmonster is
just not good enough to get on it. Did you consider that?
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:47:37 -0500:
I keep hoping, perhaps foolishly, that others who get hit with this will
add their voice, and that the list might go to using some other source to
block spam.
Oh, yeah, until the day where that list adds Hostmonster as well and
The list pays very well. It's just that your hosting provider is
regularly or irregularly on it. That's the only reason you think it
doesn't pay. Not a good reason. It pays for everybody else on this
list except you. Consider that. It may even pay for you, just that you
don't notice (less
Actually, Manitu, also known as NIXSpam, is quite a good list. I've been
using only this one and Spamhaus for years. Very good FP:Spam ratio.
I, too, had an issue with the list lately and contacted the maintainer of
the project who gave me a good explanation of why Facebook servers may be
William A. Fink wrote on Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:41:52 -0400:
My question is: The SMTP protocol allows a return address to be
'u...@ip-address.com' and 'u...@ip-address.com' and some other variations,
I'll assume.
Are you really talking about ip-address.*com* or just ip-address?
SMTP allows
Why so complicated? For literals just look for [ and ]. They can only be
around a literal IP address. Or if you want to block only the non-routable
addresses use these for regexp.
Your regexp seems to be ok to me, but I'm not an expert in regexp and I
don't know if you can use it there (it's
Why do you post this statement to this list?
Also, poweroff does not mean for a server that it's not on power, it's
just not started. BMC, fans etc. are running.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Webmaster DKDB wrote on Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:08:01 +0200:
dkdb.dk.37.66.77.in-addr.arpa
Probably because of this. This reverse DNS is not under an existing top-
level-domain and looks very much like a normal reverse lookup (and not the
result). Have them set it to a real public hostname.
Kai
do not see anything is not a problem description that gives any
information to someone who wants to help you.
If you do not know if you can reach the correct website then place a
simple index.htm in the root that makes it identifable. Then access this
file. If you can view it then the httpd
Neil Schwartzman wrote on 17 Oct 2013 07:01:00 -0700:
incorrect, not false, which implies maliciousness. I believe Spamhaus
only recently, for some value of recently, started doing NS listings
with deeper dives that show up on an SBL listing.
They didn't list any NS IP. If you look at the
Axb wrote on Thu, 17 Oct 2013 17:05:48 +0200:
15 live SBL listings aren't collateral damage:
It doesn't matter if there is more evidence. The scoring via URIBL_SBL would
have happened no matter whether the other 14 exist or not.
It doesn't get the nameserver, it gets the NS IP
What's the
That's much better, thanks! I wasn't sure about this also Because LWP
does not support IPv6. It *could* mean that LWP generally does support
IPv6, but mine doesn't. As I understand it now it means that LWP in
general doesn't support it.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:
Thanks for the explanation. So I just forget about this new module, I
don't need it. Just thought it might hold other advantages as the make
output seems to suggest it does.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Kevin A. McGrail wrote on Sun, 13 Oct 2013 14:14:02 -0400:
I don't use MailScanner and have no input on this issue, sorry.
I've installed my 3.4.0 rpm on two systems with MailScanner now, one of
them in production. I've also tested compiling rules. It seems to be
working just fine without any
You are missing the local.cf or any similar local config. MailScanner puts
a mailscanner.cf symlink there that points to
/etc/MailScanner/spamassassin.prefs.conf
The symlink seems to have been deleted.
I usually do it a bit different. I maintain my own local.cf in
/etc/mail/spamassassin and
Kevin A. McGrail wrote on Sun, 13 Oct 2013 14:14:02 -0400:
Preferably a perl module IO::Socket::IP is used (if it is available) for
network communication regardless of a protocol family - for DNS queries,
by spamd server side, and by a client code in Mail::SpamAssassin::Client.
As a fallback
Mark Martinec wrote on Sun, 13 Oct 2013 20:16:05 +0200:
Don't bother with fetch, it's FreeBSD -specific.
Ah, then the mention of it in the make output is confusing. Thanks.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
I've just tested building 3.4.0 on Centos 5 system where I also built
3.3.2. make and make test worked fine. I'm not sure if I can make it an
inplace replacement, though. Has anyone running MailScanner tried 3.4.0?
So, I haven't installed it yet.
Observations:
I'm missing a spec file. Earlier
what is the startup message as expected? MailScanner message?
Does it lint correctly (MS)?
I've just built an rpm and installed it on a test system. So far it looks
good, but I have to send some mail to it now as this system normally
doesn't get mail.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive
seems to be working on the test system.
Oct 13 15:56:31 news MailScanner[21325]: Requeue: 225071157F.A48D0 to
3B69711588
Oct 13 15:56:31 news MailScanner[21325]: Requeue: 22356114B9.A4C8E to
015801157F
Oct 13 15:56:31 news MailScanner[21325]: Uninfected: Delivered 2 messages
Oct 13 15:56:31
John McKelvey wrote on Mon, 30 Sep 2013 23:27:55 -0400:
The catch is that I can not connect to
the box using SSH
That's obviously not true or just half of the story. Did you actually try
*sshing* in? Your title mentions sftp, not ssh. So, what software are you
using to connect? I would
Just wanted to say thank you very much to everybody who made
rpmforge/repoforge go on with updates, especially Dag und David. Your
efforts are very much appreciated. Thanks!
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Reindl Harald wrote on Fri, 20 Sep 2013 14:32:46 +0200:
/etc/rc.d/rc.local
Thanks for all the answers.
First, I omitted to explicitely state that these are web servers. There is
no dhcp, only one or, in a few cases, a few IP static IP addresses. Mostly
Centos 5. Changing the data is *not*
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Wed, 25 Sep 2013 10:58:51 +0200:
Google suggests a file
/etc/rc.shutdown (or rc.local.shutdown?) which, if I understand correctly,
would be carried out after the init stuff for the shutdown (rc0) has been
done.
rc.local.shutdown or rc.halt don't work. Seems I have
This should really be directed at a PHP forum. I would suspect that
something with the server certificate is not ok.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
1 - 100 of 2723 matches
Mail list logo
