Bug#1069094: mariadb: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Source: mariadb Version: 10.11.7-4 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Hi, mariadb FTBFS on hurd-i386. Attached are three patches enabling a successful build: - debian_rules.patch: 

Bug#1069094: mariadb: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Source: mariadb Version: 10.11.7-4 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, mariadb FTBFS on hurd-i386. Attached are three patches enabling a successful build: - debian_rules.patch: 

Bug#1029097: pam: FTBFS on hurd-i386

; > There's a typo here ^ > > > +#define PATH_MAX 4096 > > +#endif > > Cheers Thanks, New patch attached. Description: define PATH_MAX for compatibility when it's not already set Some platforms, such as the Hurd, don't set PATH_MAX. Set a reasonable defaul

Re: Bug#1029097:pam: FTBFS on hurd-i386

; > There's a typo here ^ > > > +#define PATH_MAX 4096 > > +#endif > > Cheers Thanks, New patch attached. Description: define PATH_MAX for compatibility when it's not already set Some platforms, such as the Hurd, don't set PATH_MAX. Set a reasonable defaul

Fwd: Bug#1029097:pam: FTBFS on hurd-i386

uthors: Steve Langasek , Svante Signell Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/ Index: pam-1.5.3/libpam/include/path_max.h === --- /dev/null +++ pam-1.5.3/libpam/include/path_max.h @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +/* + * Define PATH_MAX if

Re: Are you doing this too for GNU/Hurd?

On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 17:43 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, le jeu. 22 févr. 2024 17:36:15 +0100, a ecrit: > > Changes: > > ... > >  gcc-13 (13.2.0-14) experimental; urgency=medium > > * Pass -D_TIME_BITS=64 together with -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 by > &

Are you doing this too for GNU/Hurd?

>From the changelog: Changes: ... gcc-13 (13.2.0-14) experimental; urgency=medium * Pass -D_TIME_BITS=64 together with -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 by default on the 32bit architectures armel, armhf, hppa, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc (-m32 only) and sh4. ...

Re: Announcing: a new Hurd distro, based on Alpine Linux

Hi Sergey. Sorry for top-posting.  This is very interesting, especially now when the Debian (GNU/Linux, GNU/Hurd) project is heading in the wrong direction. I'll take a closer look on Alpine in due time. Thanks! On Sat, 2024-01-20 at 23:03 +0300, Sergey Bugaev wrote: > Hello! > > Those of

Re: Please help test the PAM in experimental

Hi, you don't seem to address: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029097 why? On Fri, 2024-01-19 at 11:40 -0700, Sam Hartman wrote: > > There are a number of changes, and I'd just like a bit more > confidence > that it works as expected before uploading to unstable in about a >

Re: dhcpcd: FTBFS on Hurd

On Wed, 2024-01-17 at 18:48 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Joshua Branson, le mer. 17 janv. 2024 12:09:30 -0500, a ecrit: > > Also may I ask why Debian is switching to dhcpcd?  Just curious. > > Because ISC is not maintaining its dhcp software any more. I'm working on porting dhcpcd. No working

[Python-modules-team] Bug#1060093: lirc: Found Hurd bug in 0.10.2-0.{3, 4}

found 1060093 0.10.2-0.3 found 1060093 0.10.2-0.4 thanks ___ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team

[Python-modules-team] Bug#1060093: lirc: FTBFS on hurd-i386

On Fri, 2024-01-05 at 21:58 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks for your patches. > > Svante Signell, le ven. 05 janv. 2024 21:14:19 +0100, a ecrit: > > --- a/debian/rules  2023-12-16 18:35:11.0 +0100 > > +++ b/debian/rules  2024-01-

[Python-modules-team] Bug#1056311: lirc: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Source: lirc Version: 0.10.1-7.2 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, lirc FTBFS on hurd-i386. (Built in the past, last successful build version was 0.10.1-5.2) This is due to usage of __u32 in the patch

Bug#1060093: lirc: Found Hurd bug in 0.10.2-0.{3,4}

found 1060093 0.10.2-0.3 found 1060093 0.10.2-0.4 thanks

Bug#1060093: lirc: FTBFS on hurd-i386

On Fri, 2024-01-05 at 21:58 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks for your patches. > > Svante Signell, le ven. 05 janv. 2024 21:14:19 +0100, a ecrit: > > --- a/debian/rules  2023-12-16 18:35:11.0 +0100 > > +++ b/debian/rules  2024-01-

Bug#1060093: lirc: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Source: lirc Version: 0.10.2-0.2 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Hi, lirc FTBFS on hurd-i386. (Built in the past, last successful build version was 0.10.1-5.2) This is due to usage of __u32 (and

Bug#1060093: lirc: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Source: lirc Version: 0.10.2-0.2 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, lirc FTBFS on hurd-i386. (Built in the past, last successful build version was 0.10.1-5.2) This is due to usage of __u32 (and

Bug#1056980: Lost mail!

Hello, How come I never saw this mail?? https://bugs.devuan.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=813#66 Strange, gmail hickup?? I'll comment inline when/if I find it, else I'd cut and paste from the bug report. Thanks!

Bug#1056980: Lost mail!

Hello, How come I never saw this mail?? https://bugs.devuan.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=813#66 Strange, gmail hickup?? I'll comment inline when/if I find it, else I'd cut and paste from the bug report. Thanks!

Bug#1056980: [devuan-dev] bug#813: Reopen 1056980

rol: severity -1 normal > Control: tags -1 = wontfix > > * Svante Signell [231208 19:38]: > > On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 16:15 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > > reopen 1056980 > > > severity 1056980 serious > > > tags 1056980 patch > > > thanks >

Bug#1056980: [devuan-dev] bug#813: Reopen 1056980

On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 16:15 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > reopen 1056980 > severity 1056980 serious > tags 1056980 patch > thanks Sorry, forgot the patch! --- a/debian/netcat-traditional.postinst 2023-11-27 03:20:27.0 +0100 +++ b/debian/netcat-traditional.postinst 2023

Bug#1056980: [devuan-dev] bug#813: Reopen 1056980

On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 16:15 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > reopen 1056980 > severity 1056980 serious > tags 1056980 patch > thanks Sorry, forgot the patch! --- a/debian/netcat-traditional.postinst 2023-11-27 03:20:27.0 +0100 +++ b/debian/netcat-traditional.postinst 2023

Bug#1056980: Reopen 1056980

reopen 1056980 severity 1056980 serious tags 1056980 patch thanks Hello, Reopening this bug due to a deliberate attempt to fool the users: Either you move binaries _and_ configuration files to /usr/bin or explicitely depend on usrmerge. And closing this bug as wontfix is not nice. I've

Re: poweroff support on Hurd?

On Thu, 2023-12-07 at 08:16 +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > [2023-12-07 08:14](HURD i386)perkelix@pxeth:~$ showtrans /servers/shutdown > /hurd/shutdown > [2023-12-07 08:14](HURD i386)perkelix@pxeth:~$ showtrans /servers/acpi > /hurd/acpi > [2023-12-07 08:14](HURD i386)perkelix@pxeth:~$ ls

Bug#1057634: /sbin/hwclock: unrecognized option '--rtc=/dev/rtc0'

And on a Devuan/Ceres box: dpkg -S /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/hwclock.rules initscripts: /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/hwclock.rules dpkg -S /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/85-hwclock.rules dpkg-query: no path found matching pattern /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/85- hwclock.rules On Wed, 2023-12-06 at 18:08 +0100, Svante

Re: Bug#1057634: /sbin/hwclock: unrecognized option '--rtc=/dev/rtc0'

And on a Devuan/Ceres box: dpkg -S /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/hwclock.rules initscripts: /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/hwclock.rules dpkg -S /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/85-hwclock.rules dpkg-query: no path found matching pattern /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/85- hwclock.rules On Wed, 2023-12-06 at 18:08 +0100, Svante

Bug#1057634: /sbin/hwclock: unrecognized option '--rtc=/dev/rtc0'

On Wed, 2023-12-06 at 16:52 +, Mark Hindley wrote: > Martin, > > On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 06:06:41PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > Please note that the start target refers to a non-existing > > /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/85-hwclock.rules.  The correct file is > >

Re: Bug#1057634: /sbin/hwclock: unrecognized option '--rtc=/dev/rtc0'

On Wed, 2023-12-06 at 16:52 +, Mark Hindley wrote: > Martin, > > On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 06:06:41PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > Please note that the start target refers to a non-existing > > /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/85-hwclock.rules.  The correct file is > >

Bug#1057634: Fwd: Re: Bug#1057634: /sbin/hwclock: unrecognized option '--rtc=/dev/rtc0'

--- Begin Message --- On Wed, 2023-12-06 at 12:07 +, Mark Hindley wrote: > Chris, > > Thanks for your input. > > On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 11:56:56AM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > > * Mark Hindley [231206 11:42]: > > > Is hwclock actually useful on Hurd? I (naively) expected it to be

Fwd: Re: Bug#1057634: /sbin/hwclock: unrecognized option '--rtc=/dev/rtc0'

--- Begin Message --- On Wed, 2023-12-06 at 12:07 +, Mark Hindley wrote: > Chris, > > Thanks for your input. > > On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 11:56:56AM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > > * Mark Hindley [231206 11:42]: > > > Is hwclock actually useful on Hurd? I (naively) expected it to be

Bug#1056311: lirc: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Source: lirc Version: 0.10.1-7.2 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Hi, lirc FTBFS on hurd-i386. (Built in the past, last successful build version was 0.10.1-5.2) This is due to usage of __u32 in the patch

Bug#1056311: lirc: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Source: lirc Version: 0.10.1-7.2 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, lirc FTBFS on hurd-i386. (Built in the past, last successful build version was 0.10.1-5.2) This is due to usage of __u32 in the patch

Bug#1056145: e2fsprogs: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Source: e2fsprogs Version: 1.47.0-2 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Hi, e2fsprogs FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to usage of PATH_MAX which is not defined on GNU/Hurd. (Built in the past, last successful build

Bug#1056145: e2fsprogs: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Source: e2fsprogs Version: 1.47.0-2 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, e2fsprogs FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to usage of PATH_MAX which is not defined on GNU/Hurd. (Built in the past, last successful build

Bug#1056050: mate-power-manager: Non-installable on hurd-i386

Source: mate-power-manager Version: 1.26.1-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Hi, mate-power-manager is not installable on hurd-i386 due to dependencies on polkitd, pkexec, and systemd or elogind which

Bug#1056050: mate-power-manager: Non-installable on hurd-i386

Source: mate-power-manager Version: 1.26.1-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, mate-power-manager is not installable on hurd-i386 due to dependencies on polkitd, pkexec, and systemd or elogind which

Bug#1056049: consolekit2: Not buildable on hurd-i386

Source: consolekit2 Version: 1.2.6-2 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Hi, consolekit is not buildable on hurd-i386 due to a dependency on libevdev-dev which is only available for GNU/Linux. A patch

Bug#1056049: consolekit2: Not buildable on hurd-i386

Source: consolekit2 Version: 1.2.6-2 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, consolekit is not buildable on hurd-i386 due to a dependency on libevdev-dev which is only available for GNU/Linux. A patch

Bug#1055936: synaptic: Non-installable on hurd-i386

Source: synaptic Version: 0.93.1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Hi, synaptic is not installable on hurd-i386 due to dependencies on polkitd, pkexec and policykit-1 which are only available for

Bug#1055936: synaptic: Non-installable on hurd-i386

Source: synaptic Version: 0.93.1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, synaptic is not installable on hurd-i386 due to dependencies on polkitd, pkexec and policykit-1 which are only available for

Bug#1055935: mate-polkit: Non-installable on hurd-i386

Source: mate-polkit Version: 1.26.1-4 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Hi, mate-polkit is not installable on hurd-i386 due to a dependency on polkitd, which is only available for GNU/Linux. A patch

Bug#1055935: mate-polkit: Non-installable on hurd-i386

Source: mate-polkit Version: 1.26.1-4 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, mate-polkit is not installable on hurd-i386 due to a dependency on polkitd, which is only available for GNU/Linux. A patch

Bug#1055875: util-linux: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Source: util-linux Version: 2.39.2-5 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Hi, util-linux FTBFS on hurd-i386 (built in the past, last successful build was 2.39.1-4). A patch enabling a successful build is

Bug#1055875: util-linux: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Source: util-linux Version: 2.39.2-5 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, util-linux FTBFS on hurd-i386 (built in the past, last successful build was 2.39.1-4). A patch enabling a successful build is

Re: Some progress, Guix rumpdisk still crashes...

On Wed, 2023-05-17 at 20:24 +0200, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Hi! > > With this newly patched glibc > >     https://gitlab.com/janneke/guix/-/tree/wip-hurd12 > > rumpdisk still crashes, but the good news (I guess) is that it seems to > get somewhat further, or at least it crashes

Re: [PATCH] faq/64-bit.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn: added up to date 64-bit porting info

On Sat, 2023-05-13 at 19:01 +, jbra...@dismail.de wrote: > May 13, 2023 1:46 PM, "Sergey Bugaev" wrote: > > > On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 7:38 PM jbra...@dismail.de  > > wrote: > > > > > +Hurd developers are adding 64-bit support, and they plan to drop the > > > +32-bit support, once the 64-bit

Re: Prospectives (Was: hurd: Add expected abilist files for x86_64)

On Wed, 2023-05-03 at 19:56 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Samuel Thibault, le mer. 03 mai 2023 13:09:25 +0200, a ecrit: > > Sergey Bugaev, le mer. 03 mai 2023 13:26:56 +0300, a ecrit: > > > > To put another perspective: I have been doing that less funny part for a > > > > long time already. I

Re: [hurd,commited] hurd: Enable x86_64 build script

On Tue, 2023-05-02 at 22:25 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Thanks so much to all people involved in making the 64bit port a real > thing now! Congrats to all involved in creating the 64bit port. GNU/Hurd is definitely not a dead project! Thanks!

Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] hurd: Add expected abilist files for x86_64

On Tue, 2023-05-02 at 17:10 +0300, Sergey Bugaev wrote: > On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 8:43 PM Samuel Thibault > wrote: > > > > > > They will just *not* work with 64bit. The glue code is not ready at all, > > and I think it's really not useful to spend time on that when we have > > the rump drivers

Bug#1033007: Now gcc-13: [Fwd: [PATCH] gcc-12: Re-enable split-stack support for GNU/Hurd.]

Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 1:20230315-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Affects: gcc-snapshot X-Debbugs-CC: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Hello, seems like the patch gcc_config_gnu.h.diff, in debian gcc-12 named: pr104290-followup.diff was lost

Bug#1033007: Now gcc-13: [Fwd: [PATCH] gcc-12: Re-enable split-stack support for GNU/Hurd.]

Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 1:20230315-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Affects: gcc-snapshot X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hello, seems like the patch gcc_config_gnu.h.diff, in debian gcc-12 named: pr104290-followup.diff was lost

Bug#1033007: Now gcc-13: [Fwd: [PATCH] gcc-12: Re-enable split-stack support for GNU/Hurd.]

Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 1:20230315-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Affects: gcc-snapshot X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hello, seems like the patch gcc_config_gnu.h.diff, in debian gcc-12 named: pr104290-followup.diff was lost

Now gcc-13: [Fwd: [PATCH] gcc-12: Re-enable split-stack support for GNU/Hurd.]

Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 1:20230315-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Affects: gcc-snapshot X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hello, seems like the patch gcc_config_gnu.h.diff, in debian gcc-12 named: pr104290-followup.diff was lost

[sr #110199] Cross-building of GNU/Hurd and additional packages

Follow-up Comment #37, sr #110199 (project administration): Hello, Thank you for your reply. If I understand correctly all files under the BSD-3 licence have to contain a copy of the license text. Secondly for other licences every file has to carry a copyright and license notice. All of the

[sr #110199] Cross-building of GNU/Hurd and additional packages

Follow-up Comment #37, sr #110199 (project administration): Hello, Thank you for your reply. If I understand correctly all files under the BSD-3 licence have to contain a copy of the license text. Secondly for other licences every file has to carry a copyright and license notice. All of the

[sr #110199] Cross-building of GNU/Hurd and additional packages

Follow-up Comment #35, sr #110199 (project administration): Hi again, The file COPYING in patches/PAM/hurd_no_setfsuid.diff was added by me. The text in that file is now changed to: Copyright (C) 2018 Steve Langasek. Linux-PAM is free software licensed under the 3-clause BSD license, see the

[sr #110199] Cross-building of GNU/Hurd and additional packages

Follow-up Comment #35, sr #110199 (project administration): Hi again, The file COPYING in patches/PAM/hurd_no_setfsuid.diff was added by me. The text in that file is now changed to: Copyright (C) 2018 Steve Langasek. Linux-PAM is free software licensed under the 3-clause BSD license, see the

[sr #110199] Cross-building of GNU/Hurd and additional packages

Follow-up Comment #33, sr #110199 (project administration): Hello, this issue seems to have a Closed status. Can somebody open it again? Thanks! ___ Reply to this item at:

[sr #110199] Cross-building of GNU/Hurd and additional packages

Follow-up Comment #33, sr #110199 (project administration): Hello, this issue seems to have a Closed status. Can somebody open it again? Thanks! ___ Reply to this item at:

[sr #110199] Cross-building of GNU/Hurd and additional packages

Follow-up Comment #32, sr #110199 (project administration): Long time no see! Attached is an updated tarball of hurd-cross (hurdX): Hopefully the we are getting closer to upload now. (file #54322) ___ Additional Item Attachment: File

[sr #110199] Cross-building of GNU/Hurd and additional packages

Follow-up Comment #32, sr #110199 (project administration): Long time no see! Attached is an updated tarball of hurd-cross (hurdX): Hopefully the we are getting closer to upload now. (file #54322) ___ Additional Item Attachment: File

Re: [PATCH] Add libraries to Makefiles.

On Wed, 2023-01-18 at 12:41 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > I'm not talking about libz.so, but about libstore.so. Is that > libstore.so really a shared library that has libz in NEEDED? If so > there is really no need to add -lz to linking storeio. Unless you > actually send us the actual error

Re: [PATCH] Fix some compiler warnings

On Wed, 2023-01-18 at 12:27 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, le mer. 18 janv. 2023 11:59:40 +0100, a ecrit: > > On Wed, 2023-01-18 at 02:02 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > But conversely when we'll bu

Re: [PATCH] Add libraries to Makefiles.

On Wed, 2023-01-18 at 11:54 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Then you need to check that the linking of e.g. storeio does use the > shared library and not the static library. For instance you can re-run > the corresponding linking command and add -Wl,-verbose to check in the > verbose output

Re: [PATCH] Fix some compiler warnings

On Wed, 2023-01-18 at 02:02 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > > But conversely when we'll build it in 64bit, vm_page_size (actually > uintptr_t) will be an unsigned long. > > This needs to be fixed the *proper* way: either use the PRIuPTR > macro, or cast the value into unsigned long.

Re: [PATCH] Add libraries to Makefiles.

On Wed, 2023-01-18 at 11:10 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > That's not enough information: I'm asking about your cross-toolchain. > > Do you actually get e.g. libstore/libstore.so for instance? > If so, run objdump -x on it and check that libz is indeed in NEEDED. > That's what is supposed to

Re: [PATCH] Add libraries to Makefiles.

On Wed, 2023-01-18 at 01:54 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > But none of these directories are actually using libz, so it doesn't > make sense to make them use -lz. > > Are you sure that your cross-toolchain supports linking shared > libraries? Here are the configure flags:

Bug#1029097: pam: FTBFS on hurd-i386

On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 18:49 +, Sam Hartman wrote: > > > > > > "Svante" == Svante Signell > > > > > > writes: >     Svante> modules_pam_nologin_tst-pam_nologin-retval.c.diff > disabling >     Svante> two subtests failing on GNU

[PATCH] Add libraries to Makefiles.

Hi, The attached patch adds libraries needed when cross-building Hurd. Most of them arise when enabling zlib with --with-libz. Applies nicely to hurd-0.9.git20221224 and latest git. Thanks! --- hurd/boot/Makefile 2022-11-30 11:14:21.08400 +0100 +++ hurd/boot/Makefile 2022-12-02

[PATCH] Fix some compiler warnings

Hi, The attached patch fixes some format warnings as well as an implicit declaration of ‘startup_essential_task’ in mach-defpager/main.c. Applies nicely to hurd-0.9.git20221224 and latest git. Thanks! --- hurd-git/ext2fs/ext2fs.c 2022-12-08 15:05:29.80800 +0100 +++ hurd-git/ext2fs/ext2fs.c

Bug#1029050: gcc-snapshot: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (and other archs?)

Source: gcc-snapshot Version: 20230108-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Hi, gcc-snapshot in sid FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to that some patches are not applied when building gcc-snapshot. After the

Bug#1029050: gcc-snapshot: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (and other archs?)

Source: gcc-snapshot Version: 20230108-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, gcc-snapshot in sid FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to that some patches are not applied when building gcc-snapshot. After the

Bug#1029050: gcc-snapshot: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (and other archs?)

Source: gcc-snapshot Version: 20230108-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, gcc-snapshot in sid FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to that some patches are not applied when building gcc-snapshot. After the

gcc-snapshot: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (and other archs?)

Source: gcc-snapshot Version: 20230108-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, gcc-snapshot in sid FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to that some patches are not applied when building gcc-snapshot. After the

gcc-snapshot: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (and other archs?)

Source: gcc-snapshot Version: 20230108-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, gcc-snapshot in sid FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to that some patches are not applied when building gcc-snapshot. After the

Bug#1027840: gcc-11: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Source: gcc-11 Version: 11.3.0-10 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Affects: gcc-11, gcc-snapshot X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, gcc-11-11.3.0-10 in sid FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to failing linkage of pthread_once (same error already

Bug#1027840: gcc-11: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Source: gcc-11 Version: 11.3.0-10 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Affects: gcc-11, gcc-snapshot X-Debbugs-CC: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Hi, gcc-11-11.3.0-10 in sid FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to failing linkage of pthread_once (same error already

Bug#1027840: gcc-11: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Source: gcc-11 Version: 11.3.0-10 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Affects: gcc-11, gcc-snapshot X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, gcc-11-11.3.0-10 in sid FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to failing linkage of pthread_once (same error already

gcc-11: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Source: gcc-11 Version: 11.3.0-10 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Affects: gcc-11, gcc-snapshot X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, gcc-11-11.3.0-10 in sid FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to failing linkage of pthread_once (same error already

gcc-11: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Source: gcc-11 Version: 11.3.0-10 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Affects: gcc-11, gcc-snapshot X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, gcc-11-11.3.0-10 in sid FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to failing linkage of pthread_once (same error already

Re: GMP GCC C++ Hurd cross-build failure on core-updates

On Thu, 2022-12-15 at 12:17 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > Hi, > > The problem is probably that you need to add --enable-add-ons=libpthread to > configure when building first version of cross-glibc. This is to obtain weak > references when building libcstd++ of cross-gcc:

Re: GMP GCC C++ Hurd cross-build failure on core-updates

On Thu, 2022-12-15 at 01:24 -0600, Nathan Dehnel wrote: > You could try seeing what they're doing here to cross-build > https://github.com/flavioc/cross-hurd > It worked last time I ran it (which was admittedly a while ago) Hi, The problem is probably that you need to add

[sr #110199] Cross-building of GNU/Hurd and additional packages

Follow-up Comment #30, sr #110199 (project administration): Hi again. Is this support issue still open? If so I plan to upload an updated tarball RSN. Thanks! ___ Reply to this item at:

[sr #110199] Cross-building of GNU/Hurd and additional packages

Follow-up Comment #30, sr #110199 (project administration): Hi again. Is this support issue still open? If so I plan to upload an updated tarball RSN. Thanks! ___ Reply to this item at:

Re: GNU Guix 1.4.0rc1 available for testing!

On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 10:17 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello Guix! > > The first release candidate of the upcoming 1.4.0 release is now > available for testing: What about hurd?

Re: GNU Guix 1.4.0rc1 available for testing!

On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 10:17 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello Guix! > > The first release candidate of the upcoming 1.4.0 release is now > available for testing: What about hurd?

Bug#970659: GNU/Hurd patch submitted upstream #1796917

Hi, The attached patch for the build problem on GNU/Hurd (same as the one from 2020) was submitted upstream. Upstream bug number: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1796917 Thanks! Index: nspr-4.28/nspr/pr/src/pthreads/ptsynch.c

Bug#970659: nspr: FTBFS on hurd-i386 and tests fails to run.

found 970659 2:4.35-1 found 970673 2:4.35-1 thanks Hello again, (bug reports first filed on 20+21 september 2020 against 4.28-1) nspr still FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to a one-line error in the file nspr/pr/src/pthreads/ptsynch.c, see #970659. Additionally tests in runtest.sh are not run due to a

Bug#1021357: gcc-12: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Source: gcc-12 Version: 12_12.2.0-5 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Affects: gcc-11, gcc-snapshot X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, gcc-12-12.2.0-4/5 in sid FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to failing linkage of pthread_once (same error for

Bug#1021357: gcc-12: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Source: gcc-12 Version: 12_12.2.0-5 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Affects: gcc-11, gcc-snapshot X-Debbugs-CC: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Hi, gcc-12-12.2.0-4/5 in sid FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to failing linkage of pthread_once (same error for

Bug#1021357: gcc-12: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Source: gcc-12 Version: 12_12.2.0-5 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Affects: gcc-11, gcc-snapshot X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, gcc-12-12.2.0-4/5 in sid FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to failing linkage of pthread_once (same error for

gcc-12: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Source: gcc-12 Version: 12_12.2.0-5 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Affects: gcc-11, gcc-snapshot X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, gcc-12-12.2.0-4/5 in sid FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to failing linkage of pthread_once (same error for

gcc-12: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Source: gcc-12 Version: 12_12.2.0-5 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Affects: gcc-11, gcc-snapshot X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, gcc-12-12.2.0-4/5 in sid FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to failing linkage of pthread_once (same error for

Bug#1021260: libdumbnet: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Source: libdumbnet Version: 1.16.1-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Hi, Currently libdumbnet FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to some failing symbols for libdumbnet1 in the Hurd build compared to Linux. I built in

Bug#1021260: libdumbnet: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Source: libdumbnet Version: 1.16.1-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, Currently libdumbnet FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to some failing symbols for libdumbnet1 in the Hurd build compared to Linux. I built in

Bug#1020792: tech-ctte: Halt merged-/usr transition until dpkg filesystem damage bugs are fixed

Hi, I would really appreciate if you quote your reply properly: It was not Andreas Metzler who sent the below: > On Tue, 2022-09-27 at 18:25 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > On 2022-09-27 Zack Weinberg wrote: > > [...] On Wed, 2022-09-28 at 11:55 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > > This

Re: Bug#1020792: tech-ctte: Halt merged-/usr transition until dpkg filesystem damage bugs are fixed

Hi, I would really appreciate if you quote your reply properly: It was not Andreas Metzler who sent the below: > On Tue, 2022-09-27 at 18:25 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > On 2022-09-27 Zack Weinberg wrote: > > [...] On Wed, 2022-09-28 at 11:55 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > > This

Re: doxygen: FTBFS on hurd-i386

On Wed, 2022-09-28 at 17:50 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/doxygen/doxygen/pull/9514 > > Svante Signell, le mer. 28 sept. 2022 17:40:32 +0200, a ecrit: > > Currently doxygen FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to a PATH_MAX issue. > > This issue

Bug#1020919: socat: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Source: socat Version: 1.7.4.3-3 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Cc: bug-hurd Hi, Currently socat FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to differing values for O_RDONLY, O_WRONLY and O_RDWR compared to Linux systems. The attached patch, xioinitialize.c.patch, 

socat: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Source: socat Version: 1.7.4.3-3 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Cc: bug-hurd Hi, Currently socat FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to differing values for O_RDONLY, O_WRONLY and O_RDWR compared to Linux systems. The attached patch, xioinitialize.c.patch, 

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >