On 5/8/23 21:22, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi Tobias,
On Sat, 6 May 2023 10:24:41 + Tobias Hansen wrote:
Note that we could also just remove python3-sage and the autopkgtest.
I assume you mean python3-brial here.
Yes indeed.
Nothing in Debian depends on it
Not true (and it's too
On 5/8/23 21:22, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi Tobias,
On Sat, 6 May 2023 10:24:41 + Tobias Hansen wrote:
Note that we could also just remove python3-sage and the autopkgtest.
I assume you mean python3-brial here.
Yes indeed.
Nothing in Debian depends on it
Not true (and it's too
On 5/8/23 21:22, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi Tobias,
On Sat, 6 May 2023 10:24:41 + Tobias Hansen wrote:
Note that we could also just remove python3-sage and the autopkgtest.
I assume you mean python3-brial here.
Yes indeed.
Nothing in Debian depends on it
Not true (and it's too
for this:
https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Policy
This little package is basically holding sagemath and others hostage. It is the
reason we have sagemath 9.5 in bookworm instead of 9.7 or 9.8. See #1010735.
Best,
Tobias
On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 10:55:29 +0200 Tobias Hansen wrote:
Source: ipywidgets
On 5/2/23 14:20, plugwash wrote:
I've prepared a NMU, and intend to open a pre-approval
request with the release team. If you have any objections
to the NMU please tell me ASAP (I do not intend to upload
it until I receive a response from the release team, if you
would preffer to make the
On 5/2/23 14:20, plugwash wrote:
I've prepared a NMU, and intend to open a pre-approval
request with the release team. If you have any objections
to the NMU please tell me ASAP (I do not intend to upload
it until I receive a response from the release team, if you
would preffer to make the
On 5/2/23 14:20, plugwash wrote:
I've prepared a NMU, and intend to open a pre-approval
request with the release team. If you have any objections
to the NMU please tell me ASAP (I do not intend to upload
it until I receive a response from the release team, if you
would preffer to make the
Dear Jorge,
thanks for the bug report. I googled the error that you got and it seems a lot
of xfce users had similar problems over the years (unrelated to sagemath).
Maybe xfce trips over the space in the command? What happens if you change the
line
Exec=sage --notebook=jupyter
to
Dear Graham,
great, thank you!
Best wishes,
Tobias
On 2/9/23 07:42, Graham Inggs wrote:
>
> For a start, I'll let giac migrate early.
>
> Regards
> Graham
Hi Release Team,
sagemath is on track to re-enter testing on February 12 - if that's not too
late for the soft freeze.
If it's too late, could you help along to make it re-enter sooner?
Best wishes,
Tobias
On 2/6/23 23:23, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I can make a 0-day NMU if you don't want to upload giac.
>
> That's not a nice thing to do, but given the freeze deadline it's pretty
> urgent.
>
> cu
> Adrian
That would be great, thanks! It's team maintained, I don't think anyone will be
upset about it.
On 2/6/23 23:23, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I can make a 0-day NMU if you don't want to upload giac.
>
> That's not a nice thing to do, but given the freeze deadline it's pretty
> urgent.
>
> cu
> Adrian
That would be great, thanks! It's team maintained, I don't think anyone will be
upset about it.
On 2/6/23 23:23, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I can make a 0-day NMU if you don't want to upload giac.
>
> That's not a nice thing to do, but given the freeze deadline it's pretty
> urgent.
>
> cu
> Adrian
That would be great, thanks! It's team maintained, I don't think anyone will be
upset about it.
Control: block -1 by 1030687
I applied the patches and confirmed that the package builds now. I can upload
it once giac is fixed.
Control: block -1 by 1030687
I applied the patches and confirmed that the package builds now. I can upload
it once giac is fixed.
Hi Rogo,
awesome, that helps a lot! Thanks for figuring all this out. I had already
started determining which patches need to be applied, but wasn't finished yet.
Could you please file a bug against giac to get the uchar issue fixed?
Best,
Tobias
Hi Rogo,
awesome, that helps a lot! Thanks for figuring all this out. I had already
started determining which patches need to be applied, but wasn't finished yet.
Could you please file a bug against giac to get the uchar issue fixed?
Best,
Tobias
Control: retitle -1 "FTBFS with setuptools >= 64"
Control: block 1028345 by -1
Control: block 1013399 by -1
Control: block 1022254 by -1
Control: block 1022278 by -1
Control: block 1028433 by -1
Control: block 1025874 by -1
Just to clarify that the issue is simply that I can't build sagemath due
Control: retitle -1 "FTBFS with setuptools >= 64"
Control: block 1028345 by -1
Control: block 1013399 by -1
Control: block 1022254 by -1
Control: block 1022278 by -1
Control: block 1028433 by -1
Control: block 1025874 by -1
Just to clarify that the issue is simply that I can't build sagemath due
On 12/23/22 12:56, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 18:07:53 +0530 Nilesh Patra wrote:
>> On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 21:05:07 +0000 Tobias Hansen wrote:
>>> On 11/27/22 19:24, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 05:35:17PM +, Tobias Hansen
On 12/23/22 12:56, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 18:07:53 +0530 Nilesh Patra wrote:
>> On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 21:05:07 +0000 Tobias Hansen wrote:
>>> On 11/27/22 19:24, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 05:35:17PM +, Tobias Hansen
On 11/27/22 19:24, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 05:35:17PM +0000, Tobias Hansen wrote:
>> On 11/27/22 06:37, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>>> Tobias, since this is done, would you consider to check sagemath now and
>>> get the ball rolling? :-)
>> Hi
On 11/27/22 19:24, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 05:35:17PM +0000, Tobias Hansen wrote:
>> On 11/27/22 06:37, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>>> Tobias, since this is done, would you consider to check sagemath now and
>>> get the ball rolling? :-)
>> Hi
On 11/27/22 06:37, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> Tobias, since this is done, would you consider to check sagemath now and get
> the ball rolling? :-)
Hi,
I actually tried building with the new pari and gap versions a while ago (using
sagemath 9.5 with upstream patches for the new pari and gap
On 11/27/22 06:37, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> Tobias, since this is done, would you consider to check sagemath now and get
> the ball rolling? :-)
Hi,
I actually tried building with the new pari and gap versions a while ago (using
sagemath 9.5 with upstream patches for the new pari and gap
Thanks! I will apply the patch once the pari version with the other fixes is
uploaded.
Best wishes,
Tobias
On 10/26/22 10:55, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Also I consider the error message change
> - PariError: call_python: forbidden multiplication t_VEC (1 elts) * t_VEC
> (1 elts)
> +
Thanks! I will apply the patch once the pari version with the other fixes is
uploaded.
Best wishes,
Tobias
On 10/26/22 10:55, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Also I consider the error message change
> - PariError: call_python: forbidden multiplication t_VEC (1 elts) * t_VEC
> (1 elts)
> +
Thanks! I will apply the patch once the pari version with the other fixes is
uploaded.
Best wishes,
Tobias
On 10/26/22 10:55, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Also I consider the error message change
> - PariError: call_python: forbidden multiplication t_VEC (1 elts) * t_VEC
> (1 elts)
> +
Hi Ileana,
many thanks, uploaded.
Best,
Tobias
On 10/21/22 16:40, Ileana Dumitrescu wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
>
>> are you aware of the bug
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020436
>> Bill posted a suggestion how to fix this test there yesterday.
> Yes I saw the bug and initial
Hi Ileana,
are you aware of the bug
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020436
Bill posted a suggestion how to fix this test there yesterday.
Best wishes,
Tobias
On 10/19/22 14:44, Ileana Dumitrescu wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> I applied pari.patch to fix the compile issues with new
Hi Ileana,
are you aware of the bug
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020436
Bill posted a suggestion how to fix this test there yesterday.
Best wishes,
Tobias
On 10/19/22 14:44, Ileana Dumitrescu wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> I applied pari.patch to fix the compile issues with new
Hi Ileana,
are you aware of the bug
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020436
Bill posted a suggestion how to fix this test there yesterday.
Best wishes,
Tobias
On 10/19/22 14:44, Ileana Dumitrescu wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> I applied pari.patch to fix the compile issues with new
Hi Ileana,
are you aware of the bug
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020436
Bill posted a suggestion how to fix this test there yesterday.
Best wishes,
Tobias
On 10/19/22 14:44, Ileana Dumitrescu wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> I applied pari.patch to fix the compile issues with new
I tried rebuilding with this patch from sagemath:
|diff --git a/src/pari.cc b/src/pari.cc index 76ce8e1..50d08ab 100644 ---
a/src/pari.cc +++ b/src/pari.cc @@ -40,6 +40,13 @@ using namespace std; #ifdef
HAVE_LIBPARI +// Anyarg disappeared from PARI 2.15.0 +#ifdef __cplusplus +#
define ANYARG
I tried rebuilding with this patch from sagemath:
|diff --git a/src/pari.cc b/src/pari.cc index 76ce8e1..50d08ab 100644 ---
a/src/pari.cc +++ b/src/pari.cc @@ -40,6 +40,13 @@ using namespace std; #ifdef
HAVE_LIBPARI +// Anyarg disappeared from PARI 2.15.0 +#ifdef __cplusplus +#
define ANYARG
I tried rebuilding with this patch from sagemath:
|diff --git a/src/pari.cc b/src/pari.cc index 76ce8e1..50d08ab 100644 ---
a/src/pari.cc +++ b/src/pari.cc @@ -40,6 +40,13 @@ using namespace std; #ifdef
HAVE_LIBPARI +// Anyarg disappeared from PARI 2.15.0 +#ifdef __cplusplus +#
define ANYARG
Control: block -1 by 1020436 1020456
Before sagemath can be fixed, cypari2 and giac have to be built against pari
2.15.
On 10/13/22 19:08, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: severity -1 serious
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 15:55:41 +0200 Bill Allombert wrote:
>> Please update sagemath so that
Control: block -1 by 1020436 1020456
Before sagemath can be fixed, cypari2 and giac have to be built against pari
2.15.
On 10/13/22 19:08, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: severity -1 serious
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 15:55:41 +0200 Bill Allombert wrote:
>> Please update sagemath so that
Hi,
not all tests are expected to pass in sagemath's test suite.
The issue is always described at the end:
Success: 62 tests failed, up to 100 failures are tolerated
Error: critical test failures (e.g. timeout, segfault, etc.)
And in the overview above that, it indicates a segfault:
Hi,
not all tests are expected to pass in sagemath's test suite.
The issue is always described at the end:
Success: 62 tests failed, up to 100 failures are tolerated
Error: critical test failures (e.g. timeout, segfault, etc.)
And in the overview above that, it indicates a segfault:
Hi,
there is a Debian package fonts-fork-awesome. Isn't that what you need? (ITP
bug is 910256)
Best,
Tobias
On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 17:20:02 +0200 Roland Mas wrote:
>
> - fortawesome-fontawesome-free (see my other mail: no source available,
> and I don't know what to do; split the part of
Hi,
there is a Debian package fonts-fork-awesome. Isn't that what you need? (ITP
bug is 910256)
Best,
Tobias
On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 17:20:02 +0200 Roland Mas wrote:
>
> - fortawesome-fontawesome-free (see my other mail: no source available,
> and I don't know what to do; split the part of
Source: sagemath
Version: 9.5-4
Severity: normal
Control: block -1 by 950598
Control: block -1 by 896460
The need for ipywidgets >= 7 is getting even bigger in sagemath 9.6.
Sagemath now depends on jupyter-sphinx, see
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33507
jupyter-sphinx is broken in Debian
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please remove higan from unstable. It is superseded by ares, which I packaged
to replace higan. higan still exists as a slightly different version of the
same program, but ares is more user friendly and more actively maintained.
Thanks,
Tobias
Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Owner: Tobias Hansen
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: python-lrcalc
Version : 2.1
Upstream Author : Anders S. Buch
* URL : http://www.math.rutgers.edu/~asbuch/lrcalc/
* License : GPL-3+
Programming
Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Owner: Tobias Hansen
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: python-lrcalc
Version : 2.1
Upstream Author : Anders S. Buch
* URL : http://www.math.rutgers.edu/~asbuch/lrcalc/
* License : GPL-3+
Programming
Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Owner: Tobias Hansen
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: python-lrcalc
Version : 2.1
Upstream Author : Anders S. Buch
* URL : http://www.math.rutgers.edu/~asbuch/lrcalc/
* License : GPL-3+
Programming
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
please remove the python3-sage package on armhf and mips64el from unstable.
They are no longer allowed in source as their builds were constantly failing
for a long time (#920147, #1004872).
Best wishes,
Tobias
Package: libglu1-mesa-dev
Version: 9.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Control: block 1008372 by -1
Hi,
recently sludge started to FTBFS with the following error, see #1008372:
Package 'opengl', required by 'glu', not found
I believe this is because glu.pc now depends on opengl.pc which means that
Package: libglu1-mesa-dev
Version: 9.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Control: block 1008372 by -1
Hi,
recently sludge started to FTBFS with the following error, see #1008372:
Package 'opengl', required by 'glu', not found
I believe this is because glu.pc now depends on opengl.pc which means that
Package: libglu1-mesa-dev
Version: 9.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Control: block 1008372 by -1
Hi,
recently sludge started to FTBFS with the following error, see #1008372:
Package 'opengl', required by 'glu', not found
I believe this is because glu.pc now depends on opengl.pc which means that
Hi,
this is not a regression, as the armhf and mips64el tests never passed, see
#1004872 and #920147. There was a bug in the package that caused the tests not
to be run when building with python 3.10, so the armhf and mips64el package
builds succeeded. The packages for these architectures
Hi,
this is not a regression, as the armhf and mips64el tests never passed, see
#1004872 and #920147. There was a bug in the package that caused the tests not
to be run when building with python 3.10, so the armhf and mips64el package
builds succeeded. The packages for these architectures
Source: myst-parser
Version: 0.16.1-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
myst-parser is not migrating to testing because of a failing autopkgtest on
i386 and armhf, see below.
This is also blocking testing migration of other packages such as primecountpy
and sagemath.
Best wishes,
Tobias
Source: pynac
Version: 0.7.29-2
Severity: normal
Hi Julien,
pynac was merged into sagemath 9.5, see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32386
Since pynac has no other use than the one in sage (according to that ticket) I
suggest that you request removal of pynac from Debian unstable.
Best wishes,
Source: pynac
Version: 0.7.29-2
Severity: normal
Hi Julien,
pynac was merged into sagemath 9.5, see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32386
Since pynac has no other use than the one in sage (according to that ticket) I
suggest that you request removal of pynac from Debian unstable.
Best wishes,
On 2/5/22 12:12, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
>
> I plan to transfer sooner or later the following packages from science-team
> to math-team:
>
> 4ti2
> primesieve
> bliss
> blitz++
> e-antic
> nauty
> mpfrc++
> normaliz
> primesieve
> singular
> sympow
> mpfi
>
> can anyone grant me the necessary
Package: sagemath
Version: 9.0-1
Severity: normal
Control: tags -1 + ftbfs
We are getting test timeouts on armhf since sagemath 9.0-1. The exact spots
where it happens have changed over time, one that stayed the whole time is in
src/sage/modular/modform/constructor.py. From there one can see
Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Owner: Tobias Hansen
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: primecountpy
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Dima Pasechnik
* URL : https://github.com/dimpase/primecountpy
* License : GPL
Programming Lang
Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Owner: Tobias Hansen
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: primecountpy
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Dima Pasechnik
* URL : https://github.com/dimpase/primecountpy
* License : GPL
Programming Lang
Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Owner: Tobias Hansen
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: primecountpy
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Dima Pasechnik
* URL : https://github.com/dimpase/primecountpy
* License : GPL
Programming Lang
>
> If it is ok, I can put an ITP.
>
> Best wishes,
> Jerome
>
> On 08/01/2022 12:14, Tobias Hansen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we need to package primecount and primecountpy for sagemath 9.5. Jerome, I
>> saw that you are already maintaining primesieve by t
>
> If it is ok, I can put an ITP.
>
> Best wishes,
> Jerome
>
> On 08/01/2022 12:14, Tobias Hansen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we need to package primecount and primecountpy for sagemath 9.5. Jerome, I
>> saw that you are already maintaining primesieve by t
Package: wnpp
Owner: Tobias Hansen
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ares
Version : 126
Upstream Author : Near et al
* URL : https://ares-emulator.github.io/
* License : ISC
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Accurate multi-system emulator
ares
Package: wnpp
Owner: Tobias Hansen
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ares
Version : 126
Upstream Author : Near et al
* URL : https://ares-emulator.github.io/
* License : ISC
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Accurate multi-system emulator
ares
On 12/11/21 22:22, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> Package: ecl
> Version: 21.2.1+ds-1
> Severity: critical
> X-Debbugs-Cc: jspri...@debian.org
>
> Hi,
>
> according to policy:
>
> "The run-time shared library must be placed in a package whose name
> changes whenever the SONAME of the shared
On 12/11/21 22:22, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> Package: ecl
> Version: 21.2.1+ds-1
> Severity: critical
> X-Debbugs-Cc: jspri...@debian.org
>
> Hi,
>
> according to policy:
>
> "The run-time shared library must be placed in a package whose name
> changes whenever the SONAME of the shared
On 12/11/21 22:22, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> Package: ecl
> Version: 21.2.1+ds-1
> Severity: critical
> X-Debbugs-Cc: jspri...@debian.org
>
> Hi,
>
> according to policy:
>
> "The run-time shared library must be placed in a package whose name
> changes whenever the SONAME of the shared
Hi,
we need to package primecount and primecountpy for sagemath 9.5. Jerome, I saw
that you are already maintaining primesieve by the same upstream. Are you
interested in packaging these two or should I take care of it?
Best wishes,
Tobias
On Sat, 08 Jan 2022 06:35:05 + Preetham Gujjula
Hi,
we need to package primecount and primecountpy for sagemath 9.5. Jerome, I saw
that you are already maintaining primesieve by the same upstream. Are you
interested in packaging these two or should I take care of it?
Best wishes,
Tobias
On Sat, 08 Jan 2022 06:35:05 + Preetham Gujjula
Version: 9.4-1
Hi,
memory-allocator passed NEW now.
Best,
Tobias
On 12/24/21 10:33 PM, Alexandre Lymberopoulos wrote:
> Hi, Tobias.
>
> Thanks for the prompt elucidation.
>
> Best, Alexandre
>
> On December 24, 2021 6:17:16 PM GMT-03:00, Tobias Hansen
> wrote:
>
Version: 9.4-1
Hi,
memory-allocator passed NEW now.
Best,
Tobias
On 12/24/21 10:33 PM, Alexandre Lymberopoulos wrote:
> Hi, Tobias.
>
> Thanks for the prompt elucidation.
>
> Best, Alexandre
>
> On December 24, 2021 6:17:16 PM GMT-03:00, Tobias Hansen
> wrote:
>
Hi,
memory-allocator is in NEW (https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html) since two
weeks and waiting to be approved for inclusion in Debian. I uploaded sagemath
9.4 after memory-allocator but it passed NEW faster.
Best,
Tobias
On 12/24/21 9:45 PM, Alexandre Lymberopoulos wrote:
> Package:
Hi,
memory-allocator is in NEW (https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html) since two
weeks and waiting to be approved for inclusion in Debian. I uploaded sagemath
9.4 after memory-allocator but it passed NEW faster.
Best,
Tobias
On 12/24/21 9:45 PM, Alexandre Lymberopoulos wrote:
> Package:
Source: linbox
Version: 1.7.0-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
while building sagemath I noticed that linbox includes fplll.h in
algorithms/lattice.h and algorithms/short-vector.h. Hence I think liblinbox-dev
should depend on libfplll-dev.
Best,
Tobias
Package: singular
Version: 1:4.2.1-p2+ds-5
Severity: normal
Hi Jerome,
I noticed some sagemath doctests are failing because sagemath cannot find
singular.info. It uses the libsingular function feGetResource() to determine
the location of the file. You can see in resources/feResource.cc that it
Package: singular
Version: 1:4.2.1-p2+ds-5
Severity: normal
Hi Jerome,
I noticed some sagemath doctests are failing because sagemath cannot find
singular.info. It uses the libsingular function feGetResource() to determine
the location of the file. You can see in resources/feResource.cc that it
Hi Cord,
I am also in favor of the creation of this list. I think we could then close
down debian-science-sagem...@alioth-lists.debian.net and move these discussions
to debian-math.
Best,
Tobias
On Sat, 13 Nov 2021 16:45:48 +0530 "Nilesh Patra" wrote:
> Dear list masters,
>
> Since a few
On 12/13/21 4:30 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> On 13 December 2021 at 09:08, Alexandre Lymberopoulos wrote:
> | Hi there, Dirk!
> |
> | I see that, libgslblasc0 is upgradable to version 2.7.1+dfsg-3 here, but
> | the upgrade available version of libgsl25 (2.6+dfsg-2 ->
Source: sphinx
Version: 4.3.1-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
sagemath uses a custom sphinx build where some of the search.html files load
searchindex.js like this:
This causes dh_sphinxdoc to throw an error:
dh_sphinxdoc: error: */search.html does not load searchindex.js
This was already
Source: lcalc
Version: 2.0.4-1
Severity: normal
Hi Julien,
I realized that there are some failing sagemath tests where lcalc claims that
-e is an invalid option. After some digging I found that this flag only exists
when lcalc is built against pari:
Source: lcalc
Version: 2.0.4-1
Severity: normal
Hi Julien,
I realized that there are some failing sagemath tests where lcalc claims that
-e is an invalid option. After some digging I found that this flag only exists
when lcalc is built against pari:
Package: wnpp
Owner: Tobias Hansen
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: memory-allocator
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : The Sage Development Team
* URL : https://github.com/sagemath/memory_allocator
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: Python
Description
Package: wnpp
Owner: Tobias Hansen
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: memory-allocator
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : The Sage Development Team
* URL : https://github.com/sagemath/memory_allocator
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: Python
Description
On 11/3/21 4:08 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 04:55:54PM +0100 schrieb Julien Puydt:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Le lundi 01 novembre 2021 à 15:28 +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>>> How to move a package:
>>>
>>> In Salsa:
>>>
>>> Settings
>>> -> General
>>> -> Advanced
Source: matplotlib
Version: 3.5.0-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch fixed-upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/issues/21683
Hi,
I am in the process of updateting sagemath and have problems building the
documentation because of this bug. Please apply this upstream
Hi Jerome,
any chance we could get an update of singular to 4.2.1.p0 in experimental? I
tried to do it myself once but the package has many patches and it was
difficult to get everything right.
Best,
Tobias
Hi Jerome,
any chance we could get an update of singular to 4.2.1.p0 in experimental? I
tried to do it myself once but the package has many patches and it was
difficult to get everything right.
Best,
Tobias
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
On 10/31/21 7:49 PM, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 04:15:28PM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote:
>> Perhaps the debian sagemath team should be merged in the math team?
> Yep, that was the plan. Hope sagemath folks agree there.
>
> Nilesh
Hi,
yeah, why not. In the best case it leads to
Source: sagemath
Version: 9.2-2
Severity: serious
Control: block -1 by 992003
Control: block 986527 by -1
Control: block 993149 by -1
I started updating sagemath to version 9.4, which is the first version that
supports pari 2.13 (which is already in Debian and causes a large part of the
failing
Source: sagemath
Version: 9.2-2
Severity: serious
Control: block -1 by 992003
Control: block 986527 by -1
Control: block 993149 by -1
I started updating sagemath to version 9.4, which is the first version that
supports pari 2.13 (which is already in Debian and causes a large part of the
failing
I started updating sagemath to version 9.4, which is the first version that
supports pari 2.13 (which is already in Debian and causes a large part of the
failing doctests). I got stuck for now because we need an update of singular
(see #992003).
Best,
Tobias
On 8/27/21 7:37 PM, Paul Gevers
I started updating sagemath to version 9.4, which is the first version that
supports pari 2.13 (which is already in Debian and causes a large part of the
failing doctests). I got stuck for now because we need an update of singular
(see #992003).
Best,
Tobias
On 8/27/21 7:37 PM, Paul Gevers
I started updating sagemath to version 9.4, which is the first version that
supports pari 2.13 (which is already in Debian and causes a large part of the
failing doctests). I got stuck for now because we need an update of singular
(see #992003).
Best,
Tobias
On 8/27/21 7:37 PM, Paul Gevers
Hi,
yes, this is probably because sagemath 9.2 uses threejs 117 while in Debian we
are using / trying to use the Debian package three.js which is at version 111.
Replacing js stuff with Debian packages is always fiddly...
Best,
Tobias
On 8/25/21 9:56 PM, Balbir Thomas wrote:
> Package:
Hi,
yes, this is probably because sagemath 9.2 uses threejs 117 while in Debian we
are using / trying to use the Debian package three.js which is at version 111.
Replacing js stuff with Debian packages is always fiddly...
Best,
Tobias
On 8/25/21 9:56 PM, Balbir Thomas wrote:
> Package:
Source: singular
Version: 1:4.1.2-p1+ds-2
Severity: wishlist
Hi Jerome,
I started packaging sagemath 9.4 and they are using singular 4.2.0p3 at the
moment. It seems tricky to get it to work with anything else than this version.
It would be great if we had it in experimental.
Best wishes,
Source: singular
Version: 1:4.1.2-p1+ds-2
Severity: wishlist
Hi Jerome,
I started packaging sagemath 9.4 and they are using singular 4.2.0p3 at the
moment. It seems tricky to get it to work with anything else than this version.
It would be great if we had it in experimental.
Best wishes,
Thanks a lot for the patches Ahzo. Especially fixing the file handle leak
should help a lot.
I guess it's too late for bullseye now, but I can at least upload a fixed
package to experimental. I'll also try to fix many of the failing tests by
including sage's (large) patch to support pari 2.13
Thanks a lot for the patches Ahzo. Especially fixing the file handle leak
should help a lot.
I guess it's too late for bullseye now, but I can at least upload a fixed
package to experimental. I'll also try to fix many of the failing tests by
including sage's (large) patch to support pari 2.13
1 - 100 of 2885 matches
Mail list logo
