Re: [CentOS-docs] Ambiguity on a CentOS dot Org Web Page.

Phil Schaffner wrote: Phil Schaffner wrote on 02/19/2010 05:29 PM: Phil Schaffner wrote on 02/19/2010 05:17 PM: ...Could run an i386 install too, but this is probably good enough. Just for grins - tried the i386 install with 1GB RAM on a 3GB disk and got an error that it needed 1924MB and

Re: [CentOS] Any more details on Lance? (just curious; no pressure)

MHR wrote: A friend of mine sent me this link: http://linux.slashdot.org/story/09/07/30/130249/CentOS-Project-Administrator-Goes-AWOL I went to the main page and read the letter and the Facts. Are there any more details, mainly along the lines of CentOS sticking around - I know you folks

[CentOS] rattle rattle

Can I rattle this cage open? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS-docs] New page on installing to software RAID

dnk wrote: Instructions at the bottom of every email. Go to: http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs d __ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs On 27-Apr-09, at

[rhelv5-list] no more 64 httpd in 5.3?

This is in second 1.2 of the universal release notes. Surely this is a typo? http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/Release_Notes/index.html # In Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.2, a 64-bit version of *httpd* was included in this architecture in addition to the existing

[Cooker-firewall] when is next release due?

I'm anxious to try it too see if it works any better. Thanks, .dn

[Cooker-firewall] cooker-firewall

Hello Everyone: What is the latest version of this distro? I seem to have a hard time finding information about this distro. Any suggestions for web site, etc? More questions later, Thanks, .dn

Re: off-line HTML validation

On Fri, 13 Mar 1998, Vidiot wrote: Any recommendations for an off-line HTML validation tool? I'm assuming you mean a program that will check the syntax of the HTML code. Yes. Something where I don't have to paste my HTML code into a form on someone's web page. I can't use the verify URL

off-line HTML validation

Hi Everyone: Any recommendations for an off-line HTML validation tool? Must run on Linux and I don't care about the distribution type (.tgz or .rpm). I've tried various web searches, but all I can find are the on-line verification services... HELP? Thanks, .dn -- PLEASE read the Red

Apache Manual

Has anyone seen a non--html version of the apache documentation? The on-line stuff is very difficult to follow with hyper-link after hyper-link... Thanks, .dn -- PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES! http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata

Help, X color depth

I've got a stock install of RH 5.0 with X. But I can not get the display to use more than 6 bits per rgb value. I have an S3 Trio64V2 PCI clone type car with 1 meg-o-video ram. All I'm trying to do is use netscape to view some local pages, but the graphics are terrible because of the lost

Re: Help, X color depth

to reduce the size of your screen and/or number of virtual screens (not sure if that helps). I don't think forcing 'bpp' with 'startx' command would help Mike Donavan Nelson wrote: I've got a stock install of RH 5.0 with X. But I can not get the display to use more than 6 bits per rgb