On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Kasparek Tomas wrote:
Have you read the alsa-lib/INSTALL file?
Compilation of static library
-
If you would like to use the static ALSA library, you need to use these
options for the configure
Hello Patrick,
Looks very nice.
Am I correctly assuming that you will be the maintainer of the ALSA pages
from now on?
Could you add the following alsa 0.9 applications I wrote:
http://www.iua.upf.es/~mdeboer/projects/tapiir/
http://www.iua.upf.es/~mdeboer/projects/aconnectgui/
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
I have now migrated the new ALSA homepage. It was redesigned to be more user
friendly.
Excellent!
I will now add new links to the native applications page.
[...]
Are these correct and are there any others?
GStreamer has an alsa 0.9 plugin, fwiw.
Hi Patrick,
Thanks for doing this.
The new page doesn't say anything about using the 0.9.x version rather
than 0.5.x. Is it possible to have the main page make it clear that
0.9.0beta12 is the version new users and developers should start with?
-Eric Rz.
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
I have now
James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
...
I think we should have a section on the web site for the different
applications which support different alsa versions.
N. could we please please please annihilate every last little
trace of alsa 0.5.x from that page ?
if that's the stable release,
nice,
mplayer has also alsa9 and alsa5 plugins.
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
I have now migrated the new ALSA homepage. It was redesigned to be more user
friendly.
http://www.alsa-project.org
I will now add new links to the native applications page.
So far I have:
jack
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:18:51 +0200
Joern Nettingsmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
...
I think we should have a section on the web site for the different
applications which support different alsa versions.
N. could we please please please annihilate
On Thursday 18 April 2002 18:27, Fred Gleason wrote:
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
N. could we please please please annihilate every last little
trace of alsa 0.5.x from that page ?
I'd like to add my vote for this here too. The whole 0.5.x vs. 0.9.x
thing is
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, James Tappin wrote:
Is it perhaps time for an alsa-0.9.rc1 many people will be frightened off
by the beta designation, and certainly mislead into thinking that 0.5 is
the safer option.
My understanding is that SuSE 8.0 is shipping with 0.9.0beta12. That's
starting to
Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
...
I think we should have a section on the web site for the different
applications which support different alsa versions.
N. could we please please please annihilate every last little
trace of alsa 0.5.x from that page
Fred Gleason [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it perhaps time for an alsa-0.9.rc1 many people will be
frightened off by the beta designation, and certainly mislead into
thinking that 0.5 is the safer option.
My understanding is that SuSE 8.0 is shipping with 0.9.0beta12. That's
starting to
On Wed, 2002-04-17 at 23:00, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
I have now migrated the new ALSA homepage. It was redesigned to be more user
friendly.
http://www.alsa-project.org
Looking good, and its nice to know someone is working on it.
I noticed that the documentation doesn't have the Doxygen
Here's what you get for leaving off the smiley -- until such time as
software has fewer bugs than the hardware, the following is a cheap
shot. -BobC
if that's the stable release, people should be using kernel 1.2 on
an 8086 (as everyone knows, that's the stable release of the
pentium).
13 matches
Mail list logo
