[Alsa-devel] trident driver bug

2003-03-19 Thread Paul Davis
there still appears to be a bug in the trident driver. i have been running jack with a period size of 1024, and it works fine. when i change that to 4096 frames, the kernel does a hard oops, with the oops occuring in enable_hlt(). the rest of the trace doesn't make much sense, and i cannot feed it

Re: [Alsa-devel] trident driver bug

2003-03-19 Thread Jaroslav Kysela
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Paul Davis wrote: there still appears to be a bug in the trident driver. i have been running jack with a period size of 1024, and it works fine. when i change that to 4096 frames, the kernel does a hard oops, with the oops occuring in enable_hlt(). the rest of the trace

Re: [Alsa-devel] trident driver bug

2003-03-19 Thread Martin Langer
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 01:10:02PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote: there still appears to be a bug in the trident driver. i have been running jack with a period size of 1024, and it works fine. when i change that to 4096 frames, the kernel does a hard oops, with the oops occuring in enable_hlt(). the

Re: [Alsa-devel] trident driver bug

2003-03-19 Thread Jaroslav Kysela
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Martin Langer wrote: On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 01:10:02PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote: there still appears to be a bug in the trident driver. i have been running jack with a period size of 1024, and it works fine. when i change that to 4096 frames, the kernel does a hard

[Alsa-devel] trident driver bug

2001-11-29 Thread Paul Davis
the problem with the trident driver is definitely the spurious irqs. the driver doesn't print all such spurious interrupts, which is why they don't show up in my logs. when i changed my trace code, its became clear that they definitely occur quite often. the problem with dropping spurious irqs

Re: [Alsa-devel] trident driver bug

2001-11-29 Thread Jaroslav Kysela
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Paul Davis wrote: It looks like that the capture direction receives an interrupt before the capture pointer has reached the period size boundary. You can increase the insterrupt delay, something like this: i'll check on that, but i don't think thats what happened above.