Hi,
At Thu, 18 Apr 2002 21:32:07 +0200,
Thierry Vignaud wrote:
Fred Gleason [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it perhaps time for an alsa-0.9.rc1 many people will be
frightened off by the beta designation, and certainly mislead into
thinking that 0.5 is the safer option.
My
James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
...
I think we should have a section on the web site for the different
applications which support different alsa versions.
N. could we please please please annihilate every last little
trace of alsa 0.5.x from that page ?
if that's the stable release,
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:18:51 +0200
Joern Nettingsmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
...
I think we should have a section on the web site for the different
applications which support different alsa versions.
N. could we please please please annihilate
On Thursday 18 April 2002 18:27, Fred Gleason wrote:
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
N. could we please please please annihilate every last little
trace of alsa 0.5.x from that page ?
I'd like to add my vote for this here too. The whole 0.5.x vs. 0.9.x
thing is
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, James Tappin wrote:
Is it perhaps time for an alsa-0.9.rc1 many people will be frightened off
by the beta designation, and certainly mislead into thinking that 0.5 is
the safer option.
My understanding is that SuSE 8.0 is shipping with 0.9.0beta12. That's
starting to
Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
...
I think we should have a section on the web site for the different
applications which support different alsa versions.
N. could we please please please annihilate every last little
trace of alsa 0.5.x from that page
Fred Gleason [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it perhaps time for an alsa-0.9.rc1 many people will be
frightened off by the beta designation, and certainly mislead into
thinking that 0.5 is the safer option.
My understanding is that SuSE 8.0 is shipping with 0.9.0beta12. That's
starting to
Here's what you get for leaving off the smiley -- until such time as
software has fewer bugs than the hardware, the following is a cheap
shot. -BobC
if that's the stable release, people should be using kernel 1.2 on
an 8086 (as everyone knows, that's the stable release of the
pentium).
