Re: [data write: File too large]

2002-01-15 Thread Adrian Reyer
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:53:29AM -0500, Pedro Aguayo wrote: Could be that your holding disk space is to small, or you trying to backup a file that is larger than 2 gigs? Perhaps I misunderstand something here, but... The holding disk afaik holds the entire dump of the filesystem you try and

amdump, backup a directory.

2002-01-15 Thread Javier.Fernandez
Hi everyone, Amanda cans make backups for a directory or only file systems? For example backup /export/home/amanda Thanks --- Javier Fernández Pérez Servicio de Informática Corporativa D.G. de Telecomunicaciones y

gnu tar question?

2002-01-15 Thread Javier.Fernandez
hi everyone again, Does anybody know how can i use gnu tar to make incremental backups? Is it posible? Thanks. --- Javier Fernández Pérez Servicio de Informática Corporativa D.G. de Telecomunicaciones y Transportes

Re: amdump, backup a directory.

2002-01-15 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On 15 Jan 2002 at 1:22pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote Amanda cans make backups for a directory or only file systems? For example backup /export/home/amanda If you use dump as your backup program, then it can only do file systems. If you use tar, then you can do directories. -- Joshua

Re: XFS, Linux, and Amanda

2002-01-15 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 at 8:51pm, Gene Heskett wrote Humm, what I see is that you are using linux dump, specifically built for the ext2 filesystem, on a XFS filesystem? Donnbesilly. No. Amanda checks the fstab for filesystem type, and uses the appropriate dump tool for each filesystem (given

Re: gnu tar question?

2002-01-15 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On 15 Jan 2002 at 1:43pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote Does anybody know how can i use gnu tar to make incremental backups? Is it posible? Just tell amanda to use 'program GNUTAR' in your dumptype. amanda will take care of the rest. -- Joshua Baker-LePain Department of Biomedical Engineering

amrecover

2002-01-15 Thread R. Bradley Tilley
Hello Everyone, I have about 60 MS clients that AMANDA backs up. I had trouble figuring out the best way to offer individual/small file recovery to the users until a friend suggested that I install apache on the AMANDA server and do recovery thru the web. The apache web server has a

Re: amdump, backup a directory.

2002-01-15 Thread David T. Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone, Amanda cans make backups for a directory or only file systems? For example backup /export/home/amanda It depends on the backup program selected. GNUTAR will backup starting from any directory, while dump can only backup a complete filesystem. DTS

Re: gnu tar question?

2002-01-15 Thread David T. Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi everyone again, Does anybody know how can i use gnu tar to make incremental backups? Is it posible? In the amanda.conf file there is a section called 'dumptype'. All the different kind of dumps are defined. GNUTAR dumps usually have names that include

Re: amdump, backup a directory.

2002-01-15 Thread Matteo Centonza
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: On 15 Jan 2002 at 1:22pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote Amanda cans make backups for a directory or only file systems? For example backup /export/home/amanda If you use dump as your backup program, then it can only do file systems. If you

Re: amdump, backup a directory.

2002-01-15 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 at 2:36pm, Matteo Centonza wrote On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: Hmm, if I remember correctly, i've made subtree dump in the past with amanda. BTW there's that's from ext2fs dump manpage: *snip* so it's possible (with some restrictions e.g. only

disk offline

2002-01-15 Thread Javier.Fernandez
I'm here again, When i execute amdump, the backup fails FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY: sc01us0105 /software/amanda/share/ lev 0 FAILED [disk /software/amanda/share/offline on sc01us0105?] frostis.cf /export/home/setup/freeware/amanda-2.4.2p2/ lev 0 FAILED [disk

Re: amdump, backup a directory.

2002-01-15 Thread Matteo Centonza
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 at 2:36pm, Matteo Centonza wrote On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: Hmm, if I remember correctly, i've made subtree dump in the past with amanda. BTW there's that's from ext2fs dump manpage: *snip*

Re: disk offline

2002-01-15 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On 15 Jan 2002 at 2:47pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY: sc01us0105 /software/amanda/share/ lev 0 FAILED [disk /software/amanda/share/offline on sc01us0105?] frostis.cf /export/home/setup/freeware/amanda-2.4.2p2/ lev 0 FAILED [disk

RE: [data write: File too large]

2002-01-15 Thread Pedro Aguayo
That's a great Idea, I'm going to save this one. But, I think Edwin doesn't have this problem, meaning he says he doesn't have a file larger than 2gb. Could be hidden, or maybe you mounted over a directory that had a huge file, just digging here. Pedro -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

Re: [data write: File too large]

2002-01-15 Thread Adrian Reyer
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 09:14:33AM -0500, Pedro Aguayo wrote: But, I think Edwin doesn't have this problem, meaning he says he doesn't have a file larger than 2gb. I had none, either, but the filesystem was dumped into a file as a whole, leading to a huge file, same with tar. The problem only

RE: [data write: File too large]

2002-01-15 Thread Pedro Aguayo
Ahh! I see said the blind man. Pedro -Original Message- From: Adrian Reyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:24 AM To: Pedro Aguayo Cc: Rivera, Edwin; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [data write: File too large] On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 09:14:33AM -0500, Pedro

Re: XFS, Linux, and Amanda

2002-01-15 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 18:41:04 EST Brandon D. Valentine said: On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: Hmmm, you did 'rpm -e' the RPM version, right? Pre-build amanda=bad. Word. Especially the moronic way in which RedHat has decided to build it. I'm glad I'm not the

RE: [data write: File too large]

2002-01-15 Thread KEVIN ZEMBOWER
I see! said the blind carpenter, who picked up his hammer and saw. -My ninth grade science teacher, Brother Paul, a terrible punner. -Kevin Pedro Aguayo [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/15/02 09:45AM Ahh! I see said the blind man. Pedro -Original Message- From: Adrian Reyer

Re: [data write: File too large]

2002-01-15 Thread Hans Kinwel
On 15-Jan-2002 Adrian Reyer wrote: No holding-disk - no big file - no problem. (well, tape might have to stop more often because of interruption in data-flow) Why not define a chunksize of 500 Mb on your holdingdisk? That's what I did. Backups go faster and there's less wear and tear on

Re: SUMMARY: Re: onstream adr50 problems

2002-01-15 Thread Moritz Both
I have got an email from OnStream support today. They say that they are *not* planning to release a new firmware for the ADR50 or the ADR30 at the moment. Thus, no support for amanda. They claim that their new generation drives, the ADR2 series, do not have this problem. Moritz

RE: [data write: File too large]

2002-01-15 Thread Pedro Aguayo
Ok, I didn't but think I do now. Basically when amanda write to the holding disk, it rights it to a flat file on the file system, and if that flat file is larger than 2gb then you might encounter a problem if your filesystem has a limitation where it can only support files 2gb. But if you write

disk offline problem

2002-01-15 Thread Javier.Fernandez
Good afternoon, Well, when i execute dump... i receive the next e-mail FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY: sc01us0105 /software/amanda/share/ lev 0 FAILED [disk /software/amanda/share/ offline on sc01us0105?] DUMP SUMMARY: DUMPER STATS

Amrecover has defeated me.

2002-01-15 Thread Eric Hillman
And yes, I have read the FAQ. On my RedHat 7 server, Amrecover invariably dies with an Unexpected server end of file error. All other amanda functions (amdump, acheck, alabel) work great. I have the sneaking suspicion that xinetd is somehow to blame, mainly because of this error message

Re: [data write: File too large]

2002-01-15 Thread Paul Bijnens
Pedro Aguayo wrote: Ok, I didn't but think I do now. Basically when amanda write to the holding disk, it rights it to a flat file on the file system, and if that flat file is larger than 2gb then you might encounter a problem if your filesystem has a limitation where it can only support

problem to use smbclient (Samba)

2002-01-15 Thread Pierre Volcke
hello, I encounter a trouble when trying to configure my Amanda server to backup NT hosts through the Samba suite: * Amanda index/tape server: Linux RH7.1 (the server is also an Amanda client) * Amanda version : 2.4.2p2, compiled with --with-smb-client=/full/path/... * Samba version : 2.2

** Error reading label on tape

2002-01-15 Thread Brad Groshok
Help, please. I had been running amanda 2.4.2p2 on a SunSparc Ultra 2 backing up to a DLT2000 drive. HD in system has crashed, and now I can't access my backup tape. Have installed amanda again, and think I have things config'd same as before. (but I don't have my original amanda.conf

Re: problem to use smbclient (Samba)

2002-01-15 Thread Pierre Volcke
answering my own question: * Amanda version : 2.4.2p2, compiled with --with-smb-client=/full/path/... I tried to recompile again, and checked the configure output: $ ./configure ... --with-smblient=/usr/local/samba/bin/smbclient ... (...) checking for smbclient... no (...) but, $

Re: Amrecover has defeated me.

2002-01-15 Thread Stephen Carville
Looks to me like xinetd is working correctly. If xinetd was refusing the connection you wolkd never see the 220 prompt. Some sugesstions: 1. Does amandahome/.amandahosts on the tape server have a line like: localhostroot my.serverroot 2. It may be necessary to add the server

Interactive Restore with Tar?

2002-01-15 Thread Tanniel Simonian
I am trying to restore an NT partition from backup. Naturally one has to use GNUTAR to be able to backup the filesystem. However is there an interactive method to restore from tar, or must I untar to a holding disk first, then grab the files I need. Also a while back there was mention of

Re: ** Error reading label on tape

2002-01-15 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 at 1:08pm, Brad Groshok wrote I had been running amanda 2.4.2p2 on a SunSparc Ultra 2 backing up to a DLT2000 drive. amverify ody shows: Using device /dev/rmt/0bn ** Error reading label on tape Errors found: 0+0 records in 0+0 records out amrestore

Re: ** Error reading label on tape

2002-01-15 Thread Wayne Richards
Ah, the beauty of amanda. Use the no-rewind device and issue: mt -t no-rewind device fsf 1 That will skip the label header. Then you can use dump, GNUTAR or whatever backup utility you used and restore or list the tape using the no-rewind device. For GNUTAR that might be: tar xvf

Supplement: Interactive Tar Restore?

2002-01-15 Thread Tanniel Simonian
One more thing: As a normal NT server, usually the hard drives are shared automagically, via a $ sign. therefore if you have C, D and E drive, they are shared respectively by //host/c$, //host/d$, and //host/e$. Assuming you got administrative privledge access. So i got lucky and was able to

Re: ** Error reading label on tape

2002-01-15 Thread Brad Groshok
amrestore ody shows: amrestore: could not open tape ody: No such file or directory That's not the proper syntax to amrestore. It needs to know the tape device, i.e. 'amrestore /dev/rmt/0bn'. It doesn't care about a config file. [2:20pm chip]# mt rewind [2:20pm chip]# amrestore

Help! timeouts

2002-01-15 Thread Neal D. Becker
I have been using amanda-2.4.2p2-4 (RPM) on linux (redhat 7.2) for some time with good results. Now they have moved my equipment so that there is a firewall between my clients and server. After the move I am getting data timeouts. I can't figure out what's the problem. Here is what the client

Re: Amrecover still kicking my @$$

2002-01-15 Thread Eric Hillman
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 12:13 pm, you wrote: Looks to me like xinetd is working correctly. If xinetd was refusing the connection you wolkd never see the 220 prompt. Some sugesstions: 1. Does amandahome/.amandahosts on the tape server have a line like: localhost root my.server

Amanda and firewall

2002-01-15 Thread Nevin Kapur
I'm having some trouble setting up an Amanda client sitting in a DMZ of a firewall to talk to an Amanda server sittin inside a firewall. I've tried to follow the answer in the FAQ and also read the various posts on amanda-users. However, I can't get it to work and some questions till linger:

Re: Amanda and firewall

2002-01-15 Thread KEVIN ZEMBOWER
Wow, you and I are at almost the exact same place with the same problem. I too am getting errors about port numbers that I didn't set up in the configuration, when I compiled amanda. I've been assuming that my firewall was translating port addresses in addition to IP addresses, but this doesn't

Re: Amanda and firewall

2002-01-15 Thread Rick Morris
Here's how I did this. The relevant portions of my configure line: ./configure --with-udpportrange=850,855 --with-portrange=32800,32850 I used this on both client and server And my firewall (linux) looks like this: (IP numbers are not real) Internet firewall

RE: [data write: File too large]

2002-01-15 Thread Rivera, Edwin
This makes sense because when I ran my initial Amanda dump on that host, I had no holding-disk defined, and it did backup the filesystem at level 0, and that filesystem has over 24GB of data on it, albeit, they are all small .c files and the such. I am left wondering then how chunksize fits into

RE: [data write: File too large]

2002-01-15 Thread Rivera, Edwin
is there a way, in the amanda.conf file, to specify *NOT* to use the holding-disk for a particular filesystem? for example, if i use amanda to backup 8 filesystems on one box and i want 7 to use the holding-disk, but one not to.. is that possible? just curious.. -edwin -Original

Re: SUMMARY: Re: onstream adr50 problems

2002-01-15 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 10:30 am, Moritz Both wrote: I have got an email from OnStream support today. They say that they are *not* planning to release a new firmware for the ADR50 or the ADR30 at the moment. Thus, no support for amanda. They claim that their new generation drives, the ADR2

Re: [data write: File too large]

2002-01-15 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 09:56 am, Rivera, Edwin wrote: is there a way, in the amanda.conf file, to specify *NOT* to use the holding-disk for a particular filesystem? for example, if i use amanda to backup 8 filesystems on one box and i want 7 to use the holding-disk, but one not to.. is