Confused by amanda's 'planner': why multiple level 0?

2010-10-02 Thread Robert Heller
Why does Amanda do multiple level 0 backups? I only want 1 (and only 1) level 0 backup (of any given disk) in the backup cycle (4 weeks / 28 days). The documentation for the bump* parameters is not clear (to me). I want Amanda to aggressively bump dump levels. I don't have enough virtual tapes

Re: Confused by amanda's 'planner': why multiple level 0?

2010-10-02 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 09:05:44AM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: Why does Amanda do multiple level 0 backups? I only want 1 (and only 1) level 0 backup (of any given disk) in the backup cycle (4 weeks / 28 days). The documentation for the bump* parameters is not clear (to me). I want Amanda

bumpdays clarification

2010-10-02 Thread Jon LaBadie
Thinking about a recent post caused me to wonder about the bumpdays directive. Is it truely measured in days as opposed to amdump runs? If days, you could never get a bump if among multiple runs the same day. Not too big a lose. But what of sites that run dumps weekdays only. Are the weekend

Re: Confused by amanda's 'planner': why multiple level 0?

2010-10-02 Thread Robert Heller
At Sat, 02 Oct 2010 10:15:29 -0400 amanda-users@amanda.org wrote: On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 09:05:44AM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: Why does Amanda do multiple level 0 backups? I only want 1 (and only 1) level 0 backup (of any given disk) in the backup cycle (4 weeks / 28 days). The

Re: bumpdays clarification

2010-10-02 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Jon LaBadie j...@jgcomp.com wrote: Thinking about a recent post caused me to wonder about the bumpdays directive.  Is it truely measured in days as opposed to amdump runs? Neither, actually - it's measured in tapes / runtapes. So if your runtapes is large but

Re: Confused by amanda's 'planner': why multiple level 0?

2010-10-02 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Jon LaBadie j...@jgcomp.com wrote: runtapes 2 # number of tapes to be used in a single run of amdump I hope very few dumps take more than one tape, like none :) To be clear on the planner's reasoning: it considers itself to have runtapes * tapetype:length kb

trivial amtape defect

2010-10-02 Thread Jon LaBadie
When running amtape --help the usage message is printed twice. -- Jon H. LaBadie j...@jgcomp.com JG Computing 12027 Creekbend Drive (703) 787-0884 Reston, VA 20194 (703) 787-0922 (fax)

Re: Confused by amanda's 'planner': why multiple level 0?

2010-10-02 Thread Robert Heller
At Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:59:38 -0500 Dustin J. Mitchell dus...@zmanda.com wrote: On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Jon LaBadie j...@jgcomp.com wrote: runtapes 2 # number of tapes to be used in a single run of amdump I hope very few dumps take more than one tape, like none :) To be clear

Re: Confused by amanda's 'planner': why multiple level 0?

2010-10-02 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote: So I would be better off setting runtapes to 1?  And then manually 'flushing' at the beginning of the cycle to deal with the larger fulls? Arg... This sort of thing is not really well explained in the man pages...

Re: trivial amtape defect

2010-10-02 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Jon LaBadie j...@jgcomp.com wrote: When running amtape --help the usage message is printed twice. A *real* nitpick! Cool! Fix is here: http://github.com/djmitche/amanda/commit/z12091 If that works for you, let me know and I will commit. You should be able

Re: Confused by amanda's 'planner': why multiple level 0?

2010-10-02 Thread Robert Heller
At Sat, 2 Oct 2010 16:06:17 -0500 Dustin J. Mitchell dus...@zmanda.com wrote: On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote: So I would be better off setting runtapes to 1?  And then manually 'flushing' at the beginning of the cycle to deal with the larger

Re: 3.2.0 beta1 release

2010-10-02 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger s...@amanda.org wrote: ? encrypt: dumper: error: couldn't exec server encryptionÈÏ  HÃ  8 . OK, in trying to duplicate this, I'm getting dumper segfaults, which is probably the same bug -- it looks like dumper is printing random memory in

Re: Confused by amanda's 'planner': why multiple level 0?

2010-10-02 Thread Jon LaBadie
Robert, I had another thought. You could set all your DLEs to be set to do incremental only. I forget whether this is strategy nofull or strategy incronly or ???. With this you may be able to set you runtapes to 1 and maybe use a larger tape size as you would not be archiving them to DVDs. You

Re: trivial amtape defect

2010-10-02 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 04:24:46PM -0500, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Jon LaBadie j...@jgcomp.com wrote: When running amtape --help the usage message is printed twice. A *real* nitpick! Cool! Fix is here: http://github.com/djmitche/amanda/commit/z12091