On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger s...@amanda.org wrote:
Non-IT-people might say QUOTE yes --- ;-) ?
Yes, we IT people do love our N-negatives, since we can just look at
the rightmost bit of N to determine its interpretation.
The name is based on the underlying gnu-tar
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Chris Nighswonger
cnighswon...@foundations.edu wrote:
So... am I missing something that I don't know about or is this a bug?
Replying on Paddy's behalf:
There's a 3.1.1 that's currently in internal testing that might
improve the situation. It should be ready
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Marc Muehlfeld
marc.muehlf...@medizinische-genetik.de wrote:
Does amanda meanwhile provides a way to migrate the data to the new tapes
without copying 1:1 and lossing much free space (DLT has 40 GB, LTO has 400
GB space).
Not yet, no. Amvault will be able to
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Chris Nighswonger
cnighswon...@foundations.edu wrote:
So is the only way to do this to have a dumptype setup using 'exclude'
and 'exclude append' to catch each of potentially 300 some multimedia
file extensions? This would mean 300 some 'exclude'/'exclude
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote:
Then in the reports listing:
coyote /bin 1 10 10 -- 0:01 15.4 0:01 10.0
Nothing I know of changed, but that does seem small.
Well, it's an incremental, and as you say nothing's
We're looking to release 3.1.1 early next week. As I've mentioned
before, the third number in Amanda version numbering is now a patch,
so you can think of this as 3.1p1 if you'd like. That means it
doesn't have any new functionality, only bugfixes, documentation
updates, and so on.
Jean-Louis
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Jean-Francois Malouin
ma...@bic.mni.mcgill.ca wrote:
I haven't looked too hard on this but it seems to me that amreport for
amanda-3.1.0 doesn't correctly calculate the tape write rate.
At a brief look, that looks reasonable - 884G in 5 hours is about
50M/s,
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Jean-Francois Malouin
ma...@bic.mni.mcgill.ca wrote:
5hrs is the run time:
Estimate Time (hrs:min) 0:44
Run Time (hrs:min) 5:36
Dump Time (hrs:min) 2:50 2:32 0:18
Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s) 51715.5 51345.9 98233.1
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Jon LaBadie j...@jgcomp.com wrote:
This time (4:52) is the sum of the total time taken in writing each
individual DLE (DONE lines in the log). There is overhead, particularly
when writing multi-part DLEs that is reflected in this number.
..
This number (2:21)
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Jean-Francois Malouin
ma...@bic.mni.mcgill.ca wrote:
I guess bumping up tape_splitsize should speed up things.
I'll try that tonight.
You may want to check out the taper debug logs, too - it's a very
common misconfiguration to set tape_splitsize but not
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Andreas Haumer andr...@xss.co.at wrote:
I recently upgraded one machine from Amanda v2.5.2p1 to
v2.6.1p2 and noticed that with the new version amandad
does not collect exit status from forked child processes
anymore, so all terminated child processes are left
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 4:12 AM, Dennis Benndorf dennis.bennd...@gmx.de wrote:
I stumbled about that amcheck does not seem to recognize how much tapes per
run is set in amanda.conf. So if I need 5 tapes, it would say that everything
is ok if only one tape is available. Might this something to
First, I'm excited you're using the modules, and thanks for the feedback!
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Jean-Francois Malouin
ma...@bic.mni.mcgill.ca wrote:
Using Amanda::Config.pm as an example I tried:
config_init($CONFIG_INIT_EXPLICIT_NAME, Config_Name);
$ss =
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Jean-Francois Malouin
ma...@bic.mni.mcgill.ca wrote:
Are you sure about that?
I don't see any $CHANGER_CONFIG_USE_SLOTS in 3.1.0...
In the mean time I resorted to slurp all the changer properties with
$tpc_prop = changer_config_getconf($ss,
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Mark Adams m...@campbell-lange.net wrote:
Is there any way to identify (via the index or other means) what file is
at the start of what tape or what split part?
You can use 'amadmin find' I suppose.. although it doesn't let you
search by tape.
I need to audit
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Mark Adams m...@campbell-lange.net wrote:
Hi Dustin, Thanks for this pointer. I assume amcheckdump takes just as
long as the backup takes in the first place?
Within an order of magnitude, yes.
Dustin
--
Open Source Storage Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Marc Muehlfeld
marc.muehlf...@medizinische-genetik.de wrote:
This second patch fixes the problem. Thanks.
Great - thanks!
Dustin
--
Open Source Storage Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:54 AM, McGraw, Robert P rmcg...@purdue.edu wrote:
If I compile with --with-bsdtcp-security and bsd, can my 2.6.1p2 server use
bsd security for some clients and bsdtcp for other clients and would I set
this in the define dumptype?
Absolutely.
Dustin
--
Open
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Wojciech Giel
wojciech.g...@cimr.cam.ac.uk wrote:
Could you provide package for ubuntu server 10.4 LTS amd64 and x86?
You should be able to run packaging/deb/buildpkg on such a system, to
create the packages yourself.
At the moment, we don't have a 10.4 build
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 3:09 PM, McGraw, Robert P rmcg...@purdue.edu wrote:
I am not quite sure how amanda uses the --with-tcpportrange=low/high. Does
this parameter have to be defined in both the client and server software or
does the server pass the ranges to the client?
It needs to be
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Charles Curley
charlescur...@charlescurley.com wrote:
This morning, the disk drive that holds my vtapes dies on me. I was
able to recover. My notes are at
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote:
And 3161 is still confused. ;-) In the final mix, how is this supposed to
work?, and I'll change my 2 scripts accordingly.
I think you're just pulling my chain now, but I'll go again:
Right, I haven't fixed it
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it intentional now that amcheck, amplanner and a couple others are now
owned by root:root?
No, they should be owned by root:disk (or root:backup, depending on
your system), and setuid.
Dustin
--
Open Source
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote:
At the end of the install, it falls over with:
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/amanda/amanda-3.2.0alpha.svn.3147'
bash: /usr/local/sbin/amcheck: Permission denied
And sure enough, when I go check, amcheck is owned
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Marc Muehlfeld
marc.muehlf...@medizinische-genetik.de wrote:
header on 'KDD174' file 29 does not match expectations: got partnum '0';
expected '1'
Got no header and data from server, check in amidxtaped.*.debug and
amandad.*.debug files on server
Ah, this is
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Dustin J. Mitchell dus...@zmanda.com wrote:
Ah, this is completely different error, but you've given me enough
info to replicate and fix it. I've attached a source-level patch that
you can apply, but the better fix is at the C level (and will be in
3.1.1
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, but todays 3156 just fell over, same perms problem.
Right, I haven't fixed it yet.
Are you sure you want to change how that works?
Yes - chowning everything to amanda is actually *less* secure (since
it means that
OK, this was apparently a failure of my Perl-fu. I had written something like
my $check = sub {
# determine if $_ is suitable
};
@list = grep $check, @other_list;
Thinking that Perl would helpfully invoke $check. It won't - it just
looks at the boolean value of $check, and it's a nonzero
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Dimiter Maznekov
d.mazne...@optixco.com wrote:
After long long holliday I'm returning in company and see this message:
FAILURE DUMP SUMMARY:
www.site.org /var/www/htdocs/ISU lev 1 FAILED [Not enough holding disk
space]
www.site.org /var/www/htdocs/ISU
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Marc Muehlfeld
marc.muehlf...@medizinische-genetik.de wrote:
Am 09.06.2010 16:43, schrieb Dustin J. Mitchell:
The messages will have gone into amidxtaped.*.debug..
But just the following files were created, until the
amrecover - can't talk to tape server
I *think* this is the same issue being addressed here:
http://forums.zmanda.com/showthread.php?t=2800
Dustin
--
Open Source Storage Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Marc Muehlfeld
marc.muehlf...@medizinische-genetik.de wrote:
ETIMEOUT must be positive
But the manpage says:
etimeout int
. A negative value will be interpreted as a total amount of time to wait
per client instead of per disk.
Who's wrong? Manpage or
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Marc Muehlfeld
marc.muehlf...@medizinische-genetik.de wrote:
Tue Jun 8 16:39:14 2010: amidxtaped: CTL LABEL=KDD174:29
..
Tue Jun 8 16:39:18 2010: amidxtaped: CTL MESSAGE Specified file list
matches multiple dumps; cannot continue recovery
So what's
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 9:39 AM, McGraw, Robert P rmcg...@purdue.edu wrote:
I am seeing several of the following dumper: [request failed: timeout
waiting for REP](too) errors when I run the amstatus command. Below is a
snippet of one of the errors.
Is the (too) really part of the error?
Can
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 4:30 PM, McGraw, Robert P rmcg...@purdue.edu wrote:
I have search for this information but cannot find any information. Is this
an error? If so what is the resolution?
How do I make perl link with -pthreads?
Nope, it's just Make showing you the command it would invoke
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 10:23 AM, McGraw, Robert P rmcg...@purdue.edu wrote:
In /tmp/amanda I see for the first time a file core20100603 what is this
file?
It's a core file. Depending on your OS configuration, it can be
created when a process is killed by a fatal error like a segfault.
They're
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:42 PM, McGraw, Robert P rmcg...@purdue.edu wrote:
Usually core files have just the name core I have not seen any core files
with the date attached and the fact that it was in /tmp/amanda and owned by
amanda I thought it might be some file created by amanda.
Yeah,
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 3:25 PM, McGraw, Robert P rmcg...@purdue.edu wrote:
Which seem to resolve the problem.
I'm not sure what the question was .. but amgtar in 2.6.1 didn't have
an ACLS property:
http://wiki.zmanda.com/man/2.6.1/amgtar.8.html
Dustin
--
Open Source Storage Engineer
Spam detection software, running on the system becherovka.cz.omniscient.com,
has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
postmaster for
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Gunnarsson, Gunnar
gunnar.gunnars...@svk.se wrote:
I got the fatal error see below while testing the new option autolabel, the
configuration was empty and amcheck -s was ok.
Does the tapelist file exist?
Dustin
--
Open Source Storage Engineer
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Dustin J. Mitchell dus...@zmanda.com wrote:
Does the tapelist file exist?
Ah! A while back, we made a missing tapelist a warning in amcheck,
but the taper was not updated to automatically create it in this case.
So you'll need to create your tapelist first
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Charlie Reitsma reit...@denison.edu wrote:
I saw a thread that recommended trying amindexd, amidxtaped, amoldrecover
from 2.5.1b2. That was reported successful with no configuration changes. I
wonder if anyone could flesh that out a bit more for me?
Yikes, I'm
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Gunnarsson, Gunnar
gunnar.gunnars...@svk.se wrote:
I've tested the tape drivers and they seems to be working fine, how does
drivers detect end of tape. This seems to be a specific Solaris issue ?
Amanda detects EOT by counting any error as an EOT indication.
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Brian Cuttler br...@wadsworth.org wrote:
We seem to be missing something in our config but I'm not finding
the key in the wiki. What should I be looking for ?
I'm guessing that amanda/tcp isn't in your services db? On most
systems, that's /etc/services, but on
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Chris Hoogendyk
hoogen...@bio.umass.edu wrote:
I don't mean to question Dustin
I rather enjoy being questioned, so don't worry about that!
This was a guess, and apparently I was correct this time around.
Dustin
--
Open Source Storage Engineer
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Charlie Reitsma reit...@denison.edu wrote:
The two times I've tried to move to current releases I've run into trouble
and had to back out. Bringing all 24 clients and server at once is a bit
daunting. I think I'll have to scrounge up another system and tape
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Gunnarsson, Gunnar
gunnar.gunnars...@svk.se wrote:
Wrote 406883762176 bytes at 7552 kb/sec
Writing smaller files (4068835328 bytes) to determine filemark.
amtapetype: Error writing label 'amtapetype-2046333855': Error writing block:
Mysterious short write on
Ah - after the device has encountered an error, it won't give
properties anymore (case doesn't matter). Try moving the block_size
up in the script:
diff --git a/device-src/amtapetype.pl b/device-src/amtapetype.pl
index 5bd7411..80c0ad7 100644
--- a/device-src/amtapetype.pl
+++
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Gunnarsson, Gunnar
gunnar.gunnars...@svk.se wrote:
Applying heuristic check for compression.
Wrote random (uncompressible) data at 7492244.64516129 bytes/sec Wrote fixed
(compressible) data at 35732243.6923077 bytes/sec
Compression: enabled
Writing one file
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 7:27 AM, Gunnarsson, Gunnar
gunnar.gunnars...@svk.se wrote:
Thanks Dustin the patch is working fine, good work.
Great!
Compression enabled, does it mean that it is using compression ?
Yep.
Dustin
--
Open Source Storage Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:26 AM, Mark Adams m...@campbell-lange.net wrote:
You need to specify -c with pbzip2 to have it compress to stdout I
believe. If you just run it by itself;
Ah! Then, for the moment at least, you'll need to write a wrapper
script that doesn't require any arguments.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Gunnarsson, Gunnar
gunnar.gunnars...@svk.se wrote:
Tue May 18 13:22:08 2010: amtapetype: Device /dev/rmt/0n error = 'Could not
seek to file 2 correctly; got 1'
Hmm.. can you send me the syscall trace (truss or strace) of that?
Here's the comment above that error
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Dustin J. Mitchell dus...@zmanda.com wrote:
Hmm.. can you send me the syscall trace (truss or strace) of that?
(truss now in hand..)
Oh, silly me - the code detects that the tape drive needs the
FSF_AFTER_FILEMARK property, by virtue of getting an error from
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Mark Adams m...@campbell-lange.net wrote:
1273659791.836703: sendbackup: critical (fatal): index tee cannot write
[Broken pipe]
This means that the index tee (which splits off the 'tar' output to
generate the index) cannot write to its output, which is the
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 4:39 AM, Mark Adams m...@campbell-lange.net wrote:
This was the problem. Using gzip it retrieves from the 2nd tape just
fine. It takes twice as long to run the backup though! Is anyone using
pigz and is successfully retrieving data from the 2nd tape on? or has
anyone
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Mark Adams m...@campbell-lange.net wrote:
In the mean time I can't get pbzip2 to work at all. It just crashes out
with the following:
Please attach the whole sendbackup log.
Dustin
--
Open Source Storage Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Dustin C. Hatch
dha...@gosupertechs.com wrote:
I update to Kernel version 2.6.32-r7 last night. I was able to do a full
backup to tape earlier today, using tapes that I know failed before. I
guess there could have been a driver problem in 2.6.31. I'll try a
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Mark Adams m...@campbell-lange.net wrote:
Does this help at all? as it read the 2nd tape does this mean the data
is on the tapes and it's a problem with amrecover?
Basically. It could mean that the data on the tapes is corrupt,
although the basic structure of
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Jean-Francois Malouin
ma...@bic.mni.mcgill.ca wrote:
Dustin, educate me please!
How do I proceed with the git patches and
how do I patch the source on my side?
First, if you click on each of those commits in github, you'll have URLs like
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Jean-Francois Malouin
ma...@bic.mni.mcgill.ca wrote:
I see a lot of warning in the debug file:
Fri May 7 13:54:34 2010: amtape: warning: Use of uninitialized value in
bitwise or (|) at
/opt/amanda-3.1.0beta2/perl/Amanda/Changer/rait.pm line 596.
These are
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger s...@amanda.org wrote:
It's a DRAFT!
Looks good so far, though! Will you be adding this to contrib/ when it's ready?
Dustin
--
Open Source Storage Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Jean-Francois Malouin
ma...@bic.mni.mcgill.ca wrote:
How do you specify a drive number with a mirror rait using chg-robot?
~# su amanda -c /opt/amanda-3.1.0beta2/sbin/amtape rait eject 1
You would specify it as '{1,12}', but it looks like you've uncovered a
bug
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Brian Cuttler br...@wadsworth.org wrote:
Amanda is now failing differently.
tar exited with signal 11.
On Solaris, over a ZFS filesystem. We just saw this error a few days
ago on the list! Check the archives - there was a workaround.
--
Open Source Storage
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Jean-Francois Malouin
ma...@bic.mni.mcgill.ca wrote:
I must have left my brain somewhere but it's still not clear to me how
to specify a `drive' with a mirror/rait:
No, this is a good question that didn't have an answer! I've answered
it, and my patch is pending
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Mark Adams m...@campbell-lange.net wrote:
Why would the file not be in the archive if it is showing in the index?
Is there anything else I can try before I try to retrieve the whole DLE?
So this is a new dump? No, I can't see any reason it would do that.
What is the error? I suspect this:
1273071472.718696: dumper: security_seterror(handle=8074f08,
driver=fef09394 (BSD) error=timeout waiting for REP)
which likely means that you're exceeding the dtimeout for that DLE for
whatever reason. Try increasing that?
Dustin
--
Open Source Storage
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Brian Cuttler br...@wadsworth.org wrote:
Also, the issues seem to be specific to certain DLE, in both
cases the busiest of the DLEs, not necessarily the largest
but the most active.
It's clearly timing-related, then. Keep in mind that hte dtimeout is
a timeout
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Jean-Francois Malouin
ma...@bic.mni.mcgill.ca wrote:
I've corrected this by using the same state file in both
child-changer. I'm now experiencing other problems, maybe due to some
mis-config from my part:
~# su amanda -c /opt/amanda-3.1.0beta2/sbin/amtape rait
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:33 AM, McGraw, Robert P rmcg...@purdue.edu wrote:
Is there someone in the zmanda world that has the following amanda setup.
1) Solaris x86 Solaris 10
2) /usr/sfw/bin/gtar (v1.23)
3) amanda 2.6.1p2
4) amanda backup of a zfs snapshot like
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 12:27 PM, McGraw, Robert P rmcg...@purdue.edu wrote:
I setup a lookback for the snapshot and now gtar seem to be working.
It sounds like you have a fairly good understanding of this problem
now. Could you write up either a troubleshooting or How-To article on
the wiki?
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Jean-Francois Malouin
ma...@bic.mni.mcgill.ca wrote:
Is it possible with amanda-3.0 and the new changer API to setup a
mirror/rait using 2 physical tape drives and only one physical
changer?
Yes! I tested this lightly at one point, and it should work just fine.
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Jean-Francois Malouin
ma...@bic.mni.mcgill.ca wrote:
One question: should the changerfile parameter for chg-robot point to
the same file for both child-changers:
Yes, it should - that will allow the changers to avoid stepping on each other.
Dustin
--
Open
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Dustin J. Mitchell dus...@zmanda.com wrote:
Please download and test it out - with luck, this will be the last
beta before the final release!
We haven't heard of any showstopper bugs, although we have discovered
and fixed a number of nuisances since the beta2
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 2:01 PM, McGraw, Robert P rmcg...@purdue.edu wrote:
hertz /export/jumpstart lev 0 FAILED
[/local/amanda/amanda-2.6.1p2/libexec/amanda/runtar terminated with signal
11: see /tmp/amanda/client/archive/sendsize.20100503144020.debug]
signal 11 is a segfault. The last
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Jean-Francois Malouin
ma...@bic.mni.mcgill.ca wrote:
Looks good to me now! I'va attached the debug files for
amidxtaped amindexd and amrecover as requested.
Actually, Jean-Louis managed to solve this while I was waiting for the
debug info. You can (at your
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Angelo Höngens a.hong...@netmatch.nl wrote:
Just for your info, this is how it looks on my bsd box. Here, it's called
portal 0 instead of slot 24..
Hah, I like the term portal!
If you look at the underlying SCSI protocol, drives, i/e slots,
regular slots, and
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 4:31 PM, McGraw, Robert P rmcg...@purdue.edu wrote:
If I manually run the following gtar command I get a segmentation fault
/usr/sfw/bin/gtar --create
Uh-oh .. time to open a Sun^WOracle support case? It looks like a bug
either in ZFS or GNU Tar..
Dustin
--
Open
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 5:49 AM, Jean-Francois Malouin
ma...@bic.mni.mcgill.ca wrote:
no, the dump used 2 vtapes, vtape-1 and vtape-2, and there is only one
`drive'. I did 2 run with amrecover just to convince me that it really
asked for vtape-2 *before* vtape-1. Since I have
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Jean-Francois Malouin
ma...@bic.mni.mcgill.ca wrote:
Using amrecover to extract a multi virtual tape dump I see something
confusing even though in the end the dump is successfully extracted:
amrecover wants the second tape (vtape-2) loaded before the first one
Amanda-3.1.0 isn't *quite* out the door yet, but like all developers
at the end of a release cycle, we have turned our thoughts to the next
feature release, Amanda-3.2.0. This wistfulness happened to coincide
with a trip to Sunnyvale for all of us telecommuters at Zmanda, making
it a perfect time
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Mark Adams m...@campbell-lange.net wrote:
I assume this will require space the size of the DLE? (in my case 2T)
Yes, it will.
Dustin
--
Open Source Storage Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com
Hello,
The Amanda core team is pleased to announce the second beta release
of Amanda 3.1.0, the 3.1.0beta2 release.
It can be downloaded from http://www.amanda.org (not yet available) or
https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=120
Please download and test it out - with luck, this
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 6:26 AM, McGraw, Robert P rmcg...@purdue.edu wrote:
If I remove --enable-manpage-build and try to rebuild the man pages I get the
following.
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 3:29 AM, Mark Adams m...@campbell-lange.net wrote:
Sorry for the stupid questions, but I've no idea how to identify
*which* file needs to be selected in amrecover in order for it to
restore from the start of the 10th chunk.
I had been wondering why you were so concerned
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Mark Adams m...@campbell-lange.net wrote:
I've determined that when I try to retrieve files from the 2nd tape in
my set it won't work. Tar crashes out with the helpful error due to previous
errors -- no errors show before this apart from tar skipping to the
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Chris Hoogendyk
hoogen...@bio.umass.edu wrote:
I don't get it. Why is Amanda refusing to use the new tapes (or tape 3)?
See the note in this manpage:
http://wiki.zmanda.com/man/amanda-taperscan.7.html
Dustin
--
Open Source Storage Engineer
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Chris Hoogendyk
hoogen...@bio.umass.edu wrote:
The algorithm just seems a bit weird. I never thought that fast-searchable
would jump over the new tapes, especially since they are marked reuse. I
always assumed it would check the tapes in order until it found one
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Mark Adams m...@campbell-lange.net wrote:
2010-04-09 16:55:11 localhost /upbackup 0 UPSNAPSHOT-02 1 10/-1 OK
This is part 10 of the dump, at filemark 1 on UPSNAPSHOT-02. is that
what you were looking for?
Dustin
--
Open Source Storage Engineer
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 8:53 AM, McGraw, Robert P rmcg...@purdue.edu wrote:
**BLANK LINES**
I recall someone else having this problem, too. I don't know enough
nroff to figure out what's wrong, but I suspect it's a docbook XSLT
bug of some sort.
As a workaround, the 2.6.1 manpages are
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Darin Perusich
darin.perus...@cognigencorp.com wrote:
It's docbook for sure and the man pages likely didn't build because it's
not on your system or it's an old version, so --enable-manpage-build
isn't going to help.
The tarball ships with pre-built manpages,
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net wrote:
500 No dumps available on or before date 2010-04-08
Actually, this means there are no catalog entries for that date. I
think I had asked last time, what amadmin Conf find will show for that
particular DLE?
Dustin
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Paul Yeatman pyeat...@zmanda.com wrote:
Thus the first file on the second tape, file number=0.
Tape file numbers are one-based, because they reflect the number of
filemarks that precede the file data, and the tape always begins with
a tape header and a filemark:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Jean-Francois Malouin
ma...@bic.mni.mcgill.ca wrote:
Slowly going through the new stuff in 3.0.1beta1 and I came across the
following in the amanda-changers.7 manpage:
define changer hp-robot {
tapedev chg-robot:/dev/sg1
property
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Charles Curley
charlescur...@charlescurley.com wrote:
That resulted in:
Configuration: /etc/amanda
but the directory wasn't built. It would be nice if the installation
process built it.
I'm not entirely convinced of this -- I consider it the package's job
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Volker Pallas ama...@sqmail.de wrote:
Is auth=bsdtcp mandatory?
If you want to switch to bsdtcp, then yes. You'll also need to change
your (x)inetd configuration accordingly. The amanda-auth(7) manpage
may be of use to you in figuring the whole thing out.
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 1:22 PM, McGraw, Robert P rmcg...@purdue.edu wrote:
My problem seem to be that by default the SunStudio uses /usr/ccs/bin/ld
rather than /usr/sfw/i386-sun-solaris2.10/bin/ld. I cannot figure out how to
set the sfw ld to be the default.
That sounds like the correct
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Brian Cuttler br...@wadsworth.org wrote:
Unfortunately what we really wanted was to backup the
list of directories in the backup template defined
on the server.
What's a backup template?
Dustin
--
Open Source Storage Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Craig Constantine cr...@blkbx.com wrote:
AMRECOVER Version 2.6.1p2. Contacting server on localhost ...
I'd recommend just using auth local if you're communicating within
the localhost. BSDTCP is just too annoying to get right.
Dustin
--
Open Source Storage
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net wrote:
500 No dumps available on or before date 2010-04-18
No index records for disk for specified date
I didn't really understand how you shuffled your machines, but it
sounds like the catalog (the trace logs) is not where
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net wrote:
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks.
Ping!
Why are you running amgtar directly?
Dustin
--
Open Source Storage Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com
301 - 400 of 1224 matches
Mail list logo
