Re: Quantum Super DLT 320

2004-01-07 Thread Martin Oehler
Hi, Brian! On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 02:09:16PM -0500, Brian Cuttler wrote: I'm putting an new amanda server, 2.4.4p1 on a Solaris 9 system and don't see an entry for my tape in the faq-o-matic. Does anyone know the tape type for the Quantum Super DLT 320 ? This tape type works fine without

Re: Testing tapes before use / bad tape

2003-11-25 Thread Martin Oehler
Hi! Am Mo, 2003-11-24 um 13.54 schrieb Gene Heskett: On Monday 24 November 2003 03:46, Martin Oehler wrote: [...] Doing this to a tape also should tell you whether or not the drives internal compression is in use, which for amanda, should be turned off as that hides the true size

Re: Testing tapes before use / bad tape

2003-11-25 Thread Martin Oehler
Hi! Am Mo, 2003-11-24 um 23.30 schrieb Eric Siegerman: On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 09:46:31AM +0100, Martin Oehler wrote: Hmm, the only option that sounds like it could speed up the [amtapetype] process is blocksize. Does anyone know a good value for this? The same value as amdump

Re: Testing tapes before use / bad tape

2003-11-24 Thread Martin Oehler
Hi! Am So, 2003-11-23 um 14.16 schrieb Gene Heskett: There is amtapetype, which will destructively write the tape till it hits EOT, and will tell you the size it found. See the man page for running options to help speed it up as its quite slow, doing 2 passes. SYNOPSIS amtapetype

Testing tapes before use / bad tape

2003-11-23 Thread Martin Oehler
Hi! I'm using amanda 2.4.4p1 in combination with a Quantum SDLT 320 tape drive. This week I received some replacement tapes for broken ones. Using the first tape I got some kind of short write while using amflush: [...] *** A TAPE ERROR OCCURRED: [[writing file: Input/output error]]. [...]

Re: Amanda GUI

2003-11-04 Thread Martin Oehler
Hi! Am Di, 2003-11-04 um 00.20 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: GJ Jason Lavigne wrote: For configuration, testing and restore purposes for newbies like me. Thanks to the nice folks on this list I have been pointed to a ton of documentation and now I will read it and hopefully understand

Re: postponing full backup [solution]

2003-09-15 Thread Martin Oehler
Hi, Jon! Thanks, it worked. After the forced level 0 backup started, # amadmin Backup due displayed the correct number of days between two full backups. So it's not really a postponing (like I proposed in the subject) but it works moving the level 0 backups to the weekend. Martin Öhler

postponing full backup

2003-09-13 Thread Martin Oehler
Hi! I'm running the standard strategy for backing up my partitions on Amanda 2.4.4 . The next level 0 backup for a large partition is scheduled on a workday during the next week. This backup run takes about 14 hours, so I would prefer doing it on the weekend. Is it possible to run this full

Re: postponing full backup

2003-09-13 Thread Martin Oehler
Hi, Jon! Am Sam, 2003-09-13 um 17.32 schrieb Jon LaBadie: Following up my own post, try the info command of amadmin. # amadmin Backup info xy z Current info for xy /z: (Forcing to level 0 dump at next run) [...] Looks fine. I'll do a full backup this weekend and report whether the day

Re: LTO Ultrium

2003-01-27 Thread Martin Oehler
Am Mon, 2003-01-27 um 09.54 schrieb Gerhard den Hollander: * Martin Oehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 05:11:39PM +0100) I'm sorry, I made a mistake. The hardware compression was off all the time. :( That's exactly what it looked like ;) Hehe, do you know what's funny? I made

Re: LTO Ultrium

2003-01-25 Thread Martin Oehler
Hi! Am Fre, 2003-01-24 um 18.11 schrieb Jean-Francois Malouin: * Martin Oehler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20030124 11:52] thus spake: If the measured size and filemark is correct, do you have an idea how I will be able to use the drive with 15MB/sec? That all depends on your scsi or FC

LTO Ultrium

2003-01-24 Thread Martin Oehler
Hi! I've run tapetype on a LTO Ultrium drive and some questions concerning the results. The tapetype test has been made twice, once with hardware compression (HC) turned on (by mistake) and once with HC turned off. The OS is Linux and 'mt' is telling me actually: # mt -f /dev/nst0

Re: LTO Ultrium

2003-01-24 Thread Martin Oehler
Hi! Am Fre, 2003-01-24 um 16.22 schrieb Gene Heskett: On Friday 24 January 2003 08:53, Martin Oehler wrote: Why is the length the same? Seems like switching the compression modes with mt is not working. It was still on? You didn't say that you had turned it back off above. Maybe

Re: LTO Ultrium

2003-01-24 Thread Martin Oehler
Hi, Jon! Am Fre, 2003-01-24 um 16.27 schrieb Jon LaBadie: Maybe you hit what Gene describes in another posting today. Once a tape has been written to with HW compression, the drive senses it and automatically switches to HW compression regardless of settings. No, I made a mistake (see my

Tapetype

2003-01-20 Thread Martin Oehler
Hi! I'm searching for the tapetype of the following LTO-drive: HP Ultrium 1-SCSI It has a capacity of 100/200 GB. I couldn't find an entry in the FAQ-O-Matic about this. Thanks in advance, Martin Öhler

Re: strange log entry

2002-11-26 Thread Martin Oehler
Hi! Am Die, 2002-11-26 um 09.03 schrieb Jon LaBadie: On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:30:34AM +0100, Martin Oehler wrote: Perhaps sockets can not be backed up by gnutar? I got an identically installed box where /var is backed up without errors. Perhaps cron.daily was in the process of being

strange log entry

2002-11-25 Thread Martin Oehler
Hi! After running amflush I get the following message for some days: FAILED AND STRANGE DUMP DETAILS: /-- loki /var lev 1 STRANGE sendbackup: start [loki:/var level 1] sendbackup: info BACKUP=/bin/tar sendbackup: info RECOVER_CMD=/usr/bin/gzip -dc |/bin/tar -f... - sendbackup: info

Quantum SDLT 320

2002-09-26 Thread Martin Oehler
Hi all, I'm going to buy a Quantum SDLT 320 to backup our servers. Reading through the FAQ-O-MATIC I found that the smaller drive seems to run with amanda. Before spending the money I just wanted to ask if someone is using this drive? I think there shouldn't be any problems but I wanted to ask

question about amflush

2002-02-26 Thread Martin Oehler
Hi! What will happen, if I amflush all the backups in a holding disk to tape and the size of my backups is bigger than my tape capacity? Will amflush write on tape what's fitting, send a little error and everything is ok or will something bad happen? CU, thanks for your answers Martin

Re: most efficient use of holding disk

2002-02-18 Thread Martin Oehler
Hi! Chris Marble wrote: Martin Oehler wrote: I use amanda on a solaris 7 box with a DTL drive (20 GB) attached. My dumpcyle is 4 weeks with 20 runs per cycle. Because the size of one incremental backup is only between 2-4 GB I don't want to change the tape each day. You could

Re: disk offline ?

2002-02-18 Thread Martin Oehler
Hi! Hauke Fath wrote: Rainer Fuegenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After adding a new old server named fav to amanda, I keep getting the following message: FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY: fav/home2 lev 0 FAILED [disk /home2 offline on fav?] It doesn't matter if the

most efficient use of holding disk

2002-02-14 Thread Martin Oehler
Hi! I use amanda on a solaris 7 box with a DTL drive (20 GB) attached. My dumpcyle is 4 weeks with 20 runs per cycle. Because the size of one incremental backup is only between 2-4 GB I don't want to change the tape each day. Fortunately, I have a 30GB harddisk available for use as holding