When a large DLE doesn't tape all the split parts
before running out of tapes, could the subsequent
flush (amflush or autoflush) pick up where the
original taping left off?
I just had a large DLE (23 3GB parts) fail on
the last part by just 800MB. On the subsequent
amdump the DLE autoflushed the
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Jon LaBadie j...@jgcomp.com wrote:
When a large DLE doesn't tape all the split parts
before running out of tapes, could the subsequent
flush (amflush or autoflush) pick up where the
original taping left off?
I just had a large DLE (23 3GB parts) fail on
the
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 10:37:48AM -0500, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Jon LaBadie j...@jgcomp.com wrote:
When a large DLE doesn't tape all the split parts
before running out of tapes, could the subsequent
flush (amflush or autoflush) pick up where the
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Jon LaBadie j...@jgcomp.com wrote:
I'll certainly defer to you knowledge of the difficulty. I was thinking
that the logic is already there for the split disk feature. The added
code would be for saving its state and recreating it on the next flush.
Yes, that
