At Sat, 10 Jun 2023 08:25:45 -0600 Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> On 6/10/23 06:13, Robert Heller wrote:
> > At Fri, 9 Jun 2023 23:35:23 -0400 Deb Baddorf
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> ÃÂïÃÂûÃÂÿTime Machine is built into current Mac OSes. It
> >> wants its own disk, which should be a
On 6/10/23 06:13, Robert Heller wrote:
At Fri, 9 Jun 2023 23:35:23 -0400 Deb Baddorf wrote:
Time Machine is built into current Mac OSes. It wants its own disk, which
should be a bit (or a lot) bigger than the one you are backing up. I
don’t think it can backup to another
At Fri, 9 Jun 2023 23:35:23 -0400 Deb Baddorf wrote:
>
> Time Machine is built into current Mac OSes. It wants its own disk,
> which should be a bit (or a lot) bigger than the one you are backing up. I
> donâÂÂt think it can backup to another machine. It works well, since
>
Time Machine is built into current Mac OSes. It wants its own disk, which
should be a bit (or a lot) bigger than the one you are backing up. I don’t
think it can backup to another machine. It works well, since it’s baked in.
Deb
> On Jun 8, 2023, at 10:36 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
> I know
On 6/9/23 00:51, Hauke Fath wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 20:57:38 -0400 (EDT), Robert Heller wrote:
I know nothing about "Time Machine". Will it backup to a Linux machine?
We use Time Machine at work to back up Macs to a Samba share, so yes.
It is user-operable, and you can restore from the
At Thu, 8 Jun 2023 21:31:50 -0600 Charles Curley
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 20:57:38 -0400 (EDT)
> Robert Heller wrote:
>
> > I know nothing about "Time Machine". Will it backup to a Linux
> > machine?
>
> Yes. You need Apple networking so the Linux machine will fake a Mac. On
>
On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 21:31:50 -0600
Charles Curley wrote:
> However, if you encrypt the backup, the files on the Linux machine are
> opaque, meaning you can't extract a file on the Linux machine. I have
> not experimented with an unencrypted backup.
Or maybe not. Take a look at the Debian package
On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 20:57:38 -0400 (EDT), Robert Heller wrote:
> I know nothing about "Time Machine". Will it backup to a Linux machine?
We use Time Machine at work to back up Macs to a Samba share, so yes.
It is user-operable, and you can restore from the rescue system for
desaster recovery.
On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 20:57:38 -0400 (EDT)
Robert Heller wrote:
> I know nothing about "Time Machine". Will it backup to a Linux
> machine?
Yes. You need Apple networking so the Linux machine will fake a Mac. On
Debian, that would be the netatalk package. That also pulls in avahi
(bonjour
I know nothing about "Time Machine". Will it backup to a Linux machine?
At Thu, 8 Jun 2023 17:39:47 -0600 Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> On 6/8/23 09:50, Robert Heller wrote:
> >
> > Already doing that.
> >
> > I'm beginning to think that I need to find some other way of backing up this
> >
On 6/8/23 09:50, Robert Heller wrote:
>
> Already doing that.
>
> I'm beginning to think that I need to find some other way of backing up this
> machine, or maybe just not back it up at all (it is just a build box and has
> nothing on it that is not available either elsewhere on my LAN (eg
don't have access to systems running
>>>> amanda on macOS/MacOSX.
>>>>
>>>> However, I can suggest that the problem you are seeing is because of
>>>> System Integrity Protection (SIP). You will need to add the executable
>>>> amandad to
cause of
> > >> System Integrity Protection (SIP). You will need to add the executable
> > >> amandad to System Settings -> Privacy & Security -> Full Disk Access.
> > >>
> > >> Pieter
> > >>
> > >> On 6/7/23 5:43
on macOS/MacOSX.
> >>
> >> However, I can suggest that the problem you are seeing is because of
> >> System Integrity Protection (SIP). You will need to add the executable
> >> amandad to System Settings -> Privacy & Security -> Full Disk Access.
>
> amandad to System Settings -> Privacy & Security -> Full Disk Access.
>>
>> Pieter
>>
>> On 6/7/23 5:43 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
>>> Is there some "trick" to getting Amanda (3.5.1) to run properly under MacOSX
>>> 10.15? I recently ad
ty Protection (SIP). You will need to add the executable
> amandad to System Settings -> Privacy & Security -> Full Disk Access.
>
> Pieter
>
> On 6/7/23 5:43 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
> > Is there some "trick" to getting Amanda (3.5.1) to run properly unde
"exuvo" Olsson
ex...@exuvo.se
On 2023-06-07 13:43, Robert Heller wrote:
Is there some "trick" to getting Amanda (3.5.1) to run properly under MacOSX
10.15? I recently added a new (to me) machine to my LAN and want to be able
to take regular backups of it. I is an older model M
think you need to edit amanda-security.conf and uncomment some of the
tar lines so tar runs as root with access to the files you want to backup.
Anton "exuvo" Olsson
ex...@exuvo.se
On 2023-06-07 13:43, Robert Heller wrote:
Is there some "trick" to getting Amanda (3.5.1
Is there some "trick" to getting Amanda (3.5.1) to run properly under MacOSX
10.15? I recently added a new (to me) machine to my LAN and want to be able
to take regular backups of it. I is an older model MacBook Pro (mid 2012
vintage), running Amanda (3.5.1) to run properly under Ma
19 matches
Mail list logo
