check gfx functions.
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, ID tomcz...@... wrote:
Hello,
how to plot line between 2 points?
We have a High at 30,50 dated X i we have a Low at 25,00 dated Y.
How to connect by line High with Low?
Please help. Thanks.
Dominik
Herman, I think this is what they call a 2+ standard deviation event.
Asia Wanderer,
AmiBroker can be used for day trading fine, but you have to be smart about how
you use it.
For a start, most retail traders are living in dream land if they think looking
at tick charts is going to give them an edge... human beings don't have the
capacity to execute on that kind
benefit
because unless they were actually being viewed they had no drain on resources.
Yours
Rob
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Tomasz Janeczko gro...@... wrote:
Hello,
I have a question for AmiBroker users, especially those using it in real-time:
how many chart windows do you have
and/or price/volume).
Sheets are excel-like tabs on the bottom of chart window.
I was asking for chart windows and panes in the sense above.
As I understand it Rob meant sheets in his description.
Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
amibroker.com
On 2010-08-28 18:18, Keith McCombs wrote:
I
WHOOPS. MY BAD!!!
Sorry, I just saw it on the list of compatible software!!!
Thanks as always
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Rob sidharth...@... wrote:
Hey TJ,
Not sure if you've seen but IQ Feed are offering CME Exchange Fee Waiver's
for compatible software... I know IQ were very
) is NOT good
for 64-bit.
Rob wrote you in previous post that even Bootcamp running on Mac can not give
him the performance
of normal PC box. Apparently Apple has some issues with their drivers
compatibility/performance with MS platform.
Run NATIVELY on PC hardware and you will see 25%+ speed
are clearly
where the big files are... everything else in the AB folder is tiny.
Yours
Rob
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Dennis Brown se...@... wrote:
Tomasz,
Thank you for explaining the Start in property. Sometimes Mac guys are
clueless.
Things did not work as expected, or maybe
TJ,
I've just got to congratulate you on 64 Bit AB. It is literally lighting quick
on my new machine. Considerably more than 25% quicker I believe compared to 32
bit.
I'm very impressed.
Thanks
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Tomasz Janeczko gro...@... wrote:
Hello,
With regards to
TJ,
One thing... AStyle.dll seems to be missing in my 64 bit version... not sure
why. I downloaded the one from www.amibroker.com/bin but it doesn't seem to
work. Does it need a 64 bit compile...? If so, do you have a link to one...?
Thanks
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Rob sidharth
It's not possible to simply move the AmiBroker folders once it's been
installed...? i.e. the registry settings get lost. Is that correct? That's my
experience.
Do I need to re-install to move them...?
Thanks
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Tomasz Janeczko gro...@... wrote:
Hello,
Yes
CHECK analysis for bottle-necks is essential.
Happy program solving :-)
herman
Rob,
It is always a tough choice between different tools
tradeoffs for each trader. There never seems to be one
universal solution that works for everyone. I think that
is because there is not one
Dennis,
I was forced towards programming a DLL because I had a critical algorithm that
required a triple nested loop structure. I tried is as an array structure in
AFL (it is possible) and as a loop structure in AFL. In the end I moved towards
a C++ DLL and I don't recall the precise speed
on quotations, only when you wanted it to.
Rob
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Dennis Brown se...@... wrote:
Tomasz,
I anticipated the use of more static arrays in my efforts to speed up my AFL.
That was another one of my reasons for adding more RAM and looking to use W7
64 bit. RAM
Herman,
Thanks for the example. In a nutshell this idea comes down to one thing... that
is plotting StaticVariables is quicker than performing calculations. I'm still
not entirely sure where the 'net' gain comes from... since AB has to do the
same calculation, no? You are simply splitting
Herman,
It certainly makes sense where there is a differential between how often you
want your chart to refresh and how often you need to perform calculations
displayed on those charts.
TJ will have to answer that one...!
on the fly to see if anything changes in the output.
BR,
Dennis
On Aug 2, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Herman wrote:
Dennis and Rob,
Dennis, your idea of creating a generic plotting template is very
interesting. Perhaps it could call the original code normally and
substitute
On 2010-08-03 09:40, Rob wrote:
Dennis,
I actually already use Herman's technique of running the AA periodically
to calculate results that I put into static arrays for access by my other
charts. However, for my purposes the static arrays only need to be
calculated every minute. I
Herman,
Can you explain a little more about the indicator code vs AA code... is it
identical...? I'm not entirely clear why it executes so much faster via the AA
than an indicator in a chart.
Many Thanks
Rob
for proper multi-threaded apps like video editing in final
cut pro.
Just my 2 cents as a mac user too.
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Dennis Brown se...@... wrote:
Rob,
I realize I would get some performance boost, but no can do. I run a lot of
Mac programs on the same machine
Herman,
My code is as optimized as much as I can. I've even written some sections in
C++ as dll's for speed. I use a relatively small DB and only look at 40 bars of
history!!! Remember I live day trading at 1 - 3 min intervals with 12 charts on
3 screens.
Anyway, my new build PC has added
Let me just add, 50% linear processing power increase with about half the
wattage required that my mac pro used to drink...
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Rob sidharth...@... wrote:
Herman,
My code is as optimized as much as I can. I've even written some sections in
C++ as dll's
At the moment I'm on a basic one second refresh across all charts (set via
preferences Intraday)...
All my charts use the same piece of AFL (insert linked into each chart)... I
like the same functionality in each chart.
I will have to think about adjusting the refresh times across charts. Not
Janeczko
amibroker.com
On 2010-08-02 21:05, Rob wrote:
At the moment I'm on a basic one second refresh across all charts (set via
preferences Intraday)...
All my charts use the same piece of AFL (insert linked into each chart)...
I like the same functionality in each chart.
I
Herman,
It's hard to pin down an exact forumla execution time as you know. There are so
many variables that change the execution time. When I take out all the
conditional stuff in my code, doing a automatic analysischeck really leaves me
with nothing to refine or optimze. It's down to the
Interesting Herman. Now you've got me seeing the possibilites. I have to
confess I'd never thought about the idea of taking away the calculation and
simply plotting static variables... or shall we say more precisely controlling
the calculation. Interesting concept. I shall have to think about
Dennis,
I imagine you'd get a huge performance boost from running under Bootcamp rather
than Parallels. That's my experience anyway. Simply Parallels Fusion, despite
what they claim can't match the native speed under Bootcamp.
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Dennis Brown se...@... wrote:
Thanks
Rob
TJ,
Apologies because I'm sure this has been answered before (I looked but can't
find it)...
But can you clarify the difference between the RequestTimedRefresh() function
and the PreferencesIntradayUpdate every setting...?
Does it make sense to have RequestTimedRefresh() set to 1 second in
automatically
on new quotes.
The reason for RequestTimedRefresh is to refresh charts (in fact to run your
formulas) when quotes DO NOT arrive
(for example to detect halt in trading).
Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
amibroker.com
On 2010-07-27 22:10, Rob wrote:
TJ,
Apologies because
Malcolm,
you have to make sure that your chart is calculating from enough bars to
produce on a consistent result...
Try adding,
SetBarsRequired( sbrAll, sbrAll);
to the end of your code.
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, malcolm Crouch malcolm.crouc...@... wrote:
Hi there ,
I am
etc...? The
fact that it leaves more PCI slots free...?
Running cost...? I guess everything else being equal running one video card
instead of two is better for long term running costs...?
Finally... any recommendations monitor wise... I'm about to buy 3 x 24 inch.
Many Thanks
Rob
. Maybe you have some very large AB databases or lots of
symbols...? (I only look at about 30).
Thanks again
Rob
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Paul D notanaiqgen...@... wrote:
Hi Rob and other system builders,
In 2009 I built my own i7 920 and overclocked it to a very very stable 3900
. And no noise...
http://www.amd.com/us/products/desktop/graphics/ati-radeon-hd-5000/hd-5450-overview/pages/hd-5450-overview.aspx
In case of multimonitors, take care to the slot. Most of the MotherBoard
have only one graphic slot.
Best regards
Le 24/07/2010 11:48, Rob a écrit :
Paul
...? Is there such a
thing as an energy efficient graphics card option...?
Also, any recommendations on 24 inch monitors...?
Thanks
Rob
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Rob sidharth...@... wrote:
Paul,
That was super helpful. Thank's very much.
Yeah, the little bit I'm stuck on at the moment
Hi Yuki,
Thanks. Yes I've been googling quite a lot about ATI EyeFinity.
So just to clear, none of the three monitors needs to have an DisplayPort
input...?
That can provided by the active DVI/HDMI to DisplayPort adapter...?
How are you finding EyeFinity...? Working well...?
Thanks
Rob
TJ,
Thread hijack!
Could you give a brief view to my original questions...?
Many Thanks
Rob
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Tomasz Janeczko gro...@... wrote:
Mike,
I can confirm that your understanding is correct.
Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
amibroker.com
On 2010-07-23 01
not
see practical difference between 980 and 920
in typical usage.
Also for real time trading you would get better benefit from decreasing
number of bars in the database settings
than from buying new machine.
Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
amibroker.com
On 2010-07-22 11:38, Rob wrote
Michael,
I think I'm heading towards the i7-930 overclocked to 4ghz.
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, michaels_musings michaels_musi...@...
wrote:
Having a bit of time, and being in a very similar boat as Rob, I geeked
Reinsley's chart a bit...
Top 20 processors, over 5,000 CPU Marks
Hi TJ,
I am considering building myself a new computer system. Basically I am running
AB on a Mac Pro right now. 8GB Ram (ram is not one my constraints). I am
running 2 x quad core Intel Xeon X5365 2.99 Ghz processors.
I use AB for real time day trading... (not backtesting)... but I am pushing
a network or broadband connection. I
need critical power at the RHS of the chart, down to the second.
Thanks
Rob
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, michaels_musings michaels_musi...@...
wrote:
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Rob sidhartha70@ wrote:
Hi TJ,
I am considering building myself
/2008/07/05/single-license-use-on-multiple-computers/
Mike
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, michaels_musings michaels_musings@
wrote:
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Rob sidhartha70@ wrote:
Hi TJ,
I am considering building myself a new computer system.
Hi TJ/Rob
seeing the market in the
correct way in a timely way is what I use AB for.
Certainly what you are saying makes sense... but I would need such a fast
connection to myself and the server to make it work - faster than my current
7Mbit DSL connection perhaps...??
Rob
--- In amibroker
Herman,
as far as I know, IQ Feed 64 bit plug in is not ready yet...
TJ,
This is a question that's going to be asked a lot I would guess, so it may be
worth posting something that people can use as a reference...
The question is, how do I transfer my current 32 bit DB's, watchlists, layouts,
preferences and general setup to the new 64 bit version...?
Many
Ummm. That didn't work. AB 64 bit crashed.
Crash reports sent.
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Tomasz Janeczko gro...@... wrote:
Hello,
You don't need to transfer them. You can open them directly.
Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
amibroker.com
On 2010-07-20 14:54, Rob wrote:
TJ
Write your own Std Dev formula... easy.
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, aaryan111 aaryan...@... wrote:
Thanx Tomasz For your input.
If stdev isnt accepting variable periods, How can I find
a stdev of say, last 45 Minutes, from the current bar ?
If i change periodicty using timeframe
Sure you can run AB under VM Ware Fusion... copy the entire AmiBroker directory
over... you will need to reactivate on the new machine I think.
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Kevin Richards keric...@... wrote:
Take a look at bootcamp. It might work.
--- On Fri, 3/5/10, drkbrown55
No. But you can manually add bars to the right margin for any chart by pressing
the 'end' key I believe...
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Reinsley reins...@... wrote:
Hi,
Can we override the default setting Blank bars in right margin for a
specific chart ?
I want to keep the
Ahhh. Ok. I've got you... I was under the impression it was where they are
'first used'.
i.e. if a function is not called in the main code until after the declaration
of a variable (outside of the function) then it was 'first used' in the main
code and hence global... I guess 'first used'
Interesting. TJ used to claim that the 64 bit version was 25% faster. He has
since changed that claim to 'a bit' faster. Why the change...?
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, dubi1974 gonzale...@... wrote:
Hi,
I tested it and compared an normal optimization process between 32bit and 64
Janeczko
amibroker.com
On 2010-07-08 09:43, Rob wrote:
Interesting. TJ used to claim that the 64 bit version was 25% faster. He
has since changed that claim to 'a bit' faster. Why the change...?
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, dubi1974gonzales74@ wrote:
Hi,
I tested
Maybe TJ can comment...?
Generally is it worth trying to run AB from a ramdisk or via something like
herman is suggesting...?
One thing I do have plenty of is RAM... my CPU cores are getting short of spare
cycles though!
Thanks
How about a ramdisk...?
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, dotnetsdkforab dotnetsdkfo...@... wrote:
Hi All,
(I don't use it...)
AFAIK, Ready Boost is for cashing files that the system uses.
So AB, as any other application, could potentially take advantage of it.
However, USB 2.0 is
Same here
As I understand it, the use of a RAM disk would only speed up AB's access to
it's own DB's... it wouldn't speed up AFL execution times is that
correct...?
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, michaels_musings michaels_musi...@...
wrote:
Hello Tomasz,
I believe you misunderstood my
looked at how to get AB
to
talk to MySQL, but if you can get your data from AB in CSV files, getting
it into MySQL is a trivially simple load SQL statement.
HTH
Ted
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Rob sidharth...@...
mailto:sidharth...@... wrote:
Herman,
I
is - not to share if you want speed.
Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
amibroker.com
On 2010-07-03 09:44, Rob wrote:
TJ,
Then how do you suggest we share information between different instances of
AB...?
Thanks
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Tomasz Janeczkogroups@ wrote:
Hello
The short answer is YES... I run two instances of Amibroker for real time day
trading (I don't do backtesting)...
I have a lot of info being processed live and I have 3 monitors with 12 charts
on them. I simply cannot run it all in one instance of Amibroker... So I run
two... I do the same. I
The OS will take care of all that... I've never seen a case where opening a
separate instance of AB, it wasn't assigned to a different core.
Both my instances share one DTN data source... it works very well. All happens
automatically. Nothing to do on your part. Works very well... I see no data lag
between the two instances. But I am only feeding live about 35 instruments.
Nothing more.
IB I don't know so I can't comment.
As I
Interesting idea Chris... I don't know much about how to do that...
Can you post some AFL or some links to help us out...?
Thanks
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Chris DePuy cde...@... wrote:
Write tracking variables to mysql.
Sent to your iPad
-Original Message-
From:
Herman,
I don't know what sort of info you intend to pass between instances...
As for myself, I am sharing some .csv files... not arrays in and of
themselves...
I'd be interested in mysql as long as it was easy to implement, quick, reliable
and free (i.e. only some of my time required)...
...
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, ricko8294_98 ri...@... wrote:
Rob
Thank you for posting this. (Library John Ehler)
I have a general question.
I tried to translate code from other platforms, and did not succeed.
I note that you placed the greater part of the code in a FOR loop.
This has me
.
Understanding why is.
Perhaps someone can enlighten me?
Best Regards
Rick Osborn
From: Rob sidharth...@...
To: amibroker@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, June 30, 2010 2:41:18 AM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: New 3rd party toolset for AmiBroker
It's
Posted the Sine Wave... just search for John Ehler
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Rob sidharth...@... wrote:
I'll post them in the AFL library...
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Anthony Faragasso ajf@ wrote:
I would like a copy also...if possible..
Thank you
Anthony
You are never going to get x50 performance... sounds wildly optimistic - new
system or not.
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, gmorlosky gmorlo...@... wrote:
Hi Ed;
You may be on to something. I'll deactivate those files from being checked
and see if the speed comes up.
Any other
I have the hilbert oscillator sine wave already coded in AFL if anyone wants
them...
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, WiseStockTrader wisestocktra...@... wrote:
Hello Dennis
All the indicator formulas execute within about 2 - 4 milliseconds which is
on average about 0.003 seconds. The
11:42 AM
Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: New 3rd party toolset for AmiBroker
Rob
I would like a copy.
I have been trying to translate EasyLanguage and other code but I just
don't understand the math and my attempts just don't look right.
Best Regards
Rick Osborn
I have to agree, with the best will in the world, charging more than the entire
Amibroker programme itself for a little toolbox of indicators is not the most
sensible pricing policy...
I have written virtually all the Ehler's indicators in AFL in anyone wants a
copy... for free.
--- In
Have you looked at the user guide...?? You should.
I think you might find it helpful in answering your question.
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, nmrtsnmrts nmrtsnm...@... wrote:
Any answer ?
Thanks in advance
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, nmrtsnmrts nmrtsnmrts@ wrote:
I'm
you've collected this information, the main
profile I want to watch is just the regular trading session profile.
bertieb
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Rob sidhartha70@ wrote:
If you set AB to only show the RTH hour session the code should work
anyway... I'm looking at it right now
There was a bug in the Param window functionality that caused 'ghost
parameters' when new Param lines were added and removed from code. It lead to
corrupted parameter lists which then required resetting with 'reset all'
However, I believe TJ fixed this bug recently.
I have not seen it
, )
and returned value x will hold the state of button (up/down, etc)
The formula would be executed automatically on button click.
Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
amibroker.com
On 2010-06-19 12:19, Rob wrote:
There was a bug in the Param window functionality that caused 'ghost
empottasch@ wrote:
yes indeed PlotVAP is already there, don't know why it is not implemented.
Several other softwares have it built in like ensign. I have no experience
with this software:
http://ensign.editme.com/c070829
regards, Ed
From: Rob
Sent: Friday, June
no experience with this software:
http://ensign.editme.com/c070829
regards, Ed
From: Rob
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 12:52 PM
To: amibroker@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [amibroker] Re: Point of Control
Ed,
I am one of those who requested
. Several other softwares have it built in like ensign. I have
no experience with this software:
http://ensign.editme.com/c070829
regards, Ed
From: Rob
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 12:52 PM
To: amibroker@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [amibroker] Re: Point
:
yes indeed PlotVAP is already there, don't know why it is not
implemented. Several other softwares have it built in like ensign. I have
no experience with this software:
http://ensign.editme.com/c070829
regards, Ed
From: Rob
Sent: Friday, June 18
I'm looking to create my own Point of Control (POC) calculation... I know
PlotVAPOverlayA already calculates it, but I can't return the value via AFL (or
the standard deviations around that value).
So, basically at the very least I need to calculate a 'mode' price for the days
price action...
). The POC plotted in the code is from the previous day.
On inditrader.com they did some work on the MP. Last code I had a look at I
added (MPNEW.afl),
regards, Ed
From: Rob
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 11:10 AM
To: amibroker@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [amibroker] Point of Control
Thanks Mike. Perfect.
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Mike sfclimb...@... wrote:
Bruce provided a similar example last year:
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/message/139299
Mike
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Rob sidhartha70@ wrote:
Hi All,
I'd like to code
Exactly like bollinger bands... but they don't have a fixed look back period...
that's all.
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Tim raven...@... wrote:
Hello,
Are these like Bollinger bands except they adapt to the deviation present in
the stock price flucuations? Thank you.
Tim
Hi All,
I'd like to code an adaptive standard deviation... I think I use the right term.
Lets pretend todays first interval is bar one, I'd like to calculate a standard
deviation for each bar based on the number of bars we've had so far today.
The StdDev() function clearly only takes a fixed
It doesn't give you the same array... it gives you a scalar.
(as Bruce mentioned it seems sometimes AFL can see an array has the same value
all the way through and treats it as a scalar).
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Yuki Taga yukit...@... wrote:
That was exactly my take on it. Wonderful
AddColumn() statements.
The promotion that Rob alluded to is a little different. It is when a
single scalar number of promoted to an array to carry out a calculation.
Consider the following -
fact = 1.1;
array = Close * fact;
The second statement multiples an array (Close
:
Ton, Rob -
Not exactly.
Last post on this, I promise, but the details can be important in other
situations where AFL cannot make this transparent.
Ton, let's expand your example slightly -
// This is an array ...
myString = Close;
_TRACE(myString1 +myString);
_TRACE(myString2 +Ref
Rick's right, the IF() can't check and array for true or false... It can only
check a number (i.e. a boolean)...
So, if you have an array, somehow you have to get it to be a number...
If you look in the AmiBroker function definitions it tells you whether you a
function returns an array or a
value.
To me that presents two problems
1 - you lose all the prior values of the array, (is this true)
2 - you potentially look into the future
Best Regards
Rick Osborn
From: Rob sidharth...@...
To: amibroker@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, June
LastValue() does actually return an array... that as progster correctly says is
filled with the last value of SourceArray... however, AFL knows this and
treats it as a number... i.e. it can be passed to an If() statement...
Again, progster is right, LastValue() can look into the future from a
I'm pretty proficient with AFL... but I have to admit that even I get confused
on the useage of SetChartBkGradientFill() with PlotOHLC()...
I'm wrestling with one of those problems myself right now... can't get it to do
what I want for love nor money.
If I work it out I'll let you know!
---
They are circular... and as far as I can see, entirely unnecessary.
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Yuki Taga yukit...@... wrote:
Hi Rick,
Hey that works for me! Thanks. Can you explain for a non programmer
what the StrToNum and then NumToStr functions are actually doing in
this case?
Ahh. Ok. In that case you could just use LastValue()...
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Yuki Taga yukit...@... wrote:
Hi Rob,
They appear to be necessary (because you get a complaint about using
an array in an IF statement without them). But I don't exactly
understand what is happening
Easy Booby... you just need to post once!
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Bobby R bobby6...@... wrote:
Hello,
Can someone please help me with the following scrip. I have a problem, wherein
thru' AA, with timeframe 5 min,when I scan, I get the scrips in the Alert
Outputwindow. But the
TJ,
As well as utilising more memory, 64 bit AB is about 25% faster too... is that
correct..?
Will that also be true running live off a real time data feed such as IQ
Feed...?
Many Thanks
R
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Tomasz Janeczko gro...@... wrote:
Hello,
Yes, generally
You can write your own zoom function - using OLE functions.
That way you can supply a start date and end date to display...
I admit it's a complex solution... and not perfect. A 'zoom link' functionality
has been on the request list for a long time now.
However, the OLE option does work... with
Something like...
function SayNotTooOften( text, Minperiod )
{
elapsed=GetPerformanceCounter()/1000;
Lastelapsed = Nz( StaticVarGet(lastsaytime) );
if( elapsed - Lastelapsed Minperiod )
{
StaticVarSet(lastsaytime, elapsed );
Say( text );
}
}
--- In
Exactly. Folks, What you see on a chart as an angle has little basis
in reality. Take any chart, draw a line on it, and then expand the
horizontal (time) axis so that half as many bars are shown. The angle
changes; it has to. Compounding this ( as reinsley said ) as you change
anything,
Does IQFeed now have full 64 bit support via the API...?
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Tomasz Janeczko gro...@... wrote:
Hello,
Only those two are considered because only those two allow direct
TCP/IP-only communication
and this opens possibility of working around the fact that data
to serve web pages over the net,
it does not matter if IQConnect is 32-bit or not, as long as you are
using socket communication
64-bit process can talk to 32-bit process and vice versa.
Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
amibroker.com
On 2010-05-22 20:14, Rob wrote:
Does IQFeed now have
1 - 100 of 247 matches
Mail list logo
