Re: [amibroker] Digital indicators FATL, SATL,....

2010-08-26 Thread Mubashar Virk
Shoot! It was late at night and English is my fourth language only. The second line of my last reply does not read well. It should have been: I understand what you mean by how plain old FIR (finite impulse response) can be proprietary, and I agree. On 8/26/2010 6:05 AM, Tomasz Janeczko

Re: [amibroker] Digital indicators FATL, SATL,....

2010-08-25 Thread Mubashar Virk
Who posted them? Fin-ware! If not then TJ may have to take them out. These are proprietary (and not for public disclosure), I think. On 8/25/2010 11:48 PM, soni67c wrote: Dear members, This is to notify that INDICATORS for FATL,SATL,RFTL,RSTL has been posted in AB Library . Thank you

Re: [amibroker] Digital indicators FATL, SATL,....

2010-08-25 Thread Tomasz Janeczko
Hello, The original poster (soni67c) added them. With regards to 'proprietary' claim - could you explain? I don't think that a plain old FIR (finite impulse response) can be proprietary, and the formula in question is nothing more than basic FIR filter.

Re: [amibroker] Digital indicators FATL, SATL,....

2010-08-25 Thread Mubashar Virk
Hi, I did not say you added them. I just said you may/might remove them. I understand what you mean plain old FIR (finite impulse response) can be proprietary, and I agree. However, there are lots of guys out there busy packaging the open stuff into neural-networks and other number

Re: [amibroker] Digital indicators FATL, SATL,....

2010-08-25 Thread Tomasz Janeczko
Hello, I could package bread and butter, and sell it. But I can not claim any intellectual rights to it. This is the point. This indicator is not different that say MA(16). It is well-known formula (yes simple moving average is also FIR filter!) plus arbitrarily selected parameter (16).